search
Back to results

Evaluation of the Impact of a Case-finding Strategy for Vertebral Fractures (COSHIBA)

Primary Purpose

Osteoporosis, Vertebral Fracture

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Clinical assessment +/- radiography
Sponsored by
University of Bristol
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional screening trial for Osteoporosis focused on measuring osteoporosis, vertebral fractures, randomised controlled trial, screening

Eligibility Criteria

65 Years - 80 Years (Older Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female
  • Aged 65-80 years
  • Registered with a GP practice within Bristol Primary Care Trust (PCT)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Sites / Locations

  • Bristol Primary Care Trust (PCT)

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

1

2

Arm Description

Current management for identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in primary care i.e. nothing

Intervention arm: simple clinical assessment to identify high risk 30% (approximately) who will then be offered lateral thoraco-lumbar X-rays

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The change in proportion of women aged 65-80 years prescribed bisphosphonates or other drugs in intervention arm compared with control arm

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of extra VFs identified by risk-factor assessment tool
Assessment of difference in indications for bisphosphonate prescribing after intervention
Assessment of compliance
Assessment of quality of life
Economic analysis to assess cost-effectiveness of intervention
Assessment of impact on fractures
Assessment of whether algorithm based qualitative (ABQ) semi-quantitative method of analyzing X-rays is better than simple inspection in identifying vertebral fractures

Full Information

First Posted
April 18, 2007
Last Updated
December 3, 2014
Sponsor
University of Bristol
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00463905
Brief Title
Evaluation of the Impact of a Case-finding Strategy for Vertebral Fractures
Acronym
COSHIBA
Official Title
Evaluation of the Impact of a Case-finding Strategy for Vertebral Fractures on Bisphosphonate and Other Drug Prescribing in Primary Care, Using the Cohort for Skeletal Health in Bristol and Avon (COSHIBA)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2011 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Bristol

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures (VFs) represent an important target for secondary fracture prevention, but few of these patients come for clinical attention. Recent evidence suggests that screening postmenopausal women for clinical risk factors like height loss and fracture risk identifies those at high risk of prevalent VFs who should be referred for diagnostic X-rays, a strategy which is likely to prove cost effective. However, before being applied at a United Kingdom (UK)-wide level, it needs to be established that use of this strategy improves secondary fracture prevention, and that these benefits are achieved in a cost-effective manner. To examine these questions, a randomised-controlled-trial will be performed in which women aged 65-80 from general practitioner (GP)-practices in the intervention group will be invited for risk factor assessment, followed by referral for thoracolumbar X-ray where appropriate. The primary outcome will be a change in bisphosphonate or other drug prescribing between the intervention and control arms after six months.
Detailed Description
This study will use a randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of a case-finding strategy for vertebral fractures on bisphosphonate and other drug prescribing in primary care. A sample of postmenopausal women aged 65-80 years from Bristol will be invited to take part. They will be individually randomised into either the intervention or control arm in a 2:1 ratio in favour of controls. The participants in the intervention arm will attend their GP practice to receive a simple 15 minute assessment, and if found to be at high risk of vertebral fractures will have a thoracolumbar X-ray; those randomised to the control arm will receive current standard methods used to identify women at high risk of vertebral fractures (no active intervention). Follow-up will be for three years. Baseline measurements will be taken from women in each arm via self-completion postal questionnaire, including current prescriptions of any bisphosphonate or other osteoporosis medication. The women in the intervention arm will attend their GP practice and receive a simple 15 minute assessment, and if found to be at high risk of vertebral fractures will have a thoracolumbar X-ray arranged for them. They will be given a leaflet on lifestyle interventions aimed to improve bone health. Women in the control arm will be sent the same leaflet. Post-intervention questionnaires will be sent to all women asking about fractures and current prescriptions of any bisphosphonate or other osteoporosis medication. The primary outcome will be the proportion of women prescribed medication for secondary fracture prevention in the intervention arm compared to the control arm. Secondary outcomes will include the proportion of fractures in the intervention versus control arm, and compliance with bisphosphonate or other drug prescribing. This study will be performed subject to Research Ethics Committee (REC) approval, including any provisions of Site Specific Assessment (SSA), and local Research and Development approval. This study will be conducted in accordance with the Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care and Good Clinical Practice.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoporosis, Vertebral Fracture
Keywords
osteoporosis, vertebral fractures, randomised controlled trial, screening

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
3200 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Current management for identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in primary care i.e. nothing
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intervention arm: simple clinical assessment to identify high risk 30% (approximately) who will then be offered lateral thoraco-lumbar X-rays
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Clinical assessment +/- radiography
Intervention Description
Clinical assessment: height loss, history of fracture, Margolis pain score, rib/pelvis distance
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The change in proportion of women aged 65-80 years prescribed bisphosphonates or other drugs in intervention arm compared with control arm
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of extra VFs identified by risk-factor assessment tool
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Assessment of difference in indications for bisphosphonate prescribing after intervention
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Assessment of compliance
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Assessment of quality of life
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Economic analysis to assess cost-effectiveness of intervention
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Assessment of impact on fractures
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Assessment of whether algorithm based qualitative (ABQ) semi-quantitative method of analyzing X-rays is better than simple inspection in identifying vertebral fractures
Time Frame
2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Female Aged 65-80 years Registered with a GP practice within Bristol Primary Care Trust (PCT) Exclusion Criteria: None
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emma M Clark, MBBS, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Bristol
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Bristol Primary Care Trust (PCT)
City
Bristol
ZIP/Postal Code
BS2 8EE
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22107913
Citation
Clark EM, Gould VC, Morrison L, Masud T, Tobias J. Determinants of fracture risk in a UK-population-based cohort of older women: a cross-sectional analysis of the Cohort for Skeletal Health in Bristol and Avon (COSHIBA). Age Ageing. 2012 Jan;41(1):46-52. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr132. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21810994
Citation
Weston JM, Norris EV, Clark EM. The invisible disease: making sense of an osteoporosis diagnosis in older age. Qual Health Res. 2011 Dec;21(12):1692-704. doi: 10.1177/1049732311416825. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22113935
Citation
Clark EM, Gould V, Morrison L, Ades AE, Dieppe P, Tobias JH. Randomized controlled trial of a primary care-based screening program to identify older women with prevalent osteoporotic vertebral fractures: Cohort for Skeletal Health in Bristol and Avon (COSHIBA). J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Mar;27(3):664-71. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1478.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of the Impact of a Case-finding Strategy for Vertebral Fractures

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs