search
Back to results

Efficacy and Safety of Peginesatide Injection for the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Peritoneal Dialysis Participants Previously Treated With Epoetin.

Primary Purpose

Anemia

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Peginesatide
Sponsored by
Takeda
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Anemia focused on measuring Anemia, Drug Therapy, Peritoneal Dialysis.

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient was a man or woman and 18 to 90 years of age, inclusive.
  2. The patient had CKD and had been on peritoneal dialysis for ≥3 months before enrollment.
  3. The patient was on stable SC epoetin (alfa or beta) maintenance therapy continuously prescribed for a minimum of 8 weeks prior to enrollment.
  4. The patient had 4 consecutive Hb values with a mean ≥10.0 and ≤12.0 g/dL during the screening period, with the difference between the mean of the first confirmed (2 consecutive) Hb values and the mean of the last confirmed (2 consecutive) Hb values being ≤1.0 g/dL.
  5. The patient had 1 ferritin level ≥100 ng/mL within 4 weeks before enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient had known bleeding or coagulation disorder.
  2. The patient had known hematologic disease or cause of anemia other than renal disease (e.g., pure red cell aplasia, homozygous sickle-cell disease, thalassemia, multiple myeloma, hemolytic anemia, and myelodysplastic syndrome).
  3. The patient had received a recent course of intensive iron replacement (i.e., more than 500 mg IV in the 28 days before enrollment).
  4. The patient had advanced chronic congestive heart failure defined by New York Heart Association Class III or IV.
  5. The patient had a known history of seizure disorder or received antiepileptic medication for a seizure disorder within 6 months before enrollment.
  6. The patient had a scheduled kidney transplant. (Note: patients who were currently on a transplant waiting list were not excluded unless there was an identified donor).

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Peginesatide

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Mean Change in Hemoglobin Between Baseline and the Evaluation Period
The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in Hemoglobin between Baseline (the mean of the 4 most recent hemoglobin values prior to Enrollment and the hemoglobin on the day of Enrollment) and the Evaluation Period (mean hemoglobin from Weeks 20 to 25).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Within the Target Range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL During the Evaluation Period
Mean hemoglobin was calculated from measurements taken during the Evaluation Period (Week 20 to Week 25). The target hemoglobin range was 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL. The 95% confidence interval was calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction.
Percentage of Participants With a Change in Hemoglobin From Baseline to the Evaluation Period Within 1 g/dL
Percentage of participants with a mean change in Hemoglobin between Baseline (the mean of the 4 most recent hemoglobin values prior to enrollment and the hemoglobin on the day of enrollment) and the Evaluation Period (mean hemoglobin from measured at Weeks 20 to 25) of less than or equal ± 1 g/dL. The 95% confidence interval was calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction.
Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusions
The percentage of participants who received one or more red blood cell transfusions, including packed red blood cells and whole blood transfusions, during the Titration Period (Weeks 1 - 19) and Evaluation Period (Weeks 20 -25). 95% Confidence Intervals were calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction. One patient had the last study visit during the titration period and the transfusion after the titration period. This patient is excluded from the summary of evaluation period.
Mean Hemoglobin During 4-week Intervals
Hemoglobin was measured every 2 weeks during the Titration Period (Weeks 1-19) and weekly during the Evaluation Period (Weeks 20-25). One patient did not have central lab hemoglobin value during a regularly scheduled visit during weeks 2-5.
Percentage of Participants With Target Hemoglobin of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL by 4-week Intervals
Percentage of participants with mean hemoglobin levels falling between the target level of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL during 4-week study intervals. Hemoglobin was measured every 2 weeks during the Titration Period (Weeks 1-19) and weekly during the Evaluation Period (Weeks 20-25). 95% Confidence Intervals were calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction.
Percentage of Participants With Dose Adjustments During the Study
The peginesatide dose was adjusted to maintain hemoglobin values in the target range of 10 to 12 g/dL and ±1.5 g/dL from Baseline during the Titration Period (Weeks 1-19) and Evaluation Period (Weeks 20-25). A dose was classified as adjusted if it was not within 20% of the previous dose. A dose was classified as increased or decreased if it was >20% higher or >20% lower respectively, than the previous dose.

Full Information

First Posted
September 11, 2008
Last Updated
August 13, 2012
Sponsor
Takeda
Collaborators
Affymax
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00752791
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety of Peginesatide Injection for the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Peritoneal Dialysis Participants Previously Treated With Epoetin.
Official Title
A Phase 2 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Hematide Injection for the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Peritoneal Dialysis Subjects Previously Treated With Epoetin
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Takeda
Collaborators
Affymax

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of peginesatide injection for maintenance treatment of anemia in participants on peritoneal dialysis.
Detailed Description
According to the International Federation of Renal Registries, in 1999 the prevalence of peritoneal dialysis in the United States as approximately 9.5% of patients receiving dialysis (2005 United States Renal Data Systems data indicates a prevalence of around 7.5%). Data from Europe in 1999 to 2000 (not including the United Kingdom, France or Germany) indicated peritoneal dialysis was the mode of dialysis in approximately 11.1% of dialysis patients. 2006 data from the United Kingdom indicates that more than 20% of patients on dialysis are receiving peritoneal dialysis while French and German data indicate rates of 8.1% and 4.8% respectively. More than 90% of patients with chronic renal failure/chronic kidney disease Stage 5 (End Stage Renal Disease) are anemic. The vast majority of patients receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis receive erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy to treat their anemia. Anemia of chronic renal failure is due to several factors, primarily the inability of the diseased kidneys to produce adequate amounts of endogenous erythropoietin. Ancillary factors also include the shortened lifespan of red blood cells, iron and other nutritional deficiencies, infection, and inflammation. The prevalence of anemia increases with progressive deterioration of renal function, and affects more than 90% of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stage 5 (End Stage Renal Disease). Anemia is associated with increased mortality, increased likelihood of hospitalization, reduced cognitive function and exercise capacity, increased left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure. Treatment of anemia reduces morbidity and mortality risks and may improve quality of life. Erythropoiesis stimulating agents have been established as a treatment for anemia in chronic renal failure participants, and have improved the management of anemia over alternatives such as transfusion. Peginesatide (hematide) is a parenteral formulation being developed for the correction of anemia in patients with chronic renal failure, and binds to and activates the human erythropoietin receptor and stimulates erythropoiesis in human red cell precursors in a manner similar to other known erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Participants in this study received variable doses of peginesatide injection once every four weeks. Total commitment time for this study was about 29 weeks.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Anemia
Keywords
Anemia, Drug Therapy, Peritoneal Dialysis.

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
59 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Peginesatide
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Peginesatide
Other Intervention Name(s)
Hematide, AF37702, Omontys
Intervention Description
Peginesatide 0.04 to 0.16 mg/kg, subcutaneous injection, once every 4 weeks for up to 25 weeks. Initial dose based on patient's previous total weekly Epoetin dose, and thereafter could be adjusted to maintain hemoglobin values in the target range of 10 to 12 g/dL and ±1.5 g/dL from Baseline.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Change in Hemoglobin Between Baseline and the Evaluation Period
Description
The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in Hemoglobin between Baseline (the mean of the 4 most recent hemoglobin values prior to Enrollment and the hemoglobin on the day of Enrollment) and the Evaluation Period (mean hemoglobin from Weeks 20 to 25).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 20 to Week 25.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Within the Target Range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL During the Evaluation Period
Description
Mean hemoglobin was calculated from measurements taken during the Evaluation Period (Week 20 to Week 25). The target hemoglobin range was 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL. The 95% confidence interval was calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction.
Time Frame
Week 20 to Week 25.
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Change in Hemoglobin From Baseline to the Evaluation Period Within 1 g/dL
Description
Percentage of participants with a mean change in Hemoglobin between Baseline (the mean of the 4 most recent hemoglobin values prior to enrollment and the hemoglobin on the day of enrollment) and the Evaluation Period (mean hemoglobin from measured at Weeks 20 to 25) of less than or equal ± 1 g/dL. The 95% confidence interval was calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 20 to Week 25.
Title
Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusions
Description
The percentage of participants who received one or more red blood cell transfusions, including packed red blood cells and whole blood transfusions, during the Titration Period (Weeks 1 - 19) and Evaluation Period (Weeks 20 -25). 95% Confidence Intervals were calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction. One patient had the last study visit during the titration period and the transfusion after the titration period. This patient is excluded from the summary of evaluation period.
Time Frame
Up to 25 weeks.
Title
Mean Hemoglobin During 4-week Intervals
Description
Hemoglobin was measured every 2 weeks during the Titration Period (Weeks 1-19) and weekly during the Evaluation Period (Weeks 20-25). One patient did not have central lab hemoglobin value during a regularly scheduled visit during weeks 2-5.
Time Frame
Up to 25 weeks.
Title
Percentage of Participants With Target Hemoglobin of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL by 4-week Intervals
Description
Percentage of participants with mean hemoglobin levels falling between the target level of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL during 4-week study intervals. Hemoglobin was measured every 2 weeks during the Titration Period (Weeks 1-19) and weekly during the Evaluation Period (Weeks 20-25). 95% Confidence Intervals were calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction.
Time Frame
Up to 25 weeks.
Title
Percentage of Participants With Dose Adjustments During the Study
Description
The peginesatide dose was adjusted to maintain hemoglobin values in the target range of 10 to 12 g/dL and ±1.5 g/dL from Baseline during the Titration Period (Weeks 1-19) and Evaluation Period (Weeks 20-25). A dose was classified as adjusted if it was not within 20% of the previous dose. A dose was classified as increased or decreased if it was >20% higher or >20% lower respectively, than the previous dose.
Time Frame
From Week 4 to Week 25

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: The patient was a man or woman and 18 to 90 years of age, inclusive. The patient had CKD and had been on peritoneal dialysis for ≥3 months before enrollment. The patient was on stable SC epoetin (alfa or beta) maintenance therapy continuously prescribed for a minimum of 8 weeks prior to enrollment. The patient had 4 consecutive Hb values with a mean ≥10.0 and ≤12.0 g/dL during the screening period, with the difference between the mean of the first confirmed (2 consecutive) Hb values and the mean of the last confirmed (2 consecutive) Hb values being ≤1.0 g/dL. The patient had 1 ferritin level ≥100 ng/mL within 4 weeks before enrollment. Exclusion Criteria: The patient had known bleeding or coagulation disorder. The patient had known hematologic disease or cause of anemia other than renal disease (e.g., pure red cell aplasia, homozygous sickle-cell disease, thalassemia, multiple myeloma, hemolytic anemia, and myelodysplastic syndrome). The patient had received a recent course of intensive iron replacement (i.e., more than 500 mg IV in the 28 days before enrollment). The patient had advanced chronic congestive heart failure defined by New York Heart Association Class III or IV. The patient had a known history of seizure disorder or received antiepileptic medication for a seizure disorder within 6 months before enrollment. The patient had a scheduled kidney transplant. (Note: patients who were currently on a transplant waiting list were not excluded unless there was an identified donor).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Medical Director
Organizational Affiliation
Takeda
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Azusa
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Whittier
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Naples
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Decatur
State/Province
Georgia
Country
United States
City
Evergreen Park
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
Wichita
State/Province
Kansas
Country
United States
City
Baton Rouge
State/Province
Louisiana
Country
United States
City
New Iberia
State/Province
Louisiana
Country
United States
City
Shreveport
State/Province
Louisiana
Country
United States
City
Columbus
State/Province
Mississippi
Country
United States
City
Tupelo
State/Province
Mississippi
Country
United States
City
New York
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Williamsville
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Canton
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Arlington
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Tyler
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Fairfax
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
City
Mechanicsville
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
City
New Lambtom
State/Province
New South Wales
Country
Australia
City
Modena
Country
Italy
City
Dunedin
Country
New Zealand
City
London
State/Province
England
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy and Safety of Peginesatide Injection for the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Peritoneal Dialysis Participants Previously Treated With Epoetin.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs