The Norwegian Cervical Arthroplasty Trial (NORCAT)
Primary Purpose
Radiculopathy, Cervical
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Norway
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cervical arthroplasty
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Radiculopathy, Cervical focused on measuring Radiculopathy, cervical, Nerve Root Compression, Disc, intervertebral, Intervertebral Disk Displacement, Spondylosis, Spinal Osteophytosis, Arthroplasty, replacement, Diskectomy, Spinal Fusion
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 25 - 60 years
- Clinical C6 or C7 root radiculopathy with corresponding radiologic findings with or without neurological symptoms
- Mechanical provoked pain which aggravate with physical activity or positive Spurling test
- Radiological nerve root compression on the basis of disc herniation or spondylosis
- NDI =/> 30 percent
- The patient has not responded to non-operative treatment and shown no sign of improvement during the last 6 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant spondylosis involving more than one level
- Intramedullary changes on MRI
- Ankylosis at adjacent level
- Clinical suspicion of myelopathy
- Chronic generalised pain syndrome
- Infection
- Active cancer
- Rheumatoid arthritis involving the cervical spine
- Previous trauma involving the cervical spine
- Pregnancy
- Allergy against contents in cage/artificial disc
- Previous neck surgery
- Psychological or somatic illness that causes the patient not to be suitable for the study
- The patient does not understand Norwegian orally or in writing.
- Abuse of medication/narcotics
Sites / Locations
- St. Olavs Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Artificial Cervical Disc
ACDF
Arm Description
Anterior cervical discectomy, followed by insertion of the Discover™ Artificial Cervical Disc
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
change in Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Clinical effect, measured by use of EQ5-D, SF-36, numeric arm/neck pain registration, dysphagia score, rate of complications/reoperations/morbidity
Health economical aspects, measuring hospital costs, patient costs, primary health service costs, and performing cost-utility analyses.
Adjacent level disc disease, measured by use of MRI scans.
Preservation of cervical translational and rotational segmental motion, disc height and dorsoventral displacement, by use of functional X-rays with Distortion Compensated Roentgen Analysis (DCRA)
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00735176
First Posted
August 13, 2008
Last Updated
January 10, 2019
Sponsor
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Collaborators
Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Haukeland University Hospital, Ullevaal University Hospital, University Hospital of North Norway, St. Olavs Hospital
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00735176
Brief Title
The Norwegian Cervical Arthroplasty Trial
Acronym
NORCAT
Official Title
Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy With Arthroplasty Compared With Discectomy With Fusion and Cage (ACDF. Clinical, Radiological and Biomechanical Aspects. A Randomized Multicenter Study.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2008 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Collaborators
Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Haukeland University Hospital, Ullevaal University Hospital, University Hospital of North Norway, St. Olavs Hospital
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The study will compare cervical arthroplasty with cervical discectomy and fusion, in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. The 0-hypothesis is that there is no difference between the two methods, when comparing primary and secondary outcome variables.
Detailed Description
Anterior discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is in Norway currently the most common operative method against cervical radiculopathy, caused by disc herniation and/or spondylosis. In the last decade cervical arthroplasty has emerged as a new alternative operative method. Arthroplasty is claimed to preserve the natural motion of the spine, thereby preventing adjacent level disc disease and providing better clinical results. However, this hypothesis has not yet been adequately proven. In our study, we will prove if there is any real difference in terms of clinical effect between cervical arthroplasty and ACDF.We will also compare the overall costs of the two methods, including cost-utility analyses. Moreover, we will study the development of adjacent level disease by use of MRI scans, and analyze cervical spine motion and disc height by use of Distortion Compensated Roentgen Analysis (DCRA).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Radiculopathy, Cervical
Keywords
Radiculopathy, cervical, Nerve Root Compression, Disc, intervertebral, Intervertebral Disk Displacement, Spondylosis, Spinal Osteophytosis, Arthroplasty, replacement, Diskectomy, Spinal Fusion
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
136 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Artificial Cervical Disc
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Anterior cervical discectomy, followed by insertion of the Discover™ Artificial Cervical Disc
Arm Title
ACDF
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Cervical arthroplasty
Other Intervention Name(s)
Discover™ Artificial Cervical Disc
Intervention Description
Anterior cervical discectomy, followed by insertion of the Discover™ Artificial Cervical Disc
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Cage is made of polyetheretherketone (PEEK)
Intervention Description
Anterior cervical discectomy and decompression, followed by insertion of a PEEK cage, which induces fusion.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
change in Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame
up to 5 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Clinical effect, measured by use of EQ5-D, SF-36, numeric arm/neck pain registration, dysphagia score, rate of complications/reoperations/morbidity
Time Frame
Preoperatively. Postoperatively: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years
Title
Health economical aspects, measuring hospital costs, patient costs, primary health service costs, and performing cost-utility analyses.
Time Frame
Postoperatively: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
Title
Adjacent level disc disease, measured by use of MRI scans.
Time Frame
Maximum 4 months preoperatively. Postoperatively:1 year, 2 years, 5 years
Title
Preservation of cervical translational and rotational segmental motion, disc height and dorsoventral displacement, by use of functional X-rays with Distortion Compensated Roentgen Analysis (DCRA)
Time Frame
Preoperatively. Postoperatively: 1 day, 6 weeks, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
25 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 25 - 60 years
Clinical C6 or C7 root radiculopathy with corresponding radiologic findings with or without neurological symptoms
Mechanical provoked pain which aggravate with physical activity or positive Spurling test
Radiological nerve root compression on the basis of disc herniation or spondylosis
NDI =/> 30 percent
The patient has not responded to non-operative treatment and shown no sign of improvement during the last 6 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
Significant spondylosis involving more than one level
Intramedullary changes on MRI
Ankylosis at adjacent level
Clinical suspicion of myelopathy
Chronic generalised pain syndrome
Infection
Active cancer
Rheumatoid arthritis involving the cervical spine
Previous trauma involving the cervical spine
Pregnancy
Allergy against contents in cage/artificial disc
Previous neck surgery
Psychological or somatic illness that causes the patient not to be suitable for the study
The patient does not understand Norwegian orally or in writing.
Abuse of medication/narcotics
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Øystein P Nygaard, Professor MD
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
St. Olavs Hospital
City
Trondheim
ZIP/Postal Code
7004
Country
Norway
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27061727
Citation
Sundseth J, Jacobsen EA, Kolstad F, Sletteberg RO, Nygaard OP, Johnsen LG, Pripp AH, Andresen H, Fredriksli OA, Myrseth E, Zwart JA. Heterotopic ossification and clinical outcome in nonconstrained cervical arthroplasty 2 years after surgery: the Norwegian Cervical Arthroplasty Trial (NORCAT). Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2271-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4549-6. Epub 2016 Apr 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28012081
Citation
Sundseth J, Fredriksli OA, Kolstad F, Johnsen LG, Pripp AH, Andresen H, Myrseth E, Muller K, Nygaard OP, Zwart JA; NORCAT study group. The Norwegian Cervical Arthroplasty Trial (NORCAT): 2-year clinical outcome after single-level cervical arthroplasty versus fusion-a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled multicenter study. Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):1225-1235. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4922-5. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
34351401
Citation
Johansen TO, Sundseth J, Fredriksli OA, Andresen H, Zwart JA, Kolstad F, Pripp AH, Gulati S, Nygaard OP. Effect of Arthroplasty vs Fusion for Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2119606. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19606.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
The Norwegian Cervical Arthroplasty Trial
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs