search
Back to results

ConsultaTM CRT-D Clinical Evaluation Study

Primary Purpose

Tachyarrhythmias, Heart Failure, Ventricular Dysfunction

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Bi-ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
Sponsored by
Medtronic Bakken Research Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Tachyarrhythmias

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have an indication for a defibrillator.
  • Patients who are optimally treated with medication.
  • Patients who are New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a life expectancy less than the duration of the study.
  • Patients with medical conditions that preclude the testing required for all patients by the study protocol or that otherwise limit study participation required for all patients.
  • Patients with mechanical tricuspid heart valves.

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Implantation of Consulta CRT-D

Arm Description

Patients have an implant attempt with a Bi-ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Freedom From Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effects at 1-month Post Implant.
Percentage of subjects without an unanticipated serious adverse device effects at 1-month post implant.Only subjects implanted with a Consulta device that were followed at least 28 days post-implant or have had a unanticipated device effect within 28 days after implant were included in the analysis.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Adverse Events
Number of Adverse Events reported in the implanted subjects.
System Performance Assessed by Holter Records
The first 20 digital Holter records that were successfully collected in the total of 80 implanted subjects were analysed on observation of device features, ventricular arrhythmia detection times and device classification of ventricular arrhythmias.
System Performance Assessed by Save to Disk Files
94 Save to Disk files were reviewed on observation of device features, ventricular arrhythmia detection times and device classification of ventricular arrhythmias.
System Performance Assessed by Technical Observations
Reported technical observations will be reviewed to determine if there are any device performance issues.

Full Information

First Posted
September 6, 2007
Last Updated
March 25, 2019
Sponsor
Medtronic Bakken Research Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00526162
Brief Title
ConsultaTM CRT-D Clinical Evaluation Study
Official Title
Clinical Study to Evaluate System Safety and Clinical Performance of the ConsultaTM CRT-D Device
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2008 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2008 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Medtronic Bakken Research Center

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of the Consulta clinical study is to evaluate the overall system safety and clinical performance of the Consulta Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT-D).
Detailed Description
The Consulta CRT-D is an investigational bi-ventricular device that provides atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmia detection and therapy, cardioversion, defibrillation and cardiac resynchronization therapy. The study will be a prospective, non-randomized, multicenter clinical study, conducted in approximately 18 centers. To allow for sufficient experience with the device, a maximum of 80 subjects may be implanted with the Consulta device. Data will be collected at baseline (enrollment), implant, 1-, 3-, and 6- months post implant and every 6 months thereafter or until study closure (whichever occurs first), unscheduled follow-up visits, System Modifications, Technical Observations, Study Deviations, Study Exit, upon notification of new or updated Adverse Events and in case of death.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tachyarrhythmias, Heart Failure, Ventricular Dysfunction

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
83 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Implantation of Consulta CRT-D
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients have an implant attempt with a Bi-ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Bi-ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
Other Intervention Name(s)
ConsultaTM
Intervention Description
Implantation of a Bi-ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Freedom From Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effects at 1-month Post Implant.
Description
Percentage of subjects without an unanticipated serious adverse device effects at 1-month post implant.Only subjects implanted with a Consulta device that were followed at least 28 days post-implant or have had a unanticipated device effect within 28 days after implant were included in the analysis.
Time Frame
1 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Adverse Events
Description
Number of Adverse Events reported in the implanted subjects.
Time Frame
1 month
Title
System Performance Assessed by Holter Records
Description
The first 20 digital Holter records that were successfully collected in the total of 80 implanted subjects were analysed on observation of device features, ventricular arrhythmia detection times and device classification of ventricular arrhythmias.
Time Frame
1 month follow-up
Title
System Performance Assessed by Save to Disk Files
Description
94 Save to Disk files were reviewed on observation of device features, ventricular arrhythmia detection times and device classification of ventricular arrhythmias.
Time Frame
1 month follow-up
Title
System Performance Assessed by Technical Observations
Description
Reported technical observations will be reviewed to determine if there are any device performance issues.
Time Frame
1 month follow-up

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients who have an indication for a defibrillator. Patients who are optimally treated with medication. Patients who are New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV Exclusion Criteria: Patients with a life expectancy less than the duration of the study. Patients with medical conditions that preclude the testing required for all patients by the study protocol or that otherwise limit study participation required for all patients. Patients with mechanical tricuspid heart valves.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Consulta Clinical Study Team
Organizational Affiliation
Medtronic Bakken Research Center
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital
City
Bonn
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20231152
Citation
Murgatroyd FD, Helmling E, Lemke B, Eber B, Mewis C, van der Meer-Hensgens J, Chang Y, Khalameizer V, Katz A. Manual vs. automatic capture management in implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators. Europace. 2010 Jun;12(6):811-6. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq053. Epub 2010 Mar 14.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

ConsultaTM CRT-D Clinical Evaluation Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs