search
Back to results

Pharmacokinetics of Sublingual Versus Oral Tacrolimus in Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplantation

Primary Purpose

Kidney Failure, Chronic

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tacrolimus (Arm B)
Clotrimazole Troche
Tacrolimus (Arm A)
Nystatin Suspension
Sponsored by
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Kidney Failure, Chronic focused on measuring Kidney Transplantation, Tacrolimus (Prograf), Pharmacokinetics, Sublingual administration, Drug interactions (Cytochrome P450 and p-glycoprotein)

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients awaiting kidney transplantation aged ≥ 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients concurrently treated with medications that interact with tacrolimus (other than clotrimazole)

Sites / Locations

  • NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

A: Tacrolimus and Nystatin Suspension

B: Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole Troche

Arm Description

Administer sublingual tacrolimus 2 mg every 12 hours (subject weight < 90 kg) or 3 mg every 12 hours (subject weight > 90kg) (study day 1 - 3). Tacrolimus capsules will be opened and the contents placed under the participants tongue. Oral tacrolimus at same dose every 12 hours (study day 6 - 8). Tacrolimus capsules will be administered by mouth. Nystatin suspension 5 mL every 12 hours (study days 1 - 3 and 6 - 8).

Administer sublingual tacrolimus 1 mg every 12 hours (subject weight < 90 kg) or 2 mg every 12 hours (subject weight > 90 kg) (study day 1 - 3). Tacrolimus capsules will be opened and the contents placed under the participants tongue. Oral tacrolimus at same dose every 12 hours (study day 6 - 8). Tacrolimus capsules will be administered by mouth. Clotrimazole troche 10 mg every 12 hours (study day 1 - 3 and 6 - 8).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

C0 (ng/mL)
Trough concentration
Cmax
Maximum concentration (ng/mL)
Tmax
Time to Maximum concentration (hours)
Estimated AUC 0-6
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve from 0-6 hours (mg-hr/L)
Tacrolimus Powder Dissolution Time
Tacrolimus Powder Dissolution Time during Sublingual Administration (minutes)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Drug Interactions and Genotypes
Impact of drug interaction between tacrolimus and clotrimazole troche vs. nystatin suspension. Evaluate genotype polymorphisms that influence CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and p-glycoprotein expression to determine impact on sublingual and oral tacrolimus delivery.

Full Information

First Posted
February 12, 2008
Last Updated
May 30, 2019
Sponsor
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00629122
Brief Title
Pharmacokinetics of Sublingual Versus Oral Tacrolimus in Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplantation
Official Title
Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Sublingual Versus Oral Tacrolimus Administration in Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplantation
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2009 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Weill Medical College of Cornell University

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Tacrolimus (Prograf) belongs to a class of medications known as the calcineurin inhibitors. It is a maintenance drug that is used to prevent rejection in kidney, liver, and heart transplant recipients. Calcineurin inhibitors display high pharmacokinetic (the body's effects on a drug) variability and necessitate use of blood tests to ensure that adequate drug levels are present to maintain effectiveness and safety. Early after transplant or at times when tacrolimus cannot be taken by mouth, alternative routes of administration are sought. Although an intravenous (through the vein) product is available, it can be toxic to the kidneys and has been associated with allergic reactions. Drug delivery via the oral mucosa is an alternative method of systemic drug administration which offers an alternative when oral administration is impractical (gastrointestinal dysmotility, reduced drug absorption, intestinal failure, difficulty in swallowing, or in those with nausea or vomiting). Administration of tacrolimus by the sublingual route may allow for direct entry into the systemic circulation and bypasses problems associated with drug absorption and breakdown that take place in the small intestine.
Detailed Description
Tacrolimus (Prograf) belongs to a class of medications known as the calcineurin inhibitors. It is a maintenance drug that is used to prevent rejection in kidney, liver, and heart transplant recipients. Calcineurin inhibitors display high pharmacokinetic (the body's effects on a drug) variability and necessitate use of blood tests to ensure that adequate drug levels are present to maintain effectiveness and safety. The amount of oral tacrolimus that is absorbed varies in all patient populations studied. Tacrolimus is metabolized or broken down for elimination by the liver and small intestine via cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4, CYP 3A5, and p-glycoprotein enzyme systems. Enzyme activity is affected by several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in an individuals genetic make-up and differences in expression may contribute to variations in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. There are number of drug-drug interactions where concomitantly administered medications can increase or decrease this break down of tacrolimus. Early after transplant or at times when tacrolimus cannot be taken by mouth, alternative routes of administration are sought. Although an intravenous (through the vein) product is available, it can be toxic to the kidneys and has been associated with allergic reactions. Studies in lung transplant recipients have utilized sublingual (under the tongue) tacrolimus administration with successful outcomes. Drug delivery via the oral mucosa is an alternative method of systemic drug administration which offers an alternative when oral administration is impractical (gastrointestinal dysmotility, reduced drug absorption, intestinal failure, difficulty in swallowing, or in those with nausea or vomiting). Administration of tacrolimus by the sublingual route allows for direct entry into the systemic circulation and bypasses problems associated with drug absorption and breakdown that take place in the small intestine. In order to learn more about the possible role of sublingual tacrolimus among transplant recipients we will administer tacrolimus sublingually. In addition, we will evaluate differences in expression and bioactivity of SNP polymorphisms and their effects in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. Patients awaiting kidney transplantation who are listed on the kidney transplant waiting list or those with upcoming living donor transplants at our center will be administered five doses of sublingual tacrolimus followed by five doses of oral tacrolimus. We will evaluate and then compare the pharmacokinetic characteristics of sublingual and oral tacrolimus administration among the study participants. The purpose of this study is to assess the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of tacrolimus after sublingual and oral administration. A secondary objective is to assess the drug-drug interaction between concomitant therapy with clotrimazole.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Kidney Failure, Chronic
Keywords
Kidney Transplantation, Tacrolimus (Prograf), Pharmacokinetics, Sublingual administration, Drug interactions (Cytochrome P450 and p-glycoprotein)

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
5 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
A: Tacrolimus and Nystatin Suspension
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Administer sublingual tacrolimus 2 mg every 12 hours (subject weight < 90 kg) or 3 mg every 12 hours (subject weight > 90kg) (study day 1 - 3). Tacrolimus capsules will be opened and the contents placed under the participants tongue. Oral tacrolimus at same dose every 12 hours (study day 6 - 8). Tacrolimus capsules will be administered by mouth. Nystatin suspension 5 mL every 12 hours (study days 1 - 3 and 6 - 8).
Arm Title
B: Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole Troche
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Administer sublingual tacrolimus 1 mg every 12 hours (subject weight < 90 kg) or 2 mg every 12 hours (subject weight > 90 kg) (study day 1 - 3). Tacrolimus capsules will be opened and the contents placed under the participants tongue. Oral tacrolimus at same dose every 12 hours (study day 6 - 8). Tacrolimus capsules will be administered by mouth. Clotrimazole troche 10 mg every 12 hours (study day 1 - 3 and 6 - 8).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tacrolimus (Arm B)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Prograf
Intervention Description
Study day 1 (9a): Initiate sublingual (SL) tacrolimus and clotrimazole troche x 5 doses; Study day 3 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th SL tacrolimus dose; Study day 3 (9p): Start washout period, no drug administration (tacrolimus, clotrimazole); Study day 5 (9p): End washout period; Study day 6 (9a): Initiate oral tacrolimus and clotrimazole troche x 5 doses; Study day 8 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th oral tacrolimus dose; Study day 15: Contact subject by telephone to assess for any adverse effects. To ensure that dietary intake does not affect the absorption profile of tacrolimus we will ensure that breakfast is given 15 minutes prior to drug administration on the days of pharmacokinetic assessment (study day 3 and 8).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Clotrimazole Troche
Other Intervention Name(s)
Mycelex
Intervention Description
Study day 1 (9a): Initiate sublingual (SL) tacrolimus and clotrimazole troche x 5 doses; Study day 3 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th SL tacrolimus dose; Study day 3 (9p): Start washout period, no drug administration (tacrolimus, clotrimazole); Study day 5 (9p): End washout period; Study day 6 (9a): Initiate oral tacrolimus and clotrimazole troche x 5 doses; Study day 8 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th oral tacrolimus dose; Study day 15: Contact subject by telephone to assess for any adverse effects. To ensure that dietary intake does not affect the absorption profile of tacrolimus we will ensure that breakfast is given 15 minutes prior to drug administration on the days of pharmacokinetic assessment (study day 3 and 8).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tacrolimus (Arm A)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Prograf
Intervention Description
Study day 1 (9a): Initiate sublingual (SL) tacrolimus and nystatin suspension x 5 doses; Study day 3 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th SL tacrolimus dose; Study day 3 (9p): Start washout period, no drug administration (tacrolimus, nystatin); Study day 5 (9p): End washout period; Study day 6 (9a): Initiate oral tacrolimus and nystatin suspension x 5 doses; Study day 8 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th oral tacrolimus dose; Study day 15: Contact subjects by telephone to assess for any adverse effects. To ensure that dietary intake does not affect the absorption profile of tacrolimus we will ensure that breakfast is given 15 minutes prior to drug administration on the days of pharmacokinetic assessment (study day 3 and 8).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Nystatin Suspension
Other Intervention Name(s)
Nystatin Swish and Swallow
Intervention Description
Study day 1 (9a): Initiate sublingual (SL) tacrolimus and nystatin suspension x 5 doses; Study day 3 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th SL tacrolimus dose; Study day 3 (9p): Start washout period, no drug administration (tacrolimus, nystatin); Study day 5 (9p): End washout period; Study day 6 (9a): Initiate oral tacrolimus and nystatin suspension x 5 doses; Study day 8 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th oral tacrolimus dose; Study day 15: Contact subjects by telephone to assess for any adverse effects. To ensure that dietary intake does not affect the absorption profile of tacrolimus we will ensure that breakfast is given 15 minutes prior to drug administration on the days of pharmacokinetic assessment (study day 3 and 8).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
C0 (ng/mL)
Description
Trough concentration
Time Frame
Day 3 and Day 8, time 0 (before tacrolimus dose)
Title
Cmax
Description
Maximum concentration (ng/mL)
Time Frame
Day 3 and Day 8, at time of maximum concentration
Title
Tmax
Description
Time to Maximum concentration (hours)
Time Frame
Day 3 and Day 8, time of maximum concentration
Title
Estimated AUC 0-6
Description
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve from 0-6 hours (mg-hr/L)
Time Frame
Day 3 and Day 8, calculated based on concentrations measured between hours 0 and 6
Title
Tacrolimus Powder Dissolution Time
Description
Tacrolimus Powder Dissolution Time during Sublingual Administration (minutes)
Time Frame
Day 3, minutes to powder dissolution
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Drug Interactions and Genotypes
Description
Impact of drug interaction between tacrolimus and clotrimazole troche vs. nystatin suspension. Evaluate genotype polymorphisms that influence CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and p-glycoprotein expression to determine impact on sublingual and oral tacrolimus delivery.
Time Frame
2 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients awaiting kidney transplantation aged ≥ 18 years Exclusion Criteria: Patients concurrently treated with medications that interact with tacrolimus (other than clotrimazole)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Meredith J Aull, Pharm.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Pharmacokinetics of Sublingual Versus Oral Tacrolimus in Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplantation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs