search
Back to results

Trial of Otelixizumab for Adults With Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (Autoimmune): DEFEND-1 (DEFEND-1)

Primary Purpose

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
otelixizumab infusion plus physician determined standard of care
placebo infusion plus physician determined standard of care
Sponsored by
GlaxoSmithKline
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 focused on measuring Type 1 diabetes, new onset type 1 diabetes, T1DM, Type l diabetes, juvenile diabetes

Eligibility Criteria

12 Years - 45 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ages 12-45
  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, consistent with ADA criteria
  • No more than 90 days between diagnosis and administration of study compounds
  • Requires insulin for type 1 diabetes mellitus, or has required insulin at some time between diagnosis and administration of study compounds.
  • Stimulated C-peptide level greater than 0.20 nmol/L and less than or equal to 3.50 nmol/L
  • Positive for one or more of the autoantibodies typically associated with T1DM: antibody to glutamic acid decarboxylase (anti-GAD); antibody to protein tyrosine phosphatase-like protein (anti-IA-2); zinc transporter autoantibodies (ZNT8); insulin autoantibodies (IAA). A subject who is positive for insulin autoantibodies (IAA) and negative for the other autoantibodies will only be eligible if the subject has used insulin for less than 7 days total.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other, significant medical conditions based on the study doctor's evaluation

Sites / Locations

  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

otelixizumab

placebo

Arm Description

otelixizumab

Placebo

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in 2-hour Mixed Meal Stimulated C-peptide Area Under Curve [AUC] (Normalized for 120-minute Time Interval) at Month 12
Mixed meal-stimulated C-peptide AUC was the area under the C-peptide/time curve from Time 0 to 120 minutes, calculated using the trapezoidal rule. This reported AUC was normalized for time interval by dividing it by 120 minutes. This normalized AUC was calculated for each participant at Baseline, Week 12, and at Months 6, 12, 18, and 24. Data has been presented for meal stimulated C-peptide Area under assessment performed at Month 12. Baseline assessments were carried out on the morning of Day 1, before the start of the first infusion of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Month 12.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants Who Were Responders for (Glycosylated Hemoglobin) HbA1c/Insulin Use Response at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12
A participant was considered a responder if, at the given time point, the participant had HbA1c<= 6.5%, and mean daily insulin use over 7 consecutive days < 0.5 international units per kilogram per day (IU/kg/day) during the 2 weeks preceding the visit. Data has been presented from number of participants with their percentages who were responders at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
Mean Daily Insulin Use at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
Participants recorded their daily insulin use in their electronic diaries. In particular, insulin was recorded thoroughly and accurately for at least 7 consecutive days during the 2 weeks before the visits at Baseline, Week 12, and Months 6 and 12. During each of these visits, the investigator/designee accessed the invivodata DiaryPRO web site to review insulin-use data for the previous 2-week period to ensure completeness. If errors/gaps were identified (e.g., if the participant did not take insulin and not entered 0 units), the investigator/designee recorded the missing data from participant recall using a data clarification form (DCF). Paper diary to collect insulin use, were reviewed for completeness. Any missing data that could be recalled by the participant was entered. If the participant did not record any insulin use during the 2-week period before the visit, the site obtained an insulin use history for the previous 7 days and calculated the average daily insulin dose.
HbA1c Level at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12
HbA1c levels were recorded at Screening, Baseline (Day 1), Day 28, Week 8, Week 12, Months 4 to 12 and Month 24. Data has been presented for HbA1c levels at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
Number of Hypoglycemic Events Defined by Hypoglycemic Event Categories From Baseline Upto Month 12
Hypoglycemic events reported by participants were classified as defined by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Workgroup on Hypoglycemia as follows: Severe hypoglycemia: an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon/other resuscitative actions, documented symptomatic hypoglycemia: an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia are accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration(PGC)<=70 mg/dL, asymptomatic hypoglycemia: an event not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured PGC<=70 mg/dL,probable symptomatic hypoglycemia: an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia are not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination, but were presumably caused by a PGC<=70 mg/dL and relative hypoglycemia: an event during which the person with diabetes reports any of the typical symptoms of hypoglycemia, and interprets the symptoms as indicative of hypoglycemia, but with a measured PGC>70 mg/dL.
Number of Participants With Hypoglycemic Events Defined by Hypoglycemic Event Categories From Baseline Upto Month 12
Hypoglycemic events reported by participants were classified as defined by the ADA Workgroup on Hypoglycemia as Severe hypoglycemia: an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon/other resuscitative actions, documented symptomatic hypoglycemia: an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia are accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration (PGC)<=70 mg/dL, asymptomatic hypoglycemia: an event not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured PGC<=70 mg/dL,probable symptomatic hypoglycemia: an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia are not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination, but were presumably caused by a PGC<=70 mg/dL and relative hypoglycemia: an event during which the person with diabetes reports any of the typical symptoms of hypoglycemia, and interprets the symptoms as indicative of hypoglycemia, but with a measured PGC>70 mg/dL. Only categories with values are presented.
Number of Hypoglycemic Excursions (<=70 mg/dL) With Most Complete Glucose at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
The event frequency of glucose measurements that were hypoglycemic excursions were calculated per participant basis, using the number of occurrences where blood glucose was less than or equal to 70 mg/dL. Most complete glucose interval was the 7 day period with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day. If these results were in more than one 7 day period, then the 7 day period with the largest average number of daily recordings (out of those with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day) was selected. If there were 2 or more 7 day periods that have the same number of days with at least 4 recordings and the same maximum average number of glucose recordings, the period that ended closest to the day of the study was selected.
Magnitude of Greatest Hypoglycemic Excursions With Most Complete Glucose at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
The greatest hypoglycemic excursions during an interval was calculated as 70 mg/dL minus the lowest recorded glucose level in the interval. If a participant had data recorded during the interval but did not have a value below 70 mg/dL, the participants greatest hypoglycemic excursion for that interval was 0 mg/dL. Most complete glucose interval was the 7 day period with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day. If these results were in more than one 7 day period, then the 7 day period with the largest average number of daily recordings (out of those with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day) was selected. If there were 2 or more 7 day periods that have the same number of days with at least 4 recordings and the same maximum average number of glucose recordings, the period that ended closest to the day of the study was selected.
Number of Participants With Hypoglycemic Excursions With Most Complete Glucose at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12
Percentage of hypoglycemic excursions was calculated as the total number of observations that exceed the hypoglycemic excursion boundary (i.e.<= 70 mg/dL) divided by the total number of glucose measurements recorded in a time interval for the intervals: Baseline to Week 12, post-Week 12 to Month 6, post-Month 6 to Month 12. Most complete glucose interval was the 7 day period with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day. If these results were in more than one 7 day period, then the 7 day period with the largest average number of daily recordings (out of those with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day) was selected. If there were 2 or more 7 day periods that have the same number of days with at least 4 recordings and the same maximum average number of glucose recordings, the period that ended closest to the day of the study was selected. Data has been presented for number of participants with their percentages having hypoglycemic excursion.
Number of Hyperglycemic Excursions With Most Complete Glucose at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
The event frequency of glucose measurements that were hyperglycemic excursions were calculated on a per participant basis using the number of occurrences where blood glucose was greater than the hyperglycemic tolerance limit. There were 3 hyperglycemic tolerance limits considered: 200 mg/dL, 130 mg/dL and 100 mg/dL. Most complete glucose interval was the 7 day period with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day. If these results were in more than one 7 day period, then the 7 day period with the largest average number of daily recordings (out of those with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day) was selected. If there were 2 or more 7 day periods that have the same number of days with at least 4 recordings and the same maximum average number of glucose recordings, the period that ended closest to the day of the study was selected.
Magnitude of Greatest Hyperglycemic Excursions With Most Complete Glucose at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
The greatest hyperglycemic excursions during an interval was calculated as the largest recorded glucose level in the interval minus the hyperglycemic tolerance limit value (HGTLV). If a participant had data recorded during the interval but did not have a value above the HGTLV, the participants greatest hyperglycemic excursion for that interval was 0 mg/dL. Most complete glucose interval was the 7 day period with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day. If these results were in more than one 7 day period, then the 7 day period with the largest average number of daily recordings (out of those with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day) was selected. If there were 2 or more 7 day periods that have the same number of days with at least 4 recordings and the same maximum average number of glucose recordings, the period that ended closest to the day of the study was selected.
Number of Participants With Hyperglycemic Excursions With Most Complete Glucose at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12
Percentage of hyperglycemic excursions was calculated as the total number of observations that exceed the hyperglycemic excursion boundary (i.e. > HGTLV) divided by the total number of glucose measurements recorded in a time interval for the intervals: Baseline to Week 12, post-Week 12 to Month 6, post-Month 6 to Month 12. Most complete glucose interval was the 7 day period with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day. If these results were in more than one 7 day period, then the 7 day period with the largest average number of daily recordings (out of those with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day) was selected. If there were 2 or more 7 day periods that have the same number of days with at least 4 recordings and the same maximum average number of glucose recordings, the period that ended closest to the day of the study was selected. Data for number of participants with their percentages are presented.
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Risk Range (ADRR) at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
Average daily risk range is a measure for evaluation of blood glucose variability that was designed to be equally sensitive to hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. The ADRR was assessed over 30-day periods prior to Baseline and at key visits Week 12 and Months 6 and 12. Baseline assessments were carried out on the morning of Day 1, before the start of the first infusion of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
Composite Rank Summary for HbA1c and Exogenous Insulin Use at Month 6 and Month 12
O'Brien mean rank analyses was performed on a two-part composite of the baseline-adjusted HbA1c level and the baseline-adjusted mean total daily insulin use per kg body weight in the otelixizumab group compared with the placebo group at Months 6, 12. For the O'Brien mean rank analysis at a particular time point, adjusted HbA1c values (for both treatment groups together) was ranked from smallest to largest, and adjusted mean daily insulin use values were ranked from smallest to largest. For each participant, the HbA1c and insulin use ranks were added together, producing a composite rank. A treatment comparison test was then performed on the composite ranks.
Composite Rank Summary for C-Peptide AUC, HbA1c and Exogenous Insulin Use at Month 6 and Month 12
O'Brien analyses will be performed on a three-part composite of HbA1c level, C-peptide AUC, and mean daily Insulin use in the otelixizumab group compared with the placebo group at Months 6 and12. For the O'Brien mean rank analysis at a particular time point, HbA1c and insulin use will be ranked from smallest to largest, and C-peptide AUC will be ranked from largest to smallest. For each participant, the C-Peptide AUC, ranks for HbA1c and insulin use were added together, producing a composite rank. A treatment comparison test was then performed on the composite ranks.
Change From Baseline in Level of Cytokines Interleukin (IL-6), IL-10 and Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-a) at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8
Levels of cytokine (TNFα, IL-6, IL-10) were measured at Baseline and at 2 hours after end of infusion (EOI) on Day 1, Day 4, Day 8 . Baseline assessments were carried out on the morning of Day 1, before the start of the first infusion of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8.
Percent Change From Baseline in Circulating Peripheral Lymphocytes CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ T Cells and CD4+CD25hiFoxP3+ T Cells in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (TIDM) up to Month 12
Blood samples were drawn for lymphocyte subset evaluations at Baseline and at 2hours after EOI on Day 4, pre-dose and after E0I on Day 8, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Week 6, Week 8, Week 10, Week 12, Month 6 and Month 12. Percentages of relevant lymphocyte subsets were determined by flow cytometry. The lymphocyte subsets assessed included CD8+CD25+ T lymphocytes, as well as the subsets of lymphocytes of these type that were positive for FoxP3, a protein that was expressed at high levels in the cytoplasm of regulatory T cells. CD4+CD25hiFoxP3+ T lymphocytes, a cell type was of interest because it played a regulatory role in T1DM. Baseline assessments were carried out on the morning of Day 1, before the start of the first infusion of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at the time of assessment.
Percent Change From Baseline in Cell-bound Otelixizumab on CD4+ T Cells at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8
The amount of cell-bound otelixizumab was determined by flow cytometry. The extent of T cell receptor alpha beta (TCRαβ) expression was determined using an antibody that bound to TCRαβ but did not compete with otelixizumab for binding sites at the expected range of concentrations. The MESF of the anti-TCRαβ antibody was used to quantify the number of CD3/TCR complexes present on T cells. Free otelixizumab binding sites (sites not occupied by otelixizumab) were detected by staining with biotinylated otelixizumab. The MESF of bound biotinylated otelixizumab was directly proportional to the availability of free otelixizumab binding sites. MESF of bound antibody on CD4+ T cells was a direct measurement of cell-bound otelixizumab on CD4+ T cells. Baseline assessments were carried out on the morning of Day 1, before the start of the first infusion of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8.
Percent Change From Baseline in CD3/TCR Saturation on CD4+ T Cells and CD8+ T Cells at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8
The extent of saturation of CD3/TCR receptors on CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes was determined by flow cytometry. The extent of TCRαβ expression was determined using an antibody that bound to TCRαβ but did not compete with otelixizumab for binding sites at the expected range of concentrations. The MESF of the anti-TCRαβ antibody was used to quantify the number of CD3/TCR complexes present on T cells. The MESF of bound biotinylated otelixizumab was directly proportional to the availability of free otelixizumab binding sites. MESF of free CD3 sites on CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells was direct measurement of saturation of the CD3/TCR complex on CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells. Baseline assessments were carried out on the morning of Day 1, before the start of the first infusion of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8.
Percent Change From Baseline in CD3/TCR Modulation on CD4+ T Cells and CD8+ T Cells at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8
The extent of modulation of CD3/TCR receptors on CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes was determined by flow cytometry. The extent of TCRαβ expression was determined using an antibody that bound to TCRαβ but did not compete with otelixizumab for binding sites at the expected range of concentrations. The MESF of the anti-TCRαβ antibody was used to quantify the number of CD3/TCR complexes present on T cells. The MESF of bound biotinylated otelixizumab was directly proportional to the availability of free otelixizumab binding sites.CD3/TCR complexes on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were detected with a non-competing antibody. Changes in the MESF of TCR expression was a direct measurement of TCR modulation. Baseline assessments were carried out on the morning of Day 1, before the start of the first infusion of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8.

Full Information

First Posted
May 13, 2008
Last Updated
September 5, 2017
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Collaborators
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00678886
Brief Title
Trial of Otelixizumab for Adults With Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (Autoimmune): DEFEND-1
Acronym
DEFEND-1
Official Title
Durable-Response Therapy Evaluation For Early or New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes - DEFEND
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 29, 2008 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 31, 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 31, 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Collaborators
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to find out if an 8-day series of otelixizumab infusions leads to greater improvement in insulin secretion as compared with placebo infusion. Insulin secretion will be assessed using mixed meal-stimulated C-peptide. Subjects will be assigned to receive either otelixizumab or placebo at a ratio of 2:1 (2/3 otelixizumab, 1/3 placebo). These study agents will be administered as an addition to insulin, diet, and other physician determined standard of care treatments. DEFEND-1 is now closed to enrollment. DEFEND-2 will begin early in 2010. It is very similar to DEFEND-1 and will again require subjects with new onset type 1 diabetes. Please check back here for more details. In the meantime, established and new onset type 1 diabetes patients in North America are welcome to consider the TTEDD study: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00451321?term=TTEDD&rank=1
Detailed Description
The following visits are required: Screening Visits: 2 to 3 appointments will be conducted to determine eligibility. At 2 of these visits participants will drink a liquid meal and have blood tests done over the post-meal period. Dosing Visits: 8 outpatient visits on consecutive days, each lasting about 4-6 hours. Follow-up Visits: weekly for the first month, then every 2 weeks for 3 months, followed by monthly visits through 1 year. There will be 3 visits in the second year. The total duration of the study is 2 years. Glucose test strips, glucose monitors and PDAs to record insulin will be provided to all study subjects for the duration fo the study. Frequent glycemic monitoring will occur through lab testing and blood glucose self-monitoring to help facilitate tight glycemic control in all subjects.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Keywords
Type 1 diabetes, new onset type 1 diabetes, T1DM, Type l diabetes, juvenile diabetes

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
272 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
otelixizumab
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
otelixizumab
Arm Title
placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
otelixizumab infusion plus physician determined standard of care
Other Intervention Name(s)
monoclonal antibody, ChAglyCD3, anti-CD3, TRX4
Intervention Description
infusion
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
placebo infusion plus physician determined standard of care
Intervention Description
infusion
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in 2-hour Mixed Meal Stimulated C-peptide Area Under Curve [AUC] (Normalized for 120-minute Time Interval) at Month 12
Description
Mixed meal-stimulated C-peptide AUC was the area under the C-peptide/time curve from Time 0 to 120 minutes, calculated using the trapezoidal rule. This reported AUC was normalized for time interval by dividing it by 120 minutes. This normalized AUC was calculated for each participant at Baseline, Week 12, and at Months 6, 12, 18, and 24. Data has been presented for meal stimulated C-peptide Area under assessment performed at Month 12. Baseline assessments were carried out on the morning of Day 1, before the start of the first infusion of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Month 12.
Time Frame
Baseline (0-120 minutes on Day 1) and Month 12 (0-120 minutes)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants Who Were Responders for (Glycosylated Hemoglobin) HbA1c/Insulin Use Response at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12
Description
A participant was considered a responder if, at the given time point, the participant had HbA1c<= 6.5%, and mean daily insulin use over 7 consecutive days < 0.5 international units per kilogram per day (IU/kg/day) during the 2 weeks preceding the visit. Data has been presented from number of participants with their percentages who were responders at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
Time Frame
Week 12 and Months 6 and 12
Title
Mean Daily Insulin Use at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
Description
Participants recorded their daily insulin use in their electronic diaries. In particular, insulin was recorded thoroughly and accurately for at least 7 consecutive days during the 2 weeks before the visits at Baseline, Week 12, and Months 6 and 12. During each of these visits, the investigator/designee accessed the invivodata DiaryPRO web site to review insulin-use data for the previous 2-week period to ensure completeness. If errors/gaps were identified (e.g., if the participant did not take insulin and not entered 0 units), the investigator/designee recorded the missing data from participant recall using a data clarification form (DCF). Paper diary to collect insulin use, were reviewed for completeness. Any missing data that could be recalled by the participant was entered. If the participant did not record any insulin use during the 2-week period before the visit, the site obtained an insulin use history for the previous 7 days and calculated the average daily insulin dose.
Time Frame
Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
Title
HbA1c Level at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12
Description
HbA1c levels were recorded at Screening, Baseline (Day 1), Day 28, Week 8, Week 12, Months 4 to 12 and Month 24. Data has been presented for HbA1c levels at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
Time Frame
Week 12 and Months 6 and 12
Title
Number of Hypoglycemic Events Defined by Hypoglycemic Event Categories From Baseline Upto Month 12
Description
Hypoglycemic events reported by participants were classified as defined by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Workgroup on Hypoglycemia as follows: Severe hypoglycemia: an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon/other resuscitative actions, documented symptomatic hypoglycemia: an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia are accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration(PGC)<=70 mg/dL, asymptomatic hypoglycemia: an event not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured PGC<=70 mg/dL,probable symptomatic hypoglycemia: an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia are not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination, but were presumably caused by a PGC<=70 mg/dL and relative hypoglycemia: an event during which the person with diabetes reports any of the typical symptoms of hypoglycemia, and interprets the symptoms as indicative of hypoglycemia, but with a measured PGC>70 mg/dL.
Time Frame
Upto Month 12
Title
Number of Participants With Hypoglycemic Events Defined by Hypoglycemic Event Categories From Baseline Upto Month 12
Description
Hypoglycemic events reported by participants were classified as defined by the ADA Workgroup on Hypoglycemia as Severe hypoglycemia: an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon/other resuscitative actions, documented symptomatic hypoglycemia: an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia are accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration (PGC)<=70 mg/dL, asymptomatic hypoglycemia: an event not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured PGC<=70 mg/dL,probable symptomatic hypoglycemia: an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia are not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination, but were presumably caused by a PGC<=70 mg/dL and relative hypoglycemia: an event during which the person with diabetes reports any of the typical symptoms of hypoglycemia, and interprets the symptoms as indicative of hypoglycemia, but with a measured PGC>70 mg/dL. Only categories with values are presented.
Time Frame
Upto Month 12
Title
Number of Hypoglycemic Excursions (<=70 mg/dL) With Most Complete Glucose at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
Description
The event frequency of glucose measurements that were hypoglycemic excursions were calculated per participant basis, using the number of occurrences where blood glucose was less than or equal to 70 mg/dL. Most complete glucose interval was the 7 day period with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day. If these results were in more than one 7 day period, then the 7 day period with the largest average number of daily recordings (out of those with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day) was selected. If there were 2 or more 7 day periods that have the same number of days with at least 4 recordings and the same maximum average number of glucose recordings, the period that ended closest to the day of the study was selected.
Time Frame
Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
Title
Magnitude of Greatest Hypoglycemic Excursions With Most Complete Glucose at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
Description
The greatest hypoglycemic excursions during an interval was calculated as 70 mg/dL minus the lowest recorded glucose level in the interval. If a participant had data recorded during the interval but did not have a value below 70 mg/dL, the participants greatest hypoglycemic excursion for that interval was 0 mg/dL. Most complete glucose interval was the 7 day period with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day. If these results were in more than one 7 day period, then the 7 day period with the largest average number of daily recordings (out of those with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day) was selected. If there were 2 or more 7 day periods that have the same number of days with at least 4 recordings and the same maximum average number of glucose recordings, the period that ended closest to the day of the study was selected.
Time Frame
Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
Title
Number of Participants With Hypoglycemic Excursions With Most Complete Glucose at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12
Description
Percentage of hypoglycemic excursions was calculated as the total number of observations that exceed the hypoglycemic excursion boundary (i.e.<= 70 mg/dL) divided by the total number of glucose measurements recorded in a time interval for the intervals: Baseline to Week 12, post-Week 12 to Month 6, post-Month 6 to Month 12. Most complete glucose interval was the 7 day period with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day. If these results were in more than one 7 day period, then the 7 day period with the largest average number of daily recordings (out of those with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day) was selected. If there were 2 or more 7 day periods that have the same number of days with at least 4 recordings and the same maximum average number of glucose recordings, the period that ended closest to the day of the study was selected. Data has been presented for number of participants with their percentages having hypoglycemic excursion.
Time Frame
Week 12 and Months 6 and 12
Title
Number of Hyperglycemic Excursions With Most Complete Glucose at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
Description
The event frequency of glucose measurements that were hyperglycemic excursions were calculated on a per participant basis using the number of occurrences where blood glucose was greater than the hyperglycemic tolerance limit. There were 3 hyperglycemic tolerance limits considered: 200 mg/dL, 130 mg/dL and 100 mg/dL. Most complete glucose interval was the 7 day period with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day. If these results were in more than one 7 day period, then the 7 day period with the largest average number of daily recordings (out of those with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day) was selected. If there were 2 or more 7 day periods that have the same number of days with at least 4 recordings and the same maximum average number of glucose recordings, the period that ended closest to the day of the study was selected.
Time Frame
Week 12 and Months 6 and 12
Title
Magnitude of Greatest Hyperglycemic Excursions With Most Complete Glucose at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
Description
The greatest hyperglycemic excursions during an interval was calculated as the largest recorded glucose level in the interval minus the hyperglycemic tolerance limit value (HGTLV). If a participant had data recorded during the interval but did not have a value above the HGTLV, the participants greatest hyperglycemic excursion for that interval was 0 mg/dL. Most complete glucose interval was the 7 day period with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day. If these results were in more than one 7 day period, then the 7 day period with the largest average number of daily recordings (out of those with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day) was selected. If there were 2 or more 7 day periods that have the same number of days with at least 4 recordings and the same maximum average number of glucose recordings, the period that ended closest to the day of the study was selected.
Time Frame
Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
Title
Number of Participants With Hyperglycemic Excursions With Most Complete Glucose at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12
Description
Percentage of hyperglycemic excursions was calculated as the total number of observations that exceed the hyperglycemic excursion boundary (i.e. > HGTLV) divided by the total number of glucose measurements recorded in a time interval for the intervals: Baseline to Week 12, post-Week 12 to Month 6, post-Month 6 to Month 12. Most complete glucose interval was the 7 day period with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day. If these results were in more than one 7 day period, then the 7 day period with the largest average number of daily recordings (out of those with the maximum number of days with at least 4 recordings per day) was selected. If there were 2 or more 7 day periods that have the same number of days with at least 4 recordings and the same maximum average number of glucose recordings, the period that ended closest to the day of the study was selected. Data for number of participants with their percentages are presented.
Time Frame
Week 12 and Months 6 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Risk Range (ADRR) at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
Description
Average daily risk range is a measure for evaluation of blood glucose variability that was designed to be equally sensitive to hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. The ADRR was assessed over 30-day periods prior to Baseline and at key visits Week 12 and Months 6 and 12. Baseline assessments were carried out on the morning of Day 1, before the start of the first infusion of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 12 and Months 6 and 12.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12, Months 6 and 12.
Title
Composite Rank Summary for HbA1c and Exogenous Insulin Use at Month 6 and Month 12
Description
O'Brien mean rank analyses was performed on a two-part composite of the baseline-adjusted HbA1c level and the baseline-adjusted mean total daily insulin use per kg body weight in the otelixizumab group compared with the placebo group at Months 6, 12. For the O'Brien mean rank analysis at a particular time point, adjusted HbA1c values (for both treatment groups together) was ranked from smallest to largest, and adjusted mean daily insulin use values were ranked from smallest to largest. For each participant, the HbA1c and insulin use ranks were added together, producing a composite rank. A treatment comparison test was then performed on the composite ranks.
Time Frame
Month 6 and 12
Title
Composite Rank Summary for C-Peptide AUC, HbA1c and Exogenous Insulin Use at Month 6 and Month 12
Description
O'Brien analyses will be performed on a three-part composite of HbA1c level, C-peptide AUC, and mean daily Insulin use in the otelixizumab group compared with the placebo group at Months 6 and12. For the O'Brien mean rank analysis at a particular time point, HbA1c and insulin use will be ranked from smallest to largest, and C-peptide AUC will be ranked from largest to smallest. For each participant, the C-Peptide AUC, ranks for HbA1c and insulin use were added together, producing a composite rank. A treatment comparison test was then performed on the composite ranks.
Time Frame
Month 6 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Level of Cytokines Interleukin (IL-6), IL-10 and Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-a) at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8
Description
Levels of cytokine (TNFα, IL-6, IL-10) were measured at Baseline and at 2 hours after end of infusion (EOI) on Day 1, Day 4, Day 8 . Baseline assessments were carried out on the morning of Day 1, before the start of the first infusion of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8.
Time Frame
Day 1, Day 4, Day 8
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Circulating Peripheral Lymphocytes CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ T Cells and CD4+CD25hiFoxP3+ T Cells in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (TIDM) up to Month 12
Description
Blood samples were drawn for lymphocyte subset evaluations at Baseline and at 2hours after EOI on Day 4, pre-dose and after E0I on Day 8, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Week 6, Week 8, Week 10, Week 12, Month 6 and Month 12. Percentages of relevant lymphocyte subsets were determined by flow cytometry. The lymphocyte subsets assessed included CD8+CD25+ T lymphocytes, as well as the subsets of lymphocytes of these type that were positive for FoxP3, a protein that was expressed at high levels in the cytoplasm of regulatory T cells. CD4+CD25hiFoxP3+ T lymphocytes, a cell type was of interest because it played a regulatory role in T1DM. Baseline assessments were carried out on the morning of Day 1, before the start of the first infusion of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at the time of assessment.
Time Frame
Baseline (pre-dose on Day 1) and up to 12 Months
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Cell-bound Otelixizumab on CD4+ T Cells at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8
Description
The amount of cell-bound otelixizumab was determined by flow cytometry. The extent of T cell receptor alpha beta (TCRαβ) expression was determined using an antibody that bound to TCRαβ but did not compete with otelixizumab for binding sites at the expected range of concentrations. The MESF of the anti-TCRαβ antibody was used to quantify the number of CD3/TCR complexes present on T cells. Free otelixizumab binding sites (sites not occupied by otelixizumab) were detected by staining with biotinylated otelixizumab. The MESF of bound biotinylated otelixizumab was directly proportional to the availability of free otelixizumab binding sites. MESF of bound antibody on CD4+ T cells was a direct measurement of cell-bound otelixizumab on CD4+ T cells. Baseline assessments were carried out on the morning of Day 1, before the start of the first infusion of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8.
Time Frame
Baseline (pre-dose on Day 1), Day 4 and Day 8
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in CD3/TCR Saturation on CD4+ T Cells and CD8+ T Cells at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8
Description
The extent of saturation of CD3/TCR receptors on CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes was determined by flow cytometry. The extent of TCRαβ expression was determined using an antibody that bound to TCRαβ but did not compete with otelixizumab for binding sites at the expected range of concentrations. The MESF of the anti-TCRαβ antibody was used to quantify the number of CD3/TCR complexes present on T cells. The MESF of bound biotinylated otelixizumab was directly proportional to the availability of free otelixizumab binding sites. MESF of free CD3 sites on CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells was direct measurement of saturation of the CD3/TCR complex on CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells. Baseline assessments were carried out on the morning of Day 1, before the start of the first infusion of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8.
Time Frame
Baseline (Pre-dose Day 1), Day 4, Day 8
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in CD3/TCR Modulation on CD4+ T Cells and CD8+ T Cells at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8
Description
The extent of modulation of CD3/TCR receptors on CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes was determined by flow cytometry. The extent of TCRαβ expression was determined using an antibody that bound to TCRαβ but did not compete with otelixizumab for binding sites at the expected range of concentrations. The MESF of the anti-TCRαβ antibody was used to quantify the number of CD3/TCR complexes present on T cells. The MESF of bound biotinylated otelixizumab was directly proportional to the availability of free otelixizumab binding sites.CD3/TCR complexes on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were detected with a non-competing antibody. Changes in the MESF of TCR expression was a direct measurement of TCR modulation. Baseline assessments were carried out on the morning of Day 1, before the start of the first infusion of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8.
Time Frame
Baseline (Pre-dose Day 1), Day 4, Day 8

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
12 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Ages 12-45 Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, consistent with ADA criteria No more than 90 days between diagnosis and administration of study compounds Requires insulin for type 1 diabetes mellitus, or has required insulin at some time between diagnosis and administration of study compounds. Stimulated C-peptide level greater than 0.20 nmol/L and less than or equal to 3.50 nmol/L Positive for one or more of the autoantibodies typically associated with T1DM: antibody to glutamic acid decarboxylase (anti-GAD); antibody to protein tyrosine phosphatase-like protein (anti-IA-2); zinc transporter autoantibodies (ZNT8); insulin autoantibodies (IAA). A subject who is positive for insulin autoantibodies (IAA) and negative for the other autoantibodies will only be eligible if the subject has used insulin for less than 7 days total. Exclusion Criteria: Other, significant medical conditions based on the study doctor's evaluation
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
GSK Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
GlaxoSmithKline
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35294
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72205
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Costa Mesa
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92626
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90033
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Orange
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92868
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Riverside
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92506
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Santa Ana
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92705
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Torrance
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90502
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Walnut Creek
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94598
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Washington, D.C.
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20037
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Boca Raton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33486
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Jupiter
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33458
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33136
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33169
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32803
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32835
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Pembroke Pines
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33024
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Trinity
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34655
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Winter Park
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32789
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30309
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30342
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Honolulu
State/Province
Hawaii
ZIP/Postal Code
96813
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Boise
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83702
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Idaho Falls
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83404-7542
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60637
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46260
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
21287
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Topeka
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66606
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21201
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Worcester
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01655-0002
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kalamazoo
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49048
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Gulfport
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
39501
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Columbia
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
65212
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64106
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68131
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Neptune City
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07753
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Buffalo
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14209
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Mineola
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11501
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14642
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27713
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43205
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dayton
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45415-2560
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Mentor
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44060
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tulsa
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
74136-8303
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Eugene
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97401
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97210
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Langhorne
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19047
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19140
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29425-6240
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Rapid City
State/Province
South Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
57701
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chattanooga
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37403
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Memphis
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38119
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37212
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75390
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hurst
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76054
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Schertz
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
782154
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ogden
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84403
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tacoma
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98405
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T2H 2G4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Oakville
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L6H 3P1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Smiths Falls
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K7A 4W8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4G 3E8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H2W 1T8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Pointe-Claire
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H9R 3J1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Arhus C
ZIP/Postal Code
8000
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tampere
ZIP/Postal Code
33520
Country
Finland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Turku
ZIP/Postal Code
20520
Country
Finland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Heidelberg
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
69120
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bad Nauheim
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
61231
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bad Lauterberg
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
37431
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
12200
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Latina
State/Province
Lazio
ZIP/Postal Code
04100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Roma
State/Province
Lazio
ZIP/Postal Code
00157
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Roma
State/Province
Lazio
ZIP/Postal Code
00161
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Roma
State/Province
Lazio
ZIP/Postal Code
00168
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Monserrato
State/Province
Sardegna
ZIP/Postal Code
09042
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Palermo
State/Province
Sicilia
ZIP/Postal Code
90127
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Milano
ZIP/Postal Code
20132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Roma
ZIP/Postal Code
00128
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
8035
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Gerona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28040
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sant Joan
ZIP/Postal Code
´03550
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tarrasa, Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08221
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Göteborg
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-413 45
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Halmstad
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-301 85
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Harnosand
ZIP/Postal Code
871 82
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Karlskrona
ZIP/Postal Code
SE- 371 85
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Karlstad
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-651 85
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kristianstad
ZIP/Postal Code
291 85
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Motala
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-591 85
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-171 76
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Umeå
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-901 85
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Växjö
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-351 85
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bath
State/Province
Somerset
ZIP/Postal Code
BA1 3NG
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Blackburn
ZIP/Postal Code
BB2 3HH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bristol
ZIP/Postal Code
BS2 8HW
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hull
ZIP/Postal Code
HU3 2RW
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SE1 9RT
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Newcastle upon Tyne
ZIP/Postal Code
NE1 4LP
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
15972866
Citation
Keymeulen B, Vandemeulebroucke E, Ziegler AG, Mathieu C, Kaufman L, Hale G, Gorus F, Goldman M, Walter M, Candon S, Schandene L, Crenier L, De Block C, Seigneurin JM, De Pauw P, Pierard D, Weets I, Rebello P, Bird P, Berrie E, Frewin M, Waldmann H, Bach JF, Pipeleers D, Chatenoud L. Insulin needs after CD3-antibody therapy in new-onset type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 23;352(25):2598-608. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043980.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19111162
Citation
You S, Candon S, Kuhn C, Bach JF, Chatenoud L. CD3 antibodies as unique tools to restore self-tolerance in established autoimmunity their mode of action and clinical application in type 1 diabetes. Adv Immunol. 2008;100:13-37. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(08)00802-X. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
http://www.defendagainstdiabetes.com/
Description
Website containing information on DEFEND study
Available IPD and Supporting Information:
Available IPD/Information Type
Clinical Study Report
Available IPD/Information URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Available IPD/Information Identifier
115495
Available IPD/Information Comments
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
Available IPD/Information Type
Individual Participant Data Set
Available IPD/Information URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Available IPD/Information Identifier
115495
Available IPD/Information Comments
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
Available IPD/Information Type
Annotated Case Report Form
Available IPD/Information URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Available IPD/Information Identifier
115495
Available IPD/Information Comments
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
Available IPD/Information Type
Statistical Analysis Plan
Available IPD/Information URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Available IPD/Information Identifier
115495
Available IPD/Information Comments
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
Available IPD/Information Type
Study Protocol
Available IPD/Information URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Available IPD/Information Identifier
115495
Available IPD/Information Comments
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
Available IPD/Information Type
Dataset Specification
Available IPD/Information URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Available IPD/Information Identifier
115495
Available IPD/Information Comments
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
Available IPD/Information Type
Informed Consent Form
Available IPD/Information URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Available IPD/Information Identifier
115495
Available IPD/Information Comments
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

Learn more about this trial

Trial of Otelixizumab for Adults With Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (Autoimmune): DEFEND-1

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs