search
Back to results

A Clinical Study in Subjects With Neuropathic Pain From PHN Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Gabapentin Treatment

Primary Purpose

Neuralgia, Postherpetic

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
GEn 1200mg/day
GEn 3600mg/day
Sponsored by
XenoPort, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Neuralgia, Postherpetic focused on measuring Post-herpetic neuralgia(PHN), Neuropathic pain

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • Documented medical diagnosis of PHN with pain present for at least 3 months from the healing of a herpes zoster rash
  • Female subjects are eligible if of non-childbearing potential or not lactating, has a negative pregnancy, and agrees to use one a specified highly effective method for avoiding pregnancy.
  • Currently on a stable dose of 1800 mg/day of gabapentin for ≥2 weeks with inadequate response OR
  • Not currently treated with gabapentin, but previously treated with ≥1800 mg/day of gabapentin for 4 weeks or more with inadequate response.
  • Baseline 24-hour average pain intensity score ≥ 4.0 based on an 11-point PI-NRS
  • Provides written informed consent in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other chronic pain conditions not associated with PHN. However, the subject will not be excluded if:
  • The pain is located at a different region of the body; and
  • The pain intensity is not greater than the pain intensity of the PHN; and
  • The subject can assess PHN pain independently of other pain
  • Is unable to discontinue prohibited medications or non-drug therapies or procedures throughout the duration of the study
  • Hepatic impairment defined as ALT or AST > 2x upper limit of normal (ULN), or alkaline phosphatase or bilirubin > 1.5x ULN
  • Chronic hepatitis B or C
  • Impaired renal function defined as creatinine clearance <60 mL/min or requiring hemodialysis
  • Corrected QT (QTc) interval ≥ 450 msec or QTc interval ≥480 msec for patients with Bundle Branch Block
  • Uncontrolled hypertension at screen (sitting systolic >160 mmHg and/or sitting diastolic >90 mmHg)
  • Current diagnosis of active epilepsy or any active seizure disorder requiring chronic therapy with antiepileptic drugs
  • Medical condition or disorder that would interfere with the action, absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of GEn, or, in the investigator's judgment
  • Is considered to be clinically significant and may pose a safety concern, or,
  • Could interfere with the accurate assessment of safety or efficacy, or,
  • Could potentially affect a subject's safety or study outcome
  • Current or chronic history of liver disease (including acute viral hepatitis), or known hepatic or biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones).
  • Meets criteria defined by the DSM-IV-TR for a major depressive episode or for active significant psychiatric disorders within last year
  • Depression in remission, with or without antidepressant treatment, may participate, unless stable antidepressant regimen is a prohibited medication
  • Antidepressant medication may not be changed or discontinued to meet entry criteria and must be stable for at least three months prior to enrollment
  • History of clinically significant drug or alcohol abuse (DSM-IV-TR) or is unable to refrain from substance abuse throughout the study. Benzodiazepines or atypical benzodiazepines as hypnotic sleep agents permitted.
  • Currently participating in another clinical study in which the subject is, or will be exposed to an investigational or non-investigational drug or device
  • Has participated in a clinical study and was exposed to investigational or non-investigational drug or device:
  • Within preceding month for studies unrelated to PHN, or
  • Within preceding six months for studies related to PHN
  • Treated previously with GEn
  • History of allergic or medically significant adverse reaction to investigational products (including gabapentin) or their excipients, acetaminophen or related compounds

Sites / Locations

  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

GEn 1200mg/day

GEn 3600mg/day

Arm Description

gabapentin enacarbil 1200mg/day, 4 weeks treatment in either the first or second treatment period

gabapentin enacarbil 3600mg/day, 4 weeks treatment in either the first or second treatment period

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Data
Baseline and end of treatment values are the calculated means of the daily 24-hour API scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization (baseline) and the last 7 days on treatment within each period (end of treatment). Participants rated their API over the preceding 24 hours, using an 11-point PI-Numerical Rating Scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). LOCF was used if less than 4 days of diary data were provided. Change from baseline was calculated as end of treatment minus baseline. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Change From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data for Each Treatment Period
Baseline and end of treatment values are the calculated means of the daily 24-hour API scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization (baseline) and the last 7 days on treatment within each period (end of treatment). Participants used a hand-held diary to rate their average pain intensity over the preceding 24 hours, using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). LOCF was used if less than 4 days of diary data were provided. The by period summary is provided as a sensitivity analysis for the primary analysis.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in the Mean Day-time Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data
Day-time is defined as the time between rising in the morning and going to bed at night. Participants recorded day-time API on a daily basis in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and end of treatment scores are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline is calculated as the end of treatment score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Change From Baseline in the Mean Day-time Worst Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data
Day-time worst pain is defined as the participant's assessment of their worst pain intensity between rising in the morning and going to bed at night. Day-time worst pain was recorded in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and end of treatment scores are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline is calculated as the end of treatment score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Change From Baseline in the Mean Current (Evening) Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data
Current pain is defined as the participant's assessment of pain intensity "right now." Participants recorded their current evening pain intensity in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and end of treatment scores are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline is calculated as the end of treatment score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Change From Baseline in the Mean Night-time Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF
Night-time is defined as the time between going to bed in the evening and rising in the morning. Participants recorded night-time API on a daily basis in the morning upon wakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and end of treatment scores are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline is calculated as the end of treatment score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Change From Baseline in the Mean Night-time Worst Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF
Night-time worst pain is defined as the participant's assessment of their worst pain intensity between going to bed and rising in the morning. Participants recorded night-time worst pain in the morning upon wakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and end of treatment scores are as defined for primary endpoint. Change from baseline = the end of treatment score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Change From Baseline in the Mean Current Morning Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF
Current pain is defined as the participant's assessment of pain intensity "right now." Participants recorded their current morning pain intensity in the morning upon wakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and end of treatment scores are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline is calculated as the end of treatment score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data
Baseline and end of treatment (EOT) scores are the calculated means of the 24-hour average pain scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization (Baseline) and the 7 days prior to the last on-treatment completed diary (EOT). Percent reduction from baseline was calculated as the [(EOT score minus baseline score) divided by the baseline score], multiplied by 100. The PI-NRS is an 11-point scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine) by which a participant assesses their 24-hour average pain intensity. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data by Period
Baseline and end of treatment scores are the calculated means of the 24-hour average pain scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization (Baseline) and the 7 days prior to the last on-treatment completed diary (end of treatment). Percent reduction from baseline was calculated as the [(end of treatment score minus the baseline score) divided by the baseline score], multiplied by 100. The PI-NRS is an 11-point scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine) by which a participant assesses their 24-hour average pain intensity. Data are summarized by period.
Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Dose in Milligrams of Rescue Medication at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period
Mean daily use of rescue medication (milligrams of acetaminophen) was calculated by determining the average number of tablets taken per day of rescue medication (Commercial Tylenol) during treatment and multiplying that by 500 mg. Baseline and end of treatment scores are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline is calculated as the end of treatment score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data
The PGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the participant's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of "very much improved" or "much improved" Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Presented by Period Using LOCF Data
The PGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the participant's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of "very much improved" or "much improved". Data are summarized by dose within each treatment period.
Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Questionnaire at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data
The CGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the clinician's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of "very much improved" or "much improved." Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Questionnaire at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Presented by Period Using LOCF Data
The CGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the clinician's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of "very much improved" or "much improved." Data are summarized by dose within each treatment period.
Change From Baseline in the Mean Sleep Interference Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data
Participants assessed sleep interference due to pain on a daily basis using the 11-point NRS (0=pain does not interfere with sleep, 10=pain completely interferes with sleep). Baseline and end of treatment scores are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline is calculated as the end of treatment score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Change From Baseline in the Severity of Pain and the Impact of Pain as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF
The BPI assesses the severity and interference of pain; and consists of 6 items assessed on an 11-point NRS (0=no impact to 10=greatest impact). 2 summary scores are calculated: BPI Severity Score (average of first 4 items) and BPI Interference Score (average of 7 responses to item 6); where scores range from 0 to 10 (0=no impact to 10=greatest impact). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Mean Gabapentin Steady-State (ss) Average, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations
Steady-state average (Cave, ss), maximum (Cmax, ss), and minimum (Cmin,ss) plasma concentration of gabapentin in each participant were estimated using the gabapentin plasma concentration data and with the aid of a population pharmacokinetic model. Dispersion is represented by the fifth to ninety-fifth percentile, though labeled as "Full Range." A total of 10 blood samples were collected per participant over the Baseline, Period 1, and Period 2 at various timepoints during the dosing interval. Plasma concentration of gabapentin in these samples was measured.

Full Information

First Posted
February 6, 2008
Last Updated
July 15, 2013
Sponsor
XenoPort, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00617461
Brief Title
A Clinical Study in Subjects With Neuropathic Pain From PHN Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Gabapentin Treatment
Official Title
Study PXN110527: The Investigation of the Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of XP13512 in Subjects With Neuropathic Pain Associated With Post-herpetic Neuralgia (PHN) Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Gabapentin Treatment.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2009 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
XenoPort, Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is evaluate the difference between two doses of gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, on pain associated with post-herpetic neuralgia.
Detailed Description
The primary purpose of study PXN110527 was to investigate the efficacy of a high (3600mg/day) dose versus a low (1200mg/day) dose of GEn in subjects with post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) who have a history of an inadequate response to gabapentin treatment. The study is a cross-over design. Prior to screening subjects are required to have a demonstrated history of an inadequate response (as determined by the investigator) to at least 1800 mg/day of gabapentin. Prior history of treatment with gabapentin includes current treatment at 1800mg/day (2 weeks) or prior treatment with ≥1800mg/day (4 weeks). Subjects could also have been treated with pregabalin monotherapy (150-300mg/day, ≥4 weeks) and had an inadequate response. Subjects are treated with gabapentin 1800mg/day during the Baseline Period and are randomized if during the Basleline Period they are compliant with gabapentin treatment and have a 24-hour average pain intensity score ≥4.0 based on an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS). Subjects are then randomized to receive gabapentin enacarbil (either 1200mg/day or 3600mg/day in a 1:1 ratio) for Treatment Period 1 (28 days). Followed by a dose of 2400mg/day for 4 days and the alternate fixed dose (either 3600 mg/day or 1200 mg/day) for Treatment Period 2 (28 days).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Neuralgia, Postherpetic
Keywords
Post-herpetic neuralgia(PHN), Neuropathic pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
96 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
GEn 1200mg/day
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
gabapentin enacarbil 1200mg/day, 4 weeks treatment in either the first or second treatment period
Arm Title
GEn 3600mg/day
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
gabapentin enacarbil 3600mg/day, 4 weeks treatment in either the first or second treatment period
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
GEn 1200mg/day
Other Intervention Name(s)
GEn, XP13512/GSK1838262, gabapentin enacarbil
Intervention Description
1200mg/day gabapentin enacarbil
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
GEn 3600mg/day
Other Intervention Name(s)
gabapentin enacarbil, GEn, XP13512/GSK1838262
Intervention Description
3600mg/day gabapentin enacarbil
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Data
Description
Baseline and end of treatment values are the calculated means of the daily 24-hour API scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization (baseline) and the last 7 days on treatment within each period (end of treatment). Participants rated their API over the preceding 24 hours, using an 11-point PI-Numerical Rating Scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). LOCF was used if less than 4 days of diary data were provided. Change from baseline was calculated as end of treatment minus baseline. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Time Frame
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Title
Change From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data for Each Treatment Period
Description
Baseline and end of treatment values are the calculated means of the daily 24-hour API scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization (baseline) and the last 7 days on treatment within each period (end of treatment). Participants used a hand-held diary to rate their average pain intensity over the preceding 24 hours, using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). LOCF was used if less than 4 days of diary data were provided. The by period summary is provided as a sensitivity analysis for the primary analysis.
Time Frame
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in the Mean Day-time Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data
Description
Day-time is defined as the time between rising in the morning and going to bed at night. Participants recorded day-time API on a daily basis in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and end of treatment scores are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline is calculated as the end of treatment score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Time Frame
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Title
Change From Baseline in the Mean Day-time Worst Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data
Description
Day-time worst pain is defined as the participant's assessment of their worst pain intensity between rising in the morning and going to bed at night. Day-time worst pain was recorded in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and end of treatment scores are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline is calculated as the end of treatment score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Time Frame
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Title
Change From Baseline in the Mean Current (Evening) Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data
Description
Current pain is defined as the participant's assessment of pain intensity "right now." Participants recorded their current evening pain intensity in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and end of treatment scores are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline is calculated as the end of treatment score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Time Frame
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Title
Change From Baseline in the Mean Night-time Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF
Description
Night-time is defined as the time between going to bed in the evening and rising in the morning. Participants recorded night-time API on a daily basis in the morning upon wakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and end of treatment scores are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline is calculated as the end of treatment score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Time Frame
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Title
Change From Baseline in the Mean Night-time Worst Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF
Description
Night-time worst pain is defined as the participant's assessment of their worst pain intensity between going to bed and rising in the morning. Participants recorded night-time worst pain in the morning upon wakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and end of treatment scores are as defined for primary endpoint. Change from baseline = the end of treatment score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Time Frame
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Title
Change From Baseline in the Mean Current Morning Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF
Description
Current pain is defined as the participant's assessment of pain intensity "right now." Participants recorded their current morning pain intensity in the morning upon wakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and end of treatment scores are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline is calculated as the end of treatment score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Time Frame
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Title
Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data
Description
Baseline and end of treatment (EOT) scores are the calculated means of the 24-hour average pain scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization (Baseline) and the 7 days prior to the last on-treatment completed diary (EOT). Percent reduction from baseline was calculated as the [(EOT score minus baseline score) divided by the baseline score], multiplied by 100. The PI-NRS is an 11-point scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine) by which a participant assesses their 24-hour average pain intensity. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Time Frame
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Title
Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data by Period
Description
Baseline and end of treatment scores are the calculated means of the 24-hour average pain scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization (Baseline) and the 7 days prior to the last on-treatment completed diary (end of treatment). Percent reduction from baseline was calculated as the [(end of treatment score minus the baseline score) divided by the baseline score], multiplied by 100. The PI-NRS is an 11-point scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine) by which a participant assesses their 24-hour average pain intensity. Data are summarized by period.
Time Frame
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Title
Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Dose in Milligrams of Rescue Medication at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period
Description
Mean daily use of rescue medication (milligrams of acetaminophen) was calculated by determining the average number of tablets taken per day of rescue medication (Commercial Tylenol) during treatment and multiplying that by 500 mg. Baseline and end of treatment scores are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline is calculated as the end of treatment score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Time Frame
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Title
Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data
Description
The PGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the participant's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of "very much improved" or "much improved" Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Time Frame
End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Title
Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Presented by Period Using LOCF Data
Description
The PGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the participant's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of "very much improved" or "much improved". Data are summarized by dose within each treatment period.
Time Frame
End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Title
Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Questionnaire at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data
Description
The CGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the clinician's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of "very much improved" or "much improved." Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Time Frame
End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Title
Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Questionnaire at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Presented by Period Using LOCF Data
Description
The CGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the clinician's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of "very much improved" or "much improved." Data are summarized by dose within each treatment period.
Time Frame
End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Title
Change From Baseline in the Mean Sleep Interference Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data
Description
Participants assessed sleep interference due to pain on a daily basis using the 11-point NRS (0=pain does not interfere with sleep, 10=pain completely interferes with sleep). Baseline and end of treatment scores are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline is calculated as the end of treatment score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Time Frame
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Title
Change From Baseline in the Severity of Pain and the Impact of Pain as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF
Description
The BPI assesses the severity and interference of pain; and consists of 6 items assessed on an 11-point NRS (0=no impact to 10=greatest impact). 2 summary scores are calculated: BPI Severity Score (average of first 4 items) and BPI Interference Score (average of 7 responses to item 6); where scores range from 0 to 10 (0=no impact to 10=greatest impact). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Time Frame
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of treatment)
Title
Mean Gabapentin Steady-State (ss) Average, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations
Description
Steady-state average (Cave, ss), maximum (Cmax, ss), and minimum (Cmin,ss) plasma concentration of gabapentin in each participant were estimated using the gabapentin plasma concentration data and with the aid of a population pharmacokinetic model. Dispersion is represented by the fifth to ninety-fifth percentile, though labeled as "Full Range." A total of 10 blood samples were collected per participant over the Baseline, Period 1, and Period 2 at various timepoints during the dosing interval. Plasma concentration of gabapentin in these samples was measured.
Time Frame
A total of 10 blood samples (2 samples at each visit) were collected per participant at Baseline, and the Week 1 and Week 4 visits for each period

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 18 years or older Documented medical diagnosis of PHN with pain present for at least 3 months from the healing of a herpes zoster rash Female subjects are eligible if of non-childbearing potential or not lactating, has a negative pregnancy, and agrees to use one a specified highly effective method for avoiding pregnancy. Currently on a stable dose of 1800 mg/day of gabapentin for ≥2 weeks with inadequate response OR Not currently treated with gabapentin, but previously treated with ≥1800 mg/day of gabapentin for 4 weeks or more with inadequate response. Baseline 24-hour average pain intensity score ≥ 4.0 based on an 11-point PI-NRS Provides written informed consent in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements Exclusion Criteria: Other chronic pain conditions not associated with PHN. However, the subject will not be excluded if: The pain is located at a different region of the body; and The pain intensity is not greater than the pain intensity of the PHN; and The subject can assess PHN pain independently of other pain Is unable to discontinue prohibited medications or non-drug therapies or procedures throughout the duration of the study Hepatic impairment defined as ALT or AST > 2x upper limit of normal (ULN), or alkaline phosphatase or bilirubin > 1.5x ULN Chronic hepatitis B or C Impaired renal function defined as creatinine clearance <60 mL/min or requiring hemodialysis Corrected QT (QTc) interval ≥ 450 msec or QTc interval ≥480 msec for patients with Bundle Branch Block Uncontrolled hypertension at screen (sitting systolic >160 mmHg and/or sitting diastolic >90 mmHg) Current diagnosis of active epilepsy or any active seizure disorder requiring chronic therapy with antiepileptic drugs Medical condition or disorder that would interfere with the action, absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of GEn, or, in the investigator's judgment Is considered to be clinically significant and may pose a safety concern, or, Could interfere with the accurate assessment of safety or efficacy, or, Could potentially affect a subject's safety or study outcome Current or chronic history of liver disease (including acute viral hepatitis), or known hepatic or biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones). Meets criteria defined by the DSM-IV-TR for a major depressive episode or for active significant psychiatric disorders within last year Depression in remission, with or without antidepressant treatment, may participate, unless stable antidepressant regimen is a prohibited medication Antidepressant medication may not be changed or discontinued to meet entry criteria and must be stable for at least three months prior to enrollment History of clinically significant drug or alcohol abuse (DSM-IV-TR) or is unable to refrain from substance abuse throughout the study. Benzodiazepines or atypical benzodiazepines as hypnotic sleep agents permitted. Currently participating in another clinical study in which the subject is, or will be exposed to an investigational or non-investigational drug or device Has participated in a clinical study and was exposed to investigational or non-investigational drug or device: Within preceding month for studies unrelated to PHN, or Within preceding six months for studies related to PHN Treated previously with GEn History of allergic or medically significant adverse reaction to investigational products (including gabapentin) or their excipients, acetaminophen or related compounds
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
GSK Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
GlaxoSmithKline
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85016
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Oxnard
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93030
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Roseville
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95661
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94109
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bradenton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34209
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chipley
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32428
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Daytona Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32117
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fort Myers
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33916
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32608
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Marianna
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32446
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Miami Springs
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33166
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Naranja
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33032
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
South Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33143
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tallahassee
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32308
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33603
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33612
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Decatur
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30033
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Marietta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30060
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60617
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Terre Haute
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47802
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64111
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
St. Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63117
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Missoula
State/Province
Montana
ZIP/Postal Code
59808
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lebanon
State/Province
New Hampshire
ZIP/Postal Code
03766
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10004
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Greensboro
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27408
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Salisbury
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28144
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27103
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Norman
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73071
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73112
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Medford
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97501
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Greensburg
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15601
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kingsport
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37660
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78756
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77028
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77044
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77089
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Longview
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75605
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78238
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Weber City
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
24290
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tacoma
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98405
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Yakima
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98902
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Schoenau
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
69250
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Huettenberg
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
35625
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Wiesbaden
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
65189
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Achim
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
28832
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bochum
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
44892
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hattingen
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
45525
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Mainz
State/Province
Rheinland-Pfalz
ZIP/Postal Code
55116
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dresden
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
01307
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Leipzg
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
04109
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10409
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10435
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24102928
Citation
Harden RN, Freeman R, Rainka M, Zhang L, Bell C, Berges A, Chen C, Graff O, Harding K, Hunter S, Kavanagh S, Schwartzbach C, Warren S, McClung C. A phase 2a, randomized, crossover trial of gabapentin enacarbil for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia in gabapentin inadequate responders. Pain Med. 2013 Dec;14(12):1918-32. doi: 10.1111/pme.12227. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Clinical Study in Subjects With Neuropathic Pain From PHN Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Gabapentin Treatment

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs