search
Back to results

RESTART C0168Z05 Rheumatoid Arthritis Study

Primary Purpose

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Infliximab
Sponsored by
Centocor Ortho Biotech Services, L.L.C.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatoid Arthritis focused on measuring rheumatoid arthritis, remicade, infliximab, Centocor, etanercept, enbrel, adalimumab, humira, restart, swollen joints, tender joints.

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must have rheumatoid arthritis
  • Patients must have greater than or equal to 6 tender joints and greater than or equal to 6 swollen joints
  • Patients must have inadequate disease response to etanercept or adalimumab
  • Patients must have received etanercept or adalimumab in combination with methotrexate for a minimum of at least 3 months prior to the screening visit. The last dose of etanercept must have been given at least 1 week but not more than 2 weeks prior to first infliximab infusion. The last dose of adalimumab must have been administered at least 2 weeks but not more than 4 weeks prior to first infliximab infusion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have a history of latent or active TB
  • Have inflammatory disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
  • Have had a chronic or recurrent infectious disease.

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

001

Arm Description

Infliximab3 mg/kg at week 0,2,6; Increase to 5mg/kg or 7 mg/kg based on EULAR response

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percent of Patients Who Achieved a EULAR (The European League Against Rheumatism) Response at Week 10
Percent of patients who achieved EULAR response at Week 10. EULAR response is defined based on the DAS28 score and the EULAR response criteria (Van Gestel et al, 1996 and 1999). At a given visit, patients with a DAS28 score of ≤ 5.1 are considered EULAR responders if the improvement from baseline in their DAS28 score is greater than 0.6; Or patients with a DAS28 score > 5.1 are considered EULAR responders if the improvement from baseline in their DAS28 score is > 1.2.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percent of Patients Who Acheived EULAR Response at Week 10 and Maintained Through Week 26 Without Infliximab Dose Increase
Percent of patients who achieved EULAR response at Week 10 and maintained through Week 26 without infliximab dose increase
Percent of Patients Who Achieved EULAR Response at Week 26, Regardless of EULAR Response Status at Weeks 10, 14, and 22, With or Without Dose Increase Prior to Week 26
Percent of patients who achieved EULAR response at Week 26, regardless of EULAR response status at Weeks 10, 14, and 22, with or without dose increase prior to Week 26
Change From Baseline in Physical Function (HAQ)
Change from baseline in physical function (HAQ) at Week 10. HAQ assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks. A lower HAQ score indicates less difficulty. Change from baseline is computed as Week 10 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline in Physical Function (HAQ)
Change from baseline in physical function (HAQ) at Week 26. HAQ assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks. A lower HAQ score indicates less difficulty. Change from baseline is computed as Week 26 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Percent of Patients Who Achieved ACR20 at Week 10
Percent of patients who achieved ACR20 at Week 10. A patient is considered achieving ACR20 if the following two conditions are met: 1) An improvement of ≥ 20% from baseline in both the swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints; 2) An improvement of ≥ 20% from baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 assessments:Patient's assessment of pain visual analog scale (VAS), Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS), Evaluator's global assessment of disease activity (VAS), Patient's assessment of physical function as measured by the HAQ disability index, and CRP.
Percent of Patients Who Achieved ACR20 at Weeks 26.
Percent of patients who achieved ACR20 at Weeks 26. A patient is considered achieving ACR20 if the following two conditions are met: 1) An improvement of ≥ 20% from baseline in both the swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints; 2) An improvement of ≥ 20% from baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 assessments:Patient's assessment of pain visual analog scale (VAS), Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS), Evaluator's global assessment of disease activity (VAS), Patient's assessment of physical function as measured by the HAQ disability index, and CRP.

Full Information

First Posted
July 10, 2008
Last Updated
August 29, 2013
Sponsor
Centocor Ortho Biotech Services, L.L.C.
Collaborators
Schering-Plough
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00714493
Brief Title
RESTART C0168Z05 Rheumatoid Arthritis Study
Official Title
A Phase 4, Multicenter, Open-Label, Assessor-Blinded Switch Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Infliximab (REMICADE) in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are Responding Inadequately to Etanercept (ENBREL) or Adalimumab (HUMIRA).
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Centocor Ortho Biotech Services, L.L.C.
Collaborators
Schering-Plough

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of treatment in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who are having an inadequate response to at least 3 months of treatment with etanercept or adalimumab in addition to methotrexate.
Detailed Description
This is a Phase 4, multi center, open-label, assessor blinded, switch study of infliximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who are receiving methotrexate and are having an inadequate response to their current treatment with etanercept or adalimumab. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 1 week but not more than 2 weeks prior to the first infliximab study infusion. The last dose of adalimumab must have been administered at least 2 weeks but not more than 4 weeks prior to the first infliximab study infusion. The study will be conducted for 30 weeks and will include 200 patients. All eligible patients will receive 3 mg/kg infliximab infusions (drug given into a vein) at weeks 0, 2, and 6 and every 8 weeks thereafter, if they achieve a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response on their current dose of infliximab. Patients who do not achieve a EULAR response will increase their dose from 3mg/kg to 5 mg/kg at week 14. Patients who do not achieve a EULAR response at week 22 will increase from either 3 mg/kg to 5 mg/kg or from 5mg/kg to 7 mg/kg. The last study infusion will take place at week 22. The last study visit for effectiveness evaluations will take place at week 26. A week 30 follow-up visit will be performed for adverse events and tuberculosis evaluations, health economics assessments, and review of concomitant medications. All patients who end the study early will be required to complete all assessments. Patients will receive 3 mg/kg infliximab infusions at weeks 0, 2, and 6. If patients achieve European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response, they will remain on their current dose. Patients who do not demonstrate a EULAR response will increase their infliximab dose from 3 mg/kg to 5 mg/kg at week 14. At week 22, patients will also increase their infliximab dose from 3 mg/kg to 5mg/kg or from 5 mg/kg to 7mg/kg if they do not demonstrate a EULAR response.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, remicade, infliximab, Centocor, etanercept, enbrel, adalimumab, humira, restart, swollen joints, tender joints.

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
203 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
001
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Infliximab3 mg/kg at week 0,2,6; Increase to 5mg/kg or 7 mg/kg based on EULAR response
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Infliximab
Intervention Description
3 mg/kg at week 0,2,6; Increase to 5mg/kg or 7 mg/kg based on EULAR response
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent of Patients Who Achieved a EULAR (The European League Against Rheumatism) Response at Week 10
Description
Percent of patients who achieved EULAR response at Week 10. EULAR response is defined based on the DAS28 score and the EULAR response criteria (Van Gestel et al, 1996 and 1999). At a given visit, patients with a DAS28 score of ≤ 5.1 are considered EULAR responders if the improvement from baseline in their DAS28 score is greater than 0.6; Or patients with a DAS28 score > 5.1 are considered EULAR responders if the improvement from baseline in their DAS28 score is > 1.2.
Time Frame
Week 10
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent of Patients Who Acheived EULAR Response at Week 10 and Maintained Through Week 26 Without Infliximab Dose Increase
Description
Percent of patients who achieved EULAR response at Week 10 and maintained through Week 26 without infliximab dose increase
Time Frame
Week 26
Title
Percent of Patients Who Achieved EULAR Response at Week 26, Regardless of EULAR Response Status at Weeks 10, 14, and 22, With or Without Dose Increase Prior to Week 26
Description
Percent of patients who achieved EULAR response at Week 26, regardless of EULAR response status at Weeks 10, 14, and 22, with or without dose increase prior to Week 26
Time Frame
Week 26
Title
Change From Baseline in Physical Function (HAQ)
Description
Change from baseline in physical function (HAQ) at Week 10. HAQ assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks. A lower HAQ score indicates less difficulty. Change from baseline is computed as Week 10 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Week 10
Title
Change From Baseline in Physical Function (HAQ)
Description
Change from baseline in physical function (HAQ) at Week 26. HAQ assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks. A lower HAQ score indicates less difficulty. Change from baseline is computed as Week 26 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Week 26
Title
Percent of Patients Who Achieved ACR20 at Week 10
Description
Percent of patients who achieved ACR20 at Week 10. A patient is considered achieving ACR20 if the following two conditions are met: 1) An improvement of ≥ 20% from baseline in both the swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints; 2) An improvement of ≥ 20% from baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 assessments:Patient's assessment of pain visual analog scale (VAS), Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS), Evaluator's global assessment of disease activity (VAS), Patient's assessment of physical function as measured by the HAQ disability index, and CRP.
Time Frame
Week 10
Title
Percent of Patients Who Achieved ACR20 at Weeks 26.
Description
Percent of patients who achieved ACR20 at Weeks 26. A patient is considered achieving ACR20 if the following two conditions are met: 1) An improvement of ≥ 20% from baseline in both the swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints; 2) An improvement of ≥ 20% from baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 assessments:Patient's assessment of pain visual analog scale (VAS), Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS), Evaluator's global assessment of disease activity (VAS), Patient's assessment of physical function as measured by the HAQ disability index, and CRP.
Time Frame
Week 26

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients must have rheumatoid arthritis Patients must have greater than or equal to 6 tender joints and greater than or equal to 6 swollen joints Patients must have inadequate disease response to etanercept or adalimumab Patients must have received etanercept or adalimumab in combination with methotrexate for a minimum of at least 3 months prior to the screening visit. The last dose of etanercept must have been given at least 1 week but not more than 2 weeks prior to first infliximab infusion. The last dose of adalimumab must have been administered at least 2 weeks but not more than 4 weeks prior to first infliximab infusion. Exclusion Criteria: Patients who have a history of latent or active TB Have inflammatory disease other than rheumatoid arthritis Have had a chronic or recurrent infectious disease.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Centocor Ortho Biotech Services, L.L.C. Clinical Trial
Organizational Affiliation
Centocor Ortho Biotech Services, L.L.C.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Huntsville
State/Province
Alabama
Country
United States
City
Paradise Valley
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
City
Santa Monica
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Bridgeport
State/Province
Connecticut
Country
United States
City
Lewes
State/Province
Delaware
Country
United States
City
Boca Raton
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Palm Harbor
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Tamarac
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Vero Beach
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
Country
United States
City
Moline
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
Springfield
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
Country
United States
City
Wheaton
State/Province
Maryland
Country
United States
City
Saint Clair Shores
State/Province
Michigan
Country
United States
City
Eagan
State/Province
Minnesota
Country
United States
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
Country
United States
City
Springfield
State/Province
Missouri
Country
United States
City
Berkeley Heights
State/Province
New Jersey
Country
United States
City
Freehold
State/Province
New Jersey
Country
United States
City
Albany
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Syracuse
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Mayfield
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Middleburg Heights
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Tulsa
State/Province
Oklahoma
Country
United States
City
Allentown
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Duncansville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Wexford
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
Country
United States
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
Country
United States
City
Jackson
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States
City
Amarillo
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Fort Worth
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Mesquite
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Temple
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Tyler
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Burke
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
City
Reston
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
Country
United States
City
Graz-Eggenberg
Country
Austria
City
Wien
Country
Austria
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
Country
Canada
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
Country
Canada
City
St. John'S
State/Province
Newfoundland and Labrador
Country
Canada
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
City
Hamilton Ontario
Country
Canada
City
Helsinki
Country
Finland
City
Bordeaux Cedex
Country
France
City
Limoges
Country
France
City
Montivilliers
Country
France
City
Orleans
Country
France
City
Frankfurt
Country
Germany
City
Holdenfelde
Country
Germany
City
Leipzig
Country
Germany
City
Muenchen
Country
Germany
City
München
Country
Germany
City
Ratingen
Country
Germany
City
Ashkelon
Country
Israel
City
Beer Yaakov
Country
Israel
City
Haifa
Country
Israel
City
Kfar Saba
Country
Israel
City
Ramat Gan
Country
Israel
City
Rehovot
Country
Israel
City
Tel-Aviv
Country
Israel
City
Alkmaar
Country
Netherlands
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
City
Oviedo
Country
Spain
City
Santiago De Compostela
Country
Spain
City
Leeds
Country
United Kingdom
City
London
Country
United Kingdom
City
Wigan
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25050591
Citation
Fleischmann R, Goldman JA, Leirisalo-Repo M, Zanetakis E, El-Kadi H, Kellner H, Bolce R, DeHoratius R, Wang J, Decktor D. Infliximab efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis after an inadequate response to etanercept or adalimumab: results of a target-driven active switch study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Nov;30(11):2139-49. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.942416. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

RESTART C0168Z05 Rheumatoid Arthritis Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs