Trial of Laparoscopic Compared to Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children Younger Than 3 Years
Primary Purpose
Inguinal Hernia
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Inguinal Hernia focused on measuring Laparoscopic, Inguinal Hernia, Infants
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age less than 3 years (36 months) at the time of surgery
- Reducible inguinal hernia
Exclusion Criteria:
- Concomitant need for other intraabdominal procedure
- Prior inguinal hernia repair procedure
- Hospitalization expected to be prolonged due to a concurrent illness actively being treated (e.g. congenital heart disease requiring surgical repair during the same hospitalization)
- Liver Disease or contraindication to Tylenol, Midazolam, Fentanyl, or Marcaine.
- Irreducible inguinal hernia, as determined in the operating room prior to randomization and incision.
Sites / Locations
- Greater Baltimore Medical Center
- Johns Hopkins Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
The primary outcome variable will be total dose of acetaminophen administered for pain management.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Incidence of intraoperative complications: compromise of testicular vessels, perforation of abdominal viscera.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00716768
First Posted
July 14, 2008
Last Updated
August 7, 2018
Sponsor
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Collaborators
Johns Hopkins University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00716768
Brief Title
Trial of Laparoscopic Compared to Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children Younger Than 3 Years
Official Title
Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Compared to Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children Younger Than 3 Years of Age
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2014 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Collaborators
Johns Hopkins University
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Laparoscopic techniques have been applied widely to the management of various common pediatric surgical diseases. Current evidence lacks sufficient quality to justify the widespread adoption of the laparoscopic approach to the repair of inguinal hernias within children. It is important to critically evaluate the efficiency and the potential risks of these new techniques before they can supplant open techniques as the treatment modality of choice. Numerous large case series of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair have been reported with average length of stay, complication rates, recurrence rates and pain management scores that mirror those of open inguinal hernia repair. Only one randomized controlled trial has been performed to compare the open versus laparoscopic technique which has not provided answers regarding the potential benefits on young infants. Benefits of an open approach in children includes a shorter operative time, while the laparoscopic procedure is associated with less pain and a better cosmetic result.
This study will compare open versus laparoscopic repairs of inguinal hernias. The primary outcome variable will be total dose of acetaminophen administered postoperatively for pain management. Secondary outcome variables include 1) Incidence of intraoperative complications such as compromise of testicular vessels, perforation of abdominal viscera; 2) Short-term outcomes such as operative time, rate of conversion from open to laparoscopic procedure, requirement for reoperation within 30 days, wound infection, acute hydroceles and post-operative length of stay; 3) Long-term outcomes such as recurrent inguinal hernia, testicular atrophy and; 4) Cost of hospitalization will be compared between the open and laparoscopic groups.
Comparisons will be made in two groups of patients- patients with 1) unilateral hernias and 2) bilateral hernias and will last for 2 years. 102 patients in the unilateral arm and 50 patients in the bilateral arm will be randomized to each treatment group and each subject will be followed for up to 12 months following the surgical intervention. Two study evaluations by telephone (in addition to a single outpatient clinic visit already required as part of standard post-operative care) will be required of each research subject and his/her parent/guardian. The telephone evaluations will occur at 3 and 12 months following surgery. The standard post-operative clinic visit is scheduled at 2 weeks following surgery.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Inguinal Hernia
Keywords
Laparoscopic, Inguinal Hernia, Infants
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
42 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
Intervention Description
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
Intervention Description
Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The primary outcome variable will be total dose of acetaminophen administered for pain management.
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incidence of intraoperative complications: compromise of testicular vessels, perforation of abdominal viscera.
Time Frame
2 years
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
3 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age less than 3 years (36 months) at the time of surgery
Reducible inguinal hernia
Exclusion Criteria:
Concomitant need for other intraabdominal procedure
Prior inguinal hernia repair procedure
Hospitalization expected to be prolonged due to a concurrent illness actively being treated (e.g. congenital heart disease requiring surgical repair during the same hospitalization)
Liver Disease or contraindication to Tylenol, Midazolam, Fentanyl, or Marcaine.
Irreducible inguinal hernia, as determined in the operating room prior to randomization and incision.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Fizan Abdullah, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Johns Hopkins University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Greater Baltimore Medical Center
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21204
Country
United States
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins Hospital
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Trial of Laparoscopic Compared to Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children Younger Than 3 Years
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs