Ibuprofen vs. Continuous Indomethacin in the Treatment of PDA
Primary Purpose
Patent Ductus Arteriosus
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Israel
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Continuous indomethacin
ibuprofen
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Patent Ductus Arteriosus focused on measuring Patent Ductus Arteriosus, Indomethacin, Ibuprofen, Renal effects
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- < 1500 gm birth weight with PDA confirmed by echocardiography
Exclusion Criteria:
- Additional congenital heart lesions
- Significant congenital malformations
- Documented infection
- Thrombocytopenia (<60,000)
- IVH grade 4
Sites / Locations
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
To show no differences in urine output and/or in serum creatinine between the treatment groups
Secondary Outcome Measures
To show no other clinical differences, eg. NEC, IVH or ROP between the groups; to study doppler flow velocities to these areas; to correlate with BNP levels.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00485160
First Posted
June 11, 2007
Last Updated
July 20, 2011
Sponsor
Shaare Zedek Medical Center
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00485160
Brief Title
Ibuprofen vs. Continuous Indomethacin in the Treatment of PDA
Official Title
Comparison of Intravenous Ibuprofen vs. Continuous Indomethacin in the Treatment of Patent Ductus Arteriosus
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2007
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2002 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
September 2006 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
Shaare Zedek Medical Center
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether closure of the PDA in premature neonates using IV ibuprofen vs continuous IV indomethacin has different side effects, eg. effects on renal function, on blood flow velocity in the superior mesenteric artery, the anterior cerebral artery, and the renal artery.
Detailed Description
Despite the fact that ibuprofen appears to minimize the renal side effects seen following bolus indomethacin, other concerns regarding both short and long-term safety remain. Indomethacin, on the other hand, has been used to treat premature neonates for many years. Other than transient vasoconstrictive effects, no significant toxicity has been noted. Thus, if we were to be able to eliminate the differential renal effects, indomethacin would remain, for many, the therapy of choice for the premature neonate with a persistent PDA. We hypothesized that continuous administration of indomethacin would provide this option. Ibuprofen therapy has not, to date, been compared with indomethacin administered by continuous infusion. Hence, in the current study we attempted to determine whether continuous indomethacin administration could potentially offer the same advantages as ibuprofen in treating PDA, specifically in terms of mitigation of renal side effects. Specifically, our primary objective was to show no differences in urine output and/or in serum creatinine between the treatment groups. As a secondary objective, we aimed to show no other potentially vascular-mediated clinical differences, eg. Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and on bilirubin albumin binding between the groups.
B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is released by ventricular myocytes in response to ventricular volume load. It, in turn, mediates vasodilation, natriuresis and diuresis. Serum BNP levels have been shown to be clinically useful in differentiating between respiratory and cardiac disease, in monitoring heart failure therapies and in serving as early diagnostic biomarkers of ductal patency in premature neonates. As secondary objectives we intend to determine whether a decrease in BNP levels would be an equally reliable indicator of therapeutic efficacy in infants treated with ibuprofen as with indomethacin.In addition we will look at comparative effects on other vascular beds which might mediate long term side effects described above.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Patent Ductus Arteriosus
Keywords
Patent Ductus Arteriosus, Indomethacin, Ibuprofen, Renal effects
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
70 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Continuous indomethacin
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
ibuprofen
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To show no differences in urine output and/or in serum creatinine between the treatment groups
Time Frame
Up to one day after completion of therapy
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To show no other clinical differences, eg. NEC, IVH or ROP between the groups; to study doppler flow velocities to these areas; to correlate with BNP levels.
Time Frame
Until end of primary hospitalization
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
36 Hours
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
3 Weeks
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
< 1500 gm birth weight with PDA confirmed by echocardiography
Exclusion Criteria:
Additional congenital heart lesions
Significant congenital malformations
Documented infection
Thrombocytopenia (<60,000)
IVH grade 4
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cathy Hammerman, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Shaare Zedek Medical Center
City
Jerusalem
Country
Israel
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Ibuprofen vs. Continuous Indomethacin in the Treatment of PDA
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs