Trial to Assess the Effects of Vorapaxar (SCH 530348; MK-5348) in Preventing Heart Attack and Stroke in Patients With Atherosclerosis (TRA 2°P - TIMI 50) (P04737)
Primary Purpose
Atherosclerosis, Ischemia, Myocardial Infarction
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Vorapaxar
Placebo
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Atherosclerosis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Men and women at least 18 years old with evidence or a history of atherosclerosis involving the coronary, cerebral, or peripheral vascular systems by one or more of the following:
- history of myocardial infarction (heart attack)
- history of ischemic stroke (stroke due to a blocked artery)
- history of peripheral arterial disease
Exclusion Criteria:
- history of intracranial hemorrhage or of central nervous system (CNS) surgery, tumor, or aneurysm
- any bleeding disorder or abnormality
- sustained severe hypertension or valvular heart disease
- current or recent platelet count <100,000 mm^3
- planned or ongoing treatment with a blood thinning medication
- pregnancy
- any significant medical or physiological condition or abnormality that could put the subject at increased risk or limit the subject's ability to participate for the duration of the study
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Placebo
Vorapaxar
Arm Description
1 placebo tablet, orally, daily for at least 1 year in addition to current treatment of atherosclerotic disease, which will be continued to be administered as per current standard of care.
one 2.5 mg tablet daily, orally, for at least 1 year in addition to current treatment of atherosclerotic disease, which will be continued to be administered as per current standard of care.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Myocardial Infarction (MI), Stroke, or Urgent Coronary Revascularization (UCR) Within 3 Years From Randomization
The time (in days) from study start to the first occurrence of any of the following clinical outcomes was recorded: CV death, MI, stroke, or UCR. A Clinical Endpoints Committee (CEC) reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced CV death, MI, stroke, or UCR within 3 years from randomization.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced CV Death, MI, or Stroke Within 3 Years From Randomization
The time (in days) from study start to the first occurrence of any of the following clinical outcomes was recorded: CV death, MI, or stroke. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced CV death, MI, or stroke within 3 years from randomization.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Met Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Arteries (GUSTO) Moderate or Severe Bleeding Criteria Within 3 Years From Randomization
Adverse events were categorized as "bleeding events" if the intensity, frequency, or type of the event was other or more than would be normally expected in the given situation (eg, mild nosebleed in a person who does not normally have nosebleeds, greater bruising than expected for a given injury, greater volume of blood loss than expected for a given procedure). The investigator graded the intensity of bleeding events according to the GUSTO cooperative group criteria as follows: Mild , Moderate or Severe and the grading was adjudicated by the CEC. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced GUSTO moderate or severe bleeding within 3 years from randomization.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Clinically Significant Bleeding Within 3 Years From Randomization
Adverse events were categorized as "bleeding events" if the intensity, frequency, or type of the event was other or more than would be normally expected in the given situation (eg, mild nosebleed in a person who does not normally have nosebleeds, greater bruising than expected for a given injury, greater volume of blood loss than expected for a given procedure). The investigator graded the intensity of bleeding events according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group criteria as major, minor or other. "Clinically Significant Bleeding" was defined as the composite of TIMI Major bleeding, TIMI Minor bleeding, or bleeding that required unplanned medical or surgical treatment or unplanned laboratory evaluation even if it did not meet the criteria for TIMI major or minor bleeding. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced clinically significant bleeding within 3 years from randomization.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Death From Any Cause, MI, Stroke, or UCR Within 3 Years From Randomization
The time (in days) from study start to the occurrence of any of the following clinical outcomes was recorded: death from any cause, MI, stroke, or UCR. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced death from any cause, MI, stroke, or UCR within 3 years from randomization.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced CV Death or an MI Within 3 Years From Randomization
The time (in days) from study start to the occurrence of CV death or MI. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced CV death or MI within 3 years from randomization.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced CV Death, MI, Stroke, UCR, or Urgent Hospitalization for Vascular Cause of Ischemic Nature (UH-VCIN) Within 3 Years From Randomization
The time (in days) from study start to the first occurrence of any of the following clinical outcomes was recorded: CV death, MI, stroke, UCR or UH-VCIN. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced CV death, MI, stroke, UCR, or UH-VCIN within 3 years from randomization.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Died From Any Cause, or Experienced an MI, Stroke, or Any Revascularization Within 3 Years From Randomization
The time (in days) from study start to death from any cause or the first occurrence of any of the following clinical outcomes was recorded: MI, stroke, or any revascularization procedure . A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who died from any cause, or experienced an MI, stroke, or any revascularization within 3 years from randomization.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced CV Death, MI, Stroke, Any Revascularization, or UH-VCIN Within 3 Years From Randomization
The time (in days) from study start to the first occurrence of any of the following clinical outcomes was recorded: CV death, MI, stroke, any revascularization, or UH-VCIN. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced CV death, MI, stroke, any revascularization procedure, or UH-VCIN within 3 years from randomization.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced CV Death Within 3 Years From Randomization
The time (in days) from study start to CV death (if reported) was recorded. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced CV death within 3 years from randomization.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced an MI Within 3 Years From Randomization
The time (in days) from study start to the first occurrence of an MI was recorded. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced an MI within 3 years from randomization.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced UCR Within 3 Years From Randomization
The time (in days) from study start to the first occurrence of UCR was recorded. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced UCR within 3 years from randomization.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced a Stroke Within 3 Years From Randomization
The time (in days) from study start to first experience of a stroke was recorded. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced a stroke within 3 years from randomization.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Died From Any Cause Within 3 Years From Randomization
The time (in days) from study start to death from any cause was recorded. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who died from any cause within 3 years from randomization.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Had a UH-VCIN Within 3 Years From Randomization
The time (in days) from study start to the first occurrence of an UH-VCIN was recorded. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who had a UH-VCIN within 3 years from randomization.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Had Any Revascularization Performed Within 3 Years From Randomization
The time (in days) from study start to the first occurrence of a revascularization was recorded. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who had any revascularization performed within 3 years from randomization.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00526474
First Posted
September 6, 2007
Last Updated
August 22, 2018
Sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Collaborators
The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study (TIMI) Group
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00526474
Brief Title
Trial to Assess the Effects of Vorapaxar (SCH 530348; MK-5348) in Preventing Heart Attack and Stroke in Patients With Atherosclerosis (TRA 2°P - TIMI 50) (P04737)
Official Title
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of SCH 530348 in Addition to Standard of Care in Subjects With a History of Atherosclerotic Disease: Thrombin Receptor Antagonist in Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Ischemic Events (TRA 2°P - TIMI 50)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 1, 2007 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 1, 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 1, 2011 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Collaborators
The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study (TIMI) Group
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The study is designed to determine whether vorapaxar, when added to the existing standard of care (SOC) for preventing heart attack and stroke (eg, aspirin, clopidogrel) in participants with a known history of atherosclerosis, will yield additional benefit over the existing standard of care without vorapaxar in preventing heart attack and stroke.
The study is also designed to assess risk of bleeding with vorapaxar added to the standard of care versus the standard of care alone.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Atherosclerosis, Ischemia, Myocardial Infarction, Cerebrovascular Accident, Peripheral Arterial Disease
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
26449 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
1 placebo tablet, orally, daily for at least 1 year in addition to current treatment of atherosclerotic disease, which will be continued to be administered as per current standard of care.
Arm Title
Vorapaxar
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
one 2.5 mg tablet daily, orally, for at least 1 year in addition to current treatment of atherosclerotic disease, which will be continued to be administered as per current standard of care.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Vorapaxar
Intervention Description
2.5-mg tablet daily for at least 1 year
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
matching tablet daily for at least 1 year
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Myocardial Infarction (MI), Stroke, or Urgent Coronary Revascularization (UCR) Within 3 Years From Randomization
Description
The time (in days) from study start to the first occurrence of any of the following clinical outcomes was recorded: CV death, MI, stroke, or UCR. A Clinical Endpoints Committee (CEC) reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced CV death, MI, stroke, or UCR within 3 years from randomization.
Time Frame
up to 3 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced CV Death, MI, or Stroke Within 3 Years From Randomization
Description
The time (in days) from study start to the first occurrence of any of the following clinical outcomes was recorded: CV death, MI, or stroke. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced CV death, MI, or stroke within 3 years from randomization.
Time Frame
up to 3 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Met Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Arteries (GUSTO) Moderate or Severe Bleeding Criteria Within 3 Years From Randomization
Description
Adverse events were categorized as "bleeding events" if the intensity, frequency, or type of the event was other or more than would be normally expected in the given situation (eg, mild nosebleed in a person who does not normally have nosebleeds, greater bruising than expected for a given injury, greater volume of blood loss than expected for a given procedure). The investigator graded the intensity of bleeding events according to the GUSTO cooperative group criteria as follows: Mild , Moderate or Severe and the grading was adjudicated by the CEC. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced GUSTO moderate or severe bleeding within 3 years from randomization.
Time Frame
up to 3 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Clinically Significant Bleeding Within 3 Years From Randomization
Description
Adverse events were categorized as "bleeding events" if the intensity, frequency, or type of the event was other or more than would be normally expected in the given situation (eg, mild nosebleed in a person who does not normally have nosebleeds, greater bruising than expected for a given injury, greater volume of blood loss than expected for a given procedure). The investigator graded the intensity of bleeding events according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group criteria as major, minor or other. "Clinically Significant Bleeding" was defined as the composite of TIMI Major bleeding, TIMI Minor bleeding, or bleeding that required unplanned medical or surgical treatment or unplanned laboratory evaluation even if it did not meet the criteria for TIMI major or minor bleeding. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced clinically significant bleeding within 3 years from randomization.
Time Frame
up to 3 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Death From Any Cause, MI, Stroke, or UCR Within 3 Years From Randomization
Description
The time (in days) from study start to the occurrence of any of the following clinical outcomes was recorded: death from any cause, MI, stroke, or UCR. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced death from any cause, MI, stroke, or UCR within 3 years from randomization.
Time Frame
up to 3 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced CV Death or an MI Within 3 Years From Randomization
Description
The time (in days) from study start to the occurrence of CV death or MI. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced CV death or MI within 3 years from randomization.
Time Frame
up to 3 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced CV Death, MI, Stroke, UCR, or Urgent Hospitalization for Vascular Cause of Ischemic Nature (UH-VCIN) Within 3 Years From Randomization
Description
The time (in days) from study start to the first occurrence of any of the following clinical outcomes was recorded: CV death, MI, stroke, UCR or UH-VCIN. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced CV death, MI, stroke, UCR, or UH-VCIN within 3 years from randomization.
Time Frame
up to 3 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Died From Any Cause, or Experienced an MI, Stroke, or Any Revascularization Within 3 Years From Randomization
Description
The time (in days) from study start to death from any cause or the first occurrence of any of the following clinical outcomes was recorded: MI, stroke, or any revascularization procedure . A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who died from any cause, or experienced an MI, stroke, or any revascularization within 3 years from randomization.
Time Frame
up to 3 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced CV Death, MI, Stroke, Any Revascularization, or UH-VCIN Within 3 Years From Randomization
Description
The time (in days) from study start to the first occurrence of any of the following clinical outcomes was recorded: CV death, MI, stroke, any revascularization, or UH-VCIN. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced CV death, MI, stroke, any revascularization procedure, or UH-VCIN within 3 years from randomization.
Time Frame
up to 3 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced CV Death Within 3 Years From Randomization
Description
The time (in days) from study start to CV death (if reported) was recorded. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced CV death within 3 years from randomization.
Time Frame
up to 3 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced an MI Within 3 Years From Randomization
Description
The time (in days) from study start to the first occurrence of an MI was recorded. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced an MI within 3 years from randomization.
Time Frame
up to 3 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced UCR Within 3 Years From Randomization
Description
The time (in days) from study start to the first occurrence of UCR was recorded. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced UCR within 3 years from randomization.
Time Frame
up to 3 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Experienced a Stroke Within 3 Years From Randomization
Description
The time (in days) from study start to first experience of a stroke was recorded. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced a stroke within 3 years from randomization.
Time Frame
up to 3 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Died From Any Cause Within 3 Years From Randomization
Description
The time (in days) from study start to death from any cause was recorded. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who died from any cause within 3 years from randomization.
Time Frame
up to 3 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Had a UH-VCIN Within 3 Years From Randomization
Description
The time (in days) from study start to the first occurrence of an UH-VCIN was recorded. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who had a UH-VCIN within 3 years from randomization.
Time Frame
up to 3 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Who Had Any Revascularization Performed Within 3 Years From Randomization
Description
The time (in days) from study start to the first occurrence of a revascularization was recorded. A CEC reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or participants who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). If a participant had a fatal event that was not part of a specific endpoint for analysis, they were censored at the time of death. The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who had any revascularization performed within 3 years from randomization.
Time Frame
up to 3 years
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Men and women at least 18 years old with evidence or a history of atherosclerosis involving the coronary, cerebral, or peripheral vascular systems by one or more of the following:
history of myocardial infarction (heart attack)
history of ischemic stroke (stroke due to a blocked artery)
history of peripheral arterial disease
Exclusion Criteria:
history of intracranial hemorrhage or of central nervous system (CNS) surgery, tumor, or aneurysm
any bleeding disorder or abnormality
sustained severe hypertension or valvular heart disease
current or recent platelet count <100,000 mm^3
planned or ongoing treatment with a blood thinning medication
pregnancy
any significant medical or physiological condition or abnormality that could put the subject at increased risk or limit the subject's ability to participate for the duration of the study
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Medical Director
Organizational Affiliation
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Official's Role
Study Director
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
https://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf
IPD Sharing URL
http://engagezone.msd.com/ds_documentation.php
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35224730
Citation
Natale P, Palmer SC, Saglimbene VM, Ruospo M, Razavian M, Craig JC, Jardine MJ, Webster AC, Strippoli GF. Antiplatelet agents for chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 28;2(2):CD008834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008834.pub4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33884889
Citation
Berg DD, Freedman BL, Bonaca MP, Jarolim P, Scirica BM, Goodrich EL, Sabatine MS, Morrow DA. Cardiovascular Biomarkers and Heart Failure Risk in Stable Patients With Atherothrombotic Disease: A Nested Biomarker Study From TRA 2 degrees P-TIMI 50. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 May 4;10(9):e018673. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018673. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32000630
Citation
Qamar A, Morrow DA, Creager MA, Scirica BM, Olin JW, Beckman JA, Murphy SA, Bonaca MP. Effect of vorapaxar on cardiovascular and limb outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease with and without coronary artery disease: Analysis from the TRA 2 degrees P-TIMI 50 trial. Vasc Med. 2020 Apr;25(2):124-132. doi: 10.1177/1358863X19892690. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31642690
Citation
Xu H, Bonaca MP, Goodrich E, Scirica BM, Morrow DA. Efficacy and safety of vorapaxar for secondary prevention in low body weight in patients with atherosclerosis: analyses from the TRA 2 degrees P-TIMI 50 Trial. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Oct 23:2048872619883354. doi: 10.1177/2048872619883354. Online ahead of print.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33609100
Citation
Xu H, Bonaca MP, Goodrich E, Scirica BM, Morrow DA. Efficacy and safety of vorapaxar for secondary prevention in low body weight in patients with atherosclerosis: analyses from the TRA 2 degrees P-TIMI 50 Trial. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Oct 23:2048872619883354. doi: 10.1177/2048872619883354. Online ahead of print.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27765312
Citation
Bonaca MP, Creager MA, Olin J, Scirica BM, Gilchrist IC Jr, Murphy SA, Goodrich EL, Braunwald E, Morrow DA. Peripheral Revascularization in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease With Vorapaxar: Insights From the TRA 2 degrees P-TIMI 50 Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 24;9(20):2157-2164. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.034.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27440003
Citation
Bohula EA, Bonaca MP, Braunwald E, Aylward PE, Corbalan R, De Ferrari GM, He P, Lewis BS, Merlini PA, Murphy SA, Sabatine MS, Scirica BM, Morrow DA. Atherothrombotic Risk Stratification and the Efficacy and Safety of Vorapaxar in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease and Previous Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2016 Jul 26;134(4):304-13. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019861.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27431644
Citation
Kidd SK, Bonaca MP, Braunwald E, De Ferrari GM, Lewis BS, Merlini PA, Murphy SA, Scirica BM, White HD, Morrow DA. Universal Classification System Type of Incident Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Stable Atherosclerosis: Observations From Thrombin Receptor Antagonist in Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Ischemic Events (TRA 2 degrees P)-TIMI 50. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jul 18;5(7):e003237. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003237.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26876014
Citation
Berg DD, Bonaca MP, Braunwald E, Corbalan R, Goto S, Kiss RG, Murphy SA, Scirica BM, Spinar J, Morrow DA. Outcomes in Stable Patients With Previous Atherothrombotic Events Receiving Vorapaxar Who Experience a New Acute Coronary Event (from TRA2 degrees P-TIMI 50). Am J Cardiol. 2016 Apr 1;117(7):1055-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.12.052. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26826179
Citation
Bonaca MP, Gutierrez JA, Creager MA, Scirica BM, Olin J, Murphy SA, Braunwald E, Morrow DA. Acute Limb Ischemia and Outcomes With Vorapaxar in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: Results From the Trial to Assess the Effects of Vorapaxar in Preventing Heart Attack and Stroke in Patients With Atherosclerosis-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 50 (TRA2 degrees P-TIMI 50). Circulation. 2016 Mar 8;133(10):997-1005. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019355. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26338971
Citation
Bohula EA, Aylward PE, Bonaca MP, Corbalan RL, Kiss RG, Murphy SA, Scirica BM, White H, Braunwald E, Morrow DA. Efficacy and Safety of Vorapaxar With and Without a Thienopyridine for Secondary Prevention in Patients With Previous Myocardial Infarction and No History of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: Results from TRA 2 degrees P-TIMI 50. Circulation. 2015 Nov 17;132(20):1871-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.015042. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25792124
Citation
Magnani G, Bonaca MP, Braunwald E, Dalby AJ, Fox KA, Murphy SA, Nicolau JC, Oude Ophuis T, Scirica BM, Spinar J, Theroux P, Morrow DA. Efficacy and safety of vorapaxar as approved for clinical use in the United States. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Mar 19;4(3):e001505. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001505. Erratum In: J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Apr;4(4). pii: e000633. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.000633.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25681464
Citation
Cavender MA, Scirica BM, Bonaca MP, Angiolillo DJ, Dalby AJ, Dellborg M, Morais J, Murphy SA, Ophuis TO, Tendera M, Braunwald E, Morrow DA. Vorapaxar in patients with diabetes mellitus and previous myocardial infarction: findings from the thrombin receptor antagonist in secondary prevention of atherothrombotic ischemic events-TIMI 50 trial. Circulation. 2015 Mar 24;131(12):1047-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013774. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25465417
Citation
Bonaca MP, Scirica BM, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, Goto S, Nilsen DW, Bonarjee V, Murphy SA, Morrow DA. New ischemic stroke and outcomes with vorapaxar versus placebo: results from the TRA 2 degrees P-TIMI 50 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 9;64(22):2318-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.997. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25465416
Citation
Bonaca MP, Scirica BM, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, O'Donoghue ML, Murphy SA, Morrow DA. Coronary stent thrombosis with vorapaxar versus placebo: results from the TRA 2 degrees P-TIMI 50 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 9;64(22):2309-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.037. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
23501976
Citation
Bonaca MP, Scirica BM, Creager MA, Olin J, Bounameaux H, Dellborg M, Lamp JM, Murphy SA, Braunwald E, Morrow DA. Vorapaxar in patients with peripheral artery disease: results from TRA2degreesP-TIMI 50. Circulation. 2013 Apr 9;127(14):1522-9, 1529e1-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000679. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
23396280
Citation
Morrow DA, Alberts MJ, Mohr JP, Ameriso SF, Bonaca MP, Goto S, Hankey GJ, Murphy SA, Scirica BM, Braunwald E; Thrombin Receptor Antagonist in Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Ischemic Events-TIMI 50 Steering Committee and Investigators. Efficacy and safety of vorapaxar in patients with prior ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2013 Mar;44(3):691-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000433. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
22932716
Citation
Scirica BM, Bonaca MP, Braunwald E, De Ferrari GM, Isaza D, Lewis BS, Mehrhof F, Merlini PA, Murphy SA, Sabatine MS, Tendera M, Van de Werf F, Wilcox R, Morrow DA; TRA 2 degrees P-TIMI 50 Steering Committee Investigators. Vorapaxar for secondary prevention of thrombotic events for patients with previous myocardial infarction: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the TRA 2 degrees P-TIMI 50 trial. Lancet. 2012 Oct 13;380(9850):1317-24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61269-0. Epub 2012 Aug 26.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
22443427
Citation
Morrow DA, Braunwald E, Bonaca MP, Ameriso SF, Dalby AJ, Fish MP, Fox KA, Lipka LJ, Liu X, Nicolau JC, Ophuis AJ, Paolasso E, Scirica BM, Spinar J, Theroux P, Wiviott SD, Strony J, Murphy SA; TRA 2P-TIMI 50 Steering Committee and Investigators. Vorapaxar in the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events. N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 12;366(15):1404-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200933. Epub 2012 Mar 24.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
19699854
Citation
Morrow DA, Scirica BM, Fox KA, Berman G, Strony J, Veltri E, Bonaca MP, Fish P, McCabe CH, Braunwald E; TRA 2(o)P-TIMI 50 Investigators. Evaluation of a novel antiplatelet agent for secondary prevention in patients with a history of atherosclerotic disease: design and rationale for the Thrombin-Receptor Antagonist in Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Ischemic Events (TRA 2 degrees P)-TIMI 50 trial. Am Heart J. 2009 Sep;158(3):335-341.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.06.027.
Results Reference
derived
Available IPD and Supporting Information:
Available IPD/Information Type
CSR Synopsis
Available IPD/Information URL
http://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/study.html?id=P04737&kw=P04737&tab=access
Learn more about this trial
Trial to Assess the Effects of Vorapaxar (SCH 530348; MK-5348) in Preventing Heart Attack and Stroke in Patients With Atherosclerosis (TRA 2°P - TIMI 50) (P04737)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs