search
Back to results

OptiMesh® for Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (OLIF) (OLIF)

Primary Purpose

Degeneration of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Structural Allograft Spacer
OptiMesh 1500S
Sponsored by
Spineology, Inc
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Degeneration of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc focused on measuring Degenerative Disc Disease, DDD, Lumbar DDD, Disc degeneration, Interbody Fusion, Lumbar Interbody Fusion, IBF

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Skeletally mature and be at least 18 years of age
  • Have degenerative disc disease (DDD) requiring one level fusion between L2 and S1, with DDD confirmed by subject history, physical exam, and radiographic studies with one or more of the following factors:

    1. instability as defined by >3 mm translation or ≥5º rotation of flexion/ extension;
    2. osteophyte formation of facet joints or vertebral endplates;
    3. decreased disc height, on average 2 mm, but dependent on spinal level;
    4. scarring/thickening of the ligamentum flavum, annulus fibrosis, or facet joint capsule;
    5. herniated nucleus pulposus;
    6. facet joint degeneration/changes; and/or
    7. vacuum phenomenon;
  • Based on the VAS, subjects report pre-operative low back pain (>4 of 10) with duration of pain six-months or longer despite non-surgical treatment;
  • Capable of understanding and signing the consent form; and
  • Willing and able to comply with follow-up requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A previous interbody fusion at the involved level;
  • Greater than grade 2 spondylolisthesis;
  • Systemic infection or active infection at the surgical site;
  • Active malignancy;
  • Body Mass Index of 40 or higher;
  • Significant metabolic bone disease (e.g. osteoporosis or osteomalacia) to a degree that spinal instrumentation is contraindicated;
  • Taking medications that may interfere with bone or soft tissue healing (e.g. long-term steroid use);
  • Alcohol or drug abuse;
  • Waddell Signs of Inorganic Behavior >3;
  • Currently in litigation regarding a spinal condition;
  • Known sensitivity to implant material;
  • A prisoner;
  • Pregnant or contemplating pregnancy during the 24-month follow-up period; and
  • Enrolled in another concurrent clinical trial.

Sites / Locations

  • Olympia Medical Center
  • Kootenai Medical Center
  • Rush-Copley Medical Center
  • St. Mary's Christus Hospital
  • Providence Hospitals and Medical Center
  • Methodist Hospital
  • Lakeview Hospital
  • Alegent-Health Immanuel Medical Center
  • St. Charles Hospital
  • McLeod Health
  • Fletcher-Allen Health Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Optimesh 1500S

Structural Allograft Spacer

Arm Description

OptiMesh 1500S, filled with a mixture of demineralized bone matrix (DBM) and cortico-cancellous bone, placed into the interbody space from the posterior approach and supplemental pedicle screws.

Structural Allograft Spacer with pedicle screws.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Mean Change in Low Back Pain Score at 24-months Compared to Pre-op
A Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate a subject's level of pain. The VAS is a 10 cm pain scale where a score of "0" represents "No Pain" and a score of "10" represents the "Worst Possible" pain. The magnitude of change in the 24-month score compared to the baseline score is calculated. A clinically meaningful change is defined as a 2 unit (cm) reduction at 24-months when compared to pre-op.
Mean Change in Back Function Score at 24-months Compared to Pre-op
A subject's back function was assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The ODI is a 10 question survey that evaluates the degree of functional impairment. Completion of the survey yields a score from "0" to "100" points. A score of "0" represents "No disability" and "100" represents "Total disability". The magnitude of change between the two timepoints is reported. A clinically meaningful improvement is defined as a 15 point reduction at 24-months compared to the pre-op score.
Number of Participants Determined to be a Fusion Success at 24 Months Post-operative
Fusion Success is defined as <5 degrees angulation, <10% translation, and presence of bridging bone on CT.
Number of Participants With a Serious Device and Procedure Related Adverse Event
The rate of serious device and procedure related adverse events are compared between the control and treatment arm from intraoperative through 24 months of follow-up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Right Leg Pain Score--Change From Preop at the 24-month Timepoint
Right leg pain assessed by subject response on Visual Analog Scale (0-10 cm) where "0" represents "No pain" and "10" represents "Worst pain". The magnitude of change at 24-months compared to baseline is reported. A clinically relevant improvement is defined as a 2 cm reduction at 24-months compared to pre-op.
Left Leg Pain--Change From Preop at the 24-month Timepoint
Left leg pain assessed by subject response on Visual Analog Scale (0-10cm) where "0" represents "No left leg pain" and "10" represents "Worst Pain". The magnitude of change at 24-months post-operative compared to the baseline score is reported. A clinically relevant improvement is defined as a 2 cm reduction at 24-months compared to pre-op.
Number of Participants Rating Their Procedure as Very Satisfied or Somewhat Satisfied at 24-months Postoperative
Subjects were asked to rate their satisfaction with their surgical procedure as "Very Satisfied", "Somewhat Satisfied", "Somewhat Dissatisfied" or "Very Dissatisfied" with their procedure

Full Information

First Posted
October 1, 2008
Last Updated
August 19, 2021
Sponsor
Spineology, Inc
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00764491
Brief Title
OptiMesh® for Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (OLIF)
Acronym
OLIF
Official Title
OptiMesh® for Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (OLIF)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2003 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Spineology, Inc

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to collect data to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the OptiMesh 1500S to contain and reinforce bone graft materials in patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) whose condition requires an interbody spinal fusion procedure combined with posterior fixation.
Detailed Description
Seventy-six thousand posterior interbody fusions are performed annually in the U.S., and it has been estimated that at least 50% of those cases include supplemental posterior instrumentation. For interbody fusion with posterior fixation, spine surgeons currently place structural intervertebral spacers into the interbody space. These spacers may be pre-shaped devices constructed of allograft (cortical bone dowels or femoral rings) or non-metallic, radiolucent materials, or metallic cage devices. Autogenous bone graft and blood components (marrow, blood) are often added. Use of morselized bone graft in orthopedic procedures is desirable because it is more rapidly incorporated during the course of bone healing. If the morselized graft pack can be effectively contained in the interbody space, the graft material can function as a structural spacer to provide anterior column support. Contained graft material can be tightly packed within the mesh to increase the graft's compressive strength. Unlike pre-shaped cortical grafts, the morselized pack conforms intimately to the host bone at the surgical site, ensuring good vascularization potential and reducing the osteoblast jumping distance for osteogenesis. In addition, the solidly packed graft retains intra-pack porosity, ensuring an osteoconductive scaffold to facilitate vascular and bony ingrowth. It would be desirable to minimize autograft use because of associated post-op pain, to optimize contact between allograft and host bone, and to permit the surgeon to place or construct an effective structural intervertebral spacer with only minimal neural retraction required. OptiMesh 1500S is intended to be used to contain the bone graft placed by spine surgeons into the interbody space to achieve spinal intervertebral body fusion. OptiMesh 1500S enables the use of morselized bone graft materials in spine fusion procedures instead of solid allograft materials, such as cortical bone dowels or femoral rings, or rigid synthetic materials. In addition, the OptiMesh instrument system allows the surgeon to perform an interbody fusion through a small portal and to complete the entire fusion procedure from a posterior approach instead of a 360 degree anterior/ posterior procedure, which is often the case with the use of cages. The minimal access portal utilized for OptiMesh filling allows the device to be placed via a unilateral transforaminal or translaminar approach, versus the often-used bilateral approach required for many cages and cortical spacers. This flexibility permits the surgeon to adapt the surgical approach to the local anatomy of the patient.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Degeneration of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc
Keywords
Degenerative Disc Disease, DDD, Lumbar DDD, Disc degeneration, Interbody Fusion, Lumbar Interbody Fusion, IBF

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
156 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Optimesh 1500S
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
OptiMesh 1500S, filled with a mixture of demineralized bone matrix (DBM) and cortico-cancellous bone, placed into the interbody space from the posterior approach and supplemental pedicle screws.
Arm Title
Structural Allograft Spacer
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Structural Allograft Spacer with pedicle screws.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Structural Allograft Spacer
Other Intervention Name(s)
Allograft bone spacer
Intervention Description
Following disc space preparation the spacer is placed in accordance with cleared labeling and supplemental instrumentation is provided as an adjunct to fixation.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
OptiMesh 1500S
Other Intervention Name(s)
OptiMesh, OLIF
Intervention Description
Following disc space preparation the OptiMesh is deployed and filled in accordance with study surgical technique and supplemental instrumentation is provided as an adjunct to fixation.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Change in Low Back Pain Score at 24-months Compared to Pre-op
Description
A Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate a subject's level of pain. The VAS is a 10 cm pain scale where a score of "0" represents "No Pain" and a score of "10" represents the "Worst Possible" pain. The magnitude of change in the 24-month score compared to the baseline score is calculated. A clinically meaningful change is defined as a 2 unit (cm) reduction at 24-months when compared to pre-op.
Time Frame
24 month
Title
Mean Change in Back Function Score at 24-months Compared to Pre-op
Description
A subject's back function was assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The ODI is a 10 question survey that evaluates the degree of functional impairment. Completion of the survey yields a score from "0" to "100" points. A score of "0" represents "No disability" and "100" represents "Total disability". The magnitude of change between the two timepoints is reported. A clinically meaningful improvement is defined as a 15 point reduction at 24-months compared to the pre-op score.
Time Frame
24 month
Title
Number of Participants Determined to be a Fusion Success at 24 Months Post-operative
Description
Fusion Success is defined as <5 degrees angulation, <10% translation, and presence of bridging bone on CT.
Time Frame
24 month
Title
Number of Participants With a Serious Device and Procedure Related Adverse Event
Description
The rate of serious device and procedure related adverse events are compared between the control and treatment arm from intraoperative through 24 months of follow-up.
Time Frame
From Intra-op through the 24-month visit
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Right Leg Pain Score--Change From Preop at the 24-month Timepoint
Description
Right leg pain assessed by subject response on Visual Analog Scale (0-10 cm) where "0" represents "No pain" and "10" represents "Worst pain". The magnitude of change at 24-months compared to baseline is reported. A clinically relevant improvement is defined as a 2 cm reduction at 24-months compared to pre-op.
Time Frame
24-month visit
Title
Left Leg Pain--Change From Preop at the 24-month Timepoint
Description
Left leg pain assessed by subject response on Visual Analog Scale (0-10cm) where "0" represents "No left leg pain" and "10" represents "Worst Pain". The magnitude of change at 24-months post-operative compared to the baseline score is reported. A clinically relevant improvement is defined as a 2 cm reduction at 24-months compared to pre-op.
Time Frame
24-month visit
Title
Number of Participants Rating Their Procedure as Very Satisfied or Somewhat Satisfied at 24-months Postoperative
Description
Subjects were asked to rate their satisfaction with their surgical procedure as "Very Satisfied", "Somewhat Satisfied", "Somewhat Dissatisfied" or "Very Dissatisfied" with their procedure
Time Frame
24-month visit

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Skeletally mature and be at least 18 years of age Have degenerative disc disease (DDD) requiring one level fusion between L2 and S1, with DDD confirmed by subject history, physical exam, and radiographic studies with one or more of the following factors: instability as defined by >3 mm translation or ≥5º rotation of flexion/ extension; osteophyte formation of facet joints or vertebral endplates; decreased disc height, on average 2 mm, but dependent on spinal level; scarring/thickening of the ligamentum flavum, annulus fibrosis, or facet joint capsule; herniated nucleus pulposus; facet joint degeneration/changes; and/or vacuum phenomenon; Based on the VAS, subjects report pre-operative low back pain (>4 of 10) with duration of pain six-months or longer despite non-surgical treatment; Capable of understanding and signing the consent form; and Willing and able to comply with follow-up requirements Exclusion Criteria: A previous interbody fusion at the involved level; Greater than grade 2 spondylolisthesis; Systemic infection or active infection at the surgical site; Active malignancy; Body Mass Index of 40 or higher; Significant metabolic bone disease (e.g. osteoporosis or osteomalacia) to a degree that spinal instrumentation is contraindicated; Taking medications that may interfere with bone or soft tissue healing (e.g. long-term steroid use); Alcohol or drug abuse; Waddell Signs of Inorganic Behavior >3; Currently in litigation regarding a spinal condition; Known sensitivity to implant material; A prisoner; Pregnant or contemplating pregnancy during the 24-month follow-up period; and Enrolled in another concurrent clinical trial.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Martin Krag, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Fletcher-Allen Health Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Olympia Medical Center
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90036
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kootenai Medical Center
City
Coeur d'Alene
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83814
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rush-Copley Medical Center
City
Aurora
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60504
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Mary's Christus Hospital
City
Shreveport
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
71101
Country
United States
Facility Name
Providence Hospitals and Medical Center
City
Southfield
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48075
Country
United States
Facility Name
Methodist Hospital
City
Saint Louis Park
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55426
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lakeview Hospital
City
Stillwater
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55082
Country
United States
Facility Name
Alegent-Health Immanuel Medical Center
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68122
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Charles Hospital
City
Port Jefferson
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11777
Country
United States
Facility Name
McLeod Health
City
Florence
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29506
Country
United States
Facility Name
Fletcher-Allen Health Center
City
Burlington
State/Province
Vermont
ZIP/Postal Code
05401
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Links:
URL
http://www.spineology.com/
Description
Sponsor

Learn more about this trial

OptiMesh® for Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (OLIF)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs