search
Back to results

BOTOX® Economic Spasticity Trial (BEST)

Primary Purpose

Muscle Spasticity

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Botulinum Toxin Type A 900kD
Placebo
Sponsored by
Allergan
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Muscle Spasticity

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with stroke due to a primary cerebral hemorrhage/infarction
  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage producing an upper motor syndrome affecting one body side which results in a hemi-paralysis/plegia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with fixed contracture as a result of spasticity in the upper or lower limb planned to be treated and/or patients with other causes of spasticity (e.g. multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, etc.)

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Botulinum toxin type A 900kD

Placebo

Arm Description

First intra-muscular injection at the Baseline visit, and optional second injection of the randomised treatment after a minimum of 12 weeks to a maximum of 24 weeks following the Baseline visit.

First intra-muscular injection at the Baseline visit, and optional second injection of the randomised treatment after a minimum of 12 weeks to a maximum of 24 weeks following the Baseline visit.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Physician Assessment of Success, as Determined by Percentage of Patients Who Achieve Their Principal Active Functional Goal at Week 24
Physician assessment of success, as determined by percentage of patients who achieve their principal active functional goal (i.e. a score of 0 to +2 inclusive on the goal attainment scale [GAS]) at week 24 (or 10 weeks post second injection). The GAS is a 6-point scale where -3 means function is worse than at start, 0 means the expected goal was attained, and +2 is much better function than expected.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Physician Assessment of Success, as Determined by Percentage of Patients Who Achieve Their Principal Functional Goal at Week 12
Physician assessment of success, as determined by percentage of patients who achieve their principal functional goal (i.e., a score of 0 to +2 inclusive on the goal attainment scale [GAS]) at week 12. The GAS is 6-point scale where -3 means function is worse than at start, 0 means the expected goal was attained, and +2 is much better function than expected.
Physician Assessment of Success, as Determined by Percentage of Patients Who Achieve Their Principal Functional Goal at Week 52
Physician assessment of success, as determined by percentage of patients who achieve their principal functional goal (i.e., a score of 0 to +2 inclusive on the goal attainment scale [GAS]) at week 52. The GAS is a 6-point scale where -3 means function is worse than at start, 0 means the expected goal was attained, and +2 is much better function than expected
Patient Assessment of Success, as Determined by Percentage of Patients Who Achieve Their Principal Functional Goal at Week 12
Patient assessment of success, as determined by percentage of patients who achieve their principal functional goal (i.e., a score of 0 to +2 inclusive on the goal attainment scale [GAS]) at week 12. The GAS is a 6-point scale where -3 means function is worse than at start, 0 means the expected goal was attained, and +2 is much better function than expected.
Patient Assessment of Success, as Determined by Percentage of Patients Who Achieve Their Principal Functional Goal at Week 24
Patient assessment of success, as determined by percentage of patients who achieve their principal functional goal (i.e., a score of 0 to +2 inclusive on the goal attainment scale [GAS]) at week 24 (or 10 weeks post second injection). The GAS is a 6-point scale where -3 means function is worse than at start, 0 means the expected goal was attained, and +2 is much better function than expected.
Patient Assessment of Success, as Determined by Percentage of Patients Who Achieve Their Principal Functional Goal at Week 52
Patient assessment of success, as determined by percentage of patients who achieve their principal functional goal (i.e., a score of 0 to +2 inclusive on the goal attainment scale [GAS]) at week 52. The GAS is a 6-point scale where -3 means function is worse than at start, 0 means the expected goal was attained, and +2 is much better function than expected.
Activities of Daily Living Quality of Life (QOL) Score at Week 12
Activities of Daily Living QOL score at week 12 as measured by SF-12 Physical Component (PCS-12). The SF-12 consists of 12 questions on various health questions. The PCS-12 is a sub-score calculated from the SF-12 total score based on the physical health questions where 0 is worse and 100 is best. A higher score indicates a better health state.
Activities of Daily Living Quality of Life (QOL) Score at Week 24
Activities of daily living QOL score at week 24 (or 10 weeks post second injection) as measured by SF-12 Physical Component (PCS-12). The SF-12 consists of 12 questions on various health questions. The PCS-12 is a sub-score calculated from the SF-12 total score based on the physical health questions where 0 is worse and 100 is best. A higher score indicates a better health state.
Activities of Daily Living Quality of Life (QOL) Score at Week 52
Activities of daily living QOL score at week 52 as measured by SF-12 Physical Component (PCS-12). The SF-12 consists of 12 questions on various health questions. The PCS-12 is a sub-score calculated from the SF-12 total score based on the physical health questions where 0 is worse and 100 is best. A higher score indicates a better health state.
Direct Costs for Canada
Direct healthcare costs associated with spasticity in cases where the primary reason for the use of the identified health care resource was the treatment of spasticity, or any related complications. Direct healthcare costs are presented in the local currency for Canada.
Direct Costs for Germany
Direct healthcare costs associated with spasticity in cases where the primary reason for the use of the identified health care resource was the treatment of spasticity, or any related complications. Direct healthcare costs are presented in the local currency for Germany.
Direct Costs for Sweden
Direct healthcare costs associated with spasticity in cases where the primary reason for the use of the identified health care resource was the treatment of spasticity, or any related complications. Direct healthcare costs are presented in the local currency for Sweden.
Direct Costs for the United Kingdom
Direct healthcare costs associated with spasticity in cases where the primary reason for the use of the identified health care resource was the treatment of spasticity, or any related complications. Direct healthcare costs are presented in the local currency for the United Kingdom.

Full Information

First Posted
October 24, 2007
Last Updated
July 18, 2012
Sponsor
Allergan
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00549783
Brief Title
BOTOX® Economic Spasticity Trial (BEST)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Allergan

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a study to investigate if patients who have had a stroke and suffer from spasticity might benefit from being given BOTOX® in addition to the normal Standard Care. Spasticity is characterized by stiffness or frequent cramps accompanied by pain and abnormal movements and can prevent the carrying out of everyday tasks such as walking and getting dressed. BOTOX® is a neurotoxin, which is used to prevent the contraction of muscle fibre and has been shown to reduce spasticity significantly. Patients will be enrolled in this study at about 33 locations in Europe and Canada. Study participation will last for about 1 year.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Muscle Spasticity

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
274 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Botulinum toxin type A 900kD
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
First intra-muscular injection at the Baseline visit, and optional second injection of the randomised treatment after a minimum of 12 weeks to a maximum of 24 weeks following the Baseline visit.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
First intra-muscular injection at the Baseline visit, and optional second injection of the randomised treatment after a minimum of 12 weeks to a maximum of 24 weeks following the Baseline visit.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Botulinum Toxin Type A 900kD
Other Intervention Name(s)
BOTOX®
Intervention Description
The exact dosage and number of injection sites is based on the size, number, and location of muscles involved; the severity of spasticity; and the presence of local muscle weakness. First intra-muscular injection at the Baseline visit, and optional second injection of the randomised treatment after a minimum of 12 weeks to a maximum of 24 weeks following the Baseline visit.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
The exact dosage and number of injection sites is based on the size, number, and location of muscles involved; the severity of spasticity; and the presence of local muscle weakness. First intra-muscular injection at the Baseline visit, and optional second injection of the randomised treatment after a minimum of 12 weeks to a maximum of 24 weeks following the Baseline visit.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Physician Assessment of Success, as Determined by Percentage of Patients Who Achieve Their Principal Active Functional Goal at Week 24
Description
Physician assessment of success, as determined by percentage of patients who achieve their principal active functional goal (i.e. a score of 0 to +2 inclusive on the goal attainment scale [GAS]) at week 24 (or 10 weeks post second injection). The GAS is a 6-point scale where -3 means function is worse than at start, 0 means the expected goal was attained, and +2 is much better function than expected.
Time Frame
Week 24
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Physician Assessment of Success, as Determined by Percentage of Patients Who Achieve Their Principal Functional Goal at Week 12
Description
Physician assessment of success, as determined by percentage of patients who achieve their principal functional goal (i.e., a score of 0 to +2 inclusive on the goal attainment scale [GAS]) at week 12. The GAS is 6-point scale where -3 means function is worse than at start, 0 means the expected goal was attained, and +2 is much better function than expected.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Physician Assessment of Success, as Determined by Percentage of Patients Who Achieve Their Principal Functional Goal at Week 52
Description
Physician assessment of success, as determined by percentage of patients who achieve their principal functional goal (i.e., a score of 0 to +2 inclusive on the goal attainment scale [GAS]) at week 52. The GAS is a 6-point scale where -3 means function is worse than at start, 0 means the expected goal was attained, and +2 is much better function than expected
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Patient Assessment of Success, as Determined by Percentage of Patients Who Achieve Their Principal Functional Goal at Week 12
Description
Patient assessment of success, as determined by percentage of patients who achieve their principal functional goal (i.e., a score of 0 to +2 inclusive on the goal attainment scale [GAS]) at week 12. The GAS is a 6-point scale where -3 means function is worse than at start, 0 means the expected goal was attained, and +2 is much better function than expected.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Patient Assessment of Success, as Determined by Percentage of Patients Who Achieve Their Principal Functional Goal at Week 24
Description
Patient assessment of success, as determined by percentage of patients who achieve their principal functional goal (i.e., a score of 0 to +2 inclusive on the goal attainment scale [GAS]) at week 24 (or 10 weeks post second injection). The GAS is a 6-point scale where -3 means function is worse than at start, 0 means the expected goal was attained, and +2 is much better function than expected.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Patient Assessment of Success, as Determined by Percentage of Patients Who Achieve Their Principal Functional Goal at Week 52
Description
Patient assessment of success, as determined by percentage of patients who achieve their principal functional goal (i.e., a score of 0 to +2 inclusive on the goal attainment scale [GAS]) at week 52. The GAS is a 6-point scale where -3 means function is worse than at start, 0 means the expected goal was attained, and +2 is much better function than expected.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Activities of Daily Living Quality of Life (QOL) Score at Week 12
Description
Activities of Daily Living QOL score at week 12 as measured by SF-12 Physical Component (PCS-12). The SF-12 consists of 12 questions on various health questions. The PCS-12 is a sub-score calculated from the SF-12 total score based on the physical health questions where 0 is worse and 100 is best. A higher score indicates a better health state.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Activities of Daily Living Quality of Life (QOL) Score at Week 24
Description
Activities of daily living QOL score at week 24 (or 10 weeks post second injection) as measured by SF-12 Physical Component (PCS-12). The SF-12 consists of 12 questions on various health questions. The PCS-12 is a sub-score calculated from the SF-12 total score based on the physical health questions where 0 is worse and 100 is best. A higher score indicates a better health state.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Activities of Daily Living Quality of Life (QOL) Score at Week 52
Description
Activities of daily living QOL score at week 52 as measured by SF-12 Physical Component (PCS-12). The SF-12 consists of 12 questions on various health questions. The PCS-12 is a sub-score calculated from the SF-12 total score based on the physical health questions where 0 is worse and 100 is best. A higher score indicates a better health state.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Direct Costs for Canada
Description
Direct healthcare costs associated with spasticity in cases where the primary reason for the use of the identified health care resource was the treatment of spasticity, or any related complications. Direct healthcare costs are presented in the local currency for Canada.
Time Frame
52 Weeks
Title
Direct Costs for Germany
Description
Direct healthcare costs associated with spasticity in cases where the primary reason for the use of the identified health care resource was the treatment of spasticity, or any related complications. Direct healthcare costs are presented in the local currency for Germany.
Time Frame
52 Weeks
Title
Direct Costs for Sweden
Description
Direct healthcare costs associated with spasticity in cases where the primary reason for the use of the identified health care resource was the treatment of spasticity, or any related complications. Direct healthcare costs are presented in the local currency for Sweden.
Time Frame
52 Weeks
Title
Direct Costs for the United Kingdom
Description
Direct healthcare costs associated with spasticity in cases where the primary reason for the use of the identified health care resource was the treatment of spasticity, or any related complications. Direct healthcare costs are presented in the local currency for the United Kingdom.
Time Frame
52 Weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with stroke due to a primary cerebral hemorrhage/infarction Subarachnoid hemorrhage producing an upper motor syndrome affecting one body side which results in a hemi-paralysis/plegia Exclusion Criteria: Patients with fixed contracture as a result of spasticity in the upper or lower limb planned to be treated and/or patients with other causes of spasticity (e.g. multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, etc.)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Medical Director
Organizational Affiliation
Allergan
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
Country
Canada
City
Beelitz
Country
Germany
City
Uppsala
Country
Sweden
City
Burslem
State/Province
Stoke-on-Trent
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21174051
Citation
Borg J, Ward AB, Wissel J, Kulkarni J, Sakel M, Ertzgaard P, Akerlund P, Reuter I, Herrmann C, Satkunam L, Wein T, Girod I, Wright N; BEST Study Group. Rationale and design of a multicentre, double-blind, prospective, randomized, European and Canadian study: evaluating patient outcomes and costs of managing adults with post-stroke focal spasticity. J Rehabil Med. 2011 Jan;43(1):15-22. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0663.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

BOTOX® Economic Spasticity Trial (BEST)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs