search
Back to results

Nurse-led Case Management for Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease Patients With Depression

Primary Purpose

Depression

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Nurse-led case management
Treatment as usual
Sponsored by
University of Washington
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Depression focused on measuring major Depressive Disorder, Diabetes, Heart Disease

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of diabetes and/or heart disease
  • Poor disease control (defined as an HbA1c level of at least 8.5%, blood pressure greater than 140/90 mm Hg, LDL cholesterol greater than 130 mg/dL)
  • Diagnosis of major depressive disorder

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of psychosis
  • At high risk for suicide
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Current alcohol or substance abuse disorder
  • Does not own a telephone
  • Currently seeking psychiatric care
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Currently enrolled in a Group Health Cooperative disease management program
  • Terminal illness
  • Plans to leave Group Health Cooperative in less than a year
  • Does not speak English

Sites / Locations

  • Group Health Cooperative

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

B

A

Arm Description

Treatment as usual

Case management intervention

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Combined Effect of Intervention on SCL-20, Systolic Blood Pressure, LDL and HbA1c
A scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL: all data submitted as Outcome Measures #2-5 below) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.The model was estimated by iterating between estimation of the covariance associated with the outcomes and generalized-estimating equation estimation of scaled outcomes. Effect size is estimated as Cohen d effect size that was use for the depression outcome is the difference in change from baseline to 12 months in the intervention and usual care groups divided by the pooled base line standard deviation. Thus, a d of 0.25 indicates that one-quarter of a standard deviation separates the two means. Cohen has suggested that an effect size of 0.20 would be considered small, 0.50 medium and 0.80 large.
Symptom Checklist-20 Score at Baseline, 6 Months and 12 Months
SCL-20 is a 20 question checklist in which items are averaged to yield a potential score of 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating more severe depression symptoms. For the Primary Outcome (Outcome Measure #1 above), a scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.
Systolic Blood Pressure at Baseline, 6 Months and 12 Months
Systolic Blood Pressure was measured at Baseline, 6 months and 12 months For the Primary Outcome (Outcome Measure #1 above), a scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.
LDL Cholesterol at Baseline and 12 Months
LDL Cholesterol was measured at Baseline and 12 months For the Primary Outcome (Outcome Measure #1 above), a scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.
Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Baseline, 6 Months and 12 Months
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured at Baseline, 6 months and 12 months For the Primary Outcome (Outcome Measure #1 above), a scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Functional Impairment
Disability was measured by the Sheehan Disability scale which measures the extent to which health interferes with social, vocational and familial functioning each on a 0 to 10 Likert scale where 0 is "not at all" and 10 is "extremely". This scale consists of 3 items which are averaged together to create the average disability score, which ranges from 0 to 10.
Health Care Costs
Mean total outpatient costs for 2 years post baseline adjusted for age, gender and previous 12 months of outpatient costs

Full Information

First Posted
May 1, 2007
Last Updated
May 1, 2014
Sponsor
University of Washington
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00468676
Brief Title
Nurse-led Case Management for Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease Patients With Depression
Official Title
Randomized Trial of Liaison Psychiatry in Primary Care
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Washington
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse-led case management intervention in improving disease control and depression symptoms in adults with diabetes and/or heart disease who are also depressed.
Detailed Description
Depression is a serious medical illness that has been associated with increased risk for heart disease and diabetes. Depression may negatively impact aspects of self-care that are required to effectively manage such long-term diseases. In depressed people who have heart disease and/or diabetes, treatment for depression appears to result in only limited improvements in depression symptoms and no improvements in heart disease and diabetes symptoms. An integrated treatment approach may be more effective in improving all three conditions. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse-led case management intervention in improving disease control and depression symptoms in adults with diabetes and/or heart disease who are also depressed. Participants in this single-blind study will be randomly assigned to take part in the case management intervention or receive usual care. All participants will attend 5 in-person study evaluation visits and receive 4 follow-up phone calls over 24 months. At each of the study visits, measurements of height, weight, waist size, and blood pressure will be taken. At study evaluations, blood and urine samples will also be taken. Participants will be asked not to eat for 8 hours before providing blood samples at 3 of the visits. During follow-up phone calls participants will answer various questions. The case management intervention will entail approximately 10 visits with a trained nurse at the clinic or by telephone. Participants in this group will receive educational materials about how to manage diabetes and/or heart disease and stress or depression. Nurses will also provide guidance and support in managing medications, phone calls to check participants' progress, and assistance in setting personal goals and in managing physical health problems and symptoms of depression or stress. Outcomes will be measured at Months 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Depression
Keywords
major Depressive Disorder, Diabetes, Heart Disease

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
214 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
B
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Treatment as usual
Arm Title
A
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Case management intervention
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Nurse-led case management
Intervention Description
The case management intervention will entail approximately 10 visits with a trained nurse at the clinic or by telephone. Participants in this group will receive educational materials about how to manage diabetes and/or heart disease and stress or depression. Nurses will also provide guidance and support in managing medications, phone calls to check participants' progress, and assistance in setting personal goals and in managing physical health problems and symptoms of depression or stress.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Treatment as usual
Intervention Description
Participants will attend 10 study visits and receive 4 follow-up phone calls over 24 months. During this time, participants will receive usual care.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Combined Effect of Intervention on SCL-20, Systolic Blood Pressure, LDL and HbA1c
Description
A scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL: all data submitted as Outcome Measures #2-5 below) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.The model was estimated by iterating between estimation of the covariance associated with the outcomes and generalized-estimating equation estimation of scaled outcomes. Effect size is estimated as Cohen d effect size that was use for the depression outcome is the difference in change from baseline to 12 months in the intervention and usual care groups divided by the pooled base line standard deviation. Thus, a d of 0.25 indicates that one-quarter of a standard deviation separates the two means. Cohen has suggested that an effect size of 0.20 would be considered small, 0.50 medium and 0.80 large.
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Symptom Checklist-20 Score at Baseline, 6 Months and 12 Months
Description
SCL-20 is a 20 question checklist in which items are averaged to yield a potential score of 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating more severe depression symptoms. For the Primary Outcome (Outcome Measure #1 above), a scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.
Time Frame
Measured at Baseline, 6 Months, 12 months
Title
Systolic Blood Pressure at Baseline, 6 Months and 12 Months
Description
Systolic Blood Pressure was measured at Baseline, 6 months and 12 months For the Primary Outcome (Outcome Measure #1 above), a scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.
Time Frame
Measured at Baseline, 6 Months, 12 months
Title
LDL Cholesterol at Baseline and 12 Months
Description
LDL Cholesterol was measured at Baseline and 12 months For the Primary Outcome (Outcome Measure #1 above), a scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.
Time Frame
Measured at Baseline and 12 months
Title
Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Baseline, 6 Months and 12 Months
Description
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured at Baseline, 6 months and 12 months For the Primary Outcome (Outcome Measure #1 above), a scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.
Time Frame
Measured at Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Functional Impairment
Description
Disability was measured by the Sheehan Disability scale which measures the extent to which health interferes with social, vocational and familial functioning each on a 0 to 10 Likert scale where 0 is "not at all" and 10 is "extremely". This scale consists of 3 items which are averaged together to create the average disability score, which ranges from 0 to 10.
Time Frame
Measured at Months 6, 12 months
Title
Health Care Costs
Description
Mean total outpatient costs for 2 years post baseline adjusted for age, gender and previous 12 months of outpatient costs
Time Frame
Cumulative outpatient costs over 24 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of diabetes and/or heart disease Poor disease control (defined as an HbA1c level of at least 8.5%, blood pressure greater than 140/90 mm Hg, LDL cholesterol greater than 130 mg/dL) Diagnosis of major depressive disorder Exclusion Criteria: History of psychosis At high risk for suicide Cognitive impairment Current alcohol or substance abuse disorder Does not own a telephone Currently seeking psychiatric care Pregnant or breastfeeding Currently enrolled in a Group Health Cooperative disease management program Terminal illness Plans to leave Group Health Cooperative in less than a year Does not speak English
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wayne J. Katon, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Washington
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Group Health Cooperative
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98101
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21190455
Citation
Katon WJ, Lin EH, Von Korff M, Ciechanowski P, Ludman EJ, Young B, Peterson D, Rutter CM, McGregor M, McCulloch D. Collaborative care for patients with depression and chronic illnesses. N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 30;363(27):2611-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003955.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22230825
Citation
Lin EH, Von Korff M, Ciechanowski P, Peterson D, Ludman EJ, Rutter CM, Oliver M, Young BA, Gensichen J, McGregor M, McCulloch DK, Wagner EH, Katon WJ. Treatment adjustment and medication adherence for complex patients with diabetes, heart disease, and depression: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;10(1):6-14. doi: 10.1370/afm.1343.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22074851
Citation
Von Korff M, Katon WJ, Lin EH, Ciechanowski P, Peterson D, Ludman EJ, Young B, Rutter CM. Functional outcomes of multi-condition collaborative care and successful ageing: results of randomised trial. BMJ. 2011 Nov 10;343:d6612. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6612.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22566583
Citation
Katon W, Russo J, Lin EH, Schmittdiel J, Ciechanowski P, Ludman E, Peterson D, Young B, Von Korff M. Cost-effectiveness of a multicondition collaborative care intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 May;69(5):506-14. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1548.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23398269
Citation
Ludman EJ, Peterson D, Katon WJ, Lin EH, Von Korff M, Ciechanowski P, Young B, Gensichen J. Improving confidence for self care in patients with depression and chronic illnesses. Behav Med. 2013;39(1):1-6. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2012.708682.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://teamcarehealth.org
Description
Related Info

Learn more about this trial

Nurse-led Case Management for Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease Patients With Depression

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs