search
Back to results

A Phase 1/2A, Single Dose Study Of PF-04383119 In Japanese Patients With Moderate To Severe Pain From Osteoarthritis Of The Knee

Primary Purpose

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Japan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PF-04383119 (tanezumab)
PF-04383119 (tanezumab)
PF-04383119 (tanezumab)
PF-04383119 (tanezumab)
PF-04383119 (tanezumab)
PF-04383119 (tanezumab)
Sponsored by
Pfizer
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoarthritis, Knee focused on measuring monoclonal antibody

Eligibility Criteria

35 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Japanese Male or female, Age 35-65 (Part 1), Age 35-75 (Part 2)
  • Diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee based on American College of Rheumatology criteria
  • Knee pain, and radiographic evidence of knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence x-ray grade ≥2) obtained within 1 year of enrollment
  • At least one of the following: age >50, morning stiffness <30 minutes in duration, crepitus, and OA of the knee must involve the index tibiofemoral joint and must have present for at least 6 months
  • Patients who meet at least one of the following: unwilling to take non-opiate pain medications, or for whom non-opiate pain medications have failed, or are candidates for or seeking invasive interventions such as intraarticular injections, knee arthroplasty, or total knee surgery
  • Pain levels as required by the protocol at Screening and Baseline

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis or history of RA, any inflammatory arthritis, gout, Paget's disease or any other disease that in the Investigator's opinion would interfere with the assessment of pain and other symptoms of OA
  • Patients with regional pain syndromes suggestive of fibromyalgia or regional pain caused by lumbar or cervical compressions with radiculopathy or at risk of developing radiculopathy.
  • Diagnosis or history of fibromyalgia
  • Planned surgical procedure during the duration of the study

Sites / Locations

  • National Hospital Organization Takasaki General Medical Center
  • Fujisawa shounandai Hospital
  • Medical Corporation Yamamoto Kinenkai Yamamoto Kinen Hospital
  • Nippon Kokan Clinic
  • Nakamura Hospital
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Fuchu Hospital
  • FuruKawabashi Hospital
  • Research Hospital, the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo
  • Kitashinagawa Third Hospital
  • Oosaki Hospital Tokyo Heart Center
  • Kanto Medical Center Ntt Ec
  • International Medical Center of Japan Toyama Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

10 mcg/kg

100 mcg/kg

200 mcg/kg

25 mcg/kg

50 mcg/kg

Placebo

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent: events between first dose of study drug and up to Day 1 through Day 120 (Part 1 and 2) were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Baseline
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Day 1
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Day 4/5
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 1
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 2
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 3
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 4
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 13
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 17
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 1
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 2
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 3
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 4
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 5
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline In Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 6
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline In Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 7
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 10 0= extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline In Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 8
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 9
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 10
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 11
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 12
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 13
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 1
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 2
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 3
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 4
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in The Past 24 Hours at Week 5
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 6
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 7
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 8
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 9
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 10
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 11
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 12
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 13
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 1
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 2
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 3
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 4
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 5
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 6
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 7
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 8
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 9
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 10
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 11
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 12
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 13
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Version 3.1 (WOMAC 3.1) Subscales Scores at Week 1
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions). Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living. The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme). Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions. Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 2
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions). Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living. The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme). Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions. Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 4
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions). Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living. The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme). Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions. Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 8
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions). Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living. The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0=none to 100= extreme). Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions. Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 13
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions). Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living. The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme). Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions. Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 17
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions). Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living. The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme). Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions. Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) - Part 1
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) - Part 1
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0-infinity)] - Part 1
AUC (0-infinity) is defined as the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-infinity). It is obtained from AUC (0-t) plus AUC (t-infinity).
Area Under The Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) - Part 1
AUClast is defined as the area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration.
Volume of Distribution (Vz) - Part 1
Vz is defined as the the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug.
Volume of Distribution At Steady State (Vss) - Part 1
Vss is defined as the the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. It is the apparent volume of distribution at steady-state.
Systemic Clearance (CL) - Part 1
CL is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the body.
Mean Residence Time (MRT) - Part 1
MRT was calculated as area under the moment curve/area under the concentration effect curve.
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) - Part 1
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.
Percentage of Participants With Positive Anti-tanezumab Antibody Test Results
Human serum anti-drug antibody (ADA) samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Full Information

First Posted
April 25, 2008
Last Updated
January 29, 2021
Sponsor
Pfizer
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00669409
Brief Title
A Phase 1/2A, Single Dose Study Of PF-04383119 In Japanese Patients With Moderate To Severe Pain From Osteoarthritis Of The Knee
Official Title
A PHASE 1/2A, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, DOUBLE BLIND, DOSE-ESCALATION, MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, EFFICACY AND PHARMACOKINETICS, OF A SINGLE INTRAVENOUS DOSE OF PF-04383119 IN JAPANESE PATIENTS WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE PAIN FROM OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 6, 2008 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 25, 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 25, 2009 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pfizer

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To evaluate the safety and tolerability of single IV doses of PF-04383119 in Japanese patients with moderate to severe pain from OA of the knee (Part I). To evaluate the preliminary analgesic efficacy of PF-04383119 in Japanese patients with moderate to severe pain from OA of the knee in comparison with placebo (Part I and Part II).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Keywords
monoclonal antibody

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
83 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
10 mcg/kg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
100 mcg/kg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
200 mcg/kg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
25 mcg/kg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
50 mcg/kg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
PF-04383119 (tanezumab)
Intervention Description
single dose of 10 mcg/kg IV
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
PF-04383119 (tanezumab)
Intervention Description
single dose of 100 mcg/kg IV
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
PF-04383119 (tanezumab)
Intervention Description
single dose of 200 mcg/kg IV
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
PF-04383119 (tanezumab)
Intervention Description
single dose of 25 mcg/kg IV
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
PF-04383119 (tanezumab)
Intervention Description
single dose of 50 mcg/kg IV
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
PF-04383119 (tanezumab)
Intervention Description
single dose of Placebo IV
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Description
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent: events between first dose of study drug and up to Day 1 through Day 120 (Part 1 and 2) were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state
Time Frame
Day 1 up to Day 92 for tanezumab 10, 25, 50 mcg/kg group and matching placebo group (Part 1, 2); Day 1 up to Day 120 for tanezumab 100 mcg/kg group and matching placebo group (Part 1, 2), 200 mcg/kg group and matching placebo group (Part 1)
Title
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Baseline
Description
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Time Frame
Baseline (Part 1 and Part 2)
Title
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Day 1
Description
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Day 4/5
Description
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Time Frame
Day 4/5 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 1
Description
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Time Frame
Week 1 (Part 1 and Part 2)
Title
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 2
Description
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Time Frame
Week 2 (Part 1 and Part 2)
Title
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 3
Description
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Time Frame
Week 3 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 4
Description
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Time Frame
Week 4 (Part 1 and Part 2)
Title
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 13
Description
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Time Frame
Week 13 (Part 1 and Part 2)
Title
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 17
Description
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Time Frame
Week 17 (Part 1 and Part 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 1
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 2
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 3
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 3 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 4
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 5
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 5 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline In Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 6
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 6 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline In Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 7
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 10 0= extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 7 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline In Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 8
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 8 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 9
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 9 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 10
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 10 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 11
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 11 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 12
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 13
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 13 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 1
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 2
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 3
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 3 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 4
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in The Past 24 Hours at Week 5
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 5 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 6
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 6 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 7
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 7 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 8
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 8 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 9
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 9 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 10
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 10 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 11
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 11 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 12
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 13
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 13 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 1
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 2
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 3
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 3 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 4
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 5
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 5 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 6
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 6 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 7
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 7 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 8
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 8 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 9
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 9 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 10
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 10 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 11
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 11 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 12
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 13
Description
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 13 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Version 3.1 (WOMAC 3.1) Subscales Scores at Week 1
Description
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions). Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living. The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme). Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions. Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 2
Description
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions). Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living. The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme). Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions. Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 4
Description
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions). Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living. The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme). Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions. Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 8
Description
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions). Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living. The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0=none to 100= extreme). Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions. Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 8 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 13
Description
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions). Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living. The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme). Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions. Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 13 (Part 1 and 2)
Title
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 17
Description
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions). Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living. The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme). Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions. Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 17 (Part 1 and 2)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) - Part 1
Time Frame
Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
Title
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) - Part 1
Time Frame
Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
Title
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0-infinity)] - Part 1
Description
AUC (0-infinity) is defined as the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-infinity). It is obtained from AUC (0-t) plus AUC (t-infinity).
Time Frame
Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
Title
Area Under The Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) - Part 1
Description
AUClast is defined as the area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration.
Time Frame
Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
Title
Volume of Distribution (Vz) - Part 1
Description
Vz is defined as the the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug.
Time Frame
Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
Title
Volume of Distribution At Steady State (Vss) - Part 1
Description
Vss is defined as the the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. It is the apparent volume of distribution at steady-state.
Time Frame
Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
Title
Systemic Clearance (CL) - Part 1
Description
CL is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the body.
Time Frame
Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
Title
Mean Residence Time (MRT) - Part 1
Description
MRT was calculated as area under the moment curve/area under the concentration effect curve.
Time Frame
Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
Title
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) - Part 1
Description
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.
Time Frame
Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
Title
Percentage of Participants With Positive Anti-tanezumab Antibody Test Results
Description
Human serum anti-drug antibody (ADA) samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Time Frame
Baseline up to Day 120

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
35 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Japanese Male or female, Age 35-65 (Part 1), Age 35-75 (Part 2) Diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee based on American College of Rheumatology criteria Knee pain, and radiographic evidence of knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence x-ray grade ≥2) obtained within 1 year of enrollment At least one of the following: age >50, morning stiffness <30 minutes in duration, crepitus, and OA of the knee must involve the index tibiofemoral joint and must have present for at least 6 months Patients who meet at least one of the following: unwilling to take non-opiate pain medications, or for whom non-opiate pain medications have failed, or are candidates for or seeking invasive interventions such as intraarticular injections, knee arthroplasty, or total knee surgery Pain levels as required by the protocol at Screening and Baseline Exclusion Criteria: Diagnosis or history of RA, any inflammatory arthritis, gout, Paget's disease or any other disease that in the Investigator's opinion would interfere with the assessment of pain and other symptoms of OA Patients with regional pain syndromes suggestive of fibromyalgia or regional pain caused by lumbar or cervical compressions with radiculopathy or at risk of developing radiculopathy. Diagnosis or history of fibromyalgia Planned surgical procedure during the duration of the study
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
Pfizer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
National Hospital Organization Takasaki General Medical Center
City
Takasaki
State/Province
Gunma
ZIP/Postal Code
370-0829
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Fujisawa shounandai Hospital
City
Fujisawa-shi
State/Province
Kanagawa-ken
ZIP/Postal Code
252-0802
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Medical Corporation Yamamoto Kinenkai Yamamoto Kinen Hospital
City
Yokohama-shi
State/Province
Kanagawa-ken
ZIP/Postal Code
224-0024
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Nippon Kokan Clinic
City
Kawasaki
State/Province
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
210-0852
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Nakamura Hospital
City
Beppu-shi
State/Province
Oita
ZIP/Postal Code
874-0937
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Tokyo Metropolitan Fuchu Hospital
City
Fuchu City,
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
183-8524
Country
Japan
Facility Name
FuruKawabashi Hospital
City
Minato-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
106-8581
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Hospital, the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo
City
Minato-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
108-8639
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Kitashinagawa Third Hospital
City
Shinagawa-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
140-0001
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Oosaki Hospital Tokyo Heart Center
City
Shinagawa-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
141-0001
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Kanto Medical Center Ntt Ec
City
Shinagawa-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
141-8625
Country
Japan
Facility Name
International Medical Center of Japan Toyama Hospital
City
Shinjuku-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
162-8655
Country
Japan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22004765
Citation
Nagashima H, Suzuki M, Araki S, Yamabe T, Muto C; Tanezumab Investigators. Preliminary assessment of the safety and efficacy of tanezumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, double-blind, dose-escalation, placebo-controlled study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Dec;19(12):1405-12. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.09.006. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Phase 1/2A, Single Dose Study Of PF-04383119 In Japanese Patients With Moderate To Severe Pain From Osteoarthritis Of The Knee

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs