Acupuncture Versus Sham for Radiotherapy-Induced Emesis
Primary Purpose
Nausea, Vomiting
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Sweden
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Acupuncture
Sham
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Nausea focused on measuring Acupuncture therapy, Cancer, Emesis, Expectations, Placebo
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients of at least 18 years of age
- with gynaecologic-, anal-, rectal-, colon-, ventricle-, pancreatic- or testicular tumours
- willing to give their informed consent
- able to take part in the entire treatment and data collection procedure
- had planned radiation over an abdominal and/or pelvic field (with or without concomitant chemotherapy) with the volume of at least 800 cm3 and a dose of at least 25 Gy.
Exclusion Criteria:
- use of antiemetic treatment or persistent nausea within 24 hours prior to the start of radiotherapy
- ever received acupuncture against nausea, or during the last year received acupuncture for any indication.
Sites / Locations
- Sussanne Börjeson
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Acupuncture
Sham
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of patients with at least one episode of nausea during the whole radiotherapy treatment period
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary outcome measures are the summed number of days with nausea, intensity of nausea, number of patients and summed number of days with vomiting, belief in the antiemetic effects and interest in receiving needling in the future
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00621660
First Posted
February 11, 2008
Last Updated
February 21, 2008
Sponsor
University Hospital, Linkoeping
Collaborators
Swedish Cancer Society, Ostergotland County Council, Sweden, Vardalinstitutet The Swedish Institute for Health Sciences, Cancer & Traffic Injury Fund
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00621660
Brief Title
Acupuncture Versus Sham for Radiotherapy-Induced Emesis
Official Title
Acupuncture Compared To Sham With a Placebo-Needle in Radiotherapy-Induced Nausea - a Randomised Controlled Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2007
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2004 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2007 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2007 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Linkoeping
Collaborators
Swedish Cancer Society, Ostergotland County Council, Sweden, Vardalinstitutet The Swedish Institute for Health Sciences, Cancer & Traffic Injury Fund
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate if acupuncture prevents or reduces nausea or vomiting during radiotherapy
Detailed Description
Treatment with acupuncture is, despite sometimes unclear evidence, increasing in cancer care. Acupuncture is used for indications such as pain and nausea, but for radiotherapy (RT) induced nausea it is still an unexplored treatment. For evaluation of the method, the use of sham acupuncture as a control treatment provides a tool resembling placebo for drugs. The aim of the studt is therefore to investigate whether acupuncture reduces nausea caused by radiotherapy in a patient group with a >50% risk of experiencing the symptoms (abdominal or pelvic region). Patients are randomised to invasive acupuncture (IA) or placebo acupuncture (PA) 30 min, 2-3 times/week during the whole RT period. IA is administered bilaterally to the point PC6 using an invasive needle and PA with a needle, which looks identical but is not pointed and is not fixed in its handle. When this comes into contact with the surface of the skin and gives a feeling of penetration it glides upwards in its handle and is therefore shortened, which gives an illusion that the needle has entered the tissue. Nausea and vomiting is documented in diaries and questionnaires under the entire treatment period as well as two and four weeks after radiotherapy.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Nausea, Vomiting
Keywords
Acupuncture therapy, Cancer, Emesis, Expectations, Placebo
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
237 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Acupuncture
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Sham
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Acupuncture
Other Intervention Name(s)
Invasive acupuncture
Intervention Description
Acupuncture was administered bilaterally to the standard antiemetic point2-4 pericardium six (PC6) located between the tendons of palmaris longus and flexor carpii radialis at two body-inches proximal of the wrist crease. Sharp needles, diameter 0.25 x length 40 millimetres, were inserted into a depth of a half body-inch. One body-inch (or a "cun" in traditional Chinese medicine context) is equivalent to the greatest width of the individual patients´ thumb at the distal phalanx, approximately one and a half centimetres or one American thumb. The needles were manipulated three times (at the start, middle and end of the treatment session) by twirling, thrusting and lifting until deqi occurred.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Sham
Other Intervention Name(s)
Sham acupuncture, Placebo acupuncture
Intervention Description
Sham acupuncture was administered bilaterally to a non-acupuncture point two body-inches proximal of PC6 with the telescopic Park sham device16, 0.30 x 40 millimetres (fully extended length). That needle looks identical with a real needle but is blunted and glides upwards into its handle instead of penetrating, which gives an illusion of penetration. The marking tubes hold the needles in place. The therapist gave an illusion of manipulation by turning the needle three times, each time for a couple of seconds until the needle touched the skin, but no deqi occurred. Except when placing and manipulating the sham needle, it was not pressed against the skin at all.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of patients with at least one episode of nausea during the whole radiotherapy treatment period
Time Frame
The radiotherapy treatment period (md 5 weeks)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Secondary outcome measures are the summed number of days with nausea, intensity of nausea, number of patients and summed number of days with vomiting, belief in the antiemetic effects and interest in receiving needling in the future
Time Frame
From acupunture start until 4 weeks after treatment stopped
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
patients of at least 18 years of age
with gynaecologic-, anal-, rectal-, colon-, ventricle-, pancreatic- or testicular tumours
willing to give their informed consent
able to take part in the entire treatment and data collection procedure
had planned radiation over an abdominal and/or pelvic field (with or without concomitant chemotherapy) with the volume of at least 800 cm3 and a dose of at least 25 Gy.
Exclusion Criteria:
use of antiemetic treatment or persistent nausea within 24 hours prior to the start of radiotherapy
ever received acupuncture against nausea, or during the last year received acupuncture for any indication.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sussanne Börjeson, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Linkoeping University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Sussanne Börjeson
City
Linköping
ZIP/Postal Code
58185
Country
Sweden
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32371667
Citation
Blom K, Efverman A. Sleep During Pelvic-Abdominal Radiotherapy for Cancer: A Longitudinal Study With Special Attention to Sleep in Relation to Nausea and Quality of Life. Cancer Nurs. 2021 Jul-Aug 01;44(4):333-344. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000826.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
21448267
Citation
Enblom A, Lekander M, Hammar M, Johnsson A, Onelov E, Ingvar M, Steineck G, Borjeson S. Getting the grip on nonspecific treatment effects: emesis in patients randomized to acupuncture or sham compared to patients receiving standard care. PLoS One. 2011 Mar 23;6(3):e14766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014766.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Acupuncture Versus Sham for Radiotherapy-Induced Emesis
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs