Weaning Children From Mechanical Ventilation:Computer-driven System Versus Usual Care
Primary Purpose
Respiratory Failure
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Smartcare/PS
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Respiratory Failure focused on measuring mechanical ventilation, automated weaning, children
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- The attending physician thinks that the patient will be able to breathe spontaneously or the patients is already breathing spontaneously.
- No vasopressor or inotropic medication, unless the patient is receiving some digitalin or small doses of dopamine (< 5 µg/kg/min)
- Slight or no endotracheal tube gas-leakage ([Vti - Vte]/Vti ≤ 20%)
- Mechanical ventilation with a plateau pressure ≤ 25 cmH2O over PEEP
- PEEP ≤ 8 cmH2O
- FiO2 ≤ 60% in order to obtain pulse oxymetry ≥ 95%
- PaCO2 < 70 mmHg on the last blood gases
- Extubation not expected the day of inclusion
Exclusion Criteria:
- N/A
Sites / Locations
- CHU Sainte Justine
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
1
2
Arm Description
Children are mechanically ventilated with Smartcare/PS
Children are mechanically ventilated with usual care
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Length of weaning from mechanical ventilation that corresponds to the time from Time 0 to the first extubation.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Total mechanical ventilation duration
Proportion of time in the acceptable breathing zone
Weaning failure
Number of interventions on the ventilator by a physician or physiotherapist
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00678912
First Posted
May 14, 2008
Last Updated
September 18, 2012
Sponsor
St. Justine's Hospital
Collaborators
Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00678912
Brief Title
Weaning Children From Mechanical Ventilation:Computer-driven System Versus Usual Care
Official Title
Single Center Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation With Computer-driven System vs Usual Care in Children
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2009 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
St. Justine's Hospital
Collaborators
Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a computer-driven system (Smartcare/PS) decreases weaning duration from mechanical ventilation when compared to usual care in children.
Detailed Description
Baseline data: All subjects included into this RCT will undergo routine examination upon admission to the hospital. These examinations include physical, medical/medication history (on the last year for medical history and the last 3 months for medication history (if available), vital signs, radiologic data and laboratory tests.
Intervention: A pre-inclusion test (pressure support test) with a level of pressure support of ± 5 cmH2O of the P plateau, but no greater than 30 cmH2O (pressure-support level plus positive end-expiratory pressure), is performed to evaluate the patient's tolerance of this ventilation mode; the test is repeated daily until positive. The test could be stopped before 30 minutes if the patient showed evidence of respiratory distress (respiratory rate > 40 breaths per minute and FiO2 > 60% in order to obtain pulse oxymetry ≥ 95%). The test is considered positive when, after 30 minutes, the patient remained clinically stable with a respiratory rate lower than 40 breaths per minute and an expiratory tidal volume higher than 6 ml per kilogram of body weight within the authorized pressure-support range, with pulse oxymetry no lower than 95 percent when the fraction of inspired oxygen was no greater than 60 percent. When the pressure-support test is positive, the patient is randomized either to Arm 1 where the intervention is weaning with the support of Smartcare/PS or to Arm 2 where the intervention is weaning based on usual care. Both group are ventilated with the same ventilator: Evita XL.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Respiratory Failure
Keywords
mechanical ventilation, automated weaning, children
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Children are mechanically ventilated with Smartcare/PS
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Children are mechanically ventilated with usual care
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Smartcare/PS
Other Intervention Name(s)
Weaning from mechanical ventilation with Smartcare/PS
Intervention Description
computer-driven protocol that adjusts pressure support level in pressure support mode to patient respiratory status
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Length of weaning from mechanical ventilation that corresponds to the time from Time 0 to the first extubation.
Time Frame
first extubation or 28 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Total mechanical ventilation duration
Time Frame
first extubation or 28 days
Title
Proportion of time in the acceptable breathing zone
Time Frame
first extubation or 28 days
Title
Weaning failure
Time Frame
48 hours after first extubation
Title
Number of interventions on the ventilator by a physician or physiotherapist
Time Frame
First extubation or 28 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
2 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
The attending physician thinks that the patient will be able to breathe spontaneously or the patients is already breathing spontaneously.
No vasopressor or inotropic medication, unless the patient is receiving some digitalin or small doses of dopamine (< 5 µg/kg/min)
Slight or no endotracheal tube gas-leakage ([Vti - Vte]/Vti ≤ 20%)
Mechanical ventilation with a plateau pressure ≤ 25 cmH2O over PEEP
PEEP ≤ 8 cmH2O
FiO2 ≤ 60% in order to obtain pulse oxymetry ≥ 95%
PaCO2 < 70 mmHg on the last blood gases
Extubation not expected the day of inclusion
Exclusion Criteria:
N/A
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Philippe A Jouvet, MD PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Université de Montreal
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
CHU Sainte Justine
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3T 1C5
Country
Canada
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17693913
Citation
Jouvet P, Farges C, Hatzakis G, Monir A, Lesage F, Dupic L, Brochard L, Hubert P. Weaning children from mechanical ventilation with a computer-driven system (closed-loop protocol): a pilot study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2007 Sep;8(5):425-32. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000282157.77811.F9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23361631
Citation
Jouvet PA, Payen V, Gauvin F, Emeriaud G, Lacroix J. Weaning children from mechanical ventilation with a computer-driven protocol: a pilot trial. Intensive Care Med. 2013 May;39(5):919-25. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2837-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Weaning Children From Mechanical Ventilation:Computer-driven System Versus Usual Care
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs