Randomized Trial of Interrupted Versus Continuous Vaginal Closure of Anterior Repair With Mesh
Primary Purpose
Pain, Dyspareunia, Surgical Mesh
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Interrupted vaginal closure
Continuous vaginal closure
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Pain
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Scheduled for surgery to correct anterior vaginal prolapse with mesh kit
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
1
2
Arm Description
Interrupted vaginal closure
Continuous vaginal closure
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Mesh exposure
Secondary Outcome Measures
Pain
Dyspareunia
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00676000
First Posted
May 8, 2008
Last Updated
March 17, 2009
Sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00676000
Brief Title
Randomized Trial of Interrupted Versus Continuous Vaginal Closure of Anterior Repair With Mesh
Official Title
Randomized Trial of Interrupted Versus Continuous Vaginal Closure of Anterior Repair With Mesh
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2009
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Due to decrease in Avaulta mesh kit usage & inability to recruit study subjects.
Study Start Date
April 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2009 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Vaginal prolapse is a common condition that is treated with surgical correction. Recently surgeons have been using mesh to augment the repair of vaginal prolapse. Common complications of this surgery include vaginal pain, pain during sex, infection or erosion of the mesh in the vagina. There are different ways to close the vaginal wall over the mesh used in these procedures. Currently, there is no accepted standard method of closing the vaginal wall. The purpose of this study is to find out the best way to close the surgical wound in the vagina. We will compare interrupted closure (separate stitches) to continuous closure (one long, running stitch). We hope to show in our study that one method of closure is better than the other.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pain, Dyspareunia, Surgical Mesh
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
350 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Interrupted vaginal closure
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Continuous vaginal closure
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Interrupted vaginal closure
Intervention Description
Horizontal mattress closure of vaginal mucosa over mesh
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Continuous vaginal closure
Intervention Description
Running closure of vaginal mucosa over mesh
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mesh exposure
Time Frame
One year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain
Time Frame
One year
Title
Dyspareunia
Time Frame
One year
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Scheduled for surgery to correct anterior vaginal prolapse with mesh kit
Exclusion Criteria:
Pregnant
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Danielle Patterson, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Randomized Trial of Interrupted Versus Continuous Vaginal Closure of Anterior Repair With Mesh
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs