search
Back to results

Study of SB-742457 or Donepezil Versus Placebo in Subjects With Mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease

Primary Purpose

Alzheimer's Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
SB-742457
Donepezil
Placebo
Sponsored by
GlaxoSmithKline
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Alzheimer's Disease focused on measuring Alzheimer's disease, Cognition, SB-742457

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria:

  • Subjects and their caregivers must provide informed consent prior to study entry.
  • Subjects must have a clinical diagnosis of probable mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease with a documented 6-month history of AD symptoms
  • Subjects must have a regular caregiver who is willing to attend visits, oversee the subject's compliance with the study and report on the subject's status.
  • Female subjects of child-bearing potential must agree to pregnancy testing and approved form of birth control.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Diagnosis of possible, probable or definite vascular dementia.
  • History/evidence of any other CNS disorder that could be interpreted as a cause of dementia
  • History of known or suspected seizures, loss of consciousness or significant head trauma
  • Subjects with ECG, blood pressure and laboratory values outside of protocol criteria are excluded.
  • Subjects with known photosensitivity
  • Subjects with a history of previous exposure to SB-742457, taking agents for which there is a theoretical risk of interaction with SB-742457, or taking medication for Alzheimer's disease or centrally acting agents which might impact study outcomes may not participate.

Sites / Locations

  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

SB-742457 - 15mg

Placebo

SB-742457 - 35mg

Donepezil

Arm Description

SB-742457 - 15mg

SB-742457 - 35mg

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Total Score at Week 24
ADAS-Cog assesses a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items are evaluated by tests, but some are dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. The ADAS-Cog total score is the sum of the calculated scores for Questions 1 (Word recall task), 2 (Naming objects and fingers), and 7 (Word recognition task) and the scores recorded on the CRF for Questions 3 to 6 (Commands, Constructional praxis, Ideational praxis, Orientation) and 8 to 11 (Remembering test instructions, Spoken language ability, Word finding difficulty in spontaneous speech, Comprehension). The total score ranges from 0-70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction while lower indicates better cognitive function. Baseline was defined as the value at Week 0. Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change - Plus (CIBIC+) Score at Week 24
The CIBIC+ is a rating scale derived from an interview with the participant and caregiver with an independent rater designed to measure several domains of participant function, such as mental/cognitive state, behavior, and functioning. The scores are rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as follows: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderately improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (moderately worse) and 7 (markedly worse).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Score at Week 24
RBANS is an individually administered neurocognitive battery comprising 12 subtests across five domains (Attention, Language, Visuospatial/Constructional Abilities, and Immediate and Delayed memory). The scale is completed by a trained and experienced neurologist, psychiatrist or neuropsychologist, or another trained and experienced person. It is preferred that this individual is the same person who administers the ADAS-Cog, but he/she must be a separate individual from the person who completes the CIBIC+. The scale is based on the performance of the participant and takes approximately 25-30 minutes to administer. Raw total scores are calculated by adding up the scores for each of the 12 individual subtests and ranges between 0 and 311, where low score= (greater impairment) and high score=(better cognitive function). Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE] Scores 16-26) on the Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score, the Change From Baseline in RBANS Total Score at Week 24
The MMSE was used to measure cognitive impairment. The MMSE consists of 11 tests namely orientation to time, orientation to place, registration, attention and calculation, recall, naming, repetition, comprehension, reading, writing and drawing corresponding to 5 domains orientation, memory, attention, and construction. All items were scored as 0 (incorrect response) or 1 (correct response). Total scores ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and higher scores indicating better function. Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with Baseline MMSE 16-26. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline [MMSE Scores 10-20) on the Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score, the Change From Baseline in RBANS Total Score at Week 24
The MMSE was used to measure cognitive impairment. The MMSE consists of 11 tests namely orientation to time, orientation to place, registration, attention and calculation, recall, naming, repetition, comprehension, reading, writing and drawing corresponding to 5 domains orientation, memory, attention, and construction. All items were scored as 0 (incorrect response) or 1 (correct response). Total scores ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and higher scores indicating better function. Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with Baseline MMSE 10-20. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline MMSE Scores 16-26) on the CIBIC+ Score at Week 24
The CIBIC+ is a rating scale derived from an interview with the participant and caregiver with an independent rater designed to measure several domains of participant function, such as mental/cognitive state, behavior, and functioning. The scores are rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as follows: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderately improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (moderately worse) and 7 (markedly worse). Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with Baseline MMSE 16-26. Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline MMSE Scores 10-20) on the CIBIC+ Score at Week 24
The CIBIC+ is a rating scale derived from an interview with the participant and caregiver with an independent rater designed to measure several domains of participant function, such as mental/cognitive state, behavior, and functioning. The scores are rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as follows: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderately improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (moderately worse) and 7 (markedly worse). Higher scores indicate worst outcome. Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with baseline MMSE 10-20. Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score at Week 12
ADAS-Cog assesses a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items are evaluated by tests, but some are dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. The ADAS-Cog total score is the sum of the calculated scores for Questions 1 (Word recall task), 2 (Naming objects and fingers), and 7 (Word recognition task) and the scores recorded on the CRF for Questions 3 to 6 (Commands, Constructional praxis, Ideational praxis, Orientation) and 8 to 11 (Remembering test instructions, Spoken language ability, Word finding difficulty in spontaneous speech, Comprehension). The total score ranges from 0-70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction while lower indicates better cognitive function. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 12.
CIBIC+ Score at Week 12
The CIBIC+ is a rating scale derived from an interview with the participant and caregiver with an independent rater designed to measure several domains of participant function, such as mental/cognitive state, behavior, and functioning. The scores are rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as follows: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderately improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (moderately worse) and 7 (markedly worse).
Change From Baseline in RBANS Total Score at Week 12
RBANS is an individually administered neurocognitive battery comprising 12 subtests across five domains (Attention, Language, Visuospatial/Constructional Abilities, and Immediate and Delayed memory). The scale is completed by a trained and experienced neurologist, psychiatrist or neuropsychologist, or another trained and experienced person. It is preferred that this individual is the same person who administers the ADAS-Cog, but he/she must be a separate individual from the person who completes the CIBIC+. The scale is based on the performance of the participant and takes approximately 25-30 minutes to administer. Raw total scores are calculated by adding up the scores for each of the 12 individual subtests and ranges between 0 and 311, where low score= (greater impairment) and high score=(better cognitive function). Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 12.
Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline MMSE Scores 16-26) on the Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score, the Change From Baseline in RBANS Total Score at Week 12
The MMSE was used to measure cognitive impairment. The MMSE consists of 11 tests namely orientation to time, orientation to place, registration, attention and calculation, recall, naming, repetition, comprehension, reading, writing and drawing corresponding to 5 domains orientation, memory, attention, and construction. All items were scored as 0 (incorrect response) or 1 (correct response). Total scores ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and higher scores indicating better function. Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for Participants with Baseline MMSE score 16-26. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 12.
Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline MMSE Scores 10-20) on the Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score, the Change From Baseline in RBANS Total Score at Week 12
The MMSE was used to measure cognitive impairment. The MMSE consists of 11 tests namely orientation to time, orientation to place, registration, attention and calculation, recall, naming, repetition, comprehension, reading, writing and drawing corresponding to 5 domains orientation, memory, attention, and construction. All items were scored as 0 (incorrect response) or 1 (correct response). Total scores ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and higher scores indicating better function. Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with Baseline MMSE score 10-20. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 12.
Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline MMSE Scores 16-26) on the CIBIC+ Score at Week 12
The CIBIC+ is a rating scale derived from an interview with the participant and caregiver with an independent rater designed to measure several domains of participant function, such as mental/cognitive state, behavior, and functioning. The scores are rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as follows: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderately improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (moderately worse) and 7 (markedly worse). Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with Baseline MMSE score 16-26.
Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline MMSE Scores 10-20) on the CIBIC+ Score at Week 12
The CIBIC+ is a rating scale derived from an interview with the participant and caregiver with an independent rater designed to measure several domains of participant function, such as mental/cognitive state, behavior, and functioning. The scores are rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as follows: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderately improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (moderately worse) and 7 (markedly worse). Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with Baseline MMSE score 10-20.
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Total Score at Weeks 12 and 24
The ADCS-ADL measures functional impairment in terms of activities of daily living. The ADCS-ADL is an interviewer-administered informant-based scale where the informant (caregiver) responds to 23 activities of daily living questions (i.e. those necessary for personal care, communicating and interacting with other people, maintaining a household, conducting hobbies and interests, making judgments and decisions) about the participant. The questions range from basic to instrumental activities of daily living and take approximately 20 minutes to complete. The Total score ranges from 0-78 and a higher score signifies greater functional ability and lower scores indicating greater impairment. The total score is the sum of all items and sub-questions. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Weeks 12 and 24.
Change From Baseline in Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) Total Score at Week 24
The CSDD is used to assess signs and symptoms of major depression in demented participants. The CSDD scale contains 19 items on mood-related signs of depression, behavioral disturbance, physical signs of depression, cyclic functions and ideational disturbances, where each item is rated for severity on a scale of 0-2 (0=absent, 1=mild/intermittent, 2=severe). Scores above 10 (probable major depression),scores above 18 (definite major depression), scores below 6 (absence of significant depressive symptoms). The total score was calculated as a weighted average of the scores provided for the remaining 18 questions as follows: Imputed Total= Observed Total Score x 1+ Maximum Score of the missing value/ Sum of the Maximum Score of the non -missing values) and ranges from 0-38. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Change From Baseline in MMSE Total Score at Week 24
The MMSE is used to test for cognitive dysfunction. The scale is completed by a trained and experienced neurologist/psychiatrist/neuropsychologist based on the performance of the participants, and takes approximately 5 to 10 minutes to administer. It consists of 11 tests namely orientation to time, orientation to place, registration, attention and calculation, recall, naming, repetition, comprehension, reading, writing, drawing across 5 sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language). Scoring was done by circling 0 if the response was incorrect, or 1 if the response was correct. Scores range from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and higher scores indicating better cognitive function. The total MMSE score was a sum of all item scores. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Change From Baseline in ADCS-ADL-Basic Score; ADCS-ADL: Instrumental Score and ADCS-ADL: Total Independence Score at Weeks 12 and 24
Basic score was calculated as the sum of questions 1-6b and ranges from 0-22 (activities included are: eating, walking, using the toilet, bathing, grooming and dressing) and Instrumental score, sum of questions 7-23, ranges from 0-56 (activities included are: using the telephone, watching television, conversations, clearing dishes, personal belongings, making drinks, making snacks, taking rubbish out, getting out and about, shopping, keeping appointments, being left alone, current events, reading, writing, pastimes/hobbies, household chores). Total independence score is calculated by re-scoring the individual questions for each activity. The total independence score therefore ranges between 0 to 23, where 23 indicates that a participant is independent (based on these 23 ADL). Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Weeks 12 and 24.
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (Serious and Non-serious) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, may jeopardize the participant or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition above, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Number of participants with any adverse event (serious and non-serious) and SAEs were reported.
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) Any Time on Treatment (ATOT)
Vital sign measurements included systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Heart Rate (HR), Body weight (BW). SBP and DBP and HR were measured once after the participant sat quietly for at least 5 minutes and in addition, upon standing to assess participants for postural hypotension. DBP was measured at the disappearance of Korotkoff sounds (Phase V). The plethysmographic method (preferably with a column sphygmomanometer where available) was used to measure blood pressure throughout the study. Body weight was measured, without shoes and wearing light clothing. The PCC range were as follows: SBP (Reference Range [RR] <90-140> Increase from Baseline [IFB]>=40 and decrease from baseline [DFB] >=30), DBP (RR < 50-90> IFB>=30 and DFB >=20), HR (RR <50-100> IFB >=30 and DFB >=30, BW (IFB >= 7% and DFB >=7%).
Number of Participants With Hematology Data of PCC ATOT
Hematology parameters included hematocrit ratio (reference range males 0.410-0.500, females 0.350-0.460 [18-64 years] and males 0.360-0.490, females 0.330-0.460 [65+ years]), hemoglobin grams per liter (13.8-17.2), lymphocytes giga per liter (0.85-4.10), monocytes giga per liter (0.20-1.10), platelet count giga per liter (130-400), segmented neutrophils giga per liter (1.80-8.00), total neutrophils (1.80-8.00). Data has been presented in a consolidated format for hematology parameters high and low from the reference range of PCC ATOT.
Number of Participants With Chemistry Data of PCC ATOT
Clinical chemistry parameters included alanine amino transferase international units per liter (IU/L) RR [0-48], alkaline phosphatase IU/L (20-125), aspartate amino transferase international units per liter (0-55), blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio (24-101), calcium millimoles per liter (mmol/L) [2.12-2.56], carbon dioxide content/bicarbonate mmol/L (20-32), cholesterol mmol/L (0.00-5.15), creatine kinase IU/L (males 0-235 and females 0-190), creatinine micromoles per liter (umol/L) [44-124], direct bilirubin umol/L (0-6), gamma glutamyl transferase IU/L (males 0-65 and females 0-45), glucose mmol/L (3.9-6.9), low density lipoprotein cholesterol mmol/L (0.00-3.35), lactate dehydrogenase IU/L (0-270), potassium mmol/L (3.5-5.3), sodium mmol/L (135-146), total bilirubin umol/L (0-22), triglycerides mmol/L (0.00-2.24), urea/blood urea nitrogen mmol/L (2.5-10.5). Data has been presented in a consolidated format for clinical chemistry parameters high and low from the RR of PCC ATOT.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Alanine Amino Transferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Amino Transferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Week 24
Clinical chemistry parameters included alanine amino transferase, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate amino transferase, creatine kinase, gamma glutamyl transferase and lactate dehydrogenase. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Weeks 24.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Albumin and Total Protein at Week 24
Clinical chemistry parameters included albumin and total protein. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter Blood Urea Nitrogen /Creatinine Ratio at Week 24
Clinical chemistry parameter included blood urea nitrogen /creatinine ratio. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Calcium, CO2 Content/Bicarbonate, Chloride, Glucose, HDL Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urea/Blood Urea Nitrogen at Week 24
Clinical chemistry parameters included calcium, CO2 content/bicarbonate, chloride, glucose, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, sodium, triglycerides, urea/blood urea nitrogen. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin and Total Bilirubin at Week 24
Clinical chemistry parameters included creatinine, direct bilirubin and total bilirubin. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Platelet Count, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, White Blood Cell Count at Week 24
Hematology parameters included basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelet count, segmented neutrophils, total neutrophils, white blood cell count. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Hematocrit
Hematology parameter included hematocrit. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Hemoglobin and Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration at Week 24
Hematology parameter included hemoglobin and mean corpuscle hemoglobin concentration. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin at Week 24
Hematology parameter included mean corpuscle hemoglobin. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Mean Corpuscle Volume and Mean Platelet Volume at Week 24
Hematology parameter included mean corpuscle volume and mean platelet volume. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Red Blood Cell Count at Week 24
Hematology parameter included red blood cell count. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings as Assessed by Investigator and Central Cardiologist
The clinical interpretation of the ECG by the investigator was recorded as Normal, Abnormal but not clinically significant (ANCS) and Abnormal clinically significant (ACS). ECG interpretation by the central cardiologist included the most extreme result of the available ECGs where the central cardiologist's interpretation of the ECG was recorded as Normal, Unable to Evaluate and Abnormal. Data has been presented for number of participants with most severe on-treatment abnormal ECG findings.
Exposure Estimates for SB-742457 Area Under Curve Over the Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCτss)
A total of five pharmacokinetic samples per participant were collected for the purpose of assessing plasma concentrations of SB-742457 and donepezil. At each visit (Day 28±5, 56±5, 84±5, 126±5 and 168±5) one sample was collected post 24 hours of last dose.
Exposure Estimates for SB-742457 Minimum Concentration at Steady State (Cmin-ss)
Blood sample for pharmacokinetic analysis, were obtained within 24 hours of last dose. A total of five pharmacokinetic samples per participants were taken at Weeks 4, 8,12,18 and Week 24. The SB-742457 exposures at steady state Cmin-ss for each participant were estimated via nonlinear mixed effect analysis. Data has been presented in a consolidated format for SB-742457 exposures at steady state Cmin-ss.
Exposure Estimates for Donepezil Average Concentration at Steady State (Cavgss)
Blood sample for pharmacokinetic analysis, were obtained within 24 hours of last dose. A total of five pharmacokinetic samples per participants were taken at Weeks 4, 8,12,18 and Week 24. The Donepezil exposures at steady state Cavgss for each participant were estimated via nonlinear mixed effect analysis. Data has been presented in a consolidated format for SB-742457 exposures at steady state Cavgss.

Full Information

First Posted
June 30, 2008
Last Updated
May 31, 2018
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00708552
Brief Title
Study of SB-742457 or Donepezil Versus Placebo in Subjects With Mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease
Official Title
Study AZ3110865, a Study Comparing SB-742457 or Donepezil Versus Placebo in Subjects With Mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 4, 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 1, 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 9, 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The study is designed to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of SB-742457 versus placebo in subjects with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. SB-742457 is an experimental treatment which increases the levels of certain chemicals in the brain that are often decreased in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Alzheimer's Disease
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, Cognition, SB-742457

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
576 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
SB-742457 - 15mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
SB-742457 - 15mg
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Title
SB-742457 - 35mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
SB-742457 - 35mg
Arm Title
Donepezil
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
SB-742457
Intervention Description
investigational drug
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Donepezil
Intervention Description
comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
comparator
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Total Score at Week 24
Description
ADAS-Cog assesses a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items are evaluated by tests, but some are dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. The ADAS-Cog total score is the sum of the calculated scores for Questions 1 (Word recall task), 2 (Naming objects and fingers), and 7 (Word recognition task) and the scores recorded on the CRF for Questions 3 to 6 (Commands, Constructional praxis, Ideational praxis, Orientation) and 8 to 11 (Remembering test instructions, Spoken language ability, Word finding difficulty in spontaneous speech, Comprehension). The total score ranges from 0-70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction while lower indicates better cognitive function. Baseline was defined as the value at Week 0. Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
Title
Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change - Plus (CIBIC+) Score at Week 24
Description
The CIBIC+ is a rating scale derived from an interview with the participant and caregiver with an independent rater designed to measure several domains of participant function, such as mental/cognitive state, behavior, and functioning. The scores are rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as follows: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderately improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (moderately worse) and 7 (markedly worse).
Time Frame
Week 24
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Score at Week 24
Description
RBANS is an individually administered neurocognitive battery comprising 12 subtests across five domains (Attention, Language, Visuospatial/Constructional Abilities, and Immediate and Delayed memory). The scale is completed by a trained and experienced neurologist, psychiatrist or neuropsychologist, or another trained and experienced person. It is preferred that this individual is the same person who administers the ADAS-Cog, but he/she must be a separate individual from the person who completes the CIBIC+. The scale is based on the performance of the participant and takes approximately 25-30 minutes to administer. Raw total scores are calculated by adding up the scores for each of the 12 individual subtests and ranges between 0 and 311, where low score= (greater impairment) and high score=(better cognitive function). Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
Title
Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE] Scores 16-26) on the Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score, the Change From Baseline in RBANS Total Score at Week 24
Description
The MMSE was used to measure cognitive impairment. The MMSE consists of 11 tests namely orientation to time, orientation to place, registration, attention and calculation, recall, naming, repetition, comprehension, reading, writing and drawing corresponding to 5 domains orientation, memory, attention, and construction. All items were scored as 0 (incorrect response) or 1 (correct response). Total scores ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and higher scores indicating better function. Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with Baseline MMSE 16-26. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
Title
Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline [MMSE Scores 10-20) on the Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score, the Change From Baseline in RBANS Total Score at Week 24
Description
The MMSE was used to measure cognitive impairment. The MMSE consists of 11 tests namely orientation to time, orientation to place, registration, attention and calculation, recall, naming, repetition, comprehension, reading, writing and drawing corresponding to 5 domains orientation, memory, attention, and construction. All items were scored as 0 (incorrect response) or 1 (correct response). Total scores ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and higher scores indicating better function. Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with Baseline MMSE 10-20. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
Title
Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline MMSE Scores 16-26) on the CIBIC+ Score at Week 24
Description
The CIBIC+ is a rating scale derived from an interview with the participant and caregiver with an independent rater designed to measure several domains of participant function, such as mental/cognitive state, behavior, and functioning. The scores are rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as follows: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderately improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (moderately worse) and 7 (markedly worse). Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with Baseline MMSE 16-26. Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
Title
Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline MMSE Scores 10-20) on the CIBIC+ Score at Week 24
Description
The CIBIC+ is a rating scale derived from an interview with the participant and caregiver with an independent rater designed to measure several domains of participant function, such as mental/cognitive state, behavior, and functioning. The scores are rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as follows: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderately improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (moderately worse) and 7 (markedly worse). Higher scores indicate worst outcome. Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with baseline MMSE 10-20. Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score at Week 12
Description
ADAS-Cog assesses a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items are evaluated by tests, but some are dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. The ADAS-Cog total score is the sum of the calculated scores for Questions 1 (Word recall task), 2 (Naming objects and fingers), and 7 (Word recognition task) and the scores recorded on the CRF for Questions 3 to 6 (Commands, Constructional praxis, Ideational praxis, Orientation) and 8 to 11 (Remembering test instructions, Spoken language ability, Word finding difficulty in spontaneous speech, Comprehension). The total score ranges from 0-70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction while lower indicates better cognitive function. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 12.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Title
CIBIC+ Score at Week 12
Description
The CIBIC+ is a rating scale derived from an interview with the participant and caregiver with an independent rater designed to measure several domains of participant function, such as mental/cognitive state, behavior, and functioning. The scores are rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as follows: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderately improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (moderately worse) and 7 (markedly worse).
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in RBANS Total Score at Week 12
Description
RBANS is an individually administered neurocognitive battery comprising 12 subtests across five domains (Attention, Language, Visuospatial/Constructional Abilities, and Immediate and Delayed memory). The scale is completed by a trained and experienced neurologist, psychiatrist or neuropsychologist, or another trained and experienced person. It is preferred that this individual is the same person who administers the ADAS-Cog, but he/she must be a separate individual from the person who completes the CIBIC+. The scale is based on the performance of the participant and takes approximately 25-30 minutes to administer. Raw total scores are calculated by adding up the scores for each of the 12 individual subtests and ranges between 0 and 311, where low score= (greater impairment) and high score=(better cognitive function). Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 12.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Title
Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline MMSE Scores 16-26) on the Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score, the Change From Baseline in RBANS Total Score at Week 12
Description
The MMSE was used to measure cognitive impairment. The MMSE consists of 11 tests namely orientation to time, orientation to place, registration, attention and calculation, recall, naming, repetition, comprehension, reading, writing and drawing corresponding to 5 domains orientation, memory, attention, and construction. All items were scored as 0 (incorrect response) or 1 (correct response). Total scores ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and higher scores indicating better function. Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for Participants with Baseline MMSE score 16-26. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 12.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Title
Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline MMSE Scores 10-20) on the Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score, the Change From Baseline in RBANS Total Score at Week 12
Description
The MMSE was used to measure cognitive impairment. The MMSE consists of 11 tests namely orientation to time, orientation to place, registration, attention and calculation, recall, naming, repetition, comprehension, reading, writing and drawing corresponding to 5 domains orientation, memory, attention, and construction. All items were scored as 0 (incorrect response) or 1 (correct response). Total scores ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and higher scores indicating better function. Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with Baseline MMSE score 10-20. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 12.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Title
Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline MMSE Scores 16-26) on the CIBIC+ Score at Week 12
Description
The CIBIC+ is a rating scale derived from an interview with the participant and caregiver with an independent rater designed to measure several domains of participant function, such as mental/cognitive state, behavior, and functioning. The scores are rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as follows: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderately improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (moderately worse) and 7 (markedly worse). Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with Baseline MMSE score 16-26.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline MMSE Scores 10-20) on the CIBIC+ Score at Week 12
Description
The CIBIC+ is a rating scale derived from an interview with the participant and caregiver with an independent rater designed to measure several domains of participant function, such as mental/cognitive state, behavior, and functioning. The scores are rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as follows: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderately improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (moderately worse) and 7 (markedly worse). Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with Baseline MMSE score 10-20.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Total Score at Weeks 12 and 24
Description
The ADCS-ADL measures functional impairment in terms of activities of daily living. The ADCS-ADL is an interviewer-administered informant-based scale where the informant (caregiver) responds to 23 activities of daily living questions (i.e. those necessary for personal care, communicating and interacting with other people, maintaining a household, conducting hobbies and interests, making judgments and decisions) about the participant. The questions range from basic to instrumental activities of daily living and take approximately 20 minutes to complete. The Total score ranges from 0-78 and a higher score signifies greater functional ability and lower scores indicating greater impairment. The total score is the sum of all items and sub-questions. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Weeks 12 and 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 12 and 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) Total Score at Week 24
Description
The CSDD is used to assess signs and symptoms of major depression in demented participants. The CSDD scale contains 19 items on mood-related signs of depression, behavioral disturbance, physical signs of depression, cyclic functions and ideational disturbances, where each item is rated for severity on a scale of 0-2 (0=absent, 1=mild/intermittent, 2=severe). Scores above 10 (probable major depression),scores above 18 (definite major depression), scores below 6 (absence of significant depressive symptoms). The total score was calculated as a weighted average of the scores provided for the remaining 18 questions as follows: Imputed Total= Observed Total Score x 1+ Maximum Score of the missing value/ Sum of the Maximum Score of the non -missing values) and ranges from 0-38. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in MMSE Total Score at Week 24
Description
The MMSE is used to test for cognitive dysfunction. The scale is completed by a trained and experienced neurologist/psychiatrist/neuropsychologist based on the performance of the participants, and takes approximately 5 to 10 minutes to administer. It consists of 11 tests namely orientation to time, orientation to place, registration, attention and calculation, recall, naming, repetition, comprehension, reading, writing, drawing across 5 sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language). Scoring was done by circling 0 if the response was incorrect, or 1 if the response was correct. Scores range from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and higher scores indicating better cognitive function. The total MMSE score was a sum of all item scores. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in ADCS-ADL-Basic Score; ADCS-ADL: Instrumental Score and ADCS-ADL: Total Independence Score at Weeks 12 and 24
Description
Basic score was calculated as the sum of questions 1-6b and ranges from 0-22 (activities included are: eating, walking, using the toilet, bathing, grooming and dressing) and Instrumental score, sum of questions 7-23, ranges from 0-56 (activities included are: using the telephone, watching television, conversations, clearing dishes, personal belongings, making drinks, making snacks, taking rubbish out, getting out and about, shopping, keeping appointments, being left alone, current events, reading, writing, pastimes/hobbies, household chores). Total independence score is calculated by re-scoring the individual questions for each activity. The total independence score therefore ranges between 0 to 23, where 23 indicates that a participant is independent (based on these 23 ADL). Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Weeks 12 and 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 12 and 24
Title
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (Serious and Non-serious) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Description
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, may jeopardize the participant or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition above, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Number of participants with any adverse event (serious and non-serious) and SAEs were reported.
Time Frame
Upto Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) Any Time on Treatment (ATOT)
Description
Vital sign measurements included systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Heart Rate (HR), Body weight (BW). SBP and DBP and HR were measured once after the participant sat quietly for at least 5 minutes and in addition, upon standing to assess participants for postural hypotension. DBP was measured at the disappearance of Korotkoff sounds (Phase V). The plethysmographic method (preferably with a column sphygmomanometer where available) was used to measure blood pressure throughout the study. Body weight was measured, without shoes and wearing light clothing. The PCC range were as follows: SBP (Reference Range [RR] <90-140> Increase from Baseline [IFB]>=40 and decrease from baseline [DFB] >=30), DBP (RR < 50-90> IFB>=30 and DFB >=20), HR (RR <50-100> IFB >=30 and DFB >=30, BW (IFB >= 7% and DFB >=7%).
Time Frame
Upto Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With Hematology Data of PCC ATOT
Description
Hematology parameters included hematocrit ratio (reference range males 0.410-0.500, females 0.350-0.460 [18-64 years] and males 0.360-0.490, females 0.330-0.460 [65+ years]), hemoglobin grams per liter (13.8-17.2), lymphocytes giga per liter (0.85-4.10), monocytes giga per liter (0.20-1.10), platelet count giga per liter (130-400), segmented neutrophils giga per liter (1.80-8.00), total neutrophils (1.80-8.00). Data has been presented in a consolidated format for hematology parameters high and low from the reference range of PCC ATOT.
Time Frame
Upto Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With Chemistry Data of PCC ATOT
Description
Clinical chemistry parameters included alanine amino transferase international units per liter (IU/L) RR [0-48], alkaline phosphatase IU/L (20-125), aspartate amino transferase international units per liter (0-55), blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio (24-101), calcium millimoles per liter (mmol/L) [2.12-2.56], carbon dioxide content/bicarbonate mmol/L (20-32), cholesterol mmol/L (0.00-5.15), creatine kinase IU/L (males 0-235 and females 0-190), creatinine micromoles per liter (umol/L) [44-124], direct bilirubin umol/L (0-6), gamma glutamyl transferase IU/L (males 0-65 and females 0-45), glucose mmol/L (3.9-6.9), low density lipoprotein cholesterol mmol/L (0.00-3.35), lactate dehydrogenase IU/L (0-270), potassium mmol/L (3.5-5.3), sodium mmol/L (135-146), total bilirubin umol/L (0-22), triglycerides mmol/L (0.00-2.24), urea/blood urea nitrogen mmol/L (2.5-10.5). Data has been presented in a consolidated format for clinical chemistry parameters high and low from the RR of PCC ATOT.
Time Frame
Upto Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Alanine Amino Transferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Amino Transferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Week 24
Description
Clinical chemistry parameters included alanine amino transferase, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate amino transferase, creatine kinase, gamma glutamyl transferase and lactate dehydrogenase. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Weeks 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Albumin and Total Protein at Week 24
Description
Clinical chemistry parameters included albumin and total protein. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter Blood Urea Nitrogen /Creatinine Ratio at Week 24
Description
Clinical chemistry parameter included blood urea nitrogen /creatinine ratio. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Calcium, CO2 Content/Bicarbonate, Chloride, Glucose, HDL Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urea/Blood Urea Nitrogen at Week 24
Description
Clinical chemistry parameters included calcium, CO2 content/bicarbonate, chloride, glucose, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, sodium, triglycerides, urea/blood urea nitrogen. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin and Total Bilirubin at Week 24
Description
Clinical chemistry parameters included creatinine, direct bilirubin and total bilirubin. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Platelet Count, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, White Blood Cell Count at Week 24
Description
Hematology parameters included basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelet count, segmented neutrophils, total neutrophils, white blood cell count. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Hematocrit
Description
Hematology parameter included hematocrit. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Hemoglobin and Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration at Week 24
Description
Hematology parameter included hemoglobin and mean corpuscle hemoglobin concentration. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin at Week 24
Description
Hematology parameter included mean corpuscle hemoglobin. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Mean Corpuscle Volume and Mean Platelet Volume at Week 24
Description
Hematology parameter included mean corpuscle volume and mean platelet volume. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Red Blood Cell Count at Week 24
Description
Hematology parameter included red blood cell count. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings as Assessed by Investigator and Central Cardiologist
Description
The clinical interpretation of the ECG by the investigator was recorded as Normal, Abnormal but not clinically significant (ANCS) and Abnormal clinically significant (ACS). ECG interpretation by the central cardiologist included the most extreme result of the available ECGs where the central cardiologist's interpretation of the ECG was recorded as Normal, Unable to Evaluate and Abnormal. Data has been presented for number of participants with most severe on-treatment abnormal ECG findings.
Time Frame
Upto Week 24
Title
Exposure Estimates for SB-742457 Area Under Curve Over the Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCτss)
Description
A total of five pharmacokinetic samples per participant were collected for the purpose of assessing plasma concentrations of SB-742457 and donepezil. At each visit (Day 28±5, 56±5, 84±5, 126±5 and 168±5) one sample was collected post 24 hours of last dose.
Time Frame
One sample at Day 28±5, 56±5, 84±5, 126±5 and 168±5 post 24 hours of last dose
Title
Exposure Estimates for SB-742457 Minimum Concentration at Steady State (Cmin-ss)
Description
Blood sample for pharmacokinetic analysis, were obtained within 24 hours of last dose. A total of five pharmacokinetic samples per participants were taken at Weeks 4, 8,12,18 and Week 24. The SB-742457 exposures at steady state Cmin-ss for each participant were estimated via nonlinear mixed effect analysis. Data has been presented in a consolidated format for SB-742457 exposures at steady state Cmin-ss.
Time Frame
One sample at Day 28±5, 56±5, 84±5, 126±5 and 168±5 post 24 hours of last dose
Title
Exposure Estimates for Donepezil Average Concentration at Steady State (Cavgss)
Description
Blood sample for pharmacokinetic analysis, were obtained within 24 hours of last dose. A total of five pharmacokinetic samples per participants were taken at Weeks 4, 8,12,18 and Week 24. The Donepezil exposures at steady state Cavgss for each participant were estimated via nonlinear mixed effect analysis. Data has been presented in a consolidated format for SB-742457 exposures at steady state Cavgss.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8,12,18 and Week 24

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: Subjects and their caregivers must provide informed consent prior to study entry. Subjects must have a clinical diagnosis of probable mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease with a documented 6-month history of AD symptoms Subjects must have a regular caregiver who is willing to attend visits, oversee the subject's compliance with the study and report on the subject's status. Female subjects of child-bearing potential must agree to pregnancy testing and approved form of birth control. Exclusion criteria: Diagnosis of possible, probable or definite vascular dementia. History/evidence of any other CNS disorder that could be interpreted as a cause of dementia History of known or suspected seizures, loss of consciousness or significant head trauma Subjects with ECG, blood pressure and laboratory values outside of protocol criteria are excluded. Subjects with known photosensitivity Subjects with a history of previous exposure to SB-742457, taking agents for which there is a theoretical risk of interaction with SB-742457, or taking medication for Alzheimer's disease or centrally acting agents which might impact study outcomes may not participate.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
GSK Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
GlaxoSmithKline
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Shumen
ZIP/Postal Code
9700
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1113
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1431
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Varna
ZIP/Postal Code
9010
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Santiago
State/Province
Región Metro De Santiago
ZIP/Postal Code
7510186
Country
Chile
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Santiago
State/Province
Región Metro De Santiago
ZIP/Postal Code
7560356
Country
Chile
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Viña del Mar
State/Province
Valparaíso
ZIP/Postal Code
252-0997
Country
Chile
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Santiago
Country
Chile
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
656 91
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Olomouc
ZIP/Postal Code
775 20
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Praha 10
ZIP/Postal Code
100 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Praha 10
ZIP/Postal Code
10000
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Praha 1
ZIP/Postal Code
110 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Praha 2
ZIP/Postal Code
120 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tallinn
ZIP/Postal Code
10138
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tallinn
ZIP/Postal Code
10617
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tartu
ZIP/Postal Code
51014
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Stuttgart
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
70178
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tuebingen
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
72076
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Muenchen
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
80331
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Muenchen
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
81675
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Neuburg / Donau
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
86633
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nuernberg
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
90402
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Unterhaching
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
82008
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bad Homburg
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
61348
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Erbach
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
64711
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Huettenberg
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
35625
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Achim
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
28832
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hannover
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
30559
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bochum
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
44805
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bochum
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
44892
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dueren
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
52349
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Duisburg
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
47051
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hattingen
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
45525
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Koeln
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
50935
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Siegen
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
57072
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dresden
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
01097
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Leipzig
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
04107
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Leipzig
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
04157
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20249
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
115 21
Country
Greece
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
11528
Country
Greece
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Athens
Country
Greece
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Melissia
ZIP/Postal Code
151 27
Country
Greece
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Thessaloniki
ZIP/Postal Code
57010
Country
Greece
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Busan
ZIP/Postal Code
602-715
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
133-792
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
135-710
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
138-736
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
158-710
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Aguascalientes, Ags
State/Province
Aguascalientes
ZIP/Postal Code
20127
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tijuana
State/Province
Baja California Norte
ZIP/Postal Code
22320
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saltillo
State/Province
Coahuila
ZIP/Postal Code
25000
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Monterrey
State/Province
Nuevo León
ZIP/Postal Code
64660
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Mexico City
ZIP/Postal Code
06700
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Mexico, D.F.
ZIP/Postal Code
14050
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bydgoszcz
ZIP/Postal Code
85-094
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bydgoszcz
ZIP/Postal Code
85-796
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Mosina
ZIP/Postal Code
62-050
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
61-298
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sopot
ZIP/Postal Code
81-824
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Warsaw
ZIP/Postal Code
02-097
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
115522
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
115552
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
117049
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
St.-Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
198103
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Durban
ZIP/Postal Code
4001
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Loeventstein
ZIP/Postal Code
7530
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Oakdale
ZIP/Postal Code
7530
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Pretoria
ZIP/Postal Code
0181
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Rosebank
ZIP/Postal Code
2196
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sunninghill
ZIP/Postal Code
2157
Country
South Africa

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29854923
Citation
Maher-Edwards G, Watson C, Ascher J, Barnett C, Boswell D, Davies J, Fernandez M, Kurz A, Zanetti O, Safirstein B, Schronen JP, Zvartau-Hind M, Gold M. Two randomized controlled trials of SB742457 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2015 May 7;1(1):23-36. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2015.04.001. eCollection 2015 Jun.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Study of SB-742457 or Donepezil Versus Placebo in Subjects With Mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs