Back to resultsEfficacy and Safety of Armodafinil as Adjunctive Therapy in Schizophrenic Adults With Cognitive Deficits
Primary Purpose
Schizophrenia
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
armodafinil
armodafinil
armodafinil
placebo
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Schizophrenia
Eligibility Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- The patient has a diagnosis of schizophrenia according to the DSM-IV-TR criteria as determined by the SCID and has been clinically stable in a nonacute phase of their illness for at least 8 weeks prior to the baseline visit.
- The patient has received treatment with olanzapine, oral risperidone, or paliperidone for schizophrenia for at least 6 weeks prior to the screening visit and has been on a stable dose of olanzapine, oral risperidone, or paliperidone for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening visit. The patient is prepared to remain at these stable dosages for the duration of the study.
- The patient is a man or woman 18 through 60 years of age.
- The patient is in good health (except for the diagnosis of schizophrenia) as judged by the investigator on the basis of medical and psychiatric history, medical examination, ECG, serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis.
- Women of childbearing potential must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study.
- The patient must be willing and able to comply with study restrictions, to remain at the clinic for the required duration during the study period, and to return to the clinic for the follow-up evaluation as specified in this protocol.
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- The patient has any Axis I disorder, including schizoaffective disorder and sleep disorders, apart from schizophrenia, and nicotine dependence.
- The patient has tardive dyskinesia or any other clinically significant movement disorder.
- The patient has any clinically significant uncontrolled medical (including illnesses related to the cardiovascular, renal, or hepatic systems) or surgical condition.
- The patient has previously received modafinil or armodafinil, or the patient has a known sensitivity to any ingredients in the study drug tablets.
- The patient is a pregnant or lactating woman. (Any woman becoming pregnant during the study will be withdrawn from the study.)
Sites / Locations
- Collaborative NeuroScience Network
- Synergy Clinical Research
- California Clinical Trials
- CNRI-Los Angeles, LLC
- CNRI-San Diego
- Yale University School of Medicine
- Atlanta Center for Clinical Research
- Rush University Medical Center
- Washington University School of Medicine
- Duke Department of Psychiatry - DUMC
- Midwest Clinical Research Center
- University Hills Clinical Research
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm 4
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
50 mg/day armodafinil
100 mg/day armodafinil
200 mg/day armodafinil
Placebo
Arm Description
Armodafinil or placebo was provided in 50 mg tablet form and subjects were instructed to take 4 tablets orally once daily in the morning. Subjects randomized to the 50 mg/day armodafinil treatment arm for the double-blind treatment period of the study took one 50 mg armodafinil tablet plus three placebo tablets each morning.
Armodafinil or placebo was provided in 50 mg tablet form and subjects were instructed to take 4 tablets orally once daily in the morning. Subjects randomized to the 100 mg/day armodafinil treatment arm for the double-blind treatment period of the study took two 50 mg armodafinil tablets plus two placebo tablets each morning. Subjects began taking 50 mg/day and then titrated to 100 mg/day on Day 2 of the first week of the double-blind treatment period.
Armodafinil or placebo was provided in 50 mg tablet form and subjects were instructed to take 4 tablets orally once daily in the morning. Subjects randomized to the 200 mg/day armodafinil treatment arm for the double-blind treatment period of the study took four 50 mg armodafinil tablet and no placebo tablets each morning. Subjects were titrated to this dose by starting treatment at 50 mg/day (1 tablet) and increasing by 50 mg increments on days 2, 4, and 6 until they were taking 200 mg/day.
Armodafinil or placebo was provided in 50 mg tablet form and subjects were instructed to take 4 tablets orally once daily in the morning. Subjects randomized to the placebo treatment arm for the double-blind treatment period of the study took four placebo tablets and no armodafinil tablets each morning.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Mean Change From Baseline to Last Observation After Baseline in Composite Score on the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The composite score combines the individual scores of the 10 tests and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represents the change from baseline to last observation after baseline in Composite T-Score.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery Composite Score
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The composite score combines the individual scores of the 10 tests and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in composite T-score from baseline to 4 weeks.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Speed of Processing Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Processing Speed Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Attention/Vigilance Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument containing 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Attention/Vigilance Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Working Memory Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Working Memory Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Verbal Learning Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Verbal Learning Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Visual Learning Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Visual Learning Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Reasoning and Problem Solving Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument containing 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10) for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Reasoning and Problem Solving Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Social Cognition Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10) for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Social Cognition Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Trail Making Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Trail Making Test is a component of the Speed of Processing Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in Trail Making Test T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia: Symbol Coding (BASC SC) Test of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The BASC SC Test is a component of the Speed of Processing Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in BASC SC Test T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Fluency Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Fluency Test is a component of the Speed of Processing Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in Fluency Test T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wechsler Memory Scale: Spatial Span (WMS-III SS) Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The WMS-III SS is a component of the Working Memory Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in WMS-III SS T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Letter-Number Span (LNS) Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The LNS is a component of the Working Memory Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in LNS T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Number of Perseverative Errors
WCST is an instrument administered electronically to assess abstract reasoning and ability to alter problem solving strategies. Patients are given 64 response cards and 4 stimulus cards and asked to match each stimulus card to 1 pile of response cards. The patient is not told how to match the cards, only "right" or "wrong" to each placement. Examiner may change matching rules during the test. Perseveration errors occur when subject repeats the same error no matter how many times they are told the placement is wrong. The change from baseline in number of perseveration errors was assessed.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Consecutive Responses on the Final Category
WCST is an instrument administered electronically to assess abstract reasoning and ability to alter problem solving strategies. Patients are given 64 response cards and 4 stimulus cards and asked to match each stimulus card to 1 pile of response cards. The patient is not told how to match the cards, only "right" or "wrong" to each placement. Examiner may change matching rules (sorting categories) during the test at which time the subject must alter their sorting category. The change from baseline in number of consecutive responses on the final category was assessed.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Categories Completed
WCST is an instrument administered electronically to assess abstract reasoning and ability to alter problem solving strategies. Patients are given 64 response cards and 4 stimulus cards and asked to match each stimulus card to 1 pile of response cards. The patient is not told how to match the cards, only "right" or "wrong" to each placement. Examiner may change matching rules (sorting categories) during the test at which time the subject must alter their sorting category. The change from baseline in number of sorting categories achieved was assessed.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Trails B Test
Trail B is an instrument designed to assess set shifting. The patient was given a paper with numbers and letters on it and asked to connect them in an alternating manner (eg. 1-A-2-B-3C). The time required for the patient to complete the test was recorded. The change from Baseline to last observation following Baseline in the time necessary to complete the test is presented here.
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch).
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch)to Week 1.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch) to Week 2.
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch) to Week 3.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch) to Week 4.
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in maximum activity to Endpoint.
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 1 in maximum activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in maximum activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in maximum activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 4 in maximum activity.
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to endpoint in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 1 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 4 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Endpoint in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 1 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 4 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Endpoint in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 1 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 4 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Endpoint in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 1 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 4 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores
The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores
The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores
The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating
The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating
n The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating
The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.
Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline
The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at Endpoint which is Week 4 or the last observation following Baseline.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline
The PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 4 or at the last observation following Baseline is presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores
SANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Endpoint.
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores
SANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Week 1.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores
SANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Week 2.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores
SANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Week 4.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Endpoint.
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 1.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 2.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 4.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Endpoint.
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Week 1.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Week 2.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Week 4.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores
ESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or last observation following baseline) in the ESS total score.
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores
ESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Week 1 in the ESS total score.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores
ESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Week 2 in the ESS total score.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores
ESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4 in the ESS total score.
Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1
The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at week 1.
Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2
The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at week 2.
Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4
The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at week 4.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1
The PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 1 is presented here.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2
The PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 2 is presented here.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4
The PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 4 is presented here.
Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Baseline
The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at Baseline.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00487942
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety of Armodafinil as Adjunctive Therapy in Schizophrenic Adults With Cognitive Deficits
Official Title
A 4-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Fixed-Dosage Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Armodafinil as Adjunctive Therapy in Adults With Cognitive Deficits Associated With Schizophrenia
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2007 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2007 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
Cephalon
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate if adjunctive armodafinil treatment can improve the cognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Schizophrenia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
50 mg/day armodafinil
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Armodafinil or placebo was provided in 50 mg tablet form and subjects were instructed to take 4 tablets orally once daily in the morning. Subjects randomized to the 50 mg/day armodafinil treatment arm for the double-blind treatment period of the study took one 50 mg armodafinil tablet plus three placebo tablets each morning.
Arm Title
100 mg/day armodafinil
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Armodafinil or placebo was provided in 50 mg tablet form and subjects were instructed to take 4 tablets orally once daily in the morning. Subjects randomized to the 100 mg/day armodafinil treatment arm for the double-blind treatment period of the study took two 50 mg armodafinil tablets plus two placebo tablets each morning. Subjects began taking 50 mg/day and then titrated to 100 mg/day on Day 2 of the first week of the double-blind treatment period.
Arm Title
200 mg/day armodafinil
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Armodafinil or placebo was provided in 50 mg tablet form and subjects were instructed to take 4 tablets orally once daily in the morning. Subjects randomized to the 200 mg/day armodafinil treatment arm for the double-blind treatment period of the study took four 50 mg armodafinil tablet and no placebo tablets each morning. Subjects were titrated to this dose by starting treatment at 50 mg/day (1 tablet) and increasing by 50 mg increments on days 2, 4, and 6 until they were taking 200 mg/day.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Armodafinil or placebo was provided in 50 mg tablet form and subjects were instructed to take 4 tablets orally once daily in the morning. Subjects randomized to the placebo treatment arm for the double-blind treatment period of the study took four placebo tablets and no armodafinil tablets each morning.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
armodafinil
Intervention Description
50 mg/day armodafinil
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
armodafinil
Intervention Description
100 mg/day armodafinil
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
armodafinil
Intervention Description
200 mg/day armodafinil
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
placebo
Intervention Description
placebo
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Change From Baseline to Last Observation After Baseline in Composite Score on the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
Description
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The composite score combines the individual scores of the 10 tests and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represents the change from baseline to last observation after baseline in Composite T-Score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery Composite Score
Description
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The composite score combines the individual scores of the 10 tests and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in composite T-score from baseline to 4 weeks.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Speed of Processing Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
Description
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Processing Speed Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline 4 weeks (or last observation after baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Attention/Vigilance Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
Description
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument containing 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Attention/Vigilance Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Working Memory Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
Description
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Working Memory Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Verbal Learning Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
Description
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Verbal Learning Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Visual Learning Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
Description
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Visual Learning Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Reasoning and Problem Solving Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
Description
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument containing 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10) for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Reasoning and Problem Solving Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Social Cognition Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
Description
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10) for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Social Cognition Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Trail Making Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
Description
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Trail Making Test is a component of the Speed of Processing Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in Trail Making Test T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia: Symbol Coding (BASC SC) Test of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery
Description
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The BASC SC Test is a component of the Speed of Processing Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in BASC SC Test T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Fluency Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
Description
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Fluency Test is a component of the Speed of Processing Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in Fluency Test T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wechsler Memory Scale: Spatial Span (WMS-III SS) Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
Description
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The WMS-III SS is a component of the Working Memory Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in WMS-III SS T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Letter-Number Span (LNS) Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery
Description
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The LNS is a component of the Working Memory Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in LNS T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Number of Perseverative Errors
Description
WCST is an instrument administered electronically to assess abstract reasoning and ability to alter problem solving strategies. Patients are given 64 response cards and 4 stimulus cards and asked to match each stimulus card to 1 pile of response cards. The patient is not told how to match the cards, only "right" or "wrong" to each placement. Examiner may change matching rules during the test. Perseveration errors occur when subject repeats the same error no matter how many times they are told the placement is wrong. The change from baseline in number of perseveration errors was assessed.
Time Frame
4 weeks (or last observation after baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Consecutive Responses on the Final Category
Description
WCST is an instrument administered electronically to assess abstract reasoning and ability to alter problem solving strategies. Patients are given 64 response cards and 4 stimulus cards and asked to match each stimulus card to 1 pile of response cards. The patient is not told how to match the cards, only "right" or "wrong" to each placement. Examiner may change matching rules (sorting categories) during the test at which time the subject must alter their sorting category. The change from baseline in number of consecutive responses on the final category was assessed.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Categories Completed
Description
WCST is an instrument administered electronically to assess abstract reasoning and ability to alter problem solving strategies. Patients are given 64 response cards and 4 stimulus cards and asked to match each stimulus card to 1 pile of response cards. The patient is not told how to match the cards, only "right" or "wrong" to each placement. Examiner may change matching rules (sorting categories) during the test at which time the subject must alter their sorting category. The change from baseline in number of sorting categories achieved was assessed.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Trails B Test
Description
Trail B is an instrument designed to assess set shifting. The patient was given a paper with numbers and letters on it and asked to connect them in an alternating manner (eg. 1-A-2-B-3C). The time required for the patient to complete the test was recorded. The change from Baseline to last observation following Baseline in the time necessary to complete the test is presented here.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch)to Week 1.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 1
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch) to Week 2.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 2
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch) to Week 3.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 3
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch) to Week 4.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4
Title
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in maximum activity to Endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 1 in maximum activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 1
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in maximum activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 2
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in maximum activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 3
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 4 in maximum activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4
Title
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to endpoint in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 1 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 1
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 2
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 3
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 4 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4
Title
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Endpoint in total activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 1 in total activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 1
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in total activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 2
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in total activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 3
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 4 in total activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4
Title
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Endpoint in total activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 1 in total activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 1
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in total activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 2
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in total activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 3
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 4 in total activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4
Title
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Endpoint in total activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 1 in total activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 1
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in total activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 2
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in total activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 3
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity
Description
An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 4 in total activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4
Title
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores
Description
The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores
Description
The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores
Description
The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating
Description
The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating
Description
n The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating
Description
The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline
Description
The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at Endpoint which is Week 4 or the last observation following Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline
Description
The PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 4 or at the last observation following Baseline is presented.
Time Frame
Week 4 or last observation following Baseline
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores
Description
SANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores
Description
SANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Week 1.
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores
Description
SANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Week 2.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores
Description
SANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Week 4.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score
Description
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score
Description
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 1.
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score
Description
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 2.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score
Description
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 4.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score
Description
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score
Description
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Week 1.
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score
Description
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Week 2.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score
Description
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Week 4.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores
Description
ESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or last observation following baseline) in the ESS total score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores
Description
ESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Week 1 in the ESS total score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores
Description
ESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Week 2 in the ESS total score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores
Description
ESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4 in the ESS total score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1
Description
The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at week 1.
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 week
Title
Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2
Description
The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at week 2.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 weeks
Title
Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4
Description
The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at week 4.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks
Title
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1
Description
The PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 1 is presented here.
Time Frame
Week 1
Title
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2
Description
The PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 2 is presented here.
Time Frame
Week 2
Title
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4
Description
The PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 4 is presented here.
Time Frame
Week 4
Title
Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Baseline
Description
The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score
Description
The Modified Simpson Angus Scale is a clinician-rated scale to assess the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms associated study drug treatment. This is a 10-item scale that focuses on rigidity. The items are rated using a 5-point (0 - 4) scale. The total score ranges between 0 and 40. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4 or the last observation following baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score
Description
The Modified Simpson Angus Scale is a clinician-rated scale to assess the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms associated study drug treatment. This is a 10-item scale that focuses on rigidity. The items are rated using a 5-point (0 - 4) scale. The total score ranges between 0 and 40. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 1.
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score
Description
The Modified Simpson Angus Scale is a clinician-rated scale to assess the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms associated study drug treatment. This is a 10-item scale that focuses on rigidity. The items are rated using a 5-point (0 - 4) scale. The total score ranges between 0 and 40. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 2.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score
Description
The Modified Simpson Angus Scale is a clinician-rated scale to assess the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms associated study drug treatment. This is a 10-item scale that focuses on rigidity. The items are rated using a 5-point (0 - 4) scale. The total score ranges between 0 and 40. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score
Description
The BARS is a 4-item clinician-rated scale to measure the presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia. Items related to the assessment of objective akathisia, subjective awareness of restlessness, and distress related to restlessness are rated using various 4-point (0 - 3) scales. A global assessment of akathisia is rated using a 6-point (0=Absent, 1=Questionable akathisia, 2=Mild akathisia, 3=Moderate akathisia, 4=Marked akathisia, 5=Severe akathisia) scale. The total score range is from 0 to 14 with a higher score indicating more severe akathisia.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score
Description
The BARS is a 4-item clinician-rated scale to measure the presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia. Items related to the assessment of objective akathisia, subjective awareness of restlessness, and distress related to restlessness are rated using various 4-point (0 - 3) scales. A global assessment of akathisia is rated using a 6-point (0=Absent, 1=Questionable akathisia, 2=Mild akathisia, 3=Moderate akathisia, 4=Marked akathisia, 5=Severe akathisia) scale. The total score range is from 0 to 14 with a higher score indicating more severe akathisia.
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score
Description
The BARS is a 4-item clinician-rated scale to measure the presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia. Items related to the assessment of objective akathisia, subjective awareness of restlessness, and distress related to restlessness are rated using various 4-point (0 - 3) scales. A global assessment of akathisia is rated using a 6-point (0=Absent, 1=Questionable akathisia, 2=Mild akathisia, 3=Moderate akathisia, 4=Marked akathisia, 5=Severe akathisia) scale. The total score range is from 0 to 14 with a higher score indicating more severe akathisia.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score
Description
The BARS is a 4-item clinician-rated scale to measure the presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia. Items related to the assessment of objective akathisia, subjective awareness of restlessness, and distress related to restlessness are rated using various 4-point (0 - 3) scales. A global assessment of akathisia is rated using a 6-point (0=Absent, 1=Questionable akathisia, 2=Mild akathisia, 3=Moderate akathisia, 4=Marked akathisia, 5=Severe akathisia) scale. The total score range is from 0 to 14 with a higher score indicating more severe akathisia.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score
Description
The CDSS is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the level of depression in patients with schizophrenia. Each of the 9 items is scored on a 4-point scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The total score range is 0 - 27. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4 or the last observation following baseline in the total score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 2 on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score
Description
The CDSS is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the level of depression in patients with schizophrenia. Each of the 9 items is scored on a 4-point scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The total score range is 0 - 27. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 2 in the total score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score
Description
The CDSS is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the level of depression in patients with schizophrenia. Each of the 9 items is scored on a 4-point scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The total score range is 0 - 27. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4 in the total score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score
Description
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Positive Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Positive Rating Scale from Baseline to Endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score
Description
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Positive Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Positive Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 1.
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score
Description
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Positive Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Positive Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 2.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score
Description
PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Positive Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Positive Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 4.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria:
The patient has a diagnosis of schizophrenia according to the DSM-IV-TR criteria as determined by the SCID and has been clinically stable in a nonacute phase of their illness for at least 8 weeks prior to the baseline visit.
The patient has received treatment with olanzapine, oral risperidone, or paliperidone for schizophrenia for at least 6 weeks prior to the screening visit and has been on a stable dose of olanzapine, oral risperidone, or paliperidone for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening visit. The patient is prepared to remain at these stable dosages for the duration of the study.
The patient is a man or woman 18 through 60 years of age.
The patient is in good health (except for the diagnosis of schizophrenia) as judged by the investigator on the basis of medical and psychiatric history, medical examination, ECG, serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis.
Women of childbearing potential must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study.
The patient must be willing and able to comply with study restrictions, to remain at the clinic for the required duration during the study period, and to return to the clinic for the follow-up evaluation as specified in this protocol.
Key Exclusion Criteria:
The patient has any Axis I disorder, including schizoaffective disorder and sleep disorders, apart from schizophrenia, and nicotine dependence.
The patient has tardive dyskinesia or any other clinically significant movement disorder.
The patient has any clinically significant uncontrolled medical (including illnesses related to the cardiovascular, renal, or hepatic systems) or surgical condition.
The patient has previously received modafinil or armodafinil, or the patient has a known sensitivity to any ingredients in the study drug tablets.
The patient is a pregnant or lactating woman. (Any woman becoming pregnant during the study will be withdrawn from the study.)
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Collaborative NeuroScience Network
City
Garden Grove
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92845
Country
United States
Facility Name
Synergy Clinical Research
City
National City
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91950
Country
United States
Facility Name
California Clinical Trials
City
Paramount
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90723
Country
United States
Facility Name
CNRI-Los Angeles, LLC
City
Pico Rivera
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90660
Country
United States
Facility Name
CNRI-San Diego
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92126
Country
United States
Facility Name
Yale University School of Medicine
City
New Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06519
Country
United States
Facility Name
Atlanta Center for Clinical Research
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30308
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rush University Medical Center
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington University School of Medicine
City
St. Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63108
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke Department of Psychiatry - DUMC
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Midwest Clinical Research Center
City
Dayton
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45408
Country
United States
Facility Name
University Hills Clinical Research
City
Irving
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75062
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20816042
Citation
Kane JM, D'Souza DC, Patkar AA, Youakim JM, Tiller JM, Yang R, Keefe RS. Armodafinil as adjunctive therapy in adults with cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia: a 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;71(11):1475-81. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05950gry. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Efficacy and Safety of Armodafinil as Adjunctive Therapy in Schizophrenic Adults With Cognitive Deficits
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs