search
Back to results

Prolotherapy for the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis

Primary Purpose

Lateral Epicondylitis, Tennis Elbow

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Prolotherapy
Placebo
Sponsored by
University of Pittsburgh
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Lateral Epicondylitis focused on measuring Lateral epicondylitis, Tennis elbow, Prolotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Ages 18-65, as younger individuals are more likely to have other developmental conditions and older individuals are more likely to have a significant arthritic component to their elbow pain;
  2. Ability to speak, read, and write English;
  3. Unilateral or bilateral lateral elbow pain associated with findings on exam consistent with LE and absence of other conditions that can mimic LE such as radial tunnel syndrome.
  4. Functional impairment, due to the diagnosis of LE, with a Nirschl Pain Phase Scale (NPPS) rating of Phase 4 or higher.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Other conditions that result in significant impairment in upper extremity function such as fibromyalgia, rotator cuff tendonitis, cervical radiculopathy, or carpal tunnel syndrome;
  2. Prior surgery of the involved elbow;
  3. Known allergy to lidocaine or dextrose;
  4. Presence of an autoimmune condition such as rheumatoid arthritis, given that a possible immune mechanism is hypothesized for PrT.
  5. Presence of known immune dysfunction, such as with HIV/AIDS, as it might raise the risk for development of infection from injections;
  6. Ongoing treatment with systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressant medications, as they may block a potential immune mechanism of the PrT and increase the risk for infection;
  7. Active diagnosis of malignancy anywhere in the body, given potential of any concurrent immune dysfunction to impact on the response to PrT;
  8. Treatment with any anticoagulant medication beyond 1 aspirin per day, given the potential to increase bleeding or bruising associated with injections;
  9. Presence of a coagulopathy, given the potential to increase bleeding or bruising associated with injections;
  10. Pregnancy-as there is no research documenting safety of PrT during pregnancy;
  11. Medical necessity for taking ongoing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication, beyond 1 aspirin per day for cardiac prevention, as this may diminish the effect of PrT;
  12. Corticosteroid injection within the 6 weeks prior to entry into the study, as this may diminish the effect of the PrT.
  13. Prior treatment with PrT for any condition, as this may impact on blinding.

Sites / Locations

  • Center for Integrative Medicine at UPMC Shadyside

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Group 1-Prolotherapy

Group 2-Deep Saline/Lidocaine

Group 3-Superficial Saline/lidocaine

Arm Description

Deep injection with 15% dextrose in lidocaine

Deep injection with saline/lidocaine

Superficial injection with saline/lidocaine

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

McGill Pain Questionnaire
This is a pain severity rating. 15 adjectival descriptors of pain are scored on a 0-3 scale for a total score of 0-45 with a high score reflecting greater pain severity.

Secondary Outcome Measures

QuickDASH
The QuickDASH is an abbreviated form of the rating scale DASH or Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, & Hand. This is a self-report rating of function for individuals with problems of the upper extremity. The Institute for Work and Health, in collaboration with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons developed a self-report questionnaire "Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, & Hand". It is seen as a valid and reliable measure of upper extremity functional impairment, is in widespread use in the States and abroad, having been translated into multiple languages and has been used for studies on LE. 11 items are scored on this self-rating instrument on a 1-5 Likert scale with higher score reflecting greater disability. The scores are averaged and then converted to a 100 point scale (0-100), with higher score reflecting greater disability.
Grip Strength
Maximal pain-free grip strength has been used as a physical correlate of disability associated with LE. Grip strength was obtained using a Jamar Dynamometer set in the 2nd position. 3 trials were recorded and the average pain-free grip strength was noted.
Nirschl Pain Phase Scale
The Nirschl Pain Phase Scale (NPPS), which has been used to describe functional impairment related to tendinopathies such as lateral epicondylitis. This scale provides a global rating of impairment associated with sports and musculoskeletal injuries. A rating from 0-7 describes the phase of overuse injuries, with Phase 0 noting "No stiffness or soreness after activity" and Phase 7 corresponding with "Pain that also disrupts sleep consistently. Pain is aching in nature and intensifies with activity". It was used as an indication of severity for entry into the study and as the criterion for treatment response.
Pain Threshold on Dolorimetry
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) has been noted to correlate with pain and disability associated with LE. PPT was determined by applying pressure with a digital algometer over the area of maximal tenderness corresponding with the common extensor tendon area. Only 1 determination was obtained as the 1st application of pressure can lower the pain threshold for subsequent testing.

Full Information

First Posted
May 6, 2008
Last Updated
May 13, 2016
Sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00674622
Brief Title
Prolotherapy for the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis
Official Title
Prolotherapy for the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2011 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Lateral epicondylitis (LE), or tennis elbow, is a common and often disabling condition affecting young and middle-aged adults-most commonly manual workers and recreational athletes. It results in significant pain and disability, limiting work productivity and an individual's ability to participate in and enjoy recreational activities. Like many other chronic musculoskeletal conditions LE often shows an incomplete response to acute treatments, leading to chronic pain and disability. Prolotherapy (PrT) involves the injection of an irritant or proliferant solution into tendons, ligaments, and joints to treat chronic musculoskeletal pain. We will be conducting a 3-group randomized, blinded trial to determine the safety and efficacy of PrT injections in the treatment of chronic LE. Additionally, we will seek to determine to what extent any beneficial effect of PrT is derived from deep needle placement vs. a specific effect of the injectate. The specific aims for this study are: 1) to determine if PrT is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective treatment for individuals with chronic LE; and 2) to determine whether the deep needle placement alone is responsible for the therapeutic effect, independent of injectate. In order to accomplish these aims, we will measure indicators of pain and disability using self-rating scales, questionnaires and physical measures. Subjects will be stratified prior to randomization on two factors: 1) unilateral vs. bilateral LE; and 2) treatment with steroids within the prior 6 months. If effective, subjects receiving PrT will show greater reduction of pain and functional impairment compared with the other two groups. This research will guide future studies on prolotherapy by determining what may be the best control condition. Additionally, further studies may explore the mechanism responsible for any beneficial effect.
Detailed Description
Same

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lateral Epicondylitis, Tennis Elbow
Keywords
Lateral epicondylitis, Tennis elbow, Prolotherapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
67 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group 1-Prolotherapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Deep injection with 15% dextrose in lidocaine
Arm Title
Group 2-Deep Saline/Lidocaine
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Deep injection with saline/lidocaine
Arm Title
Group 3-Superficial Saline/lidocaine
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Superficial injection with saline/lidocaine
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Prolotherapy
Intervention Description
Injection of 15% dextrose with lidocaine at the lateral epicondyle
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Saline/lidocaine
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
McGill Pain Questionnaire
Description
This is a pain severity rating. 15 adjectival descriptors of pain are scored on a 0-3 scale for a total score of 0-45 with a high score reflecting greater pain severity.
Time Frame
6 weeks and 12 weeks post intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
QuickDASH
Description
The QuickDASH is an abbreviated form of the rating scale DASH or Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, & Hand. This is a self-report rating of function for individuals with problems of the upper extremity. The Institute for Work and Health, in collaboration with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons developed a self-report questionnaire "Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, & Hand". It is seen as a valid and reliable measure of upper extremity functional impairment, is in widespread use in the States and abroad, having been translated into multiple languages and has been used for studies on LE. 11 items are scored on this self-rating instrument on a 1-5 Likert scale with higher score reflecting greater disability. The scores are averaged and then converted to a 100 point scale (0-100), with higher score reflecting greater disability.
Time Frame
6 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention
Title
Grip Strength
Description
Maximal pain-free grip strength has been used as a physical correlate of disability associated with LE. Grip strength was obtained using a Jamar Dynamometer set in the 2nd position. 3 trials were recorded and the average pain-free grip strength was noted.
Time Frame
6 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention
Title
Nirschl Pain Phase Scale
Description
The Nirschl Pain Phase Scale (NPPS), which has been used to describe functional impairment related to tendinopathies such as lateral epicondylitis. This scale provides a global rating of impairment associated with sports and musculoskeletal injuries. A rating from 0-7 describes the phase of overuse injuries, with Phase 0 noting "No stiffness or soreness after activity" and Phase 7 corresponding with "Pain that also disrupts sleep consistently. Pain is aching in nature and intensifies with activity". It was used as an indication of severity for entry into the study and as the criterion for treatment response.
Time Frame
6 and 12 weeks post-intervention
Title
Pain Threshold on Dolorimetry
Description
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) has been noted to correlate with pain and disability associated with LE. PPT was determined by applying pressure with a digital algometer over the area of maximal tenderness corresponding with the common extensor tendon area. Only 1 determination was obtained as the 1st application of pressure can lower the pain threshold for subsequent testing.
Time Frame
6 and 12 weeks post-intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Ages 18-65, as younger individuals are more likely to have other developmental conditions and older individuals are more likely to have a significant arthritic component to their elbow pain; Ability to speak, read, and write English; Unilateral or bilateral lateral elbow pain associated with findings on exam consistent with LE and absence of other conditions that can mimic LE such as radial tunnel syndrome. Functional impairment, due to the diagnosis of LE, with a Nirschl Pain Phase Scale (NPPS) rating of Phase 4 or higher. Exclusion Criteria: Other conditions that result in significant impairment in upper extremity function such as fibromyalgia, rotator cuff tendonitis, cervical radiculopathy, or carpal tunnel syndrome; Prior surgery of the involved elbow; Known allergy to lidocaine or dextrose; Presence of an autoimmune condition such as rheumatoid arthritis, given that a possible immune mechanism is hypothesized for PrT. Presence of known immune dysfunction, such as with HIV/AIDS, as it might raise the risk for development of infection from injections; Ongoing treatment with systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressant medications, as they may block a potential immune mechanism of the PrT and increase the risk for infection; Active diagnosis of malignancy anywhere in the body, given potential of any concurrent immune dysfunction to impact on the response to PrT; Treatment with any anticoagulant medication beyond 1 aspirin per day, given the potential to increase bleeding or bruising associated with injections; Presence of a coagulopathy, given the potential to increase bleeding or bruising associated with injections; Pregnancy-as there is no research documenting safety of PrT during pregnancy; Medical necessity for taking ongoing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication, beyond 1 aspirin per day for cardiac prevention, as this may diminish the effect of PrT; Corticosteroid injection within the 6 weeks prior to entry into the study, as this may diminish the effect of the PrT. Prior treatment with PrT for any condition, as this may impact on blinding.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ronald M Glick, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pittsburgh
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Center for Integrative Medicine at UPMC Shadyside
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15232
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Presented at conference.

Learn more about this trial

Prolotherapy for the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs