search
Back to results

A Study of Tocilizumab in Combination With DMARD Therapy in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Primary Purpose

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]
Placebo
Sponsored by
Hoffmann-La Roche
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients, 18-70 years of age;
  • rheumatoid arthritis for >= 6 months;
  • receiving permitted DMARDs, at a stable dose, for >= 8 weeks prior to baseline;
  • current inadequate clinical response to DMARDs.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • major surgery, including joint surgery, within 8 weeks before entering study, or planned major surgery within 6 months following randomization;
  • rheumatic autoimmune disease or inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis;
  • unsuccessful treatment with an anti-TNF agent;
  • previous treatment with tocilizumab.

Sites / Locations

  • Peking University People's Hospital
  • Beijing Union Hospital
  • General Hospital of Chinese PLA; Department of Hematology
  • The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
  • The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
  • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
  • Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
  • Changhai Hospital of Shanghai
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of The Fourth Military Medical University (Xijing Hospital)

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

1

2

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20 Response at Week 24
To achieve an ACR20 response required at least a 20% improvement, compared with baseline, in both (tender joints count)TJC and (swollen joints count) SJC, as well as in 3 out of 5 additional ACR core set variables: physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's global assessment of disease activity, participant's assessment of pain, health assessment questionnaire disease index (HAQ-DI) and C-reactive protein (CRP). CRP was used primarily for the calculation of the ACR response; if missing, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) was substituted. ITT sensitivity analysis was carried out using an alternative imputation method (last observation carried forward [LOCF]).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With ACR50 and ACR70 Responses at Week 24
To achieve an ACR50 or ACR 70 response required at least a 50% or 70% improvement, compared with baseline in both TJC and SJC, as well as in 3 out of 5 additional ACR core set variables: physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's global assessment of disease activity, participant's assessment of pain, HAQ-DI and CRP. CRP was used primarily for the calculation of the ACR response; if missing, ESR was substituted.
Number of Participants Who Received Escape Therapy
Participants who did not achieve a 20% improvement from baseline in both SJC and TJC at week 16 could, if requested and deemed necessary by the investigator, receive escape therapy, comprising adjustment of the background DMARD dose and/or treatment with a different traditional DMARD.
Change in Tender and Swollen Joint Counts From Baseline to Week 24
68 joints were assessed for tenderness and joints were classified as tender/not tender giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 68. 66 joints were assessed for swelling and joints were classified as swollen/not swollen giving a total possible swollen joint count score of 0 to 66.
Change in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity From Baseline to Week 24
The participant's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the participant. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Change in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity From Baseline to Week 24
The physician's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity).
Change in Participant's Global Assessment of Pain From Baseline to Week 24
The participants assessed their pain on a 0 to 100 mm VAS. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". A negative change indicated improvement.
Change in C-Reactive Protein From Baseline to Week 24
The serum concentration of CRP an acute phase inflammatory marker, is measured in milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL). A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.
Change in ESR From Baseline to Week 24
The ESR was measured in mm/hour. A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.
Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity and in Clinical Remission
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 less than or equal to (≤3.2) = low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (>)3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Score
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Patients scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in health status.
Mean Rheumatoid Factor at Baseline and Week 24
Rheumatoid factor (RF) is a disease characteristic and more than 85% of the participants studied were positive for the factor. These data are from patients who were RF positive. RF level was reported in international units/milliliter (IU/mL). A positive RF= >15 IU/mL.
Change in Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24
Levels of hemoglobin were determined in grams/liter (g/L)as a measure of anemia in participants
Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) From Baseline to Week 24
HAQ-DI is a self-completed participant questionnaire specific for RA. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Percentage of Participants With ACR20 Response by First Week of Onset
ACR 20 responses are summarized by first onset as a percentage of the total number of responders at week 24. The number of participants first achieving an ACR20 response at each time point is represented by treatment arm as a proportion of the total number of participants that had an ACR20 response at Week 24 using n as the denominator.
Time to First Low Disease Activity
Time to Low disease activity was calculated as the number of days from the first dose of drug administration to the date of first achievement of DAS28≤3.2.
Time to First Remission
Time to first Remission was calculated as the number of days from the date of first dose of study drug administration to the date of first achievement of DAS<2.6

Full Information

First Posted
October 15, 2008
Last Updated
June 27, 2017
Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00773461
Brief Title
A Study of Tocilizumab in Combination With DMARD Therapy in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Official Title
A Randomized, Double Blind Study of Safety and Reduction in Signs and Symptoms During Treatment With Tocilizumab Versus Placebo, in Combination With DMARD Therapy, in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Current DMARD Therapy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 31, 2008 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 22, 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 22, 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This 2 arm study will compare the safety and efficacy, with regard to reduction of signs and symptoms, of tocilizumab versus placebo, both in combination with DMARDs, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who currently have an inadequate response to DMARD therapy. Patients will be randomized 2:1 to receive tocilizumab 8mg/kg iv or placebo iv every 4 weeks, in conjunction with stable DMARD therapy. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatoid Arthritis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
209 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]
Intervention Description
8mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for 24 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
iv every 4 weeks for 24 weeks
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20 Response at Week 24
Description
To achieve an ACR20 response required at least a 20% improvement, compared with baseline, in both (tender joints count)TJC and (swollen joints count) SJC, as well as in 3 out of 5 additional ACR core set variables: physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's global assessment of disease activity, participant's assessment of pain, health assessment questionnaire disease index (HAQ-DI) and C-reactive protein (CRP). CRP was used primarily for the calculation of the ACR response; if missing, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) was substituted. ITT sensitivity analysis was carried out using an alternative imputation method (last observation carried forward [LOCF]).
Time Frame
Week 24
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With ACR50 and ACR70 Responses at Week 24
Description
To achieve an ACR50 or ACR 70 response required at least a 50% or 70% improvement, compared with baseline in both TJC and SJC, as well as in 3 out of 5 additional ACR core set variables: physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's global assessment of disease activity, participant's assessment of pain, HAQ-DI and CRP. CRP was used primarily for the calculation of the ACR response; if missing, ESR was substituted.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Number of Participants Who Received Escape Therapy
Description
Participants who did not achieve a 20% improvement from baseline in both SJC and TJC at week 16 could, if requested and deemed necessary by the investigator, receive escape therapy, comprising adjustment of the background DMARD dose and/or treatment with a different traditional DMARD.
Time Frame
24 Weeks
Title
Change in Tender and Swollen Joint Counts From Baseline to Week 24
Description
68 joints were assessed for tenderness and joints were classified as tender/not tender giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 68. 66 joints were assessed for swelling and joints were classified as swollen/not swollen giving a total possible swollen joint count score of 0 to 66.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Change in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity From Baseline to Week 24
Description
The participant's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the participant. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Change in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity From Baseline to Week 24
Description
The physician's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Change in Participant's Global Assessment of Pain From Baseline to Week 24
Description
The participants assessed their pain on a 0 to 100 mm VAS. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". A negative change indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Change in C-Reactive Protein From Baseline to Week 24
Description
The serum concentration of CRP an acute phase inflammatory marker, is measured in milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL). A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Change in ESR From Baseline to Week 24
Description
The ESR was measured in mm/hour. A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity and in Clinical Remission
Description
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 less than or equal to (≤3.2) = low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (>)3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Score
Description
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Patients scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in health status.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Mean Rheumatoid Factor at Baseline and Week 24
Description
Rheumatoid factor (RF) is a disease characteristic and more than 85% of the participants studied were positive for the factor. These data are from patients who were RF positive. RF level was reported in international units/milliliter (IU/mL). A positive RF= >15 IU/mL.
Time Frame
Baseline and 24 Weeks
Title
Change in Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24
Description
Levels of hemoglobin were determined in grams/liter (g/L)as a measure of anemia in participants
Time Frame
Baseline and 24 Weeks
Title
Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) From Baseline to Week 24
Description
HAQ-DI is a self-completed participant questionnaire specific for RA. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and 24 Weeks
Title
Percentage of Participants With ACR20 Response by First Week of Onset
Description
ACR 20 responses are summarized by first onset as a percentage of the total number of responders at week 24. The number of participants first achieving an ACR20 response at each time point is represented by treatment arm as a proportion of the total number of participants that had an ACR20 response at Week 24 using n as the denominator.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Title
Time to First Low Disease Activity
Description
Time to Low disease activity was calculated as the number of days from the first dose of drug administration to the date of first achievement of DAS28≤3.2.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Title
Time to First Remission
Description
Time to first Remission was calculated as the number of days from the date of first dose of study drug administration to the date of first achievement of DAS<2.6
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: adult patients, 18-70 years of age; rheumatoid arthritis for >= 6 months; receiving permitted DMARDs, at a stable dose, for >= 8 weeks prior to baseline; current inadequate clinical response to DMARDs. Exclusion Criteria: major surgery, including joint surgery, within 8 weeks before entering study, or planned major surgery within 6 months following randomization; rheumatic autoimmune disease or inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis; unsuccessful treatment with an anti-TNF agent; previous treatment with tocilizumab.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
Hoffmann-La Roche
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Peking University People's Hospital
City
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100044
Country
China
Facility Name
Beijing Union Hospital
City
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100730
Country
China
Facility Name
General Hospital of Chinese PLA; Department of Hematology
City
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100853
Country
China
Facility Name
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
City
Guangzhou
ZIP/Postal Code
510630
Country
China
Facility Name
The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
City
Harbin
ZIP/Postal Code
150001
Country
China
Facility Name
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
City
Jinan
ZIP/Postal Code
250012
Country
China
Facility Name
Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
City
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
200127
Country
China
Facility Name
Changhai Hospital of Shanghai
City
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
200433
Country
China
Facility Name
The First Affiliated Hospital of The Fourth Military Medical University (Xijing Hospital)
City
Xi'an
ZIP/Postal Code
710032
Country
China

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

A Study of Tocilizumab in Combination With DMARD Therapy in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs