search
Back to results

The High-Dose Aldesleukin (IL-2) "Select" Trial for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (SELECT)

Primary Purpose

Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
HD IL2
Sponsored by
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma focused on measuring Kidney, Renal Cell, Metastatic, interleukin-2, select

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must have histologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma that is metastatic or unresectable.
  • If patients have measurable disease restricted to a solitary lesion, its neoplastic nature should be confirmed by cytology/histology.
  • Patients must provide access to tissue blocks containing adequate tumor for interpretation and analysis.
  • Patients must have measurable disease.
  • Patients must have good performance status (ECOG 0 or 1; Karnofsky PS 100-80%).
  • Patients must have adequate organ function.
  • Patients must have no contraindication of vasopressor agents.
  • Patients must be ≥ 18 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have received systemic therapy for metastatic disease.
  • Patients with organ allografts.
  • Patients who require or are likely to require systemic corticosteroid therapy for intercurrent illness.
  • Patients with any significant medical disease other than the malignancy (e.g. COPD, patients with ascites or pleural effusions), which in the opinion of the investigator would significantly increase the risk of immunotherapy.
  • Patients with a history of another malignancy within the past 5 years other than surgically cured non-melanoma skin cancer, carcinoma-in-situ or Stage I carcinoma of the cervix.

Sites / Locations

  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

HD IL2

Arm Description

Participants received high-dose (HD) IL2, 600,000 IU/kg/dose (Prometheus Laboratories Inc.) i.v. every 8 hours for 5 days (maximum of 14 doses) beginning on day 1 and again on day 15. One course generally consisted of 5 days of treatment, 9 days of rest, 5 more days of treatment, and 9 weeks of rest, followed by up to two additional courses of HD IL2 for patients who benefited and tolerated most of the planned IL2 doses. A treatment delay of up to 4 weeks was allowed for resolution of side effects between courses. Patients were eligible to receive a maximum of three courses of treatment.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Objective Response in ISM Good Risk Group
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by investigator assessment of radiographs.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Objective Response Rate in ISM Poor Risk Group
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on treatment on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs.
Objective Response Rate (Independent Assessment)
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks.. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs.
Overall Survival
Overall survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from treatment start to date of death or censored at the date of last documented contact.
3-Year Progression-Free Survival Rate
3-year progression-free survival rate is defined as the proportion of patients absent death or progression based on WHO criteria by 3 years since time of treatment start. PD is a >/=25% increase in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions. Further, PD is the appearance of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Objective Response Rate by MSKCC Risk Group
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs.
Objective Response Rate by UCLA SANI Score
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs.
Objective Response Rate by Tumor Type
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs.
Objective Response Rate by Clear Cell Histology Risk Group
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks.
Objective Response Rate by CA-9 Score (CAIX Classification)
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs.
Objective Response Rate by PD-L1 Tumor
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs.
Objective Response Rate by B7-H3 Tumor
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs.
Objective Response Rate by CA-9 SNP
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs.
Progression-Free Survival
Progression-free survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from treatment start to date of disease progression (PD) or death. Per WHO criteria: PD is a >/=25% increase in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions. Further, PD is the appearance of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants who were event-free were censored at the date of their last disease evaluation.

Full Information

First Posted
November 6, 2007
Last Updated
June 13, 2023
Sponsor
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Collaborators
City of Hope National Medical Center, Providence Cancer Center, Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Indiana University, Loyola University, Our Lady of Mercy Medical Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, University of Cincinnati, University of Pittsburgh, University of Virginia, Vanderbilt University, Wayne State University, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00554515
Brief Title
The High-Dose Aldesleukin (IL-2) "Select" Trial for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Acronym
SELECT
Official Title
The High-Dose Aldesleukin (IL-2) "Select" Trial: A Trial Designed to Prospectively Validate Predictive Models of Response to High Dose IL-2 Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 31, 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 31, 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Collaborators
City of Hope National Medical Center, Providence Cancer Center, Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Indiana University, Loyola University, Our Lady of Mercy Medical Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, University of Cincinnati, University of Pittsburgh, University of Virginia, Vanderbilt University, Wayne State University, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
High-dose interleukin 2 (Proleukin, Novartis) (IL-2) is approved by the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of metastatic kidney cancer and is a standard treatment of this disease. At the present time, IL-2 is the only therapy for kidney cancer that can produce a remission of disease that lasts after treatment is completed. However, most patients who receive IL-2 do not benefit and all patients experience potentially dangerous side effects. Recent research has suggested that certain patients may respond better to IL-2 than others. The Cytokine Working Group is currently conducting a clinical trial that aims to identify and confirm this research and narrow the application of IL-2 to those patients most likely to benefit.
Detailed Description
OBJECTIVES: Primary To determine, in a prospective fashion, if the response rate to high-dose IL-2 for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and "good" pathologic predictive features is significantly higher than a historical, unselected patient population. Secondary To determine, in a prospective fashion, the response rate to high-dose IL-2 for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and "poor" pathologic predictive features and to compare this response rate to the response rate of patients with "good" pathologic predictive features. To determine if components of other predictive and prognostic models (e.g MSKCI or UCLA criteria) can help to further define the optimal population to receive high-dose IL2 for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. To identify features of the baseline immune function (arginine, arginase, T cell zeta chain) of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma that are associated with response to high-dose IL-2. To identify new proteins or patterns of gene expression that might be associated with high-dose IL-2 responsiveness in order to further narrow the application of IL-2 therapy to those who will benefit the most.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Keywords
Kidney, Renal Cell, Metastatic, interleukin-2, select

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
123 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
HD IL2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received high-dose (HD) IL2, 600,000 IU/kg/dose (Prometheus Laboratories Inc.) i.v. every 8 hours for 5 days (maximum of 14 doses) beginning on day 1 and again on day 15. One course generally consisted of 5 days of treatment, 9 days of rest, 5 more days of treatment, and 9 weeks of rest, followed by up to two additional courses of HD IL2 for patients who benefited and tolerated most of the planned IL2 doses. A treatment delay of up to 4 weeks was allowed for resolution of side effects between courses. Patients were eligible to receive a maximum of three courses of treatment.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
HD IL2
Other Intervention Name(s)
Proleukin, Aldesleukin
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Objective Response in ISM Good Risk Group
Description
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by investigator assessment of radiographs.
Time Frame
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262).
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Objective Response Rate in ISM Poor Risk Group
Description
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on treatment on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs.
Time Frame
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262).
Title
Objective Response Rate (Independent Assessment)
Description
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks.. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs.
Time Frame
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262).
Title
Overall Survival
Description
Overall survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from treatment start to date of death or censored at the date of last documented contact.
Time Frame
Participants were followed for survival up to 7 years.
Title
3-Year Progression-Free Survival Rate
Description
3-year progression-free survival rate is defined as the proportion of patients absent death or progression based on WHO criteria by 3 years since time of treatment start. PD is a >/=25% increase in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions. Further, PD is the appearance of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Time Frame
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Long-term follow-up occurred every 3 m for 2 yrs, semi-annually for yr 3 and annually for yrs 4 and 5. Relevant for this endpoint was disease status at 3 y.
Title
Objective Response Rate by MSKCC Risk Group
Description
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs.
Time Frame
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262).
Title
Objective Response Rate by UCLA SANI Score
Description
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs.
Time Frame
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262).
Title
Objective Response Rate by Tumor Type
Description
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs.
Time Frame
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262).
Title
Objective Response Rate by Clear Cell Histology Risk Group
Description
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks.
Time Frame
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Response status was confirmed by an independent assessment of radiographs. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each.
Title
Objective Response Rate by CA-9 Score (CAIX Classification)
Description
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs.
Time Frame
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262).
Title
Objective Response Rate by PD-L1 Tumor
Description
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs.
Time Frame
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262).
Title
Objective Response Rate by B7-H3 Tumor
Description
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs.
Time Frame
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262).
Title
Objective Response Rate by CA-9 SNP
Description
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs.
Time Frame
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262).
Title
Progression-Free Survival
Description
Progression-free survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from treatment start to date of disease progression (PD) or death. Per WHO criteria: PD is a >/=25% increase in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions. Further, PD is the appearance of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants who were event-free were censored at the date of their last disease evaluation.
Time Frame
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Long-term follow-up occurred every 3 m for 2 yrs, semi-annually for yr 3 and annually for yrs 4 and 5. Median survival follow-up was X months (95% CI: ).
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
VHL Genotype Status
Description
VHL genotype status will be determined based on establish methods.
Time Frame
Determined from baseline sample.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients must have histologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma that is metastatic or unresectable. If patients have measurable disease restricted to a solitary lesion, its neoplastic nature should be confirmed by cytology/histology. Patients must provide access to tissue blocks containing adequate tumor for interpretation and analysis. Patients must have measurable disease. Patients must have good performance status (ECOG 0 or 1; Karnofsky PS 100-80%). Patients must have adequate organ function. Patients must have no contraindication of vasopressor agents. Patients must be ≥ 18 years of age. Exclusion Criteria: Patients who have received systemic therapy for metastatic disease. Patients with organ allografts. Patients who require or are likely to require systemic corticosteroid therapy for intercurrent illness. Patients with any significant medical disease other than the malignancy (e.g. COPD, patients with ascites or pleural effusions), which in the opinion of the investigator would significantly increase the risk of immunotherapy. Patients with a history of another malignancy within the past 5 years other than surgically cured non-melanoma skin cancer, carcinoma-in-situ or Stage I carcinoma of the cervix.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David F McDermott, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kim Margolin, MD
Organizational Affiliation
City of Hope National Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Walter Urba, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Chiles Cancer Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marc Ernstoff, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Theodore Logan, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Indiana University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joseph Clark, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Loyola University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janice Dutcher, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Our Lady of Mercy Cancer Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Wong, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Allen Pantuck, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of California, Los Angeles
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Leslie Oleksowicz, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Cincinnati
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Leonard Appleman, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pittsburgh
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Geoffrey Weiss, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Virginia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jeffrey Sosman, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Vanderbilt University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ulka Vaishampayan, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Wayne State University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02215
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17255299
Citation
McDermott DF. Update on the application of interleukin-2 in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Jan 15;13(2 Pt 2):716s-720s. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1872.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15897568
Citation
Atkins M, Regan M, McDermott D, Mier J, Stanbridge E, Youmans A, Febbo P, Upton M, Lechpammer M, Signoretti S. Carbonic anhydrase IX expression predicts outcome of interleukin 2 therapy for renal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 May 15;11(10):3714-21. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2019.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25424850
Citation
McDermott DF, Cheng SC, Signoretti S, Margolin KA, Clark JI, Sosman JA, Dutcher JP, Logan TF, Curti BD, Ernstoff MS, Appleman L, Wong MK, Khushalani NI, Oleksowicz L, Vaishampayan UN, Mier JW, Panka DJ, Bhatt RS, Bailey AS, Leibovich BC, Kwon ED, Kabbinavar FF, Belldegrun AS, Figlin RA, Pantuck AJ, Regan MM, Atkins MB. The high-dose aldesleukin "select" trial: a trial to prospectively validate predictive models of response to treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Feb 1;21(3):561-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1520. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

The High-Dose Aldesleukin (IL-2) "Select" Trial for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs