NB-UVB Phototherapy With and Without Topical LCD Treatment: a Bilateral Pilot Study
Primary Purpose
Plaque Psoriasis
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
LCD Solution with NB-UVB Phototherapy
NB-UVB Light Device (311-315 nm)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Plaque Psoriasis focused on measuring psoriasis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years old or older
- able and willing to provide written informed consent
- symmetrical plaque psoriasis
- able and willing to attend phototherapy sessions and apply LCD at home
- negative pregnancy test for women of child-bearing potential
Exclusion Criteria:
- current or recent other treatments for psoriasis
- hypersensitivity to LCD or UVB light
- current or previous skin cancer
- pregnant or nursing mother
- participating in another clinical trial
Sites / Locations
- Windsor Dermatology
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
NB-UVB Light Device (311-315 nm)
LCD Solution with NB-UVB Phototherapy
Arm Description
the subject will receive full body NB-UVB light therapy
on half of the body will receive LCD while the full body receives NB-UVB therapy
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
The Difference in Bilateral Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) Scores, and Erythema, Scaling, and Induration (ESI) Scores of Bilateral Target Lesion Scores Across Visits for Each Condition and Between Conditions.
Twelve (12) participants were followed over a 12-week treatment period. Treatment was administered bilaterally as they applied LCD solution to one half of their body while receiving full-body NB-UVB light therapy. The difference in their sPGA, and ESI scores of bilateral target lesions were measured across all visits. PGA scores are calculated using a 6-point scale from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe). Erythema, induration and scaling scores use a 5-point scale from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe).
Secondary Outcome Measures
The Difference in Number and Severity of Treatment-related Adverse Reactions Between Conditions.
Number of subjects who experienced and adverse reaction due to UVB + LCD, versus number of subjects who experienced an adverse reaction due to UVB therapy alone.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00708851
Brief Title
NB-UVB Phototherapy With and Without Topical LCD Treatment: a Bilateral Pilot Study
Official Title
A Clinical Evaluation of Safety & Efficacy of Adding an At-home Topical LCD Solution Regimen to Standard Narrowband UVB Phototherapy Administered 3 Times Weekly to Adults With Generalized Plaque Psoriasis.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2008 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2008 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
NeoStrata Company, Inc.
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if combining a daily at-home regimen using an LCD Solution with a 3 times weekly outpatient narrowband UVB phototherapy regimen could be a safe, effective, rapid, and, convenient treatment for plaque psoriasis.
Detailed Description
Use of coal tar with narrowband (NB) ultraviolet B (UVB) light (the Goeckermen regimen) is an effective treatment for plaque psoriasis that has become impractical in outpatient care mainly due to the inconvenience and aesthetic concerns of coal tar. This study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and convenience of adding a novel liquor carbonis distillate (LCD) (coal tar) solution to standard NB_UVB phototherapy in adults with chronic plaque psoriasis. Patients will apply LCD solution to half the body, twice daily at home and receive outpatient full-body NB-UVB light therapy 3 times a week for up to 12 weeks. A blinded investigator will grade psoriasis severity of body halves and bilateral target lesions and monitor adverse reactions. Patients will rate their psoriasis symptoms and LCD solution aesthetics. Incorporating an at-home regimen with a novel LCD solution into outpatient NB-UVB light therapy is safe, convenient, and effective and can improve psoriasis more quickly than NB-UVB light therapy alone.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Plaque Psoriasis
Keywords
psoriasis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
12 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
NB-UVB Light Device (311-315 nm)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
the subject will receive full body NB-UVB light therapy
Arm Title
LCD Solution with NB-UVB Phototherapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
on half of the body will receive LCD while the full body receives NB-UVB therapy
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
LCD Solution with NB-UVB Phototherapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
LCD
Intervention Description
LCD Solution: 2 applications / day
NB-UVB Phototherapy: 3 light sessions / week
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
NB-UVB Light Device (311-315 nm)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Ultralite Model # V4848NB
Intervention Description
NB-UVB Phototherapy: 3 light exposures / week
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Difference in Bilateral Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) Scores, and Erythema, Scaling, and Induration (ESI) Scores of Bilateral Target Lesion Scores Across Visits for Each Condition and Between Conditions.
Description
Twelve (12) participants were followed over a 12-week treatment period. Treatment was administered bilaterally as they applied LCD solution to one half of their body while receiving full-body NB-UVB light therapy. The difference in their sPGA, and ESI scores of bilateral target lesions were measured across all visits. PGA scores are calculated using a 6-point scale from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe). Erythema, induration and scaling scores use a 5-point scale from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe).
Time Frame
12 weeks of treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Difference in Number and Severity of Treatment-related Adverse Reactions Between Conditions.
Description
Number of subjects who experienced and adverse reaction due to UVB + LCD, versus number of subjects who experienced an adverse reaction due to UVB therapy alone.
Time Frame
12 weeks of treatment
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
18 years old or older
able and willing to provide written informed consent
symmetrical plaque psoriasis
able and willing to attend phototherapy sessions and apply LCD at home
negative pregnancy test for women of child-bearing potential
Exclusion Criteria:
current or recent other treatments for psoriasis
hypersensitivity to LCD or UVB light
current or previous skin cancer
pregnant or nursing mother
participating in another clinical trial
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jerry Bagel, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Windsor Dermatology, East Windsor, NJ 08520
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Windsor Dermatology
City
East Windsor
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08520
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
NB-UVB Phototherapy With and Without Topical LCD Treatment: a Bilateral Pilot Study
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs