search
Back to results

Implementation of the Low Risk Ankle Rule

Primary Purpose

Ankle Injury

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
LRAR Implementation
Sponsored by
The Hospital for Sick Children
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Ankle Injury focused on measuring Paediatric, Emergency Department, Ankle, Injury, Low risk ankle rule

Eligibility Criteria

3 Years - 16 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All otherwise healthy children between the ages of 3 and 16 years of age that present to the participating EDs with an isolated acute (< 72 hours) blunt ankle injury due to any mechanism of injury will be eligible for the study. The age criteria were chosen to match those ages in which the LRAR was validated.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Children with ankle injuries who were referred from outside the hospital with radiographs.
  2. Children with ankle injuries who returned for reassessment of the same ankle injury.
  3. Children with open wounds on their ankle and/or foot
  4. All children at risk for pathological fractures such as those with congenital or acquired generalized bony disease (Appendix I). Clinical presentation and risks in these cases may be altered.
  5. Congenital anomalies of the feet and/or ankles (eg club feet, tarsal coalition). These abnormalities may have features which may complicate clinical assessment.
  6. Patients with known coagulopathies. Underlying hemarthrosis may complicate clinical assessment.
  7. Patients with cognitive and/or developmental delay. These patients may not localize pain.
  8. Injuries greater than 72 hours old. The signs and symptoms of the most common fracture, the Salter-Harris I fracture of the distal fibula, may be diminished. Our ability to make this clinical diagnosis with confidence may thus be compromised.
  9. Recent history of surgery or closed reduction of the same ankle within the last 3 months. These prior events may confuse current presenting symptomatology and ability to weight-bear and recover normally.
  10. Patients with low risk injuries who do not have phone or electronic mail access and/or have an insurmountable language barrier. This will preclude follow up.

Sites / Locations

  • Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
  • North York General Hospital
  • The Hospital for Sick Children
  • Toronto East General Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

1

2

Arm Description

Control Sites

Intervention Sites

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

To assess the impact of a LRAR implementation strategy on paediatric ankle radiography rates in participating EDS.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Ankle x-ray rate changes at individual hospital from pre-LRAR to post-LRAR implementation phases.
Intervention and control sites will be compared individually and collectively, during the post-LRAR for: missed significant fractures, number of unscheduled x-rays following initial ED visit, total length of stay, patient and physician satisfaction
To determine the sustainability of the clinical impact of the LRAR strategy at intervention sites by comparing high and low intensity implementation phases with respect to weekly x-ray rates, missed fractures and physician and patient satisfaction
To evaluate the performance of the LRAR during the implementation period of the rule at intervention sites with respect to: sensitivity and specificity of the LRAR for detecting "high risk" fractures and physician compliance with use of the rule
To compare total costs of "low risk injuries" at intervention versus control sites during the post-LRAR implementation phase.

Full Information

First Posted
November 4, 2008
Last Updated
October 6, 2017
Sponsor
The Hospital for Sick Children
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00785876
Brief Title
Implementation of the Low Risk Ankle Rule
Official Title
Controlled Radiography for Ankle Injury Cases in Kids in the Emergency Department: Implementation of the Low Risk Ankle Rule
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 2011 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
The Hospital for Sick Children

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Ankle injuries are a very common injury in children. Each year approximately 35000 kids present to Ontario emergency departments (ED) with this problem. Right now, about 90% of these children get x-rays of the injured ankle, even though only 12% of these x-rays show a break in the bone. Some excellent research has created some rules that doctors can use to help them decide which children really need x-rays. Unfortunately, even though these rules have been proven to safely reduce x-rays by as much as two-thirds, most doctors are not using these rules. Therefore, this study will be the first to put the best paediatric ankle x-ray rule, the Low Rick Ankle Rule, into physician practice in EDs. Our main goal is to determine how much we can reduce ankle x-ray rates in EDs that use this rule regularly versus those that do not. If we show that doctors can safely use this rule regularly and the number of ankle x-rays will be significantly less, this will lessen unnecessary potentially harmful radiation exposure in children, these children will spend less time in an ED, and the health care system will save money.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ankle Injury
Keywords
Paediatric, Emergency Department, Ankle, Injury, Low risk ankle rule

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
3000 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Control Sites
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intervention Sites
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
LRAR Implementation
Intervention Description
Pre-LRAR - no changes in the usual procedures for the first 26 weeks except for flagging of all paediatric charts with ankle injuries, ED documentation which will not refer to the LRAR and phone follow up. Post-LRAR: At 27 weeks, in addition to the aforementioned ED collection sheet and phone follow up, the implementation strategy for the LRAR rule and related management will be introduced at the intervention hospitals.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To assess the impact of a LRAR implementation strategy on paediatric ankle radiography rates in participating EDS.
Time Frame
three six month phases of implementation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ankle x-ray rate changes at individual hospital from pre-LRAR to post-LRAR implementation phases.
Time Frame
duration of subjects participation in study
Title
Intervention and control sites will be compared individually and collectively, during the post-LRAR for: missed significant fractures, number of unscheduled x-rays following initial ED visit, total length of stay, patient and physician satisfaction
Time Frame
duration of subjects participation in study
Title
To determine the sustainability of the clinical impact of the LRAR strategy at intervention sites by comparing high and low intensity implementation phases with respect to weekly x-ray rates, missed fractures and physician and patient satisfaction
Time Frame
duration of subjects participation in study
Title
To evaluate the performance of the LRAR during the implementation period of the rule at intervention sites with respect to: sensitivity and specificity of the LRAR for detecting "high risk" fractures and physician compliance with use of the rule
Time Frame
duration of subjects participation in study
Title
To compare total costs of "low risk injuries" at intervention versus control sites during the post-LRAR implementation phase.
Time Frame
duration of subjects participation in study

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
3 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
16 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: All otherwise healthy children between the ages of 3 and 16 years of age that present to the participating EDs with an isolated acute (< 72 hours) blunt ankle injury due to any mechanism of injury will be eligible for the study. The age criteria were chosen to match those ages in which the LRAR was validated. Exclusion Criteria: Children with ankle injuries who were referred from outside the hospital with radiographs. Children with ankle injuries who returned for reassessment of the same ankle injury. Children with open wounds on their ankle and/or foot All children at risk for pathological fractures such as those with congenital or acquired generalized bony disease (Appendix I). Clinical presentation and risks in these cases may be altered. Congenital anomalies of the feet and/or ankles (eg club feet, tarsal coalition). These abnormalities may have features which may complicate clinical assessment. Patients with known coagulopathies. Underlying hemarthrosis may complicate clinical assessment. Patients with cognitive and/or developmental delay. These patients may not localize pain. Injuries greater than 72 hours old. The signs and symptoms of the most common fracture, the Salter-Harris I fracture of the distal fibula, may be diminished. Our ability to make this clinical diagnosis with confidence may thus be compromised. Recent history of surgery or closed reduction of the same ankle within the last 3 months. These prior events may confuse current presenting symptomatology and ability to weight-bear and recover normally. Patients with low risk injuries who do not have phone or electronic mail access and/or have an insurmountable language barrier. This will preclude follow up.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kathy Boutis, MD
Organizational Affiliation
The Hospital for Sick Children
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
North York General Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
The Hospital for Sick Children
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Toronto East General Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23939215
Citation
Boutis K, Grootendorst P, Willan A, Plint AC, Babyn P, Brison RJ, Sayal A, Parker M, Mamen N, Schuh S, Grimshaw J, Johnson D, Narayanan U. Effect of the Low Risk Ankle Rule on the frequency of radiography in children with ankle injuries. CMAJ. 2013 Oct 15;185(15):E731-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.122050. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26187612
Citation
Boutis K, von Keyserlingk C, Willan A, Narayanan UG, Brison R, Grootendorst P, Plint AC, Parker M, Goeree R. Cost Consequence Analysis of Implementing the Low Risk Ankle Rule in Emergency Departments. Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;66(5):455-463.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.05.027. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
Results Reference
result
Links:
URL
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26187612
Description
Link to Abstract: : Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;66(5):455-
URL
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23939215
Description
Link to Abstract: Effect of the Low Risk Ankle Rule on the frequency of radiography in children with ankle injuries.

Learn more about this trial

Implementation of the Low Risk Ankle Rule

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs