search
Back to results

Abatacept and Cyclophosphamide Combination Therapy for Lupus Nephritis (ACCESS)

Primary Purpose

Lupus Nephritis, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
abatacept
cyclophosphamide
azathioprine
prednisone
abatacept placebo
azathioprine placebo
Sponsored by
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Lupus Nephritis focused on measuring lupus, systemic lupus erythematosus, lupus nephritis, SLE, abatacept, CTLA4, CTLA4Ig, glomerulonephritis

Eligibility Criteria

16 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
  • Active lupus nephritis (defined by: kidney biopsy documentation within the last 12 months using International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) classification- proliferative nephritis, active urinary sediment, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio > 1, low complement C3)
  • Positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test result at time of study entry

Exclusion Criteria:

  • End stage renal disease
  • Use of cyclophosphamide in the past year
  • Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, moderately severe anemia
  • Active infection, including HIV, hepatitis B or C
  • History of cancer, except carcinoma in situ and treated basal and squamous cell carcinomas
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding

Sites / Locations

  • University of Alabama, Birmingham
  • University of California San Diego
  • Cedars Sinai Medical Center
  • University of California San Francisco
  • University of Miami
  • Emory University
  • Rush University Medical Center
  • University of Chicago
  • University of Michigan
  • Wayne State University
  • Feinstein Institute
  • Columbia University
  • Seligman Center for Advanced Therapeutics (NYU)
  • University of Rochester
  • UNC Chapel Hill
  • Ohio State University Medical Center
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
  • Temple University
  • University of Pittsburgh Lupus Center of Excellence
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • UT Southwestern
  • Unidad de investigación en enfermedades crónico - degenerativas SC
  • El Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (INNSZ)

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Treatment

Control

Arm Description

Abatacept plus Euro-lupus regimen

Abatacept placebo plus Euro-lupus regimen

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Complete Response
Complete response definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to <=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder (CR). Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks were defined as CR failures for all subsequent visits. CRs are those who successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Partial Response
Outcome measure description: Partial response definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, and improvement (reduction) >= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline visit, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day or according to protocol dosing allowances in protocol. Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks were defined as complete response failures for all subsequent visits. Partial responders are those who showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.
Number of Participants With a Complete or Partial Response
Complete response: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to <=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder. Partial response: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, and improvement >= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline visit, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day or according to protocol dosing allowances in protocol. Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study were defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. CRs successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis. Partial responders showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response by Week 24 and Maintained the Complete Response Through Week 52
Complete response definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to <=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder (CR). Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study were defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. CRs are those who successfully responded to treatment and had minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.
Number of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Complete Response
A complete proteinuria and prednisone response is defined as urine protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5 and prednisone dose tapered to <= 10mg/day. Subjects who discontinued treatment or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks are defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. Complete responders are those who successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.
Number of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Partial Response
A partial proteinuria and prednisone response is defined as an improvement (reduction) of >=50% in the urine protein-to-creatinine ratio at either visit -1 or 0, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day. Subjects who discontinued treatment or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks are defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. Partial responders are those who showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.
Number of Participants Who Achieved No Response at 24 Weeks and Continued in the Study
A participant who did not meet the criteria for either a complete response or a partial response at Week 24 was considered a non-responder. After Week 24, non-responders were terminated from the study and treated according to best clinical judgment unless the site investigator judged that the participant could benefit from continued participation. Non responders did not respond to treatment and lupus activity is moderate to severe.
Number of Participants Who Achieved No Response at 24 Weeks and Continued in the Study , Achieving a Complete or Partial Response
A participant who did not meet the criteria for either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) at Week 24 was considered a non-responder. After Week 24, non-responders were terminated from the study and treated according to best clinical judgment unless the investigator judged that the participant may benefit from continued participation. CR definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to <=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a CR. PR definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline, and improvement (reduction) >= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day.
Lupus Disease Activity - Participants Who Were Anti-dsDNA Positive at Baseline and Negative at Week 104
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: reduction in anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. Participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may have autoantibodies (e.g., self against self) to double-stranded DNA. Double-stranded DNA is one of multiple diagnostic tests for SLE and levels may be associated with disease activity. One measure used to assess disease activity is the number of participants who were anti-dsDNA positive at baseline but negative at Week 104. Going from positive to negative is indicative of lowered lupus activity.
Lupus Disease Activity - Negative Anti-dsDNA
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: reduction in anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. Participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may have autoantibodies (e.g., self against self) to double-stranded DNA. Double-stranded DNA is one of multiple diagnostic tests for SLE and levels may be associated with disease activity. This measure was the number of participants who had negative anti-dsDNA at Week 104. Having a negative score is indicative of low lupus disease activity.
Lupus Disease Activity - Presence of Hypocomplementemia
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. Participants were categorized as having hypocomplementemia if their serum complement test results (C3, and C4) were below the normal range at the site. Below normal complement test results are indicative of active lupus erythematosus.
Lupus Disease Activity - Frequency of Flares
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. Flares can be renal or non-renal. A renal flare is defined as two successive evaluations at least 1 week apart as proteinuria >1 gm/24h for participants who attain a complete response at Week 12 and for all other participants either 1) Increasing serum creatinine and persistent proteinuria, or 2) Worsening proteinuria. A non-renal flare is defined as any new post-baseline BILAG A in a non-renal organ system using BILAG-2004. This outcome measures the number of participants with the presence of renal and non-renal flares from Week 24 through Week 52 by response status. Having flares is indicative of more lupus disease activity.
Lupus Disease Activity - Patient Global Assessment
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment (PGA), SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. PGA is measured on a 100mm scale and assessed at Weeks 0, 12, 24, 52, and 104. Higher values indicate greater burden of disease.
Lupus Disease Activity - Patient Global Assessment Percent Change From Baseline
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment (PGA), SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. PGA is measured on a 100mm scale and assessed at Weeks 0, 12, 24, 52, and 104. Higher values indicate greater burden of disease.
Lupus Disease Activity - SF-36 Scores
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. The SF-36 is a quality of life assessment that was performed at Weeks 9, 24, 36, 52, and 104. Eight scale scores are derived from responses to the 36 items of the SF-36 questionnaire which were combined to produce the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. The Physical Component Score is based on the Physical Functioning Scale (10 items), the Role-Physical Scale (4 items), the Bodily Pain Scale (2 items), and the General Health Scale (5 items). The Mental Component Score is based upon the Vitality Scale (4 items), the Social Functioning Scale (2 items), the Role-Emotional Scale (3 items) and the Mental Health Scale (5 items). Each component score is transformed into a 0-100 scale, with higher numbers indicating greater quality of life.
Lupus Disease Activity - SF-36 Scores Percent Change From Baseline
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. The SF-36 is a quality of life assessment that was performed at Weeks 9, 24, 36, 52, and 104. Eight scale scores are derived from responses to the 36 items of the SF-36 questionnaire which were combined to produce the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. The Physical Component Score is based on the Physical Functioning Scale (10 items), the Role-Physical Scale (4 items), the Bodily Pain Scale (2 items), and the General Health Scale (5 items). The Mental Component Score is based upon the Vitality Scale (4 items), the Social Functioning Scale (2 items), the Role-Emotional Scale (3 items) and the Mental Health Scale (5 items). Each component score is transformed into a 0-100 scale, with higher numbers indicating greater quality of life.
Lupus Disease Activity - Total BILAG-2004
BILAG-2004 has 5 categories of scoring.Category A:defined by severe disease activity requiring any of the following treatments: 1) systemic high dose oral glucocorticoids, 2) IV pulse glucocorticoids, 3) systemic immunomodulators, or 4)therapeutic high dose anticoagulation in the presence of high dose steroids or immunomodulators. Category B:defined by moderate disease activity requiring any of the following treatments:1) systemic low dose oral glucocorticoids, 2) intramuscular or intra-articular or soft tissue glucocorticoids injection,3) topical glucocorticoids, 4) topical immunomodulators,5) antimalarials or thalidomide or prasterone or acitretin, or 6) symptomatic therapy.Category C:defined by mild disease.Category D is defined by inactive disease, previously affected.Category E is defined as the system never being involved.The categories are converted to a numeric score (A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, E=0) and treated as a continuous variable. Higher score= more severe disease activity.
Proportion of Vaccinated Participants With a Competent Immune Response
Among participants who are vaccinated, the number of who have a competent immune response at Week 52 as defined as having met both of the following criteria: Pneumococcal vaccination response - absolute value >= 0.35 ug/mL and, when measured 4-6 weeks after vaccination, a >=2-fold increase from baseline in serotype-specific antibody titer for at least 50% of the serotypes tested. Tetanus toxoid vaccination response - absolute value >=0.015 IU/mL and, when measured 4-6 weeks after vaccination, a 2-fold increase from baseline in antigen-specific antibody titer Competent immune response is indicative of low disease activity.

Full Information

First Posted
October 16, 2008
Last Updated
January 15, 2016
Sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Collaborators
Immune Tolerance Network (ITN)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00774852
Brief Title
Abatacept and Cyclophosphamide Combination Therapy for Lupus Nephritis
Acronym
ACCESS
Official Title
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled, Phase II Multicenter Trial of CTLA4Ig (Abatacept) Plus Cyclophosphamide vs Cyclophosphamide Alone in the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Collaborators
Immune Tolerance Network (ITN)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is for individuals with lupus who have developed complications in their kidneys, or lupus nephritis. The study will determine whether adding the experimental medication abatacept to standard cyclophosphamide therapy is more effective in improving lupus nephritis than standard cyclophosphamide therapy by itself.
Detailed Description
Lupus nephritis is an inflammation of the kidney that occurs in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is caused by the immune system attacking the kidney and is among the most serious complications of SLE: left untreated it can cause long term damage to the kidneys or, in some cases, result in kidney failure. One of the more common treatments for lupus nephritis is the "Euro-lupus" therapy. In this therapy, patients receive three different drugs - cyclophosphamide, azathioprine and prednisone - over the course of several months. However, some patients do not respond to this therapy and many only show some improvement. In this ACCESS trial for lupus nephritis, an experimental medication known as abatacept will be added to the Euro-lupus therapy to assess if it works better than Euro-lupus therapy alone. Abatacept is a man-made protein that suppresses parts of the immune system that can cause autoimmune disease. While abatacept is experimental for lupus, it has been approved by the FDA to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Abatacept is also being studied for use in other autoimmune diseases, like multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes. Participants in the ACCESS trial for lupus nephritis will receive bi-weekly intravenous infusions of cyclophosphamide for 3 months, then will take azathioprine tablets daily for at least 3 months more. Abatacept or a placebo will be administered every 2 weeks initially, then every 4 weeks for at least the first 6 months. Treatment of abatacept or placebo and azathioprine may continue for the remainder of the year. All participants will take prednisone tablets daily during the entire study. Because the ACCESS trial is a randomized, controlled study, each participant has a 50-50 chance (like flipping a coin) of receiving abatacept. Others will receive an inactive, placebo form of the drug. Note however, that all participants will receive the Euro-lupus therapy. As a blinded (masked) study, neither participants nor study physicians will know to which group a person has been assigned. All participants will undergo regular physical examinations, medical history and various blood and urine tests. Many of these tests will be repeated throughout the study. Participants will be asked to attend 18 study visits in the first year, and one study visit at the end of the second year. The study will reimburse participants for certain expenses incurred as part of the study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lupus Nephritis, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Keywords
lupus, systemic lupus erythematosus, lupus nephritis, SLE, abatacept, CTLA4, CTLA4Ig, glomerulonephritis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
137 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Treatment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Abatacept plus Euro-lupus regimen
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Abatacept placebo plus Euro-lupus regimen
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
abatacept
Other Intervention Name(s)
CTLA4Ig, Orencia
Intervention Description
Intravenous infusion (500-1000 mg, dep on weight) at weeks 0, 2, and 4, then every 4 weeks until week 24; continue to week 48 only if partial response at 24 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
cyclophosphamide
Other Intervention Name(s)
Cytoxan, Neosar
Intervention Description
500 mg intravenous infusion every 2 weeks for 12 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
azathioprine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Imuran, Azasan
Intervention Description
2 mg/kg/day orally from weeks 12-28; continue until week 52 if only partial response observed at week 24
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
prednisone
Other Intervention Name(s)
Sterapred
Intervention Description
60 mg/day for 2 weeks, then taper to 10 mg/day by 12 weeks, then continue on stable dose
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
abatacept placebo
Intervention Description
Intravenous infusion at weeks 0, 2, and 4, then every 4 weeks until week 24; continue to week 48 only if partial response at 24 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
azathioprine placebo
Intervention Description
Oral capsule, daily from weeks 28 to 52, only if complete response observed at week 24
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Complete Response
Description
Complete response definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to <=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder (CR). Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks were defined as CR failures for all subsequent visits. CRs are those who successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.
Time Frame
Week 24
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Partial Response
Description
Outcome measure description: Partial response definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, and improvement (reduction) >= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline visit, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day or according to protocol dosing allowances in protocol. Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks were defined as complete response failures for all subsequent visits. Partial responders are those who showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With a Complete or Partial Response
Description
Complete response: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to <=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder. Partial response: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, and improvement >= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline visit, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day or according to protocol dosing allowances in protocol. Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study were defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. CRs successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis. Partial responders showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response by Week 24 and Maintained the Complete Response Through Week 52
Description
Complete response definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to <=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder (CR). Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study were defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. CRs are those who successfully responded to treatment and had minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Number of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Complete Response
Description
A complete proteinuria and prednisone response is defined as urine protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5 and prednisone dose tapered to <= 10mg/day. Subjects who discontinued treatment or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks are defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. Complete responders are those who successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Number of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Partial Response
Description
A partial proteinuria and prednisone response is defined as an improvement (reduction) of >=50% in the urine protein-to-creatinine ratio at either visit -1 or 0, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day. Subjects who discontinued treatment or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks are defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. Partial responders are those who showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Number of Participants Who Achieved No Response at 24 Weeks and Continued in the Study
Description
A participant who did not meet the criteria for either a complete response or a partial response at Week 24 was considered a non-responder. After Week 24, non-responders were terminated from the study and treated according to best clinical judgment unless the site investigator judged that the participant could benefit from continued participation. Non responders did not respond to treatment and lupus activity is moderate to severe.
Time Frame
Week 104
Title
Number of Participants Who Achieved No Response at 24 Weeks and Continued in the Study , Achieving a Complete or Partial Response
Description
A participant who did not meet the criteria for either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) at Week 24 was considered a non-responder. After Week 24, non-responders were terminated from the study and treated according to best clinical judgment unless the investigator judged that the participant may benefit from continued participation. CR definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to <=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a CR. PR definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline, and improvement (reduction) >= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Lupus Disease Activity - Participants Who Were Anti-dsDNA Positive at Baseline and Negative at Week 104
Description
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: reduction in anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. Participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may have autoantibodies (e.g., self against self) to double-stranded DNA. Double-stranded DNA is one of multiple diagnostic tests for SLE and levels may be associated with disease activity. One measure used to assess disease activity is the number of participants who were anti-dsDNA positive at baseline but negative at Week 104. Going from positive to negative is indicative of lowered lupus activity.
Time Frame
Week 104
Title
Lupus Disease Activity - Negative Anti-dsDNA
Description
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: reduction in anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. Participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may have autoantibodies (e.g., self against self) to double-stranded DNA. Double-stranded DNA is one of multiple diagnostic tests for SLE and levels may be associated with disease activity. This measure was the number of participants who had negative anti-dsDNA at Week 104. Having a negative score is indicative of low lupus disease activity.
Time Frame
Week 104
Title
Lupus Disease Activity - Presence of Hypocomplementemia
Description
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. Participants were categorized as having hypocomplementemia if their serum complement test results (C3, and C4) were below the normal range at the site. Below normal complement test results are indicative of active lupus erythematosus.
Time Frame
Week 104
Title
Lupus Disease Activity - Frequency of Flares
Description
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. Flares can be renal or non-renal. A renal flare is defined as two successive evaluations at least 1 week apart as proteinuria >1 gm/24h for participants who attain a complete response at Week 12 and for all other participants either 1) Increasing serum creatinine and persistent proteinuria, or 2) Worsening proteinuria. A non-renal flare is defined as any new post-baseline BILAG A in a non-renal organ system using BILAG-2004. This outcome measures the number of participants with the presence of renal and non-renal flares from Week 24 through Week 52 by response status. Having flares is indicative of more lupus disease activity.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Lupus Disease Activity - Patient Global Assessment
Description
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment (PGA), SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. PGA is measured on a 100mm scale and assessed at Weeks 0, 12, 24, 52, and 104. Higher values indicate greater burden of disease.
Time Frame
Week 104
Title
Lupus Disease Activity - Patient Global Assessment Percent Change From Baseline
Description
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment (PGA), SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. PGA is measured on a 100mm scale and assessed at Weeks 0, 12, 24, 52, and 104. Higher values indicate greater burden of disease.
Time Frame
Week 104
Title
Lupus Disease Activity - SF-36 Scores
Description
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. The SF-36 is a quality of life assessment that was performed at Weeks 9, 24, 36, 52, and 104. Eight scale scores are derived from responses to the 36 items of the SF-36 questionnaire which were combined to produce the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. The Physical Component Score is based on the Physical Functioning Scale (10 items), the Role-Physical Scale (4 items), the Bodily Pain Scale (2 items), and the General Health Scale (5 items). The Mental Component Score is based upon the Vitality Scale (4 items), the Social Functioning Scale (2 items), the Role-Emotional Scale (3 items) and the Mental Health Scale (5 items). Each component score is transformed into a 0-100 scale, with higher numbers indicating greater quality of life.
Time Frame
Week 104
Title
Lupus Disease Activity - SF-36 Scores Percent Change From Baseline
Description
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. The SF-36 is a quality of life assessment that was performed at Weeks 9, 24, 36, 52, and 104. Eight scale scores are derived from responses to the 36 items of the SF-36 questionnaire which were combined to produce the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. The Physical Component Score is based on the Physical Functioning Scale (10 items), the Role-Physical Scale (4 items), the Bodily Pain Scale (2 items), and the General Health Scale (5 items). The Mental Component Score is based upon the Vitality Scale (4 items), the Social Functioning Scale (2 items), the Role-Emotional Scale (3 items) and the Mental Health Scale (5 items). Each component score is transformed into a 0-100 scale, with higher numbers indicating greater quality of life.
Time Frame
Week 104
Title
Lupus Disease Activity - Total BILAG-2004
Description
BILAG-2004 has 5 categories of scoring.Category A:defined by severe disease activity requiring any of the following treatments: 1) systemic high dose oral glucocorticoids, 2) IV pulse glucocorticoids, 3) systemic immunomodulators, or 4)therapeutic high dose anticoagulation in the presence of high dose steroids or immunomodulators. Category B:defined by moderate disease activity requiring any of the following treatments:1) systemic low dose oral glucocorticoids, 2) intramuscular or intra-articular or soft tissue glucocorticoids injection,3) topical glucocorticoids, 4) topical immunomodulators,5) antimalarials or thalidomide or prasterone or acitretin, or 6) symptomatic therapy.Category C:defined by mild disease.Category D is defined by inactive disease, previously affected.Category E is defined as the system never being involved.The categories are converted to a numeric score (A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, E=0) and treated as a continuous variable. Higher score= more severe disease activity.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Proportion of Vaccinated Participants With a Competent Immune Response
Description
Among participants who are vaccinated, the number of who have a competent immune response at Week 52 as defined as having met both of the following criteria: Pneumococcal vaccination response - absolute value >= 0.35 ug/mL and, when measured 4-6 weeks after vaccination, a >=2-fold increase from baseline in serotype-specific antibody titer for at least 50% of the serotypes tested. Tetanus toxoid vaccination response - absolute value >=0.015 IU/mL and, when measured 4-6 weeks after vaccination, a 2-fold increase from baseline in antigen-specific antibody titer Competent immune response is indicative of low disease activity.
Time Frame
Week 52

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
16 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria Active lupus nephritis (defined by: kidney biopsy documentation within the last 12 months using International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) classification- proliferative nephritis, active urinary sediment, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio > 1, low complement C3) Positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test result at time of study entry Exclusion Criteria: End stage renal disease Use of cyclophosphamide in the past year Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, moderately severe anemia Active infection, including HIV, hepatitis B or C History of cancer, except carcinoma in situ and treated basal and squamous cell carcinomas Pregnant or breastfeeding
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Wofsy, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of California, San Francisco
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Betty Diamond, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Feinstein Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Alabama, Birmingham
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35294
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California San Diego
City
La Jolla
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92037
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cedars Sinai Medical Center
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90048
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California San Francisco
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94143
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Miami
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33136
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emory University
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rush University Medical Center
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Chicago
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60637
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Michigan
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wayne State University
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Feinstein Institute
City
Manhasset
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbia University
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States
Facility Name
Seligman Center for Advanced Therapeutics (NYU)
City
NY
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10003
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Rochester
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14642
Country
United States
Facility Name
UNC Chapel Hill
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27599
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ohio State University Medical Center
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Temple University
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19147
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pittsburgh Lupus Center of Excellence
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15261
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical University of South Carolina
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29425
Country
United States
Facility Name
UT Southwestern
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75390
Country
United States
Facility Name
Unidad de investigación en enfermedades crónico - degenerativas SC
City
Guadalajara
State/Province
Jalisco
ZIP/Postal Code
44620
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
El Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (INNSZ)
City
Mexico City
Country
Mexico

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25403681
Citation
ACCESS Trial Group. Treatment of lupus nephritis with abatacept: the Abatacept and Cyclophosphamide Combination Efficacy and Safety Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Nov;66(11):3096-104. doi: 10.1002/art.38790. Erratum In: Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Feb;67(2):487. Aranow, Cynthia [added].
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25779381
Citation
Wofsy D, Diamond B, Houssiau FA. Crossing the Atlantic: the Euro-Lupus Nephritis regimen in North America. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 May;67(5):1144-6. doi: 10.1002/art.39067. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
Links:
URL
http://www.niaid.nih.gov/Pages/default.aspx
Description
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
URL
http://www.immunetolerance.org
Description
Immune Tolerance Network website
URL
http://lupusnephritis.org/about-the-lntn/our-research/
Description
Lupus Nephritis Trials Network Research

Learn more about this trial

Abatacept and Cyclophosphamide Combination Therapy for Lupus Nephritis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs