search
Back to results

Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (Tenofovir DF) Versus Emtricitabine/Tenofovir DF in Subjects Resistant to Lamivudine

Primary Purpose

Hepatitis B

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
TDF
FTC/TDF
TDF Placebo
FTC/TDF Placebo
Sponsored by
Gilead Sciences
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hepatitis B focused on measuring Tenofovir DF, Emtricitabine, Chronic hepatitis B, Combination therapy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria

  • Chronic HBV infection, defined as positive serum HBsAg for at least 6 months
  • 18 through 75 years of age, inclusive
  • HBV DNA ≥ 10^3 IU/mL
  • Receiving treatment with lamivudine with confirmation of HBV reverse transcriptase mutation(s) known to confer resistance to lamivudine (rtM204I/V with or without rtL180M) by central laboratory assessment prior to randomization; adefovir dipivoxil treatment of ≤ 48 weeks at the time of screening (inclusive of combination adefovir dipivoxil + lamivudine at entry) was allowed
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent
  • Negative serum pregnancy test (for females of childbearing potential only)
  • Calculated creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min
  • Hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL
  • Neutrophils ≥ 1000 /mm^3
  • No prior oral HBV therapy with approved nucleotide and/or nucleoside therapy or other investigational agents for HBV infection other than lamivudine or adefovir dipivoxil

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnant women, women who are breast feeding or who believe they may wish to become pregnant during the course of the study
  • Males and females of reproductive potential who are not willing to use an effective method of contraception during the study
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥ 10 × the upper limit of the normal range (ULN)
  • Decompensated liver disease
  • Interferon or pegylated interferon therapy within 6 months of the screening visit
  • Alpha fetoprotein > 50 ng/mL
  • Evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Coinfection with hepatitis C virus, HIV, or hepatitis D virus
  • Significant renal, cardiovascular, pulmonary, or neurological disease
  • Received solid organ or bone marrow transplantation
  • Receiving therapy with immunomodulators (eg, corticosteroids, etc.), investigational agents, nephrotoxic agents, or agents susceptible of modifying renal excretion
  • Proximal tubulopathy
  • Known hypersensitivity to the study drugs, the metabolites or formulation excipients

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Tenofovir DF

FTC/TDF

Arm Description

TDF plus placebo to match FTC/TDF

FTC/TDF plus placebo to match TDF

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 96

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 144, 192, and 240
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
HBV DNA Level at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Percentage of Participants With Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Normal ALT was defined as having a value less than or equal to the ULN. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to < 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
The percentage of participants who were HBeAg positive at baseline and who had HBeAg Loss at the given time point was summarized. Loss of HBeAg was defined as change of detectable HBeAg from positive to negative.
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion to Antibody Against HBeAg (Anti-HBe) at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
The percentage of participants who were HBeAg positive at baseline and who had seroconversion to anti-HBe at the given time point was summarized. Seroconversion to anti-HBe was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative to positive.
Percentage of Participants With HBV Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
The percentage of participants with HBsAg Loss at the given time point was summarized. Loss of HBsAg was defined as change of detectable HBsAg from positive to negative.
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion to Antibody Against HBV Surface Antigen (Anti-HBs) at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
The percentage of participants with seroconversion to anti-HBs at the given time point was summarized. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative to positive.
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Breakthrough at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
The percentage of participants with virologic breakthrough at the given time point was summarized. Virologic breakthrough was defined as having two consecutive 1.0 log10 or greater increases in serum HBV DNA from on-treatment nadir, or two consecutive HBV DNA values ≥ 400 copies/mL after being < 400 copies/mL.
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Spine at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, 192, and 240
BMD is calculated as grams per cubic centimeter (g/cm^2); the mean (SD) percentage change is presented.
Percent Change From Baseline in BMD of the Hip at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, 192, and 240
BMD is calculated as g/cm^2; the mean (SD) percentage change is presented.
Development of Drug-resistant Mutations (DRMs)
The development of DRMs was summarized, either as development of new DRMs or enrichment of existing DRMs.

Full Information

First Posted
August 15, 2008
Last Updated
February 9, 2016
Sponsor
Gilead Sciences
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00737568
Brief Title
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (Tenofovir DF) Versus Emtricitabine/Tenofovir DF in Subjects Resistant to Lamivudine
Official Title
A Phase 3b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study Evaluating the Antiviral Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (DF) Monotherapy Versus Emtricitabine Plus Tenofovir DF Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy in Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis B Who Are Resistant to Lamivudine
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Gilead Sciences

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of therapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) is to maintain suppression of viral replication to prevent the emergence of complications, which requires long-term therapy. Durable suppression of viral replication is achieved in the treatment of chronic viral diseases by preventing of the emergence of drug-resistant mutations. The clinical guidelines for the management of lamivudine resistant patients are variable. Some recommend switching to another agent without cross-resistance, while others recommend adding on another agent without cross-resistance. Limited clinical data exists to demonstrate whether tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF; TDF) is an effective monotherapy for lamivudine resistant patients or if it should be used as part of a combination therapy regimen. This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of tenofovir DF monotherapy versus emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir DF combination therapy in participants with chronic HBV with lamivudine resistance (presence of the rtM204I/V mutation with or without the rtL180M mutation) over a 240-week period. Participants in this study must be receiving lamivudine treatment at the time of enrollment.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hepatitis B
Keywords
Tenofovir DF, Emtricitabine, Chronic hepatitis B, Combination therapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
280 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Tenofovir DF
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
TDF plus placebo to match FTC/TDF
Arm Title
FTC/TDF
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
FTC/TDF plus placebo to match TDF
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
TDF
Other Intervention Name(s)
Viread®
Intervention Description
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF; TDF) 300 mg tablet administered orally once daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
FTC/TDF
Other Intervention Name(s)
Truvada®
Intervention Description
Emtricitabine (FTC)/TDF 200/300 mg fixed-dose combination tablet administered orally once daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
TDF Placebo
Intervention Description
TDF placebo tablet administered orally once daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
FTC/TDF Placebo
Intervention Description
FTC/TDF placebo tablet administered orally once daily
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 96
Time Frame
Week 96
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 144, 192, and 240
Time Frame
Weeks 48, 144, 192, and 240
Title
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Time Frame
Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Title
HBV DNA Level at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Time Frame
Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Title
Percentage of Participants With Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Description
Normal ALT was defined as having a value less than or equal to the ULN. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to < 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
Time Frame
Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Title
Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Description
The percentage of participants who were HBeAg positive at baseline and who had HBeAg Loss at the given time point was summarized. Loss of HBeAg was defined as change of detectable HBeAg from positive to negative.
Time Frame
Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Title
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion to Antibody Against HBeAg (Anti-HBe) at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Description
The percentage of participants who were HBeAg positive at baseline and who had seroconversion to anti-HBe at the given time point was summarized. Seroconversion to anti-HBe was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative to positive.
Time Frame
Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Title
Percentage of Participants With HBV Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Description
The percentage of participants with HBsAg Loss at the given time point was summarized. Loss of HBsAg was defined as change of detectable HBsAg from positive to negative.
Time Frame
Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Title
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion to Antibody Against HBV Surface Antigen (Anti-HBs) at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Description
The percentage of participants with seroconversion to anti-HBs at the given time point was summarized. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative to positive.
Time Frame
Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Title
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Breakthrough at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Description
The percentage of participants with virologic breakthrough at the given time point was summarized. Virologic breakthrough was defined as having two consecutive 1.0 log10 or greater increases in serum HBV DNA from on-treatment nadir, or two consecutive HBV DNA values ≥ 400 copies/mL after being < 400 copies/mL.
Time Frame
Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Spine at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Description
BMD is calculated as grams per cubic centimeter (g/cm^2); the mean (SD) percentage change is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline; Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in BMD of the Hip at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Description
BMD is calculated as g/cm^2; the mean (SD) percentage change is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline; Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Title
Development of Drug-resistant Mutations (DRMs)
Description
The development of DRMs was summarized, either as development of new DRMs or enrichment of existing DRMs.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 240

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria Chronic HBV infection, defined as positive serum HBsAg for at least 6 months 18 through 75 years of age, inclusive HBV DNA ≥ 10^3 IU/mL Receiving treatment with lamivudine with confirmation of HBV reverse transcriptase mutation(s) known to confer resistance to lamivudine (rtM204I/V with or without rtL180M) by central laboratory assessment prior to randomization; adefovir dipivoxil treatment of ≤ 48 weeks at the time of screening (inclusive of combination adefovir dipivoxil + lamivudine at entry) was allowed Willing and able to provide written informed consent Negative serum pregnancy test (for females of childbearing potential only) Calculated creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min Hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL Neutrophils ≥ 1000 /mm^3 No prior oral HBV therapy with approved nucleotide and/or nucleoside therapy or other investigational agents for HBV infection other than lamivudine or adefovir dipivoxil Exclusion Criteria Pregnant women, women who are breast feeding or who believe they may wish to become pregnant during the course of the study Males and females of reproductive potential who are not willing to use an effective method of contraception during the study Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥ 10 × the upper limit of the normal range (ULN) Decompensated liver disease Interferon or pegylated interferon therapy within 6 months of the screening visit Alpha fetoprotein > 50 ng/mL Evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma Coinfection with hepatitis C virus, HIV, or hepatitis D virus Significant renal, cardiovascular, pulmonary, or neurological disease Received solid organ or bone marrow transplantation Receiving therapy with immunomodulators (eg, corticosteroids, etc.), investigational agents, nephrotoxic agents, or agents susceptible of modifying renal excretion Proximal tubulopathy Known hypersensitivity to the study drugs, the metabolites or formulation excipients
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John Flaherty, PharmD
Organizational Affiliation
Gilead Sciences
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Bradenton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34205
Country
United States
City
Flushing
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11355
Country
United States
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19107
Country
United States
City
Innsbruck
ZIP/Postal Code
A-6020
Country
Austria
City
Wien
ZIP/Postal Code
A-1090
Country
Austria
City
Wien
ZIP/Postal Code
A-1130
Country
Austria
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1407
Country
Bulgaria
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1527
Country
Bulgaria
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1606
Country
Bulgaria
City
Varna
ZIP/Postal Code
9010
Country
Bulgaria
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V5Z
Country
Canada
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V6AB46
Country
Canada
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V6Z 2K5
Country
Canada
City
Winnepeg
State/Province
Manitoba
ZIP/Postal Code
R3E 3P4
Country
Canada
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G 1X5
Country
Canada
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G 2C4
Country
Canada
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5T 2S8
Country
Canada
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M6H 3M1
Country
Canada
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
625 00
Country
Czech Republic
City
Plzen
ZIP/Postal Code
304 60
Country
Czech Republic
City
Prague
ZIP/Postal Code
160 00
Country
Czech Republic
City
Praha 4
ZIP/Postal Code
14021
Country
Czech Republic
City
Usti Nad Labem
ZIP/Postal Code
40001
Country
Czech Republic
City
Ulm
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
89081
Country
Germany
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13353
Country
Germany
City
Duesseldorf
ZIP/Postal Code
40225
Country
Germany
City
Essen
ZIP/Postal Code
45122
Country
Germany
City
Frankfurt
ZIP/Postal Code
60590
Country
Germany
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20099
Country
Germany
City
Hannover
ZIP/Postal Code
30625
Country
Germany
City
Stuttgart
Country
Germany
City
Larissa
ZIP/Postal Code
41110
Country
Greece
City
Patras
ZIP/Postal Code
25404
Country
Greece
City
Thessaloniki
ZIP/Postal Code
54642
Country
Greece
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1126
Country
Hungary
City
Debrecen
ZIP/Postal Code
4032
Country
Hungary
City
Gyula
ZIP/Postal Code
H5700
Country
Hungary
City
Kasposvar
ZIP/Postal Code
H7400
Country
Hungary
City
Auckland
Country
New Zealand
City
Hamilton
Country
New Zealand
City
Wellington
ZIP/Postal Code
6035
Country
New Zealand
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-540
Country
Poland
City
Bydgoszcz
ZIP/Postal Code
85-030
Country
Poland
City
Chorzow
ZIP/Postal Code
41-500
Country
Poland
City
Krakow
ZIP/Postal Code
31-351
Country
Poland
City
Lodz
ZIP/Postal Code
91-347
Country
Poland
City
Szczecin
ZIP/Postal Code
71-455
Country
Poland
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
01-201
Country
Poland
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-507
Country
Poland
City
Wroclaw
ZIP/Postal Code
50-220
Country
Poland
City
Lasi
State/Province
Judetul lasi
ZIP/Postal Code
700111
Country
Romania
City
Timisoara
State/Province
Judetul Timis
ZIP/Postal Code
300736
Country
Romania
City
Bucharest
ZIP/Postal Code
021105
Country
Romania
City
Bucharest
ZIP/Postal Code
022328
Country
Romania
City
Bucharest
ZIP/Postal Code
030303
Country
Romania
City
Bucuresti
ZIP/Postal Code
020125
Country
Romania
City
Bucuresti
ZIP/Postal Code
021105
Country
Romania
City
Bucuresti
ZIP/Postal Code
022328
Country
Romania
City
Cluj-Napoca
ZIP/Postal Code
400158
Country
Romania
City
Constanta
ZIP/Postal Code
900708
Country
Romania
City
Belgrade
ZIP/Postal Code
11000
Country
Serbia
City
Kragujevac
ZIP/Postal Code
34000
Country
Serbia
City
Nis
ZIP/Postal Code
18000
Country
Serbia
City
Novi Sad
ZIP/Postal Code
21000
Country
Serbia
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
4103
Country
Spain
City
Ankara
ZIP/Postal Code
06100
Country
Turkey
City
Bursa
ZIP/Postal Code
16059
Country
Turkey
City
Izmir
ZIP/Postal Code
35100
Country
Turkey
City
Samsun
ZIP/Postal Code
55139
Country
Turkey
City
Trabzon
ZIP/Postal Code
61080
Country
Turkey
City
Uskudar
ZIP/Postal Code
34668
Country
Turkey

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24929235
Citation
Corsa AC, Liu Y, Flaherty JF, Mitchell B, Fung SK, Gane E, Miller MD, Kitrinos KM. No resistance to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate through 96 weeks of treatment in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Dec;12(12):2106-12.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.05.024. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24861361
Citation
Liu Y, Fung S, Gane EJ, Dinh P, Flaherty JF, Svarovskaia ES, Miller MD, Kitrinos KM. Evaluation of HBV DNA decay kinetics in patients containing both rtM204V/I mutant and wild-type HBV subpopulations during tenofovir DF (TDF) monotherapy or combination therapy with emtricitabine (FTC)/TDF. J Med Virol. 2014 Sep;86(9):1473-81. doi: 10.1002/jmv.23982. Epub 2014 May 23.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24368224
Citation
Fung S, Kwan P, Fabri M, Horban A, Pelemis M, Hann HW, Gurel S, Caruntu FA, Flaherty JF, Massetto B, Dinh P, Corsa A, Subramanian GM, McHutchison JG, Husa P, Gane E. Randomized comparison of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2014 Apr;146(4):980-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.12.028. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27545497
Citation
Fung S, Kwan P, Fabri M, Horban A, Pelemis M, Hann HW, Gurel S, Caruntu FA, Flaherty JF, Massetto B, Kim K, Kitrinos KM, Subramanian GM, McHutchison JG, Yee LJ, Elkhashab M, Berg T, Sporea I, Yurdaydin C, Husa P, Jablkowski MS, Gane E. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) vs. emtricitabine (FTC)/TDF in lamivudine resistant hepatitis B: A 5-year randomised study. J Hepatol. 2017 Jan;66(1):11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (Tenofovir DF) Versus Emtricitabine/Tenofovir DF in Subjects Resistant to Lamivudine

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs