search
Back to results

MK-0524B Lipid Study (MK-0524B-063)

Primary Purpose

Primary Hypercholesterolemia, Mixed Dyslipidemia

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Comparator: simvastatin
MK-0524A
Placebo
MK-0524B
Sponsored by
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Primary Hypercholesterolemia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • has primary hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia based on medical history (previous diagnosis), historic lipid values, or as otherwise determined through optional lipid measurements at screening visit
  • meets one of the following triglyceride (TG) criteria:

    1. is on niacin, statin, or fibrate and has TG <500 mg/dL at or within 6 months of washout
    2. is not on any lipid altering therapy or is on lipid altering therapy other than niacin, statin, or fibrate and has TG <600 mg/dL at or within 6 months of screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • is high risk (coronary heart disease [CHD] or CHD risk equivalent) AND is on a statin
  • is pregnant or breast-feeding, or expecting to conceive during the study including the 14-day post study follow-up
  • has Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus and is on statin therapy, is poorly controlled, is newly diagnosed (within 3 months of Visit 1), has recently experienced repeated hypoglycemia or unstable glycemic control or is taking new or recently adjusted anti-diabetic medications (with the exception of +/- 10 units of insulin) within 3 months of Visit 1
  • has the following conditions: chronic heart failure, uncontrolled/unstable cardiac arrhythmias, unstable hypertension, active or chronic hepatobiliary disorder or hepatic disease, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive, gout (within 1 year)

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm 3

    Arm 4

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Sequence 1: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg→MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg

    Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg →MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg

    Sequence 3: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg→MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg

    Sequence 4: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg →MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg

    Arm Description

    After a 2-week placebo run-in, participants will receive MK-0524B (0.9 g/simvastatin 10 mg) for 4 weeks, then MK-0524B 1.8g /20 mg combination tablet for 8 weeks. Participant is then co-administered MK-0524A 2 g + simvastatin 20 mg for 8 weeks.

    After a 2-week placebo run-in, participants will be co-administered MK-0524A 1g + simvastatin 10 mg for 4 weeks, then co-administered MK-0524A 2g +simvastatin 20 mg for 8 weeks. Participant then receives MK-0524B 1.8 g/20 mg combination tablet for 8 weeks.

    After a 2-week placebo run-in, participants will receive MK-0524B 0.9g/40 mg combination tablet for 4 weeks, then MK-0524B 1.8g /40 mg combination tablet for 8 weeks. Participant is then co-administered MK-0524A 2 g + simvastatin 40 mg for 8 weeks.

    After a 2-week placebo run-in, participants will be co-administered MK-0524A 1g + simvastatin 40 mg for 4 weeks, then co-administration MK-0524A 2g +simvastatin 40 mg for 8 weeks. Participant then receives MK-0524B 1.8 g/40 mg combination tablet for 8 weeks.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Percentage Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
    Blood samples taken at baseline (Week 4 for Period II; Week 12 for Period III) and after 8 weeks of treatment during each period to determine the LDL-C levels. The change from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment was recorded.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Percentage Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)
    Blood samples taken at baseline (Week 4 for Period II; Week 12 for Period III) and after 8 weeks of treatment during each period to determine the HDL-C levels. The change from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment was recorded.
    Percentage of Participants With Consecutive Elevations in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) of >=3 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
    Participants had AST and ALT levels assessed during Period I (4 weeks ) throughout each 8 week treatment period (20 weeks total). Participants who had an assessment of either AST or ALT that was 3 x ULN or greater were recorded. The AST ULNs for males and females were 43 U/L and 36 U/L, respectively. The ALT ULNs for males and females were 40 U/L and 33 U/L, respectively.
    Percentage of Participants With Creatine Kinase (CK) >=10 x ULN
    Participants had CK levels assessed during Period I (4 weeks ) throughout each 8 week treatment period (20 weeks total). Participants who had an assessment of CK that was 10 x ULN or greater were recorded. The ULNs for males and females were 207 U/L and 169 U/L, respectively.
    Percentage of Participants With CK >=10 x ULN With Muscle Symptoms
    Participants had CK levels assessed during Period I (4 weeks ) throughout each 8 week treatment period (20 weeks total). Participants who had an assessment of CK that was 10 x ULN or greater and had associated muscle symptoms present within +/- 7 days were recorded. The ULNs for males and females were 207 U/L and 169 U/L, respectively.
    Percentage of Participants With CK >=10 x ULN With Muscle Symptoms - Drug Related
    Participants had CK levels assessed during Period I (4 weeks ) throughout each 8 week treatment period (20 weeks total). Participants who had an assessment of CK that was 10 x ULN or greater and had associated muscle symptoms present within +/- 7 days that were reported as at least possibly related to study drug were recorded. The ULNs for males and females were 207 U/L and 169 U/L, respectively.
    Percentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Impaired Fasting Blood Glucose
    Participants had fasting glucose levels assessed during Period I (4 weeks ) throughout each 8 week treatment period (20 weeks total). Participants who had the new diagnosis of impaired fasting blood glucose were recorded. A pre-defined set of MedDRA terms was used to identify participants whose glycemic status became 'impaired' during the course of treatment (from clinical adverse experience reports). The MedDRA terms were as follows: blood glucose increased, blood glucose abnormal, glucose tolerance decreased, glucose tolerance test abnormal, carbohydrate tolerance decreased, glucose tolerance impaired, hyperglycaemia, impaired fasting glucose, impaired insulin secretion, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, insulin resistance syndrome.
    Percentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Diabetes
    Participants who with newly diagnosed of diabetes were recorded. A participant was classified as having new onset diabetes if they experienced an adverse Event (AE) related to a diagnosis of diabetes (based on a pre-defined set of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities [MedDRA] terms), or if they started taking an anti-diabetic medication during the course of the study. The MedDRA terms were as follows: diabetes mellitus, diabetes mellitus insulin-dependent, diabetes mellitus non-insulin dependent, insulin-requiring type II diabetes mellitus, insulin resistant diabetes, diabetes with hyperosmolarity, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults.
    Percentage of Participants With Worsening of the Pre-existing Conditions of Diabetes in Participants With Diabetes at Baseline
    Participants with diabetes at baseline and who experienced a worsening of the diabetes identified through adverse event reports using a pre-defined set of terms and/or increasing dose/adding a new anti-diabetic medication.
    Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Adjudicated Cardiovascular Event
    Select serious adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality that occurred during the treatment phase of the study were adjudicated by an expert committee external to the sponsor. Those events confirmed by the committee as cardiovascular events were recorded
    Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Clinical Adverse Event (AE)
    An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A clinical AE was an AE reported as a result of a clinical examination or reported by the participant.
    Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Laboratory AE
    An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A laboratory AE was an AE reported as a result of a laboratory assessment or test
    Percentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Clinical AE
    An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A clinical AE was an AE reported as a result of a clinical examination or reported by the participant. Participants who were discontinued from the study due to a clinical AE were recorded.
    Percentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Laboratory AE
    An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A laboratory AE was an AE reported as a result of a laboratory assessment or test. Participants who were discontinued from the study due to a laboratory AE were recorded.
    Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Hepatitis-related Non-serious Clinical AE
    An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. Non-serious Hepatitis-related AEs were identified by a collective review using the following pre-specified set of preferred terms: cholestasis, hepatic necrosis, hepatocellular damage, cytolytic hepatitis, hepatitis, hepatomegaly, jaundice, hepatic failure, hepatitis cholestatic, jaundice cholestatic, hepatitis fulminant, hyperbilirubinaemia, jaundice hepatocellular, ocular icterus, yellow skin, hepatic function abnormal, acute hepatic failure, subacute hepatic failure, hepatitis acute, hepatitis toxic, hepatotoxicity, and mixed hepatocellular-cholestatic injury.
    Percentage Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 4
    Blood samples taken at baseline (Day1 of Period I) and after 4 weeks of treatment to determine the LDL-C levels. The change from baseline after 4 weeks of treatment was recorded.
    Percentage Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 4
    Blood samples taken at baseline (Day1 of Period I) and after 4 weeks of treatment to determine the HDL-C levels. The change from baseline after 4 weeks of treatment was recorded.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    May 24, 2007
    Last Updated
    January 17, 2019
    Sponsor
    Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT00479882
    Brief Title
    MK-0524B Lipid Study (MK-0524B-063)
    Official Title
    A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, "Crossover" Design Study to Evaluate the Lipid-Altering Efficacy and Safety of MK-0524B Combination Tablet Compared to MK-0524A + Simvastatin Coadministration in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia and Mixed Dyslipidemia
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    January 2019
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    June 15, 2007 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    June 16, 2008 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    June 16, 2008 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    This is a 20-week clinical trial in participants with primary hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia to demonstrate the effect of MK-0524B compared to MK-0524A + Simvastatin on lipid values.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Primary Hypercholesterolemia, Mixed Dyslipidemia

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 3
    Interventional Study Model
    Crossover Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantInvestigator
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    2414 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Sequence 1: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg→MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    After a 2-week placebo run-in, participants will receive MK-0524B (0.9 g/simvastatin 10 mg) for 4 weeks, then MK-0524B 1.8g /20 mg combination tablet for 8 weeks. Participant is then co-administered MK-0524A 2 g + simvastatin 20 mg for 8 weeks.
    Arm Title
    Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg →MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    After a 2-week placebo run-in, participants will be co-administered MK-0524A 1g + simvastatin 10 mg for 4 weeks, then co-administered MK-0524A 2g +simvastatin 20 mg for 8 weeks. Participant then receives MK-0524B 1.8 g/20 mg combination tablet for 8 weeks.
    Arm Title
    Sequence 3: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg→MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    After a 2-week placebo run-in, participants will receive MK-0524B 0.9g/40 mg combination tablet for 4 weeks, then MK-0524B 1.8g /40 mg combination tablet for 8 weeks. Participant is then co-administered MK-0524A 2 g + simvastatin 40 mg for 8 weeks.
    Arm Title
    Sequence 4: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg →MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    After a 2-week placebo run-in, participants will be co-administered MK-0524A 1g + simvastatin 40 mg for 4 weeks, then co-administration MK-0524A 2g +simvastatin 40 mg for 8 weeks. Participant then receives MK-0524B 1.8 g/40 mg combination tablet for 8 weeks.
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Comparator: simvastatin
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Zocor®, MK0733
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    MK-0524A
    Intervention Description
    Extended-release(ER) niacin/Laropiprant (MK-0524) Combination tablet
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Placebo
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    MK-0524B
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Percentage Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
    Description
    Blood samples taken at baseline (Week 4 for Period II; Week 12 for Period III) and after 8 weeks of treatment during each period to determine the LDL-C levels. The change from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment was recorded.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (Week 4 for Period II; Week 12 for Period III) and after 8 weeks of treatment during each period (Week 12 for Period II and Week 20 for Period III)
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Percentage Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)
    Description
    Blood samples taken at baseline (Week 4 for Period II; Week 12 for Period III) and after 8 weeks of treatment during each period to determine the HDL-C levels. The change from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment was recorded.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (Week 4 for Period II; Week 12 for Period III) and after 8 weeks of treatment during each period (Week 12 for Period II and Week 20 for Period III)
    Title
    Percentage of Participants With Consecutive Elevations in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) of >=3 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
    Description
    Participants had AST and ALT levels assessed during Period I (4 weeks ) throughout each 8 week treatment period (20 weeks total). Participants who had an assessment of either AST or ALT that was 3 x ULN or greater were recorded. The AST ULNs for males and females were 43 U/L and 36 U/L, respectively. The ALT ULNs for males and females were 40 U/L and 33 U/L, respectively.
    Time Frame
    up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)
    Title
    Percentage of Participants With Creatine Kinase (CK) >=10 x ULN
    Description
    Participants had CK levels assessed during Period I (4 weeks ) throughout each 8 week treatment period (20 weeks total). Participants who had an assessment of CK that was 10 x ULN or greater were recorded. The ULNs for males and females were 207 U/L and 169 U/L, respectively.
    Time Frame
    up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)
    Title
    Percentage of Participants With CK >=10 x ULN With Muscle Symptoms
    Description
    Participants had CK levels assessed during Period I (4 weeks ) throughout each 8 week treatment period (20 weeks total). Participants who had an assessment of CK that was 10 x ULN or greater and had associated muscle symptoms present within +/- 7 days were recorded. The ULNs for males and females were 207 U/L and 169 U/L, respectively.
    Time Frame
    up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)
    Title
    Percentage of Participants With CK >=10 x ULN With Muscle Symptoms - Drug Related
    Description
    Participants had CK levels assessed during Period I (4 weeks ) throughout each 8 week treatment period (20 weeks total). Participants who had an assessment of CK that was 10 x ULN or greater and had associated muscle symptoms present within +/- 7 days that were reported as at least possibly related to study drug were recorded. The ULNs for males and females were 207 U/L and 169 U/L, respectively.
    Time Frame
    up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)
    Title
    Percentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Impaired Fasting Blood Glucose
    Description
    Participants had fasting glucose levels assessed during Period I (4 weeks ) throughout each 8 week treatment period (20 weeks total). Participants who had the new diagnosis of impaired fasting blood glucose were recorded. A pre-defined set of MedDRA terms was used to identify participants whose glycemic status became 'impaired' during the course of treatment (from clinical adverse experience reports). The MedDRA terms were as follows: blood glucose increased, blood glucose abnormal, glucose tolerance decreased, glucose tolerance test abnormal, carbohydrate tolerance decreased, glucose tolerance impaired, hyperglycaemia, impaired fasting glucose, impaired insulin secretion, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, insulin resistance syndrome.
    Time Frame
    up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)
    Title
    Percentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Diabetes
    Description
    Participants who with newly diagnosed of diabetes were recorded. A participant was classified as having new onset diabetes if they experienced an adverse Event (AE) related to a diagnosis of diabetes (based on a pre-defined set of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities [MedDRA] terms), or if they started taking an anti-diabetic medication during the course of the study. The MedDRA terms were as follows: diabetes mellitus, diabetes mellitus insulin-dependent, diabetes mellitus non-insulin dependent, insulin-requiring type II diabetes mellitus, insulin resistant diabetes, diabetes with hyperosmolarity, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults.
    Time Frame
    up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)
    Title
    Percentage of Participants With Worsening of the Pre-existing Conditions of Diabetes in Participants With Diabetes at Baseline
    Description
    Participants with diabetes at baseline and who experienced a worsening of the diabetes identified through adverse event reports using a pre-defined set of terms and/or increasing dose/adding a new anti-diabetic medication.
    Time Frame
    up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)
    Title
    Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Adjudicated Cardiovascular Event
    Description
    Select serious adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality that occurred during the treatment phase of the study were adjudicated by an expert committee external to the sponsor. Those events confirmed by the committee as cardiovascular events were recorded
    Time Frame
    up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)
    Title
    Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Clinical Adverse Event (AE)
    Description
    An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A clinical AE was an AE reported as a result of a clinical examination or reported by the participant.
    Time Frame
    up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)
    Title
    Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Laboratory AE
    Description
    An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A laboratory AE was an AE reported as a result of a laboratory assessment or test
    Time Frame
    up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)
    Title
    Percentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Clinical AE
    Description
    An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A clinical AE was an AE reported as a result of a clinical examination or reported by the participant. Participants who were discontinued from the study due to a clinical AE were recorded.
    Time Frame
    up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)
    Title
    Percentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Laboratory AE
    Description
    An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A laboratory AE was an AE reported as a result of a laboratory assessment or test. Participants who were discontinued from the study due to a laboratory AE were recorded.
    Time Frame
    up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)
    Title
    Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Hepatitis-related Non-serious Clinical AE
    Description
    An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. Non-serious Hepatitis-related AEs were identified by a collective review using the following pre-specified set of preferred terms: cholestasis, hepatic necrosis, hepatocellular damage, cytolytic hepatitis, hepatitis, hepatomegaly, jaundice, hepatic failure, hepatitis cholestatic, jaundice cholestatic, hepatitis fulminant, hyperbilirubinaemia, jaundice hepatocellular, ocular icterus, yellow skin, hepatic function abnormal, acute hepatic failure, subacute hepatic failure, hepatitis acute, hepatitis toxic, hepatotoxicity, and mixed hepatocellular-cholestatic injury.
    Time Frame
    up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)
    Title
    Percentage Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 4
    Description
    Blood samples taken at baseline (Day1 of Period I) and after 4 weeks of treatment to determine the LDL-C levels. The change from baseline after 4 weeks of treatment was recorded.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (Day1 of Period I) and Week 4
    Title
    Percentage Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 4
    Description
    Blood samples taken at baseline (Day1 of Period I) and after 4 weeks of treatment to determine the HDL-C levels. The change from baseline after 4 weeks of treatment was recorded.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (Day1 of Period I) and Week 4

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    85 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: has primary hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia based on medical history (previous diagnosis), historic lipid values, or as otherwise determined through optional lipid measurements at screening visit meets one of the following triglyceride (TG) criteria: is on niacin, statin, or fibrate and has TG <500 mg/dL at or within 6 months of washout is not on any lipid altering therapy or is on lipid altering therapy other than niacin, statin, or fibrate and has TG <600 mg/dL at or within 6 months of screening Exclusion Criteria: is high risk (coronary heart disease [CHD] or CHD risk equivalent) AND is on a statin is pregnant or breast-feeding, or expecting to conceive during the study including the 14-day post study follow-up has Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus and is on statin therapy, is poorly controlled, is newly diagnosed (within 3 months of Visit 1), has recently experienced repeated hypoglycemia or unstable glycemic control or is taking new or recently adjusted anti-diabetic medications (with the exception of +/- 10 units of insulin) within 3 months of Visit 1 has the following conditions: chronic heart failure, uncontrolled/unstable cardiac arrhythmias, unstable hypertension, active or chronic hepatobiliary disorder or hepatic disease, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive, gout (within 1 year)
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Medical Monitor
    Organizational Affiliation
    Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
    Official's Role
    Study Director

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Yes
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf
    IPD Sharing URL
    http://engagezone.msd.com/ds_documentation.php
    Available IPD and Supporting Information:
    Available IPD/Information Type
    CSR Synopsis Link
    Available IPD/Information URL
    http://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/study.html?id=0524B-063&kw=0524B-063&tab=access

    Learn more about this trial

    MK-0524B Lipid Study (MK-0524B-063)

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs