Epidural Anesthesia /Analgesia Versus PCA for Laparoscopic Complex Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Primary Purpose
Analgesia
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Epidural Catheter for Analgesia
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Analgesia focused on measuring Epidural Analgesia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18-80 years of age
- ASA grades I-III
Patients with large hernias
- requiring mesh greater than or equal to 18cmx 30cm
- with a known hernia of at least 10cm x 8cm
- Or several smaller hernias that require or may require the coverage referred to in #1
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age<18 or >80
- Poor candidacy for operative treatment
- Previous spinal operations
- Sepsis
- Incarcerated ventral hernias requiring anticoagulation
Sites / Locations
- University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary outcome measures will improve. Patients will have a shorter length of stay (1 day less) with pre and post-operative epidural analgesia.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary outcome measures will also improve. Among them will be VAS pain scores, time to first flatus and bowel movement as well as major and minor complications.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00529074
First Posted
September 11, 2007
Last Updated
August 15, 2016
Sponsor
University of Missouri-Columbia
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00529074
Brief Title
Epidural Anesthesia /Analgesia Versus PCA for Laparoscopic Complex Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Official Title
Epidural Anesthesia /Analgesia Versus PCA for Laparoscopic Complex Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
never activated
Study Start Date
February 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2006 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2006 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Missouri-Columbia
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
We plan to demonstrate the superiority of epidural anaesthesia/analgesia in repairs of large ventral hernias as compared with a conventional narcotic analgesia regimen.
We hypothesize that:
Primary outcome measures will improve. Patients will have a shorter length of stay (1 day less) with pre and post-operative epidural analgesia.
Secondary outcome measures will also improve. Among them will be VAS pain scores, time to first flatus and bowel movement as well as major and minor complications.
Detailed Description
Epidural anesthesia and analgesia has shown benefits over standard anesthesia/analgesia in many types of Vascular, GI, and Thoracic surgeries. The benefits extended are varied, and include: improvements in cardiac and pulmonary function, decreases in hypercoagulability, reduction of post-operative ileus and decreases in post-operative pain. 1 Epidural pain relief works by exposing the epidural space, with its network of nerve roots, to a flood of analgesics and/or local anesthetic. This is thought to prevent the release of neurotransmitters from afferent pain fibers or interrupt the transmission of pain related information to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. 2 Several studies have been done on patients undergoing GI surgery with adjunct epidurals (particularly colorectal procedures) and they have shown that ileus and length of stay, is greatly reduced. 3No one has yet extended these benefits to patients undergoing hernia repair.
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair has recently become a popular choice for both patients and surgeons alike, and has been shown in some studies to reduce wound complications and length of hospital stay. But improvements in post-operative pain, ileus and return to work have been less than hoped for, and as such, adjuncts are being investigated to improve some of these outcomes. In one study of 850 patients in 4 different academic institutions patients had a mean hospital stay of 2.3 days (although a great portion of cases were small ventral hernias that resulted in same-day discharges) and 3% remained hospitalized with a prolonged ileus. The proportion of patients who had prolonged ileus and subsequently longer hospital stays was much greater amongst the patients with larger ventral hernia repairs as well as the patients with recurrences.4 Moreover there has been some suggestion by Ramshaw and colleagues that Laparoscopic Ventral hernia repair is more painful than the classical open hernia operation. 5 One of the explanations is that there may be a component of parietal as well as visceral pain to this procedure; with the visceral pain accompanying the counter-traction on the herniated contents of the sac when taking down adhesions, and the parietal pain from the many full thickness sutures and 3mm tacks used to secure the prosthesis into the abdominal wall.6 In this study, we will test the benefits of epidural anesthesia/analgesia on these patients with complicated Laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs.
As of yet there have been no studies that compare the use of epidural analgesia/anesthesia to conventional anesthesia and narcotics for these patients in relation to their expected length of stay, post-op pain, ileus, or other complications.
Moraca RJ, Sheldon DG, Thirlby RC The role of Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia in Surgical Practice. Annals of Surgery 2003;238 663-673.
R. J. Fotiadis1, S. Badvie1, M. D.Weston2 and T. G. Allen-Mersh1 Epidural analgesia in gastrointestinal surgery British Journal of Surgery 2004; 91: 828-841
Rodgers A, Walker N et al. Reduction of Post Operative Mortality and Morbidity With Epidural or Spinal Anaesthesia: Results From an Overview of Randomized Trials. Br Med Journal 2000; 321: 1493-1497
Heniford BT. Park A. Ramshaw BJ. Voeller G. Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years' experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Annals of Surgery. 238(3):391-9; discussion 399-400, 2003 Sep
Ramshaw B, Esartia Et Al.Comparison of Laparoscopic and open Ventral Hernia Repair; The American Surgeon; Sept 1999; Vol 65: 9 pg 827
Heniford BT, Park, A, ramshaw BJ, Voeller G Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair in 407 Patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. Vol 190: 6 PP 645-650 June 2000
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Analgesia
Keywords
Epidural Analgesia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Epidural Catheter for Analgesia
Intervention Description
Patients enrolled will be placed into one of two groups of 30 patients. The decision to place the patients in either one of the two groups will be randomized as above. The Epidural group will have a thoracic epidural catheter placed pre-operatively at the T6-T7 level before general anesthesia is given. (using a .1% Marcaine and .1% Meperidine solution) A dose of Ketorolac will be given 15 minutes before the patient will be awakened from anesthesia (provided that there is good renal function and the patient is not hypovolemic) The catheter will be used preoperatively as an adjunct for general anesthesia as well as used postoperatively for continuous epidural analgesia(CEA). The control group will be given general anesthesia alone and post-operative PCA along with NSAIDS before leaving for the recovery room (as above).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Primary outcome measures will improve. Patients will have a shorter length of stay (1 day less) with pre and post-operative epidural analgesia.
Time Frame
Post-operatively
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Secondary outcome measures will also improve. Among them will be VAS pain scores, time to first flatus and bowel movement as well as major and minor complications.
Time Frame
Post-operatively.
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
18-80 years of age
ASA grades I-III
Patients with large hernias
requiring mesh greater than or equal to 18cmx 30cm
with a known hernia of at least 10cm x 8cm
Or several smaller hernias that require or may require the coverage referred to in #1
Exclusion Criteria:
Age<18 or >80
Poor candidacy for operative treatment
Previous spinal operations
Sepsis
Incarcerated ventral hernias requiring anticoagulation
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bruce Ramshaw, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Missouri-Columbia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics
City
Columbia
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
65212
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Epidural Anesthesia /Analgesia Versus PCA for Laparoscopic Complex Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs