search
Back to results

Efficacy and Safety of Armodafinil for Adults With Excessive Sleepiness Obstructive Sleep Apnea/Hypopnea and Depression

Primary Purpose

Sleep Disorders, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Major Depressive Disorder

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
armodafinil
placebo
Sponsored by
Cephalon
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Sleep Disorders focused on measuring Obstructive Sleep Apnea/Hypopnea Syndrome, Excessive Sleepiness

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Current diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS)
  • Complaint of residual excessive sleepiness despite nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) therapy being effective
  • Current or prior diagnosis of major depressive disorder or dysthymic disorder
  • Clinically stable with regard to depressed mood and has shown a treatment response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) therapy
  • Patient has been on a stable monotherapy dose of an allowed SSRI or SNRI for at least 8 weeks at the time of screening
  • Women of childbearing potential must use a medically accepted method of contraception.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed or suspected diagnosis of a currently active sleep disorder other than obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS)
  • Current episode of major depression that is considered to be treatment-resistant
  • A primary diagnosis of: eating disorder, psychotic disorder, delirium, dementia, substance-related disorders, or moderate to severe hypochondriasis
  • Patient has a history of bipolar disorder, psychotic depression, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, any other psychotic disorder, or other clinically significant uncontrolled psychiatric condition.
  • Patient has a history of homicidal ideation or significant aggression
  • Patient has a diagnosis of severe antisocial or borderline personality disorder
  • Has a history of significant suicidal ideation, or has current active suicidal ideation, or is considered at imminent risk of self harm.
  • Patient has a history consistent with fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue syndrome
  • A high consumption of caffeinated products, approximately equivalent to 5 or more cups of coffee per day
  • Patient history of any clinically significant cutaneous drug reaction, or a history of clinically significant hypersensitivity reaction
  • Has a past or present seizure disorder
  • Patient has a history of alcohol, narcotic, or any other substance abuse or dependence (with the exception of nicotine)
  • Psychotherapeutic intervention for the patient was initiated within 8 weeks of the screening visit.
  • Patient has known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Patient has any clinically significant uncontrolled medical condition (including illnesses related to the cardiovascular, renal, or hepatic systems) or surgical condition (treated or untreated)
  • Patient is a pregnant or lactating woman
  • Patient has previously received armodafinil; or, patient has used modafinil or any investigational product within 28 days of the baseline visit.

Sites / Locations

  • Jasper Summit Research, LLC
  • Pulmonary Associates, P.A.
  • Psypharma Clinical Research
  • PsyPharm Clinical Research, Inc.
  • Behavioral Research Specialists
  • California Clinical Trials Medical Group, Inc.
  • Pacific Sleep Medicine Services, Inc.
  • Pacific Research Network, Inc.
  • Pacific Sleep Medicine Services, Inc.
  • California Clinical Trials Medical Group, Inc.
  • SDS Clinical Research
  • St. Johns Medical Plaza Sleep Disorders Center
  • National Jewish Medical and Research Center
  • Rocky Mountain Center for Clinical Research
  • PAB Clinical Research
  • Florida Sleep Institute
  • Clinical Research Group of St. Petersburg
  • SomnoMedics
  • Stedman Clinical Trials, LLC
  • Florida Pulmonary Research Center, LLC
  • The Sleep Disorders Center
  • Neurotrials Research, Inc
  • Sleep Disorders Center of Georgia
  • SleepMed, Inc
  • Chicago Research Center
  • Peoria Pulmonary Associates
  • Sleep and Behavior Medicine
  • The Center for Sleep and Wake Disorders
  • Vince & Associates Clinical Research
  • Graves Gilbert Clinic
  • Community Research
  • Clinical Trials of America
  • The Center for Sleep & Wake Disorders
  • Sleep Health Centers
  • AccelRx Research
  • The Center for Sleep Medicine
  • Washington University
  • Somnos Sleep Center
  • Brooklyn Medical Institute
  • Clinilabs, Inc
  • Sleep Medicine Centers
  • Duke University Medical Center
  • Clinical Trials of America
  • Tri-State Sleep Disorders Center
  • Ohio Sleep Medicine Institute
  • North Star Medical Research, LLC
  • St. Vincent Mercy Medical Center
  • Lynn Health Science Institute
  • Sleep Lab of Northeastern PA
  • University of Pennsylvania Center for Sleep
  • CRI Worldwide
  • University Services
  • AccelRx Research
  • Lowcountry Lung and Critical Care
  • SleepMed of South Carolina
  • Sleep Medicine of Middle Tennessee
  • FutureSearch Trials of Neurology
  • Sleep Medicine Associates of Texas, P.A.
  • Baylor College of Medicine VAMC Sleep Research
  • Houston Sleep Center
  • Northwest Clinical Research
  • Pacific Sleep Medicine Services, Inc.

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

1

2

Arm Description

armodafinil 200 mg/day

Placebo

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline on Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) to Endpoint (12 Weeks or Last Observation After Baseline)
MWT measures ability of subject to remain awake. Subjects instructed to try and remain awake during series of 4 30-minute periods (0900, 1100, 1300, and 1500) reclining in dark room. Each period was terminated immediately after sleep onset or at end of 30 minutes if no sleep occurred. If subject fell asleep, they were awakened and not allowed to sleep for remainder of that 30 minute period. Change from Baseline to Endpoint (12 weeks or last observation after baseline) in mean sleep latency averaged from the 4 intervals was measured. Poorest outcome was 0 minutes the best was 30 minutes.
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at Endpoint (12-weeks or Last Observation After Baseline)
The CGI-C is a clinician's rating of disease severity compared with baseline as assessed by Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). CGI-C rates improvement by 7 categories: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. CGI-S measured 7 categories of illness as well: normal, borderline ill, mildly ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill, among most extremely ill. Proportion of responders who had at least "minimally improved" in CGI-C ratings (as related to sleepiness) were assessed.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at Endpoint (12 Weeks or Last Measurement After Baseline)
For this key secondary outcome the ESS score is based on responses to questions (self administered) that assessed the propensity of the subject to fall asleep in 8 everyday situations (sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic, etc.) Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness. The change in ESS total score from baseline to Endpoint (12 weeks or last observation after baseline) are summarized.
Change From Baseline on Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) at 4 Weeks
MWT measures ability of subject to remain awake. Subjects instructed to try and remain awake during series of four 30-minute periods (0900, 1100, 1300, and 1500) reclining in dark room. Each period was terminated immediately after sleep onset or at end of 30 minutes if no sleep occured. If subject fell asleep, they were awakened and not allowed to sleep for remainder of that 30 minute period. Change from Baseline to 4 weeks in mean sleep latency (measured in minutes)averaged from each of the four testing intervals was measured. The poorest outcome was 0 minutes the best was 30 minutes.
Change From Baseline on Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) at 8 Weeks
MWT measures ability of subject to remain awake. Subjects instructed to try and remain awake during series of four 30-minute periods (0900, 1100, 1300, and 1500) reclining in dark room. Each period was terminated immediately after sleep onset or at end of 30 minutes if no sleep occured. If subject fell asleep, they were awakened and not allowed to sleep for remainder of that 30 minute period. Change from Baseline to 8 weeks in mean sleep latency (measured in minutes)averaged from each of the four testing intervals was measured. The poorest outcome was 0 minutes the best was 30 minutes.
Change From Baseline on Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) at 12 Weeks
MWT measures ability of subject to remain awake. Subjects instructed to try and remain awake during series of four 30-minute periods (0900, 1100, 1300, and 1500) reclining in dark room. Each period was terminated immediately after sleep onset or at end of 30 minutes if no sleep occured. If subject fell asleep, they were awakened and not allowed to sleep for remainder of that 30 minute period. Change from Baseline to 12 weeks in mean sleep latency (measured in minutes)averaged from each of the four testing intervals was measured. The poorest outcome was 0 minutes the best was 30 minutes.
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at 4 Weeks
The CGI-C is a clinician's rating of disease severity compared with baseline as assessed by Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). CGI-C rates 7 responses: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. CGI-S measured 7 categories as well: normal, borderline ill, mildly ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill, among most extremely ill. Proportion of responders who had at least "minimally improved" in CGI-C ratings (as related to sleepiness) at 4 weeks were assessed.
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at 8 Weeks
The CGI-C is a clinician's rating of disease severity compared with baseline as assessed by Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). CGI-C rates 7 responses: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. CGI-S measured 7 categories as well: normal, borderline ill, mildly ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill, among most extremely ill. Proportion of responders who had at least "minimally improved" in CGI-C ratings (as related to sleepiness) at 8 weeks were assessed.
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at 12 Weeks
The CGI-C is a clinician's rating of disease severity compared with baseline as assessed by Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). CGI-C rates 7 responses: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. CGI-S measured 7 categories as well: normal, borderline ill, mildly ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill, among most extremely ill. Proportion of responders who had at least minimal improvement in CGI-C ratings (as related to sleepiness) were assessed.
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI C) at 4 Weeks - Full Scale
The CGI-C is a clinician's rating of disease severity compared with baseline as assessed by Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). CGI-C rates 7 responses: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. CGI-S measured 7 categories as well: normal, borderline ill, mildly ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill, among most extremely ill. The results for the number of participants who responded to each item on the full scale at 4 weeks are presented.
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at 8 Weeks - Full Scale
The CGI-C is a clinician's rating of disease severity compared with baseline as assessed by Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). CGI-C rates 7 responses: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. CGI-S measured 7 categories as well: normal, borderline ill, mildly ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill, among most extremely ill. The results for the number of participants who responded to each item on the full scale at 8 weeks are presented.
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at 12 Weeks - Full Scale
The CGI-C is a clinician's rating of disease severity compared with baseline as assessed by Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). CGI-C rates 7 responses: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. CGI-S measured 7 categories as well: normal, borderline ill, mildly ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill, among most extremely ill. The results for the number of participants who responded to each item on the full scale at 12 weeks are presented.
Change From Baseline on Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at 2 Weeks
ESS score is based on responses to questions (self administered) that assessed the propensity of the subject to fall asleep in 8 everyday situations (sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic, etc.) Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness. The change in ESS total score from baseline to two weeks are summarized.
Change From Baseline on Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at 4 Weeks
ESS score is based on responses to questions (self administered) that assessed the propensity of the subject to fall asleep in 8 everyday situations (sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic, etc.) Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness. The change in ESS total score from baseline to 4 weeks are summarized.
Change From Baseline on Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at 8 Weeks
ESS score is based on responses to questions (self administered) that assessed the propensity of the subject to fall asleep in 8 everyday situations (sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic, etc.) Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness. The change in ESS total score from baseline to 8 weeks are summarized.
Change From Baseline on Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at 12 Weeks
ESS score is based on responses to questions (self administered) that assessed the propensity of the subject to fall asleep in 8 everyday situations (sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic, etc.) Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness. The change in ESS total score from baseline to 12 weeks are summarized.
Number of Responders According to the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Score at 2 Weeks
ESS score is based on responses to questions (self administered) that assessed the propensity of the subject to fall asleep in 8 everyday situations (sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic, etc.) Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness. The number of responders who had a total ESS score < 10 and the number of non-responders with a total score >= 10 at 2 weeks are presented.
Number of Responders According to the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Score at 4 Weeks
ESS score is based on responses to questions (self administered) that assessed the propensity of the subject to fall asleep in 8 everyday situations (sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic, etc.) Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness. The number of responders who had a total ESS score < 10 and the number of non-responders with a total score >= 10 at 4 weeks are presented.
Number of Responders According to the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Score at 8 Weeks
ESS score is based on responses to questions (self administered) that assessed the propensity of the subject to fall asleep in 8 everyday situations (sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic, etc.) Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness. The number of responders who had a total ESS score < 10 and the number of non-responders with a total score >= 10 at 8 weeks are presented.
Number of Responders According to the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Score at 12 Weeks
ESS score is based on responses to questions (self administered) that assessed the propensity of the subject to fall asleep in 8 everyday situations (sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic, etc.) Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness. The number of responders who had a total ESS score < 10 and the number of non-responders with a total score >= 10 at 12 weeks are presented.
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 12 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Total Score
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The total score is calculated by taking the sum of all 9 rating scales for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 90. This assessment examines the difference in total BFI score from Baseline to 12 weeks or last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Total Score at 2 Weeks
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The total score is calculated by taking the sum of all 9 rating scales for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 90. This assessment examines the difference in total BFI score from Baseline to 2 weeks.
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Total Score at 4 Weeks
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The total score is calculated by taking the sum of all 9 rating scales for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 90. This assessment examines the difference in total BFI score from Baseline to 4 weeks.
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Total Score at 8 Weeks
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The total score is calculated by taking the sum of all 9 rating scales for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 90. This assessment examines the difference in total BFI score from Baseline to 8 weeks.
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Total Score at 12 Weeks
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The total score is calculated by taking the sum of all 9 rating scales for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 90. This assessment examines the difference in total BFI score from Baseline to 12 weeks.
Change From Baseline on the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worst Daily Fatigue Score at Endpoint (12 Weeks or Last Observation After Baseline)
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with >= 7 indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. This measure compares the change in score from baseline to Week 12 (or last observation after baseline).
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worse Daily Fatigue Score at 2 Weeks
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. This measure compares the change in score from baseline to Week 2.
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worse Daily Fatigue Score at 4 Weeks
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. This measure compares the change in score from baseline to Week 4.
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worse Daily Fatigue Score at 8 Weeks
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. This measure compares the change in score from baseline to Week 8.
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worse Daily Fatigue Score at 12 Weeks
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. This measure compares the change in score from baseline to Week 12.
Number of Responders According to Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worst Fatigue Score at Endpoint (12 Weeks or Last Observation After Baseline)
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. Subjects were considered responders if the final Worst Fatigue Score was < 7 at Week 12 or last observation after baseline.
Number of Responders According to the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worst Fatigue Score at 2 Weeks
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. Subjects were considered responders if the final Worst Fatigue Score was < 7 at Week 2.
Number of Responders According to the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worst Fatigue Score at 4 Weeks
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. Subjects were considered responders if the final Worst Fatigue Score was < 7 at Week 4.
Number of Responders According to the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worst Fatigue Score at 8 Weeks
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. Subjects were considered responders if the final Worst Fatigue Score was < 7 at Week 8.
Number of Responders According to the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worst Fatigue Score at 12 Weeks
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. Subjects were considered responders if the final Worst Fatigue Score was < 7 at Week 12.
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Interference Score at Endpoint (12 Weeks or Last Observation After Baseline)
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The Interference Score consists of 6 questions that ask subjects to rate on a 0 to 10 scale how during the past 24 hours fatigue has interfered with their general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. The scores are averaged (0-10) for the Interference Score.
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Interference Score at 2 Weeks
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The Interference Score consists of 6 questions that ask subjects to rate on a 0 to 10 scale how during the past 24 hours fatigue has interfered with their general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. The scores are averaged (0-10) for the Interference Score.
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Interference Score at 4 Weeks
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The Interference Score consists of 6 questions that ask subjects to rate on a 0 to 10 scale how during the past 24 hours fatigue has interfered with their general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. The scores are averaged (0-10) for the Interference Score.
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Interference Score at 8 Weeks
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The Interference Score consists of 6 questions that ask subjects to rate on a 0 to 10 scale how during the past 24 hours fatigue has interfered with their general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. The scores are averaged (0-10) for the Interference Score.
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Interference Score at 12 Weeks (or Last Observation After Baseline)
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The Interference Score consists of 6 questions that ask subjects to rate on a 0 to 10 scale how during the past 24 hours fatigue has interfered with their general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. The scores are averaged (0-10) for the Interference Score.
Change From Baseline on Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) Total Score at Endpoint (12 Weeks or Last Observation After Baseline)
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score (minimum of 2 maximum of 120) was calculated from the responses. The change in total score from baseline to Endpoint (12 weeks or last observation after baseline) is presented here.
Change From Baseline on Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) Total Score at 2 Weeks
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score (minimum = 2 maximum = 120) was calculated from the responses. The change in total score from baseline to 2 weeks is presented here.
Change From Baseline on Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) Total Score at 4 Weeks
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score (minimum = 2 maximum = 120) was calculated from the responses. The change in total score from baseline to 4 weeks is presented here.
Change From Baseline on Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) Total Score at 8 Weeks
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score (minimum = 2 maximum = 120) was calculated from the responses. The change in total score from baseline to 8 weeks is presented here.
Change From Baseline on Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) Total Score at 12 Weeks
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score (minimum = 2 maximum = 120) was calculated from the responses. The change in total score from baseline to 12 weeks is presented here.
Number of Responders According to the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) Total Score at Endpoint (Week 12 or Last Observation After Baseline)
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score (minimum = 2 maximum = 120) was calculated from the responses. A responder analysis defining responders as patients with a total score > 17.9 at Endpoint (12 weeks or last observation after baseline) is presented.
Number of Responders According to the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) Total Score at 2 Weeks
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score (minimum=2 maximum=120) was calculated from the responses. A responder analysis defining responders as patients with a total score > 17.9 at 2 weeks is presented here.
Number of Responders According to the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) at Week 4
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score (minimum=2 maximum = 120) was calculated from the responses. A responder analysis defining responders as patients with a total score > 17.9 at 4 weeks is presented here.
Number of Responders According to the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) at Week 8
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score was calculated from the responses (minimum = 2 maximum = 120). A responder analysis defining responders as patients with a total score > 17.9 at 8 weeks is presented here.
Number of Responders According to the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) at Week 12
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score (minimum = 2 maximum = 120) was calculated from the responses. A responder analysis defining responders as patients with a total score > 17.9 at 12 weeks is presented here.
Change From Baseline on Medical Outcomes Study 6 Item Cognitive Functioning (MOS-CF6) Scale at Endpoint (12 Weeks or Last Observation After Baseline)
The MOS-CF6 assesses self-reported cognitive function. Items were selected to cover 6 relevant aspects of cognitive functioning:confusion, concentration/thinking, attention, memory, reasoning, problem-solving, and processing speed. Responses range from "none of the time" to "all of the time". The MOS-CF6 is scored by summing responses across the 6 items and converting the total to a 0 - 100 point scale, with the higher score indicating better cognitive functioning. Data is presented showing the change in score from baseline to Endpoint (12 weeks or last observation after baseline).
Change From Baseline on Medical Outcomes Study 6 Item Cognitive Functioning (MOS-CF6) Scale at 2 Weeks
The MOS-CF6 assesses self-reported cognitive function. Items were selected to cover 6 relevant aspects of cognitive functioning as follows: confusion, concentration/thinking, attention, memory, reasoning, problem-solving, and processing speed. The MOS-CF6 responses includes 6 choices, ranging from "none of the time" to "all of the time". The MOS-CF6 is scored by summing responses across the 6 items and converting the total to a 0 - 100 point scale, with the higher score indicating better cognitive functioning. Data is presented showing the change in score from baseline to 2 weeks.
Change From Baseline on Medical Outcomes Study 6 Item Cognitive Functioning (MOS-CF6) Scale at 4 Weeks
The MOS-CF6 assesses self-reported cognitive function. Items were selected to cover 6 relevant aspects of cognitive functioning as follows: confusion, concentration/thinking, attention, memory, reasoning, problem-solving, and processing speed. The MOS-CF6 responses includes 6 choices, ranging from "none of the time" to "all of the time". The MOS-CF6 is scored by summing responses across the 6 items and converting the total to a 0 - 100 point scale, with the higher score indicating better cognitive functioning. Data is presented showing the change in score from baseline to 4 weeks.
Change From Baseline on Medical Outcomes Study 6 Item Cognitive Functioning (MOS-CF6) Scale at 8 Weeks
The MOS-CF6 assesses self-reported cognitive function. Items were selected to cover 6 relevant aspects of cognitive functioning as follows: confusion, concentration/thinking, attention, memory, reasoning, problem-solving, and processing speed. The MOS-CF6 responses includes 6 choices, ranging from "none of the time" to "all of the time". The MOS-CF6 is scored by summing responses across the 6 items and converting the total to a 0 - 100 point scale, with the higher score indicating better cognitive functioning. Data is presented showing the change in score from baseline to 8 weeks.
Change From Baseline on Medical Outcomes Study 6 Item Cognitive Functioning (MOS-CF6) Scale at 12 Weeks
The MOS-CF6 assesses self-reported cognitive function. Items were selected to cover 6 relevant aspects of cognitive functioning as follows: confusion, concentration/thinking, attention, memory, reasoning, problem-solving, and processing speed. The MOS-CF6 responses includes 6 choices, ranging from "none of the time" to "all of the time". The MOS-CF6 is scored by summing responses across the 6 items and converting the total to a 0 - 100 point scale, with the higher score indicating better cognitive functioning. Data is presented showing the change in score from baseline to 12 weeks.
Change From Baseline in the Excessive Sleepiness (ES) Symptom Rating Form - Sleepiness Scores at Endpoint (12 Weeks or Last Observation After Baseline)
The Excessive Sleepiness Symptom Rating Form was used to assess symptoms of excessive sleepiness. Patients rate 7 symptoms(tiredness, fatigue, sleepiness, lack of energy, trouble paying attention, forgetfulness, trouble staying organized) on an 11-point Likert scale (0 = no problem at all to 10 = as bad as you can imagine). ES Symptom Rating Form was designed to follow the response to treatment measuring severity of each of these 7 symptoms using the same 11-point scale. Change from Baseline to Endpoint (12 weeks or last baseline observation) is presented only for the symptom of "Sleepiness".
Change From Baseline in the Excessive Sleepiness (ES) Symptom Rating Form - Sleepiness Scores at 2 Weeks
Cephalon created the Excessive Sleepiness Symptom Rating Form to assess symptoms of excessive sleepiness. Patients rate 7 symptoms(Tiredness, Fatigue, Sleepiness, Lack of energy, Trouble paying attention, Forgetfulness, Trouble staying organized) each on an 11-point Likert scale(0="no problem at all" 10="as bad as you can imagine"). ES Symptom Rating Form was designed to follow the response to treatment (measuring severity) of each of these 7 symptoms using the same 11-point scale. Change from Baseline to 2 Weeks is presented only for the symptom of "Sleepiness".
Change From Baseline in the Excessive Sleepiness (ES) Symptom Rating Form - Sleepiness Scores at 4 Weeks
Cephalon created the Excessive Sleepiness Symptom Rating Form to assess symptoms of excessive sleepiness. Patients rate 7 symptoms(Tiredness, Fatigue, Sleepiness, Lack of energy, Trouble paying attention, Forgetfulness, Trouble staying organized) each on an 11-point Likert scale(0="no problem at all" 10="as bad as you can imagine"). ES Symptom Rating Form was designed to follow the response to treatment (measuring severity) of each of these 7 symptoms using the same 11-point scale. Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks is presented only for the symptom of "Sleepiness".
Change From Baseline in the Excessive Sleepiness (ES) Symptom Rating Form - Sleepiness Scores at 8 Weeks
Cephalon created the Excessive Sleepiness Symptom Rating Form to assess symptoms of excessive sleepiness. Patients rate 7 symptoms(Tiredness, Fatigue, Sleepiness, Lack of energy, Trouble paying attention, Forgetfulness, Trouble staying organized) each on an 11-point Likert scale(0="no problem at all" 10="as bad as you can imagine"). ES Symptom Rating Form was designed to follow the response to treatment (measuring severity) of each of these 7 symptoms using the same 11-point scale. Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks is presented only for the symptom of "Sleepiness".
Change From Baseline in the Excessive Sleepiness (ES) Symptom Rating Form - Sleepiness Scores at 12 Weeks
Cephalon created the Excessive Sleepiness Symptom Rating Form to assess symptoms of excessive sleepiness. Patients rate 7 symptoms(Tiredness, Fatigue, Sleepiness, Lack of energy, Trouble paying attention, Forgetfulness, Trouble staying organized) each on an 11-point Likert scale(0="no problem at all" 10="as bad as you can imagine"). ES Symptom Rating Form was designed to follow the response to treatment (measuring severity) of each of these 7 symptoms using the same 11-point scale. Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks is presented only for the symptom of "Sleepiness".

Full Information

First Posted
August 17, 2007
Last Updated
July 12, 2013
Sponsor
Cephalon
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00518986
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety of Armodafinil for Adults With Excessive Sleepiness Obstructive Sleep Apnea/Hypopnea and Depression
Official Title
Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Armodafinil for Adults With Excessive Sleepiness Associated With Obstructive Sleep Apnea/Hypopnea Syndrome With Major Depressive Disorder or Dysthymic Disorder
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2009 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Cephalon

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate whether armodafinil at a target dosage of 200 mg/day is more effective than placebo treatment in improving excessive sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) who have comorbid major depressive disorder or dysthymic disorder.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Sleep Disorders, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Major Depressive Disorder, Dysthymic Disorder
Keywords
Obstructive Sleep Apnea/Hypopnea Syndrome, Excessive Sleepiness

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
249 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
armodafinil 200 mg/day
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
armodafinil
Intervention Description
200 mg/day
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
placebo
Intervention Description
placebo
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline on Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) to Endpoint (12 Weeks or Last Observation After Baseline)
Description
MWT measures ability of subject to remain awake. Subjects instructed to try and remain awake during series of 4 30-minute periods (0900, 1100, 1300, and 1500) reclining in dark room. Each period was terminated immediately after sleep onset or at end of 30 minutes if no sleep occurred. If subject fell asleep, they were awakened and not allowed to sleep for remainder of that 30 minute period. Change from Baseline to Endpoint (12 weeks or last observation after baseline) in mean sleep latency averaged from the 4 intervals was measured. Poorest outcome was 0 minutes the best was 30 minutes.
Time Frame
Baseline and 12 weeks (or last observation after baseline)
Title
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at Endpoint (12-weeks or Last Observation After Baseline)
Description
The CGI-C is a clinician's rating of disease severity compared with baseline as assessed by Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). CGI-C rates improvement by 7 categories: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. CGI-S measured 7 categories of illness as well: normal, borderline ill, mildly ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill, among most extremely ill. Proportion of responders who had at least "minimally improved" in CGI-C ratings (as related to sleepiness) were assessed.
Time Frame
12 weeks (or last observation after baseline)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at Endpoint (12 Weeks or Last Measurement After Baseline)
Description
For this key secondary outcome the ESS score is based on responses to questions (self administered) that assessed the propensity of the subject to fall asleep in 8 everyday situations (sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic, etc.) Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness. The change in ESS total score from baseline to Endpoint (12 weeks or last observation after baseline) are summarized.
Time Frame
Baseline and 12 weeks (or last observation after baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline on Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) at 4 Weeks
Description
MWT measures ability of subject to remain awake. Subjects instructed to try and remain awake during series of four 30-minute periods (0900, 1100, 1300, and 1500) reclining in dark room. Each period was terminated immediately after sleep onset or at end of 30 minutes if no sleep occured. If subject fell asleep, they were awakened and not allowed to sleep for remainder of that 30 minute period. Change from Baseline to 4 weeks in mean sleep latency (measured in minutes)averaged from each of the four testing intervals was measured. The poorest outcome was 0 minutes the best was 30 minutes.
Time Frame
baseline and 4 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline on Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) at 8 Weeks
Description
MWT measures ability of subject to remain awake. Subjects instructed to try and remain awake during series of four 30-minute periods (0900, 1100, 1300, and 1500) reclining in dark room. Each period was terminated immediately after sleep onset or at end of 30 minutes if no sleep occured. If subject fell asleep, they were awakened and not allowed to sleep for remainder of that 30 minute period. Change from Baseline to 8 weeks in mean sleep latency (measured in minutes)averaged from each of the four testing intervals was measured. The poorest outcome was 0 minutes the best was 30 minutes.
Time Frame
Baseline and 8 weeks following start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) at 12 Weeks
Description
MWT measures ability of subject to remain awake. Subjects instructed to try and remain awake during series of four 30-minute periods (0900, 1100, 1300, and 1500) reclining in dark room. Each period was terminated immediately after sleep onset or at end of 30 minutes if no sleep occured. If subject fell asleep, they were awakened and not allowed to sleep for remainder of that 30 minute period. Change from Baseline to 12 weeks in mean sleep latency (measured in minutes)averaged from each of the four testing intervals was measured. The poorest outcome was 0 minutes the best was 30 minutes.
Time Frame
baseline and 12 weeks (or last observation after baseline)
Title
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at 4 Weeks
Description
The CGI-C is a clinician's rating of disease severity compared with baseline as assessed by Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). CGI-C rates 7 responses: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. CGI-S measured 7 categories as well: normal, borderline ill, mildly ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill, among most extremely ill. Proportion of responders who had at least "minimally improved" in CGI-C ratings (as related to sleepiness) at 4 weeks were assessed.
Time Frame
4 weeks after beginning study drug treatment
Title
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at 8 Weeks
Description
The CGI-C is a clinician's rating of disease severity compared with baseline as assessed by Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). CGI-C rates 7 responses: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. CGI-S measured 7 categories as well: normal, borderline ill, mildly ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill, among most extremely ill. Proportion of responders who had at least "minimally improved" in CGI-C ratings (as related to sleepiness) at 8 weeks were assessed.
Time Frame
8 weeks after beginning study drug treatment
Title
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at 12 Weeks
Description
The CGI-C is a clinician's rating of disease severity compared with baseline as assessed by Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). CGI-C rates 7 responses: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. CGI-S measured 7 categories as well: normal, borderline ill, mildly ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill, among most extremely ill. Proportion of responders who had at least minimal improvement in CGI-C ratings (as related to sleepiness) were assessed.
Time Frame
12 weeks after beginning treatment
Title
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI C) at 4 Weeks - Full Scale
Description
The CGI-C is a clinician's rating of disease severity compared with baseline as assessed by Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). CGI-C rates 7 responses: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. CGI-S measured 7 categories as well: normal, borderline ill, mildly ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill, among most extremely ill. The results for the number of participants who responded to each item on the full scale at 4 weeks are presented.
Time Frame
4 weeks after start of treatment
Title
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at 8 Weeks - Full Scale
Description
The CGI-C is a clinician's rating of disease severity compared with baseline as assessed by Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). CGI-C rates 7 responses: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. CGI-S measured 7 categories as well: normal, borderline ill, mildly ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill, among most extremely ill. The results for the number of participants who responded to each item on the full scale at 8 weeks are presented.
Time Frame
8 weeks after start of study drug treatment
Title
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at 12 Weeks - Full Scale
Description
The CGI-C is a clinician's rating of disease severity compared with baseline as assessed by Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). CGI-C rates 7 responses: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. CGI-S measured 7 categories as well: normal, borderline ill, mildly ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill, among most extremely ill. The results for the number of participants who responded to each item on the full scale at 12 weeks are presented.
Time Frame
12 weeks after starting study drug treatment
Title
Change From Baseline on Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at 2 Weeks
Description
ESS score is based on responses to questions (self administered) that assessed the propensity of the subject to fall asleep in 8 everyday situations (sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic, etc.) Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness. The change in ESS total score from baseline to two weeks are summarized.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 weeks following start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at 4 Weeks
Description
ESS score is based on responses to questions (self administered) that assessed the propensity of the subject to fall asleep in 8 everyday situations (sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic, etc.) Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness. The change in ESS total score from baseline to 4 weeks are summarized.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks after start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at 8 Weeks
Description
ESS score is based on responses to questions (self administered) that assessed the propensity of the subject to fall asleep in 8 everyday situations (sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic, etc.) Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness. The change in ESS total score from baseline to 8 weeks are summarized.
Time Frame
Baseline and 8 weeks after start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at 12 Weeks
Description
ESS score is based on responses to questions (self administered) that assessed the propensity of the subject to fall asleep in 8 everyday situations (sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic, etc.) Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness. The change in ESS total score from baseline to 12 weeks are summarized.
Time Frame
12 weeks (or last observation after baseline)
Title
Number of Responders According to the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Score at 2 Weeks
Description
ESS score is based on responses to questions (self administered) that assessed the propensity of the subject to fall asleep in 8 everyday situations (sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic, etc.) Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness. The number of responders who had a total ESS score < 10 and the number of non-responders with a total score >= 10 at 2 weeks are presented.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Number of Responders According to the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Score at 4 Weeks
Description
ESS score is based on responses to questions (self administered) that assessed the propensity of the subject to fall asleep in 8 everyday situations (sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic, etc.) Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness. The number of responders who had a total ESS score < 10 and the number of non-responders with a total score >= 10 at 4 weeks are presented.
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Number of Responders According to the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Score at 8 Weeks
Description
ESS score is based on responses to questions (self administered) that assessed the propensity of the subject to fall asleep in 8 everyday situations (sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic, etc.) Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness. The number of responders who had a total ESS score < 10 and the number of non-responders with a total score >= 10 at 8 weeks are presented.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Number of Responders According to the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Score at 12 Weeks
Description
ESS score is based on responses to questions (self administered) that assessed the propensity of the subject to fall asleep in 8 everyday situations (sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic, etc.) Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness. The number of responders who had a total ESS score < 10 and the number of non-responders with a total score >= 10 at 12 weeks are presented.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 12 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Total Score
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The total score is calculated by taking the sum of all 9 rating scales for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 90. This assessment examines the difference in total BFI score from Baseline to 12 weeks or last observation after baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and 12 weeks following start of study drug administration or last recorded observation
Title
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Total Score at 2 Weeks
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The total score is calculated by taking the sum of all 9 rating scales for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 90. This assessment examines the difference in total BFI score from Baseline to 2 weeks.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 weeks after start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Total Score at 4 Weeks
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The total score is calculated by taking the sum of all 9 rating scales for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 90. This assessment examines the difference in total BFI score from Baseline to 4 weeks.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks after start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Total Score at 8 Weeks
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The total score is calculated by taking the sum of all 9 rating scales for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 90. This assessment examines the difference in total BFI score from Baseline to 8 weeks.
Time Frame
Baseline and 8 weeks after start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Total Score at 12 Weeks
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The total score is calculated by taking the sum of all 9 rating scales for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 90. This assessment examines the difference in total BFI score from Baseline to 12 weeks.
Time Frame
Baseline and 12 weeks after start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worst Daily Fatigue Score at Endpoint (12 Weeks or Last Observation After Baseline)
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with >= 7 indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. This measure compares the change in score from baseline to Week 12 (or last observation after baseline).
Time Frame
Baseline and 12 weeks or last observation after baseline
Title
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worse Daily Fatigue Score at 2 Weeks
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. This measure compares the change in score from baseline to Week 2.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 weeks after start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worse Daily Fatigue Score at 4 Weeks
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. This measure compares the change in score from baseline to Week 4.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks after start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worse Daily Fatigue Score at 8 Weeks
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. This measure compares the change in score from baseline to Week 8.
Time Frame
Baseline and 8 weeks after start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worse Daily Fatigue Score at 12 Weeks
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. This measure compares the change in score from baseline to Week 12.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Number of Responders According to Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worst Fatigue Score at Endpoint (12 Weeks or Last Observation After Baseline)
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. Subjects were considered responders if the final Worst Fatigue Score was < 7 at Week 12 or last observation after baseline.
Time Frame
12 weeks after start of study drug administration (or last observation after baseline)
Title
Number of Responders According to the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worst Fatigue Score at 2 Weeks
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. Subjects were considered responders if the final Worst Fatigue Score was < 7 at Week 2.
Time Frame
2 weeks after start of study drug administration
Title
Number of Responders According to the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worst Fatigue Score at 4 Weeks
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. Subjects were considered responders if the final Worst Fatigue Score was < 7 at Week 4.
Time Frame
4 weeks after start of study drug administration
Title
Number of Responders According to the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worst Fatigue Score at 8 Weeks
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. Subjects were considered responders if the final Worst Fatigue Score was < 7 at Week 8.
Time Frame
8 weeks after start of study drug administration
Title
Number of Responders According to the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worst Fatigue Score at 12 Weeks
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The worst daily fatigue score reports the outcome of a single item on the BFI that rates the worst fatigue experienced over the day on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being most severe. Subjects were considered responders if the final Worst Fatigue Score was < 7 at Week 12.
Time Frame
12 weeks after start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Interference Score at Endpoint (12 Weeks or Last Observation After Baseline)
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The Interference Score consists of 6 questions that ask subjects to rate on a 0 to 10 scale how during the past 24 hours fatigue has interfered with their general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. The scores are averaged (0-10) for the Interference Score.
Time Frame
Baseline and at endpoint (12 weeks or last observation after baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Interference Score at 2 Weeks
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The Interference Score consists of 6 questions that ask subjects to rate on a 0 to 10 scale how during the past 24 hours fatigue has interfered with their general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. The scores are averaged (0-10) for the Interference Score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 weeks after start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Interference Score at 4 Weeks
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The Interference Score consists of 6 questions that ask subjects to rate on a 0 to 10 scale how during the past 24 hours fatigue has interfered with their general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. The scores are averaged (0-10) for the Interference Score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks after start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Interference Score at 8 Weeks
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The Interference Score consists of 6 questions that ask subjects to rate on a 0 to 10 scale how during the past 24 hours fatigue has interfered with their general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. The scores are averaged (0-10) for the Interference Score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 8 weeks after start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Interference Score at 12 Weeks (or Last Observation After Baseline)
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Simple numeric rating scales from 0 to 10 are used. The higher scores are associated with more severe fatigue, with any score >= 7 considered to be indicative of severe fatigue. The Interference Score consists of 6 questions that ask subjects to rate on a 0 to 10 scale how during the past 24 hours fatigue has interfered with their general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. The scores are averaged (0-10) for the Interference Score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 12 weeks after start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) Total Score at Endpoint (12 Weeks or Last Observation After Baseline)
Description
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score (minimum of 2 maximum of 120) was calculated from the responses. The change in total score from baseline to Endpoint (12 weeks or last observation after baseline) is presented here.
Time Frame
Baseline and endpoint (12 weeks after start of study drug or last observation after baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline on Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) Total Score at 2 Weeks
Description
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score (minimum = 2 maximum = 120) was calculated from the responses. The change in total score from baseline to 2 weeks is presented here.
Time Frame
baseline and 2 weeks following start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) Total Score at 4 Weeks
Description
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score (minimum = 2 maximum = 120) was calculated from the responses. The change in total score from baseline to 4 weeks is presented here.
Time Frame
baseline and 4 weeks following start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) Total Score at 8 Weeks
Description
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score (minimum = 2 maximum = 120) was calculated from the responses. The change in total score from baseline to 8 weeks is presented here.
Time Frame
baseline and 8 weeks following start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) Total Score at 12 Weeks
Description
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score (minimum = 2 maximum = 120) was calculated from the responses. The change in total score from baseline to 12 weeks is presented here.
Time Frame
baseline and 12 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Number of Responders According to the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) Total Score at Endpoint (Week 12 or Last Observation After Baseline)
Description
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score (minimum = 2 maximum = 120) was calculated from the responses. A responder analysis defining responders as patients with a total score > 17.9 at Endpoint (12 weeks or last observation after baseline) is presented.
Time Frame
Endpoint (week 12 or last observation after baseline)
Title
Number of Responders According to the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) Total Score at 2 Weeks
Description
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score (minimum=2 maximum=120) was calculated from the responses. A responder analysis defining responders as patients with a total score > 17.9 at 2 weeks is presented here.
Time Frame
2 weeks following start of study drug administration
Title
Number of Responders According to the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) at Week 4
Description
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score (minimum=2 maximum = 120) was calculated from the responses. A responder analysis defining responders as patients with a total score > 17.9 at 4 weeks is presented here.
Time Frame
4 weeks following start of study drug administration
Title
Number of Responders According to the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) at Week 8
Description
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score was calculated from the responses (minimum = 2 maximum = 120). A responder analysis defining responders as patients with a total score > 17.9 at 8 weeks is presented here.
Time Frame
8 weeks following start of study drug administration
Title
Number of Responders According to the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) at Week 12
Description
The FOSQ is a self-administered questionnaire that assess the impact of excessive sleepiness on functional outcomes relevant to daily behaviors. The questionnaire contains 30 questions each rated from 1 to 4 (1 indicating extreme difficulty 4 indicating no difficulty, or 0 indicating not applicable). A total score (minimum = 2 maximum = 120) was calculated from the responses. A responder analysis defining responders as patients with a total score > 17.9 at 12 weeks is presented here.
Time Frame
12 weeks following the start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Medical Outcomes Study 6 Item Cognitive Functioning (MOS-CF6) Scale at Endpoint (12 Weeks or Last Observation After Baseline)
Description
The MOS-CF6 assesses self-reported cognitive function. Items were selected to cover 6 relevant aspects of cognitive functioning:confusion, concentration/thinking, attention, memory, reasoning, problem-solving, and processing speed. Responses range from "none of the time" to "all of the time". The MOS-CF6 is scored by summing responses across the 6 items and converting the total to a 0 - 100 point scale, with the higher score indicating better cognitive functioning. Data is presented showing the change in score from baseline to Endpoint (12 weeks or last observation after baseline).
Time Frame
Baseline and Endpoint (12 weeks or last observation after baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline on Medical Outcomes Study 6 Item Cognitive Functioning (MOS-CF6) Scale at 2 Weeks
Description
The MOS-CF6 assesses self-reported cognitive function. Items were selected to cover 6 relevant aspects of cognitive functioning as follows: confusion, concentration/thinking, attention, memory, reasoning, problem-solving, and processing speed. The MOS-CF6 responses includes 6 choices, ranging from "none of the time" to "all of the time". The MOS-CF6 is scored by summing responses across the 6 items and converting the total to a 0 - 100 point scale, with the higher score indicating better cognitive functioning. Data is presented showing the change in score from baseline to 2 weeks.
Time Frame
baseline and 2 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline on Medical Outcomes Study 6 Item Cognitive Functioning (MOS-CF6) Scale at 4 Weeks
Description
The MOS-CF6 assesses self-reported cognitive function. Items were selected to cover 6 relevant aspects of cognitive functioning as follows: confusion, concentration/thinking, attention, memory, reasoning, problem-solving, and processing speed. The MOS-CF6 responses includes 6 choices, ranging from "none of the time" to "all of the time". The MOS-CF6 is scored by summing responses across the 6 items and converting the total to a 0 - 100 point scale, with the higher score indicating better cognitive functioning. Data is presented showing the change in score from baseline to 4 weeks.
Time Frame
baseline and 4 weeks following start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Medical Outcomes Study 6 Item Cognitive Functioning (MOS-CF6) Scale at 8 Weeks
Description
The MOS-CF6 assesses self-reported cognitive function. Items were selected to cover 6 relevant aspects of cognitive functioning as follows: confusion, concentration/thinking, attention, memory, reasoning, problem-solving, and processing speed. The MOS-CF6 responses includes 6 choices, ranging from "none of the time" to "all of the time". The MOS-CF6 is scored by summing responses across the 6 items and converting the total to a 0 - 100 point scale, with the higher score indicating better cognitive functioning. Data is presented showing the change in score from baseline to 8 weeks.
Time Frame
baseline and 8 weeks following start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline on Medical Outcomes Study 6 Item Cognitive Functioning (MOS-CF6) Scale at 12 Weeks
Description
The MOS-CF6 assesses self-reported cognitive function. Items were selected to cover 6 relevant aspects of cognitive functioning as follows: confusion, concentration/thinking, attention, memory, reasoning, problem-solving, and processing speed. The MOS-CF6 responses includes 6 choices, ranging from "none of the time" to "all of the time". The MOS-CF6 is scored by summing responses across the 6 items and converting the total to a 0 - 100 point scale, with the higher score indicating better cognitive functioning. Data is presented showing the change in score from baseline to 12 weeks.
Time Frame
baseline and 12 weeks following start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline in the Excessive Sleepiness (ES) Symptom Rating Form - Sleepiness Scores at Endpoint (12 Weeks or Last Observation After Baseline)
Description
The Excessive Sleepiness Symptom Rating Form was used to assess symptoms of excessive sleepiness. Patients rate 7 symptoms(tiredness, fatigue, sleepiness, lack of energy, trouble paying attention, forgetfulness, trouble staying organized) on an 11-point Likert scale (0 = no problem at all to 10 = as bad as you can imagine). ES Symptom Rating Form was designed to follow the response to treatment measuring severity of each of these 7 symptoms using the same 11-point scale. Change from Baseline to Endpoint (12 weeks or last baseline observation) is presented only for the symptom of "Sleepiness".
Time Frame
Baseline and Endpoint (12 weeks or last observation after baseline)
Title
Change From Baseline in the Excessive Sleepiness (ES) Symptom Rating Form - Sleepiness Scores at 2 Weeks
Description
Cephalon created the Excessive Sleepiness Symptom Rating Form to assess symptoms of excessive sleepiness. Patients rate 7 symptoms(Tiredness, Fatigue, Sleepiness, Lack of energy, Trouble paying attention, Forgetfulness, Trouble staying organized) each on an 11-point Likert scale(0="no problem at all" 10="as bad as you can imagine"). ES Symptom Rating Form was designed to follow the response to treatment (measuring severity) of each of these 7 symptoms using the same 11-point scale. Change from Baseline to 2 Weeks is presented only for the symptom of "Sleepiness".
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in the Excessive Sleepiness (ES) Symptom Rating Form - Sleepiness Scores at 4 Weeks
Description
Cephalon created the Excessive Sleepiness Symptom Rating Form to assess symptoms of excessive sleepiness. Patients rate 7 symptoms(Tiredness, Fatigue, Sleepiness, Lack of energy, Trouble paying attention, Forgetfulness, Trouble staying organized) each on an 11-point Likert scale(0="no problem at all" 10="as bad as you can imagine"). ES Symptom Rating Form was designed to follow the response to treatment (measuring severity) of each of these 7 symptoms using the same 11-point scale. Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks is presented only for the symptom of "Sleepiness".
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks following start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline in the Excessive Sleepiness (ES) Symptom Rating Form - Sleepiness Scores at 8 Weeks
Description
Cephalon created the Excessive Sleepiness Symptom Rating Form to assess symptoms of excessive sleepiness. Patients rate 7 symptoms(Tiredness, Fatigue, Sleepiness, Lack of energy, Trouble paying attention, Forgetfulness, Trouble staying organized) each on an 11-point Likert scale(0="no problem at all" 10="as bad as you can imagine"). ES Symptom Rating Form was designed to follow the response to treatment (measuring severity) of each of these 7 symptoms using the same 11-point scale. Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks is presented only for the symptom of "Sleepiness".
Time Frame
baseline and 8 weeks following start of study drug administration
Title
Change From Baseline in the Excessive Sleepiness (ES) Symptom Rating Form - Sleepiness Scores at 12 Weeks
Description
Cephalon created the Excessive Sleepiness Symptom Rating Form to assess symptoms of excessive sleepiness. Patients rate 7 symptoms(Tiredness, Fatigue, Sleepiness, Lack of energy, Trouble paying attention, Forgetfulness, Trouble staying organized) each on an 11-point Likert scale(0="no problem at all" 10="as bad as you can imagine"). ES Symptom Rating Form was designed to follow the response to treatment (measuring severity) of each of these 7 symptoms using the same 11-point scale. Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks is presented only for the symptom of "Sleepiness".
Time Frame
Baseline and 12 weeks following start of study drug administration

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Current diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) Complaint of residual excessive sleepiness despite nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) therapy being effective Current or prior diagnosis of major depressive disorder or dysthymic disorder Clinically stable with regard to depressed mood and has shown a treatment response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) therapy Patient has been on a stable monotherapy dose of an allowed SSRI or SNRI for at least 8 weeks at the time of screening Women of childbearing potential must use a medically accepted method of contraception. Exclusion Criteria: Confirmed or suspected diagnosis of a currently active sleep disorder other than obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) Current episode of major depression that is considered to be treatment-resistant A primary diagnosis of: eating disorder, psychotic disorder, delirium, dementia, substance-related disorders, or moderate to severe hypochondriasis Patient has a history of bipolar disorder, psychotic depression, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, any other psychotic disorder, or other clinically significant uncontrolled psychiatric condition. Patient has a history of homicidal ideation or significant aggression Patient has a diagnosis of severe antisocial or borderline personality disorder Has a history of significant suicidal ideation, or has current active suicidal ideation, or is considered at imminent risk of self harm. Patient has a history consistent with fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue syndrome A high consumption of caffeinated products, approximately equivalent to 5 or more cups of coffee per day Patient history of any clinically significant cutaneous drug reaction, or a history of clinically significant hypersensitivity reaction Has a past or present seizure disorder Patient has a history of alcohol, narcotic, or any other substance abuse or dependence (with the exception of nicotine) Psychotherapeutic intervention for the patient was initiated within 8 weeks of the screening visit. Patient has known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Patient has any clinically significant uncontrolled medical condition (including illnesses related to the cardiovascular, renal, or hepatic systems) or surgical condition (treated or untreated) Patient is a pregnant or lactating woman Patient has previously received armodafinil; or, patient has used modafinil or any investigational product within 28 days of the baseline visit.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Jasper Summit Research, LLC
City
Jasper
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35501
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pulmonary Associates, P.A.
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85012
Country
United States
Facility Name
Psypharma Clinical Research
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85050
Country
United States
Facility Name
PsyPharm Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85712
Country
United States
Facility Name
Behavioral Research Specialists
City
Glendale
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91204
Country
United States
Facility Name
California Clinical Trials Medical Group, Inc.
City
Glendale
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91206
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pacific Sleep Medicine Services, Inc.
City
Redlands
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92373
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pacific Research Network, Inc.
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pacific Sleep Medicine Services, Inc.
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92121
Country
United States
Facility Name
California Clinical Trials Medical Group, Inc.
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92123
Country
United States
Facility Name
SDS Clinical Research
City
Santa Ana
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92704
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Johns Medical Plaza Sleep Disorders Center
City
Santa Monica
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90404
Country
United States
Facility Name
National Jewish Medical and Research Center
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80206
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rocky Mountain Center for Clinical Research
City
Wheat Ridge
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80033
Country
United States
Facility Name
PAB Clinical Research
City
Brandon
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33511
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Sleep Institute
City
Spring Hill
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34609
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Group of St. Petersburg
City
St. Petersburg
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33707
Country
United States
Facility Name
SomnoMedics
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Stedman Clinical Trials, LLC
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33613
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Pulmonary Research Center, LLC
City
Winter Park
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33613
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Sleep Disorders Center
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30339
Country
United States
Facility Name
Neurotrials Research, Inc
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30342
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sleep Disorders Center of Georgia
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30342
Country
United States
Facility Name
SleepMed, Inc
City
Macon
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Chicago Research Center
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60634
Country
United States
Facility Name
Peoria Pulmonary Associates
City
Peoria
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61603
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sleep and Behavior Medicine
City
Vernon Hills
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60061
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Center for Sleep and Wake Disorders
City
Danville
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vince & Associates Clinical Research
City
Overland Park
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66212
Country
United States
Facility Name
Graves Gilbert Clinic
City
Bowling Green
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
42101
Country
United States
Facility Name
Community Research
City
Crestview
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
45217
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Trials of America
City
Shreveport
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
71101
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Center for Sleep & Wake Disorders
City
Chevy Chase
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20815
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sleep Health Centers
City
Brighton
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02135
Country
United States
Facility Name
AccelRx Research
City
Fall River
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02721
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Center for Sleep Medicine
City
Hattiesburg
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
39406
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington University
City
St. Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63108
Country
United States
Facility Name
Somnos Sleep Center
City
Lincoln
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68510
Country
United States
Facility Name
Brooklyn Medical Institute
City
Brooklyn
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11223
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinilabs, Inc
City
New York City
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10019
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sleep Medicine Centers
City
West Seneca
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14224
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University Medical Center
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Trials of America
City
Hickory
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28601
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tri-State Sleep Disorders Center
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45246
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ohio Sleep Medicine Institute
City
Dublin
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43017
Country
United States
Facility Name
North Star Medical Research, LLC
City
Middleburg Heights
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44130
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Vincent Mercy Medical Center
City
Toledo
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43606
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lynn Health Science Institute
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73112
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sleep Lab of Northeastern PA
City
Clarks Summit
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
18411
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania Center for Sleep
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
CRI Worldwide
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19139
Country
United States
Facility Name
University Services
City
West Chester
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19380
Country
United States
Facility Name
AccelRx Research
City
Lincoln
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02865
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lowcountry Lung and Critical Care
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29406
Country
United States
Facility Name
SleepMed of South Carolina
City
Columbia
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sleep Medicine of Middle Tennessee
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37203
Country
United States
Facility Name
FutureSearch Trials of Neurology
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78756
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sleep Medicine Associates of Texas, P.A.
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor College of Medicine VAMC Sleep Research
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Houston Sleep Center
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77063
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwest Clinical Research
City
Bellevue
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98004
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pacific Sleep Medicine Services, Inc.
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98122
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20051221
Citation
Krystal AD, Harsh JR, Yang R, Rippon GA, Lankford DA. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of armodafinil for excessive sleepiness in patients with treated obstructive sleep apnea and comorbid depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;71(1):32-40. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05536gry. Epub 2009 Dec 29. Erratum In: J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;72(8):1157. Yang, Ronghua R [corrected to Yang, Ronghua].
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy and Safety of Armodafinil for Adults With Excessive Sleepiness Obstructive Sleep Apnea/Hypopnea and Depression

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs