search
Back to results

Albumin-bound Paclitaxel (ABI-007) for Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Primary Purpose

Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Albumin-bound paclitaxel
Paclitaxel
Carboplatin
Sponsored by
Celgene
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma focused on measuring Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
  • Male or non-pregnant and non-lactating female, and equal or greater than age 18

    • If a female patient is of child-bearing potential, as evidence by regular menstrual periods, she must have a negative serum pregnancy test (beta human chorionic gonadotropin [βhCG]) documented within 72 hours of the first administration of study drug
    • If sexually active, the patient must agree to utilize contraception considered adequate and appropriate by the investigator
  • No other current active malignancy
  • Radiographically-documented measurable disease (defined by the presence of at least 1 radiographically documented measurable lesion)
  • Patients must have received no prior chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy permitted providing cytotoxic chemotherapy was completed 12 months prior to starting the study
  • Patient has the following blood counts at baseline:

    • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 1.5x10^9/L
    • Platelets greater than or equal to 100x10^9/L
    • Hemoglobin (Hgb) greater than or equal to 9 g/dL
  • Patient has the following blood chemistry levels at baseline:

    • Aspartate aminotransferase (SGOT), alanine aminotransferase (SGPT) less than or equal to 2.5 x upper limit of normal range (ULN) or less than or equal to 5.0 x ULN if liver metastases;
    • Total bilirubin less than or equal to ULN
    • Creatinine less than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL
  • Expected survival of greater than 12 weeks
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1
  • Patient or his/her legally authorized representative or guardian has been informed about the nature of the study, and has agreed to participate in the study, and signed the Informed Consent form prior to participation in any study-related activities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of active brain metastases, including leptomeningeal involvement. Prior evidence of brain metastasis permitted only if treated and stable and off therapy for greater than or equal to 1 month
  • The only evidence of disease is non-measurable
  • Patient has pre-existing peripheral neuropathy of Grade 2, 3, or 4 (per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] Version 3).
  • Patient received radiotherapy in the last 4 weeks, except if to a non-target lesion only. Prior radiation to a target lesion is permitted only if there has been clear progression of the lesion since radiation was completed
  • Patient has a clinically significant concurrent illness
  • Patient has received treatment with any investigational drug within the previous 4 weeks
  • Patient has a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs
  • Patient has serious medical risk factors involving any of the major organ systems such that the investigator considers it unsafe for the patient to receive an experimental research drug
  • Patient is enrolled in any other clinical protocol or investigational trial that involves administration of experimental therapy and/or therapeutic devices.

Sites / Locations

  • Clearview Cancer Institute Oncology Specialties, P.C.
  • Genesis Cancer Center- Hot Springs
  • Little Rock Hematology Oncology Associates
  • Pacific Cancer Medical Center, Inc.
  • Comprehensive Blood and Cancer Center
  • Southwest Cancer Care
  • Robert A. Moss, MD, FACP, Inc.
  • Pacific Shores Medical Group
  • Ventura County Hematology-Oncology Specialists
  • Comprehensice Cancer Ctr.
  • Gulf Coast Oncology Associates
  • Lake County Oncology and Hematology, PA
  • Phoebe Cancer Center
  • Cancer Center of Kansas
  • Kentuckiana Cancer Institute, PLLC
  • Mercy Hospital
  • Maine Center for Cancer Medicine
  • Mercy Medical Center
  • St. Louis University
  • Essex Oncology of North Jersey
  • Mary Imogene Bassett Hospital
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • St. Mary Medical Center- Oncology, Hematology PC
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • Dallas Oncology Consultants, PA
  • The Center for Cancers and Blood Disorders
  • Joe Arrington Cancer Research and Treatment Center
  • Blood and Cancer Center of East Texas
  • Tyler Hematology Oncology
  • Fletcher Allen Health Care
  • Cancer Outreach Associates, PC
  • Royal Columbian Hospital
  • William Osler Health Centre, Brampton Clinic
  • Toronto East General Hospital
  • Princess Margaret Hospital
  • McGill University- Dept. of Oncology
  • Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Albumin-bound paclitaxel + Carboplatin

Paclitaxel + Carboplatin

Arm Description

Participants received albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABRAXANE®) 100 mg/m^2 administered as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. Carboplatin was given at an Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 6 mg*min/mL on Day 1 only of each 21-day cycle, beginning immediately after the completion of albumin-bound paclitaxel administration. Participants could continue treatment at the investigator's discretion until disease progression, development of an unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.

Participants received 200 mg/m^2 paclitaxel (Taxol®) administered by intravenous infusion followed by carboplatin at AUC = 6 mg*min/mL on Day 1 of a 21 day cycle. Participants could continue treatment at the investigator's discretion until disease progression, development of an unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology Assessment
Antitumor response was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an objective response (Confirmed Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]), confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Response was based on the blinded radiological review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) response guidelines, Version 1.0. A complete response was defined as a disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Partial response was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD, and the persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for CR or Progressive Disease (the "unequivocal progression" of existing non-target lesion(s) or appearance of one or more new lesions).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Progression-free Survival by Blinded Radiology Assessment
Progression free survival time was defined as the time from the day of randomization to the start of disease progression or death (any cause), whichever occurred first, based on the blinded radiological review response assessment. Progressive disease was defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the SLD of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD recorded since the treatment started, or the presence of one or more new lesions, or the "unequivocal progression" of existing non-target lesion(s) or appearance of one or more new lesion(s). Participants who did not have disease progression or had not died were censored at the last visit they were documented as progression free. If palliative radiotherapy or surgery at lesion sites occurred, the participant was censored at the last date without documented progression prior to radiotherapy or surgery. In follow-up, participants who began new therapy prior to progression were censored at the last documented date as progression-free.
Overall Participant Survival
Overall survival was defined as the time from the day of randomization to participant death (due to any cause), as assessed by post study follow-up performed monthly for 6 months and every 3 months thereafter for 12 months. All participants who were lost to the follow-up prior to the end of the trial or who completed the 18 month follow up phase were censored at last known time the participant was alive.
Percentage of Participants With Controlled Disease
Controlled disease was defined as the percentage of participants with stable disease for ≥ 16 weeks or confirmed complete or partial overall response, based on blinded radiological assessment. Stable disease was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage of target lesions to qualify for Partial Response, nor sufficient increase to qualify for Progressive Disease, or the persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for Complete Response or Progressive Disease.
Duration of Response in Responding Patients
Duration of response was assessed by progression free survival for participants who achieved a confirmed complete response or partial response based on blinded radiological assessment.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
A Treatment-emergent AE was any AE that began or worsened in grade after the start of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or end of study whichever is later. Treatment related toxicity was one considered by the investigator to be possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug. AEs were graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 on the following scale: Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening, Grade 5 = death. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: is fatal or life-threatening; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; requires or prolongs in-patient hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a patient; and conditions not included in the above that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters
SPARC Status and Correlation With Overall Survival
The expression and cellular distribution of Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in cysteine (SPARC) in biopsies of lung tumor was examined by immunohistochemistry using a 2 antibody system by an approved central laboratory and analyzed by 2 pathologists. The following tissue components were scored: tumor cells, fibroblasts, inflammatory cells, acellular stroma/matrix, and blood vessels. To classify participants into "high-SPARC" and "low-SPARC" groups, an average z-score was calculated across variables and classified "high-SPARC" (average z-scores ≥0) and "low-SPARC" (average z-scores <0) groups. SPARC status was then correlated with overall survival (the time from the day of randomization to participant death due to any cause).

Full Information

First Posted
October 4, 2007
Last Updated
October 16, 2019
Sponsor
Celgene
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00540514
Brief Title
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel (ABI-007) for Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Official Title
A Randomized, Phase III Trial of ABI-007 and Carboplatin Compared With Taxol and Carboplatin as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 1, 2007 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 1, 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 1, 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Celgene

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare disease response of Albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABI-007) plus Carboplatin versus Taxol and Carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Keywords
Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1052 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Albumin-bound paclitaxel + Carboplatin
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABRAXANE®) 100 mg/m^2 administered as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. Carboplatin was given at an Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 6 mg*min/mL on Day 1 only of each 21-day cycle, beginning immediately after the completion of albumin-bound paclitaxel administration. Participants could continue treatment at the investigator's discretion until disease progression, development of an unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.
Arm Title
Paclitaxel + Carboplatin
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received 200 mg/m^2 paclitaxel (Taxol®) administered by intravenous infusion followed by carboplatin at AUC = 6 mg*min/mL on Day 1 of a 21 day cycle. Participants could continue treatment at the investigator's discretion until disease progression, development of an unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Albumin-bound paclitaxel
Other Intervention Name(s)
ABI-007, ABRAXANE®, nab®-paclitaxel
Intervention Description
Administered by intravenous infusion.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Paclitaxel
Other Intervention Name(s)
Taxol®
Intervention Description
Administered by intravenous infusion.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Carboplatin
Intervention Description
Administered by intravenous infusion. Dosing was based on the Calvert formula: carboplatin dose (mg) = (Target AUC) x (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] + 25). For the purposes of this protocol, the GFR is considered to be equivalent to creatinine clearance (calculated by the method of Cockcroft and Gault, 1976).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology Assessment
Description
Antitumor response was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an objective response (Confirmed Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]), confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Response was based on the blinded radiological review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) response guidelines, Version 1.0. A complete response was defined as a disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Partial response was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD, and the persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for CR or Progressive Disease (the "unequivocal progression" of existing non-target lesion(s) or appearance of one or more new lesions).
Time Frame
Objective response was evaluated every 6 weeks until progression or new anti-cancer therapy initiation, up to 22 months.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-free Survival by Blinded Radiology Assessment
Description
Progression free survival time was defined as the time from the day of randomization to the start of disease progression or death (any cause), whichever occurred first, based on the blinded radiological review response assessment. Progressive disease was defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the SLD of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD recorded since the treatment started, or the presence of one or more new lesions, or the "unequivocal progression" of existing non-target lesion(s) or appearance of one or more new lesion(s). Participants who did not have disease progression or had not died were censored at the last visit they were documented as progression free. If palliative radiotherapy or surgery at lesion sites occurred, the participant was censored at the last date without documented progression prior to radiotherapy or surgery. In follow-up, participants who began new therapy prior to progression were censored at the last documented date as progression-free.
Time Frame
Assessed every 6 weeks until progression or death, up to 38 months
Title
Overall Participant Survival
Description
Overall survival was defined as the time from the day of randomization to participant death (due to any cause), as assessed by post study follow-up performed monthly for 6 months and every 3 months thereafter for 12 months. All participants who were lost to the follow-up prior to the end of the trial or who completed the 18 month follow up phase were censored at last known time the participant was alive.
Time Frame
Up to 38 months
Title
Percentage of Participants With Controlled Disease
Description
Controlled disease was defined as the percentage of participants with stable disease for ≥ 16 weeks or confirmed complete or partial overall response, based on blinded radiological assessment. Stable disease was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage of target lesions to qualify for Partial Response, nor sufficient increase to qualify for Progressive Disease, or the persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for Complete Response or Progressive Disease.
Time Frame
Assessed every 6 weeks, up to 22 months
Title
Duration of Response in Responding Patients
Description
Duration of response was assessed by progression free survival for participants who achieved a confirmed complete response or partial response based on blinded radiological assessment.
Time Frame
Assessed every 6 weeks, up to 38 months
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Description
A Treatment-emergent AE was any AE that began or worsened in grade after the start of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or end of study whichever is later. Treatment related toxicity was one considered by the investigator to be possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug. AEs were graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 on the following scale: Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening, Grade 5 = death. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: is fatal or life-threatening; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; requires or prolongs in-patient hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a patient; and conditions not included in the above that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Time Frame
Up to 38 months
Title
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters
Time Frame
Blood samples for PK analyses were taken during Cycle 1 at 0.25, 3.5 and 24 hours post-infusion.
Title
SPARC Status and Correlation With Overall Survival
Description
The expression and cellular distribution of Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in cysteine (SPARC) in biopsies of lung tumor was examined by immunohistochemistry using a 2 antibody system by an approved central laboratory and analyzed by 2 pathologists. The following tissue components were scored: tumor cells, fibroblasts, inflammatory cells, acellular stroma/matrix, and blood vessels. To classify participants into "high-SPARC" and "low-SPARC" groups, an average z-score was calculated across variables and classified "high-SPARC" (average z-scores ≥0) and "low-SPARC" (average z-scores <0) groups. SPARC status was then correlated with overall survival (the time from the day of randomization to participant death due to any cause).
Time Frame
Archival tissue samples were used for SPARC analysis. Survival was assessed for up to 38 months.
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology Assessment, by Histology
Description
Antitumor response was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an objective response (Confirmed Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]), confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Response was based on the blinded radiological review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) response guidelines, Version 1.0. A complete response was defined as a disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Partial response was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD, and the persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for CR or Progressive Disease (the "unequivocal progression" of existing non-target lesion(s) or appearance of one or more new lesions). Histology was determined at the time of primary diagnosis.
Time Frame
Objective response was evaluated every 6 weeks until progression or new anti-cancer therapy initiation, up to 22 months.
Title
Maximal Degree of Anemia Based on Clinical Laboratory Values for Hemoglobin
Description
The maximal degree of anemia (and myelosuppression) was assessed by the overall nadir of hemoglobin levels based on clinical laboratory measurements graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0.
Time Frame
38 months
Title
Maximal Degree of Neutropenia Based on Clinical Laboratory Values of Absolute Neutrophil Count
Description
The maximal degree of neutropenia (and myelosuppression) was assessed by the overall nadir of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) based on clinical laboratory measurements graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0.
Time Frame
38 months
Title
Maximal Degree of Thrombocytopenia Based on Clinical Laboratory Values of Platelet Count
Description
The maximal degree of thrombocytopenia (and myelosuppression) was assessed by the overall nadir of platelet count based on clinical laboratory measurements graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0.
Time Frame
38 months
Title
Time to Improvement of ≥ Grade 3 Treatment Related Peripheral Neuropathy
Description
Peripheral neuropathy was graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 on the following scale: Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening, Grade 5 = death. Improvement in peripheral neuropathy was evaluated as: Time to improvement of grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy by at least one grade; Time to improvement of grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy to grade 1. Time to improvement was defined as the time from the first occurrence of grade 3 or higher treatment related neuropathy to improvement, as defined. Participants not experiencing improvement were censored at the last time the participant was evaluated for adverse events.
Time Frame
38 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Male or non-pregnant and non-lactating female, and equal or greater than age 18 If a female patient is of child-bearing potential, as evidence by regular menstrual periods, she must have a negative serum pregnancy test (beta human chorionic gonadotropin [βhCG]) documented within 72 hours of the first administration of study drug If sexually active, the patient must agree to utilize contraception considered adequate and appropriate by the investigator No other current active malignancy Radiographically-documented measurable disease (defined by the presence of at least 1 radiographically documented measurable lesion) Patients must have received no prior chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy permitted providing cytotoxic chemotherapy was completed 12 months prior to starting the study Patient has the following blood counts at baseline: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 1.5x10^9/L Platelets greater than or equal to 100x10^9/L Hemoglobin (Hgb) greater than or equal to 9 g/dL Patient has the following blood chemistry levels at baseline: Aspartate aminotransferase (SGOT), alanine aminotransferase (SGPT) less than or equal to 2.5 x upper limit of normal range (ULN) or less than or equal to 5.0 x ULN if liver metastases; Total bilirubin less than or equal to ULN Creatinine less than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL Expected survival of greater than 12 weeks Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1 Patient or his/her legally authorized representative or guardian has been informed about the nature of the study, and has agreed to participate in the study, and signed the Informed Consent form prior to participation in any study-related activities Exclusion Criteria: Evidence of active brain metastases, including leptomeningeal involvement. Prior evidence of brain metastasis permitted only if treated and stable and off therapy for greater than or equal to 1 month The only evidence of disease is non-measurable Patient has pre-existing peripheral neuropathy of Grade 2, 3, or 4 (per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] Version 3). Patient received radiotherapy in the last 4 weeks, except if to a non-target lesion only. Prior radiation to a target lesion is permitted only if there has been clear progression of the lesion since radiation was completed Patient has a clinically significant concurrent illness Patient has received treatment with any investigational drug within the previous 4 weeks Patient has a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs Patient has serious medical risk factors involving any of the major organ systems such that the investigator considers it unsafe for the patient to receive an experimental research drug Patient is enrolled in any other clinical protocol or investigational trial that involves administration of experimental therapy and/or therapeutic devices.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mark A Socinski, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Clearview Cancer Institute Oncology Specialties, P.C.
City
Huntsville
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35805
Country
United States
Facility Name
Genesis Cancer Center- Hot Springs
City
Hot Springs
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
71913
Country
United States
Facility Name
Little Rock Hematology Oncology Associates
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pacific Cancer Medical Center, Inc.
City
Anaheim
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92801
Country
United States
Facility Name
Comprehensive Blood and Cancer Center
City
Bakersfield
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93309
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southwest Cancer Care
City
Escondido
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92064
Country
United States
Facility Name
Robert A. Moss, MD, FACP, Inc.
City
Fountain Valley
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92708
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pacific Shores Medical Group
City
Long Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90813
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ventura County Hematology-Oncology Specialists
City
Oxnard
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Comprehensice Cancer Ctr.
City
Palms Springs
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92262
Country
United States
Facility Name
Gulf Coast Oncology Associates
City
Saint Petersburg
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lake County Oncology and Hematology, PA
City
Tavares
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32778
Country
United States
Facility Name
Phoebe Cancer Center
City
Albany
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cancer Center of Kansas
City
Wichita
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
67214
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kentuckiana Cancer Institute, PLLC
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mercy Hospital
City
Portland
State/Province
Maine
ZIP/Postal Code
04101
Country
United States
Facility Name
Maine Center for Cancer Medicine
City
Scarborough
State/Province
Maine
ZIP/Postal Code
04074
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mercy Medical Center
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21202
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Louis University
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Essex Oncology of North Jersey
City
Belleville
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mary Imogene Bassett Hospital
City
Cooperstown
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13326
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27599
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Mary Medical Center- Oncology, Hematology PC
City
Langhorne
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19047
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical University of South Carolina
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29425
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dallas Oncology Consultants, PA
City
Duncanville
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75137
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Center for Cancers and Blood Disorders
City
Fort Worth
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Joe Arrington Cancer Research and Treatment Center
City
Lubbock
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79410
Country
United States
Facility Name
Blood and Cancer Center of East Texas
City
Tyler
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tyler Hematology Oncology
City
Tyler
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Fletcher Allen Health Care
City
Burlington
State/Province
Vermont
ZIP/Postal Code
05405
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cancer Outreach Associates, PC
City
Abingdon
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
24211
Country
United States
Facility Name
Royal Columbian Hospital
City
New Westminster
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V3L 3W4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
William Osler Health Centre, Brampton Clinic
City
Brampton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L6R 3J7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Toronto East General Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4C3E7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Princess Margaret Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G 2M9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
McGill University- Dept. of Oncology
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H2W 1S6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H4J 1C5
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24467217
Citation
Hirsh V. nab-paclitaxel for the management of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2014 Feb;14(2):129-41. doi: 10.1586/14737140.2014.881719.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25572008
Citation
Langer CJ, Hirsh V, Ko A, Renschler MF, Socinski MA. Weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of safety and efficacy in patients with renal impairment. Clin Lung Cancer. 2015 Mar;16(2):112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26035702
Citation
Langer CJ, Hirsh V, Okamoto I, Lin FJ, Wan Y, Whiting S, Ong TJ, Renschler MF, Botteman MF. Survival, quality-adjusted survival, and other clinical end points in older advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with albumin-bound paclitaxel. Br J Cancer. 2015 Jun 30;113(1):20-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.181. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22547591
Citation
Socinski MA, Bondarenko I, Karaseva NA, Makhson AM, Vynnychenko I, Okamoto I, Hon JK, Hirsh V, Bhar P, Zhang H, Iglesias JL, Renschler MF. Weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin versus solvent-based paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: final results of a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 10;30(17):2055-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.5848. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23123509
Citation
Socinski MA, Langer CJ, Okamoto I, Hon JK, Hirsh V, Dakhil SR, Page RD, Orsini J, Zhang H, Renschler MF. Safety and efficacy of weekly nab(R)-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin as first-line therapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013 Feb;24(2):314-321. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds461. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23545279
Citation
Satouchi M, Okamoto I, Sakai H, Yamamoto N, Ichinose Y, Ohmatsu H, Nogami N, Takeda K, Mitsudomi T, Kasahara K, Negoro S. Efficacy and safety of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2013 Jul;81(1):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.02.020. Epub 2013 Mar 30.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23842283
Citation
Socinski MA, Okamoto I, Hon JK, Hirsh V, Dakhil SR, Page RD, Orsini J, Yamamoto N, Zhang H, Renschler MF. Safety and efficacy analysis by histology of weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2390-6. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt235. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24346096
Citation
Hirsh V, Okamoto I, Hon JK, Page RD, Orsini J, Sakai H, Zhang H, Renschler MF, Socinski MA. Patient-reported neuropathy and taxane-associated symptoms in a phase 3 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus solvent-based paclitaxel plus carboplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Jan;9(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000011.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Albumin-bound Paclitaxel (ABI-007) for Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs