An Efficacy Study of Combination of Tramadol and Acetaminophen Tablets in the Treatment of Participants With Fibromyalgia Pain
Primary Purpose
Pain, Fibromyalgia
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tramadol hydrochloride
Acetaminophen
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Pain focused on measuring Pain, Fibromyalgia, Ultracet, Tramadol Hydrochloride, Acetaminophen
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants must meet the American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia (that are, Participants must have had widespread pain [pain in three quadrants and in the axial skeleton] for at least three months and pain on digital palpation in 11 or more of the 18 tender-point sites
- Female participants must not be pregnant, breast feeding or postmenopausal for at least one year
- Participant must be able to take oral medication
- Participants must have completed the Screening or wash-out procedures and have a visual analog scale score greater than or equal to 40 milliliter
- Fail to non-opioid analgesics
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants who previously failed tramadol hydrochloride therapy or those who discontinued tramadol hydrochloride due to adverse events
- Participants diagnosed with either any active connective tissue or musculo-skeletal diseases, or malignancy or history of malignancy within past 5 years, or painful, symptomatic osteoarthritis, or regional periarticular pain syndromes, spondyloarthropathy and major endocrine disease
- Participants who currently have more severe pain than the pain of fibromyalgia
- Participants who have taken antidepressants, cyclobenzaprine or anti-epileptic drugs for pain within three weeks of the Treatment Phase
- Participants who have taken short-acting analgesics, topical medications and anesthetics and/or muscle relaxants for a period of less than 21 days of the given medication prior to the Treatment Phase
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Tramadol hydrochloride/acetaminophen
Arm Description
Tramadol hydrochloride/acetaminophen oral tablet will be administered as 37.5 /325 milligram respectively once daily for Day 1-3, twice daily for Day 4-6 and thrice daily for Day 7-56.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Pain Visual Analog Scale Score at Day 14
Pain visual analog scale was used to assess the amount of pain recently experienced (within the last 48 hours) by marking a slash through the line of a 100 millimeter (mm) scale measuring pain from "no pain (0 mm)" to "worst possible pain (100 mm)".
Pain Visual Analog Scale Score at Day 28
Pain visual analog scale was used to assess the amount of pain recently experienced (within the last 48 hours) by marking a slash through the line of a 100 millimeter (mm) scale measuring pain from "no pain (0 mm)" to "worst possible pain (100 mm)".
Pain Visual Analog Scale Score at Day 56
Pain visual analog scale was used to assess the amount of pain recently experienced (within the last 48 hours) by marking a slash through the line of a 100 millimeter (mm) scale measuring pain from "no pain (0 mm)" to "worst possible pain (100 mm)".
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Pain Relief Rating Scale
Pain Relief Rating Scale was used to measure the amount of pain relief experienced (on average) relative to the no-medication Screening or wash-out phase using a 6-point Likert scale ranging from (-) 1 to 4 and rated as (-) 1=worse, 0=None, 1=Slight, 2=moderate,3=a lot and 4=complete.
Tender-Point Evaluation/ Myalgic Score
Eighteen tender-point sites were evaluated by digital palpation for pain by the same Investigator at each site. The Investigator rated the participant's response to digital palpation on a scale from 0 (no pain [participant did not have a tender point]) to 3 (participant withdrawn or flinched). Total myalgic score was the sum of tender-point pain ratings.The total tender-Point score ranges from 0 to 18, and the total myalgic score ranges from 0 to 54. Higher score indicates worsening.
Sleep Questionnaire: Number of Hours to Fall Asleep and Participant Slept
The patient assessment sleep questionnaire consisted of 12-Questions (Q) to evaluate the participant's sleep habits out of which Q1 was "How long did it usually take for participant to fall asleep during the past 4 weeks" and Q2 was "On the average, how many hours did participant sleep each night during the past 4 weeks".
Participant Assessment Sleep Questionnaire Score
Sleep questionnaire consisted of 12-Questions (Q), Q3-Q12 were related to "How often during past 4 weeks did participant felt" and are as: Q3: sleep not quiet, Q4: get enough sleep to feel rested upon waking in morning, Q5: awaken short of breath or with headache, Q6: feel drowsy or sleepy, Q7: have trouble falling asleep, Q8: awaken during sleep time and have trouble falling asleep again, Q9: trouble staying awake during day, Q10: snore, Q11: take naps during day, Q12: get amount of sleep needed. Score ranged from 1= all the time to 6 = none of the time, higher score indicates improvement.
Total Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Score
The FIQ was 19-item questionnaire which measured participant status, progress and outcomes. First 10 items made up of a physical functioning scale, ranging from 0 (always) to 3 (never). Items 11 and 12 asked participants to mark the number of days they felt well (0-7 days) and missed work (0-5 days). Items 13-19 were measured using 10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale, score ranging from 0 cm (no) to 10 cm (very). Total FIQ score ranged from 0 -100 which was calculated as sum of final scores for item 1-10, 11 and 12, and individual score for item 13-19, and higher score indicates worsening.
Number of Participants With Physician Global Assessment
The treating physician rated the participant's condition on Day 1 before the start of treatment and each return visit. The assessment included how the drug controlled the pain (Question 1 [Q1]), adverse event (Question 2 [Q2]), and overall evaluation (Question 3 [Q3]), and participant's condition was indicated as very good, good, moderate, poor and very poor.
Number of Participants With Subject's Global Assessment
Participants indicated their condition on Day 1 before the start of treatment and each return visit. The assessment included how the drug controlled the pain (Question 1 [Q1]), adverse event (Question 2 [Q2]), and overall evaluation (Question 3 [Q3]), and participants indicated their condition as very good, good, moderate, poor and very poor.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00766675
First Posted
October 3, 2008
Last Updated
May 29, 2013
Sponsor
Johnson & Johnson Taiwan Ltd
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00766675
Brief Title
An Efficacy Study of Combination of Tramadol and Acetaminophen Tablets in the Treatment of Participants With Fibromyalgia Pain
Official Title
Ultracet (Tramadol HCL [37.5 mg]/Acetaminophen [325 mg]) Combination Tablets in the Treatment of the Pain of Fibromyalgia
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2009 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Johnson & Johnson Taiwan Ltd
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the analgesic effect of combination of tramadol hydrochloride and acetaminophen in participants for treatment of fibromyalgia pain (chronic widespread pain and presence of tender points).
Detailed Description
This is an open-label (all people know the identity of the intervention) and multi-center (conducted in more than one center) study of combination of tramadol hydrochloride and acetaminophen in treatment of participants with pain of fibromyalgia. The duration of this study will be 56 days per participant. The study consists of 2 parts: Screening (that is, 3 weeks before study commences on Day 1) and Treatment (that is, up to Day 56). All the eligible participants will receive oral tablet for combination of tramadol hydrochloride and acetaminophen. Rescue medication (a medication intended to relieve symptoms immediately) of tylenol (500 milligram, up to 6 oral tablets daily) will be permitted throughout the study duration. Efficacy of the participants will primarily be evaluated by Pain Visual Analog Scale. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pain, Fibromyalgia
Keywords
Pain, Fibromyalgia, Ultracet, Tramadol Hydrochloride, Acetaminophen
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
80 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Tramadol hydrochloride/acetaminophen
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Tramadol hydrochloride/acetaminophen oral tablet will be administered as 37.5 /325 milligram respectively once daily for Day 1-3, twice daily for Day 4-6 and thrice daily for Day 7-56.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tramadol hydrochloride
Intervention Description
Tramadol hydrochloride oral tablet will be administered at a dose of 37.5 milligram as, once daily for Day 1-3, twice daily for Day 4-6 and thrice daily for Day 7-56.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Acetaminophen
Intervention Description
Acetaminophen oral tablet will be administered at a dose of 325 milligram as, once daily for Day 1-3, twice daily for Day 4-6 and thrice daily for Day 7-56.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain Visual Analog Scale Score at Day 14
Description
Pain visual analog scale was used to assess the amount of pain recently experienced (within the last 48 hours) by marking a slash through the line of a 100 millimeter (mm) scale measuring pain from "no pain (0 mm)" to "worst possible pain (100 mm)".
Time Frame
Day 14
Title
Pain Visual Analog Scale Score at Day 28
Description
Pain visual analog scale was used to assess the amount of pain recently experienced (within the last 48 hours) by marking a slash through the line of a 100 millimeter (mm) scale measuring pain from "no pain (0 mm)" to "worst possible pain (100 mm)".
Time Frame
Day 28
Title
Pain Visual Analog Scale Score at Day 56
Description
Pain visual analog scale was used to assess the amount of pain recently experienced (within the last 48 hours) by marking a slash through the line of a 100 millimeter (mm) scale measuring pain from "no pain (0 mm)" to "worst possible pain (100 mm)".
Time Frame
Day 56
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Pain Relief Rating Scale
Description
Pain Relief Rating Scale was used to measure the amount of pain relief experienced (on average) relative to the no-medication Screening or wash-out phase using a 6-point Likert scale ranging from (-) 1 to 4 and rated as (-) 1=worse, 0=None, 1=Slight, 2=moderate,3=a lot and 4=complete.
Time Frame
Day 14, 28 and 56
Title
Tender-Point Evaluation/ Myalgic Score
Description
Eighteen tender-point sites were evaluated by digital palpation for pain by the same Investigator at each site. The Investigator rated the participant's response to digital palpation on a scale from 0 (no pain [participant did not have a tender point]) to 3 (participant withdrawn or flinched). Total myalgic score was the sum of tender-point pain ratings.The total tender-Point score ranges from 0 to 18, and the total myalgic score ranges from 0 to 54. Higher score indicates worsening.
Time Frame
Baseline and Day 56
Title
Sleep Questionnaire: Number of Hours to Fall Asleep and Participant Slept
Description
The patient assessment sleep questionnaire consisted of 12-Questions (Q) to evaluate the participant's sleep habits out of which Q1 was "How long did it usually take for participant to fall asleep during the past 4 weeks" and Q2 was "On the average, how many hours did participant sleep each night during the past 4 weeks".
Time Frame
Baseline and Day 56
Title
Participant Assessment Sleep Questionnaire Score
Description
Sleep questionnaire consisted of 12-Questions (Q), Q3-Q12 were related to "How often during past 4 weeks did participant felt" and are as: Q3: sleep not quiet, Q4: get enough sleep to feel rested upon waking in morning, Q5: awaken short of breath or with headache, Q6: feel drowsy or sleepy, Q7: have trouble falling asleep, Q8: awaken during sleep time and have trouble falling asleep again, Q9: trouble staying awake during day, Q10: snore, Q11: take naps during day, Q12: get amount of sleep needed. Score ranged from 1= all the time to 6 = none of the time, higher score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Day 56
Title
Total Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Score
Description
The FIQ was 19-item questionnaire which measured participant status, progress and outcomes. First 10 items made up of a physical functioning scale, ranging from 0 (always) to 3 (never). Items 11 and 12 asked participants to mark the number of days they felt well (0-7 days) and missed work (0-5 days). Items 13-19 were measured using 10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale, score ranging from 0 cm (no) to 10 cm (very). Total FIQ score ranged from 0 -100 which was calculated as sum of final scores for item 1-10, 11 and 12, and individual score for item 13-19, and higher score indicates worsening.
Time Frame
Baseline and Day 56
Title
Number of Participants With Physician Global Assessment
Description
The treating physician rated the participant's condition on Day 1 before the start of treatment and each return visit. The assessment included how the drug controlled the pain (Question 1 [Q1]), adverse event (Question 2 [Q2]), and overall evaluation (Question 3 [Q3]), and participant's condition was indicated as very good, good, moderate, poor and very poor.
Time Frame
Day 14, 28 and 56
Title
Number of Participants With Subject's Global Assessment
Description
Participants indicated their condition on Day 1 before the start of treatment and each return visit. The assessment included how the drug controlled the pain (Question 1 [Q1]), adverse event (Question 2 [Q2]), and overall evaluation (Question 3 [Q3]), and participants indicated their condition as very good, good, moderate, poor and very poor.
Time Frame
Day 14, 28 and 56
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants must meet the American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia (that are, Participants must have had widespread pain [pain in three quadrants and in the axial skeleton] for at least three months and pain on digital palpation in 11 or more of the 18 tender-point sites
Female participants must not be pregnant, breast feeding or postmenopausal for at least one year
Participant must be able to take oral medication
Participants must have completed the Screening or wash-out procedures and have a visual analog scale score greater than or equal to 40 milliliter
Fail to non-opioid analgesics
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants who previously failed tramadol hydrochloride therapy or those who discontinued tramadol hydrochloride due to adverse events
Participants diagnosed with either any active connective tissue or musculo-skeletal diseases, or malignancy or history of malignancy within past 5 years, or painful, symptomatic osteoarthritis, or regional periarticular pain syndromes, spondyloarthropathy and major endocrine disease
Participants who currently have more severe pain than the pain of fibromyalgia
Participants who have taken antidepressants, cyclobenzaprine or anti-epileptic drugs for pain within three weeks of the Treatment Phase
Participants who have taken short-acting analgesics, topical medications and anesthetics and/or muscle relaxants for a period of less than 21 days of the given medication prior to the Treatment Phase
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Johnson & Johnson Taiwan Ltd Clinical Trial
Organizational Affiliation
Johnson & Johnson Taiwan Ltd
Official's Role
Study Director
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
An Efficacy Study of Combination of Tramadol and Acetaminophen Tablets in the Treatment of Participants With Fibromyalgia Pain
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs