search
Back to results

Comparison of Two Methods of Bronchial Methacholine Provocation

Primary Purpose

Bronchial Hyperreactivity, Bronchial Asthma

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Bronchial methacholine provocation
Bronchial methacholine provocation
Sponsored by
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Bronchial Hyperreactivity focused on measuring PC20 FEV1, PD20FEV1, bronchial hyperreactivity, bronchial asthma

Eligibility Criteria

12 Years - 45 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent
  • Age 12-45 years
  • Known bronchial hyperreactivity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 12 > 45 years
  • Clinical asthma requiring regular inhalation
  • Vital capacity < 80%
  • FEV1 < 75%
  • Chronic disease conditions or infections
  • Pregnancy
  • Inhalative or systemic steroid use
  • Substance abuse
  • Incapability of understanding the study's purpose and performance

Sites / Locations

  • Goethe University, Department of Pulmonology

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

A

B

Arm Description

Methacholine challenge, five-breath dosimeter protocol

Methacholine challenge five incremental dosages protocol

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

correlation of the two parameters PC20 FEV1 and PD20 FEV1

Secondary Outcome Measures

kappa index of concordance: reliability of the two procedures as to a FEV1 decrease of 20% depending on methacholine concentration

Full Information

First Posted
July 18, 2007
Last Updated
October 7, 2011
Sponsor
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00503659
Brief Title
Comparison of Two Methods of Bronchial Methacholine Provocation
Official Title
Comparison of Two Methods of Bronchial Methacholine Provocation: PC 20 FEV1 Versus PD 20 FEV1
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2011
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2007 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2007 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is meant to compare two routine diagnostic approaches in patients with bronchial asthma. Patients are challenged with methacholine in order to measure their bronchial response. We compare the evaluation of the effects of incremental concentrations versus incremental dosages.
Detailed Description
Bronchial methacholine challenge is well established in asthma diagnostic and research purposes. ATS guidelines provide a short five-breath dosimeter protocol using a five-step dilution schedule. The Viasys APS system enables a feasible and less time consuming provocation with incremental dosages. In 48 young adults with bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) the ATS-protocol with a five-step protocol using a single dilution of 16 mg/ml methacholine should be compared.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Bronchial Hyperreactivity, Bronchial Asthma
Keywords
PC20 FEV1, PD20FEV1, bronchial hyperreactivity, bronchial asthma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
48 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
A
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Methacholine challenge, five-breath dosimeter protocol
Arm Title
B
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Methacholine challenge five incremental dosages protocol
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Bronchial methacholine provocation
Other Intervention Name(s)
DeVilbiss nebulizer
Intervention Description
A short five-breath dosimeter protocol using a five-step dilution schedule according to ATS guidelines (0.0625, 0.25, 1, 4, 16 mg/ml methacholine)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Bronchial methacholine provocation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Viasys APS nebulizer
Intervention Description
A five-step protocol using a single dilution of 16 mg/ml methacholine (0.01, 0.1, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6 mg)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
correlation of the two parameters PC20 FEV1 and PD20 FEV1
Time Frame
feb 2007 - dec 2007
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
kappa index of concordance: reliability of the two procedures as to a FEV1 decrease of 20% depending on methacholine concentration
Time Frame
see above

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
12 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Informed consent Age 12-45 years Known bronchial hyperreactivity Exclusion Criteria: Age < 12 > 45 years Clinical asthma requiring regular inhalation Vital capacity < 80% FEV1 < 75% Chronic disease conditions or infections Pregnancy Inhalative or systemic steroid use Substance abuse Incapability of understanding the study's purpose and performance
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stefan Zielen, M.D., Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Goethe University, Department of Pulmonology
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Goethe University, Department of Pulmonology
City
Frankfurt
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
60590
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
10619836
Citation
Crapo RO, Casaburi R, Coates AL, Enright PL, Hankinson JL, Irvin CG, MacIntyre NR, McKay RT, Wanger JS, Anderson SD, Cockcroft DW, Fish JE, Sterk PJ. Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Jan;161(1):309-29. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.1.ats11-99. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Comparison of Two Methods of Bronchial Methacholine Provocation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs