search
Back to results

Anaemia Correction in Haemodialyzed Patients - Comparative Analysis of Two Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents Schedules (VAES)

Primary Purpose

Bio-Equivalency of 2 Treatment Schedules in HD Patients

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Romania
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
switch (epoetinum beta, darbepoetinum)
continuation (darbepoetinum)
Sponsored by
Anemia Working Group Romania
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Bio-Equivalency of 2 Treatment Schedules in HD Patients focused on measuring epoetinum beta once-weekly, darbepoetinum once-fortnightly, anemia correction, hemoglobin stability

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult age (≥18 years)
  • at least 6 months HD
  • efficient HD (urea-equilibrated Kt/V >1.2, Daugirdas II equation)
  • haemoglobin (Hb) levels above 10g/dL
  • treatment with an ESA for at least 12 weeks prior to enrollment
  • serum ferritin level 100-800 ng/mL
  • transferrin saturation 20-50%.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • hepatic diseases (as defined by abnormal ALT and AST levels) or association of psychical disorders or other disturbances making the enrollment unacceptable, as judged by the physician
  • acute infection or HIV infection
  • severe hyperparathyroidism (iPTH >800 ng/mL)
  • active bleeding
  • > 5% variation in dry body weight in the last 6 months
  • previously diagnosed folic acid and/or vitamin B12 deficiency
  • neoplastic diseases
  • other known causes of anaemia
  • known hypersensibility to one of the administered drugs
  • epilepsy
  • pregnancy or lactation
  • anti-viral treatment during the month before the inclusion
  • immunosuppressive treatment or use of other medication known to influence erythropoiesis during the month preceding the enrollment
  • need for blood transfusions within 12 weeks prior to enrollment

Sites / Locations

  • "Dr Carol Davila" Fresenius NephroCare Dialysis Centre
  • IHS Dialysis Centre "Sf Ioan Nou" Clinical Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

1

2

Arm Description

Group Epo will receive anaemia treatment according to the Romanian Best Practice Guidelines recommendation, with once-weekly SC epoetinum beta during the first phase, then will be switched to receive SC once-fortnightly darbepoetinum. Anaemia treatment schedule will continue according to the Romanian Best Practice Guidelines recommendations, with the same dose. A conversion factor of 1:200 will be used.

Subjects in the Darbepo Group will receive anaemia treatment according to the Romanian Best Practice Guidelines recommendation, with once-fortnightly or once-monthly darbepoetin SC administration, continuing their previous schedule and will continue their previous schedule of anaemia treatment during the second phase of the study

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

- hemoglobin level during the study and - monthly ESA dose per dry body weight during the study

Secondary Outcome Measures

- percentage of patients maintaining target Hb without increase in ESA dose - difference between the average Hb during second study phase period versus the first one and versus baseline phase

Full Information

First Posted
October 29, 2007
Last Updated
December 21, 2017
Sponsor
Anemia Working Group Romania
Collaborators
Dr Carol Davila Teaching Hospital of Nephrology, Romanian Renal Registry
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00551603
Brief Title
Anaemia Correction in Haemodialyzed Patients - Comparative Analysis of Two Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents Schedules
Acronym
VAES
Official Title
Anaemia Correction in Haemodialyzed Patients - Comparative Analysis of Two Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents Schedules
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Logistic reasons, financial contrastraints
Study Start Date
July 2006 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2008 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2009 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Anemia Working Group Romania
Collaborators
Dr Carol Davila Teaching Hospital of Nephrology, Romanian Renal Registry

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Several recent reports support the efficacy of once every-other-week epoetinum administration in the maintenance phase of the anaemia treatment in predialysis, haemodialysis and in peritoneal dialysis CKD patients. However, there are studies suggesting that in HD patients receiving SC short-acting ESA therapy, ESA efficacy decreases when the dosing is extended from thrice-weekly to once-weekly administration. When every-2-week administration of long-acting ESAs is extended to every 4 weeks, efficacy either remains stable or decreases incrementally. The GAIN trial (Gain effectiveness in Anemia treatment with NeoRecormon®) was designed to compare anemia management with epoetin beta, epoetin alpha or darbepoetin alpha in HD patients. An interim analysis of data from 1005 stable HD patients suggested that switching to epoetin beta from either epoetin alpha or darbepoetin alpha resulted in improved efficacy and a 20% dose reduction in SC epoetin beta. The aim of the study is to compare two schedules of anaemia treatment in HD patients using two different erythropoietic stimulating agents (epoetinum beta vs darbepoetinum) with respect to the efficacy in anaemia correction and to the haemoglobin (Hb) level stability. This is a multicenter (2 centers), prospective, open-label, parallel, controlled trial of therapy equivalence
Detailed Description
Currently available ESAs include epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, and darbepoetin. Epoetin alfa and beta have been designed to resemble closely the endogenous molecule and have similar pharmacokinetics. They are considered "short-acting" in comparison to darbepoetin, a second-generation molecule with a prolonged half-life, which is considered "long-acting." European and American Best Practice Guidelines (EBPG) recommend preferential subcutaneous (SC) twice- to thrice-weekly epoetin administration. There is a great deal of evidence that once-weekly SC administration of epoetin beta to be equally efficient and well tolerated in HD patients, even in those requiring high weekly epoetin doses. Several recent reports support the efficacy of once every-other-week epoetinum administration in the maintenance phase of the anaemia treatment in predialysis, haemodialysis and in peritoneal dialysis CKD patients. However, there are studies suggesting that in HD patients receiving SC short-acting ESA therapy, ESA efficacy decreases when the dosing is extended from thrice-weekly to once-weekly administration. When every-2-week administration of long-acting ESAs is extended to every 4 weeks, efficacy either remains stable or decreases incrementally . The GAIN trial (Gain effectiveness in Anemia treatment with NeoRecormon®) was designed to compare anemia management with epoetin beta, epoetin alpha or darbepoetin alpha in HD patients. An interim analysis of data from 1005 stable HD patients suggested that switching to epoetin beta from either epoetin alpha or darbepoetin alpha resulted in improved efficacy and a 20% dose reduction in SC epoetin beta. The aim of the study is to compare two schedules of anaemia treatment in HD patients using two different erythropoietic stimulating agents (epoetinum beta vs darbepoetinum) with respect to the efficacy in anaemia correction and to the haemoglobin (Hb) level stability. The trial is designed according to the Guidelines for studies testing the equivalence of different treatment regimens , and will be conducted with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki and Tokio as amended in Venice (1983). This is a multicenter (2 centers), prospective, open-label, parallel, controlled trial of therapy equivalence. The total observation period is of 80 weeks: The baseline phase (pre-therapeutic intervention) - 12 weeks; The first study phase of therapeutical intervention - 48 weeks: each the two groups of patients will receive anaemia treatment according to the Romanian Best Practice Guidelines either with epoetinum beta or with darbepoetinum; The second study phase of therapeutical intervention - 24 weeks: the patients from the epoetinum beta group will be switched to darbepoetinum. The anaemia treatment will continue according to the Romanian Best Practice Guidelines, using the recommended conversion factor of 200 (Romanian Best Practice Guidelines, NKF-DOQI 2006, Revised EBPG). 300 haemodialyzed patients will be enrolled.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Bio-Equivalency of 2 Treatment Schedules in HD Patients
Keywords
epoetinum beta once-weekly, darbepoetinum once-fortnightly, anemia correction, hemoglobin stability

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Group Epo will receive anaemia treatment according to the Romanian Best Practice Guidelines recommendation, with once-weekly SC epoetinum beta during the first phase, then will be switched to receive SC once-fortnightly darbepoetinum. Anaemia treatment schedule will continue according to the Romanian Best Practice Guidelines recommendations, with the same dose. A conversion factor of 1:200 will be used.
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects in the Darbepo Group will receive anaemia treatment according to the Romanian Best Practice Guidelines recommendation, with once-fortnightly or once-monthly darbepoetin SC administration, continuing their previous schedule and will continue their previous schedule of anaemia treatment during the second phase of the study
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
switch (epoetinum beta, darbepoetinum)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Group Epo
Intervention Description
switching from epoetinum beta once weekly to once-fortnightly darbepoetinum
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
continuation (darbepoetinum)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Darbepo Group
Intervention Description
continuation of the previous darbepoetinum administration schedule
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
- hemoglobin level during the study and - monthly ESA dose per dry body weight during the study
Time Frame
80 weeks of the study
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
- percentage of patients maintaining target Hb without increase in ESA dose - difference between the average Hb during second study phase period versus the first one and versus baseline phase
Time Frame
during the study

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: adult age (≥18 years) at least 6 months HD efficient HD (urea-equilibrated Kt/V >1.2, Daugirdas II equation) haemoglobin (Hb) levels above 10g/dL treatment with an ESA for at least 12 weeks prior to enrollment serum ferritin level 100-800 ng/mL transferrin saturation 20-50%. Exclusion Criteria: hepatic diseases (as defined by abnormal ALT and AST levels) or association of psychical disorders or other disturbances making the enrollment unacceptable, as judged by the physician acute infection or HIV infection severe hyperparathyroidism (iPTH >800 ng/mL) active bleeding > 5% variation in dry body weight in the last 6 months previously diagnosed folic acid and/or vitamin B12 deficiency neoplastic diseases other known causes of anaemia known hypersensibility to one of the administered drugs epilepsy pregnancy or lactation anti-viral treatment during the month before the inclusion immunosuppressive treatment or use of other medication known to influence erythropoiesis during the month preceding the enrollment need for blood transfusions within 12 weeks prior to enrollment
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Liliana Garneata, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Anemia Working Group
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gabriel Mircescu, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Anemia Working Group
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carmen Barbulescu, MD
Organizational Affiliation
"Dr Carol Davila" NephroCare Dialysis Centre
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alexandru Ciocalteu, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
"IHS" Dialysis Centre "Sf Ioan Nou" Clinical Hospital
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Daniela Ciortea, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
IHS Dialysis Centre, "Sf Ioan Nou" Clinical Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
"Dr Carol Davila" Fresenius NephroCare Dialysis Centre
City
Bucharest
ZIP/Postal Code
0107231
Country
Romania
Facility Name
IHS Dialysis Centre "Sf Ioan Nou" Clinical Hospital
City
Bucharest
Country
Romania

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19254204
Citation
Rath T, Mactier RA, Weinreich T, Scherhag AW; GAIN Investigators. Effectiveness and safety of recombinant human erythropoietin beta in maintaining common haemoglobin targets in routine clinical practice in Europe: the GAIN study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Apr;25(4):961-70. doi: 10.1185/03007990902784459.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Anaemia Correction in Haemodialyzed Patients - Comparative Analysis of Two Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents Schedules

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs