search
Back to results

Fentanyl Buccal Tablets Versus Immediate Release Oxycodone for Breakthrough Pain in Patients With Chronic Pain

Primary Purpose

Chronic Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet
Immediate release oxycodone
Sponsored by
Cephalon
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Chronic Pain focused on measuring Breakthrough Pain, Opioid-tolerant, Chronic Pain

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has chronic pain of at least 3 months duration associated with any of the following conditions: diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, traumatic injury, complex regional pain syndrome, back pain, neck pain, fibromyalgia, chronic pancreatitis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or cancer. Other chronic painful conditions may be evaluated for possible inclusion.
  • The patient is currently using at least one of the following: at least 60 mg of oral morphine/day, or at least 25 mcg of transdermal fentanyl/hour, or at least 30 mg of oxycodone/day, or at least 8 mg of hydromorphone/day, or an equianalgesic dose of another opioid/day as ATC therapy for at least 7 days before administration of the first dose of study drug.
  • The patient is willing to provide written informed consent, including a written opioid agreement form, to participate in this study.
  • Women must be surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal, or, if of childbearing potential, using a medically accepted method of birth control and agree to continued use of this method for the duration of the study.
  • Any patient with cancer should have a life expectancy of at least 3 months.
  • The patient reports an average PI score, over the 24 hours prior to screening, of 6 or less (0=no pain through 10=pain as bad as you can imagine) for their chronic pain.
  • The patient experiences, on average, at least 1 and less than 5 BTP episodes per day while taking ATC opioid therapy, and on average, the duration of each BTP episode is less than 4 hours during the screening period.
  • The patient currently uses opioid therapy for alleviation of BTP episodes, occurring at the location of the chronic pain, and achieves at least partial relief.
  • The patient must be willing and able to successfully self administer the study drug, comply with study restrictions, complete the electronic diary, and return to the clinic for scheduled study visits as specified in this protocol.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has uncontrolled or rapidly escalating pain as determined by the investigator or has pain uncontrolled by therapy that could adversely impact the safety of the patient or that could be compromised by treatment with study drug.
  • The patient has a recent history (within 5 years) or current evidence of alcohol or other substance abuse.
  • The patient has known or suspected hypersensitivities, allergies, or other contraindications to any ingredient in either study drug.
  • The patient has a diagnosis of chronic headache or migraine as the primary painful condition with associated BTP.
  • The patient has cardiopulmonary disease that would, in the opinion of the investigator, significantly increase the risk of treatment with potent synthetic opioids.
  • The patient has medical or psychiatric disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the patient's safety or collected data.
  • The patient has suicidal ideation at screening or has a history of suicidal ideation within 1 year or history of suicide attempt within 2 years before screening, or a diagnosis of bipolar disorder or history of schizophrenia
  • The patient is expected to have surgery during the study that will impact the patient's chronic pain and/or BTP.
  • The patient has had therapy before study drug treatment that, in the opinion of the investigator, could alter pain or response to pain medication.
  • The patient is pregnant or lactating.
  • The patient has participated in a previous study with FBT.
  • The patient has participated in a study involving an investigational drug in the prior 30 days.
  • The patient is currently using FBT or oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for BTP.
  • The patient is currently using immediate-release oxycodone for BTP and is unwilling to undergo re-titration.
  • The patient has received a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) within 14 days before the first treatment with study drug.
  • The patient has any other medical condition or is receiving concomitant medication/therapy (e.g., regional nerve block) that could, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the patient's safety or compliance with the study protocol, or compromise collected data.
  • The patient is involved in active litigation in regard to the chronic pain currently being treated.
  • The patient has a positive UDS for an illicit drug or a medication not prescribed for him/her or which is not medically explainable (i.e., active metabolites).
  • The investigator feels that the patient is not suitable for the study for any reason (e.g., the patient's social history indicates an increased risk of drug diversion)
  • Additional exclusion criteria will apply for patients who decide to participate in the pharmacokinetics assessment to be performed at designated study sites.

Sites / Locations

  • Parkway Medical Center
  • Horizon Research Group, Inc
  • Robert Karns, MD a Medical Corporation
  • Catalina Research Institute, LLC
  • Pacific Coast Pain Management
  • Loma Linda University Health
  • VA Northern California Health
  • New England Research Associates
  • Delray Research Associates
  • Emerald Coast Research Group Inc
  • Compass Research, LLC
  • Gold Coast Research
  • Sarasota Pain Medicine Research
  • Suncoast Neuroscience Associates
  • Clinical Research of West Florida
  • Taylor Research
  • Drug Studies America
  • Georgia Pain Care
  • South Coast Medical Group
  • Millennium Pain Center
  • Suburban Clinical Research
  • Knight Center for Integrated Health
  • Indiana Medical Research
  • Rehabilitation Associates of Indiana
  • Indiana Pain & Spine Clinic
  • ICRI Inc.
  • The Pain Treatment Center of the Bluegrass
  • Gulf Coast Research Associates, Inc
  • Columbia Medical Practice
  • MidAtlantic Pain Medicine Center
  • Michigan Neurology Associates PC
  • CRC of Jackson
  • Healthcare Research
  • Clinical Research Center of Nevada
  • Five Towns Neuroscience Research
  • Upstate Clinical Research Associates
  • University of Cincinnati Medical Center
  • Clinical Research Source Inc
  • Pain Research of Oregon
  • Allegheny Pain Management
  • The Clinical Trial Center, LLC
  • CRI Worldwide
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Clinical Research Center
  • Greenville Pharmaceutical Research
  • Trident Institute of Medical Research, LLC
  • South Carolina Pharmaceutical Research
  • Lovelace Scientific
  • Sun Research Institute
  • Aspen Clinical Research

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Fentanyl buccal tablet first then immediate release oxycodone

Immediate Release Oxycodone first then FBT

Arm Description

This crossover study includes a screening period, two titration periods, two double-blind treatment periods during which subjects will be randomized to receive fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) plus placebo during the first treatment period and then immediate release oxycodone plus placebo during the second treatment period or vice versa, then followed by a 12-week open-label treatment period with FBT or an alternative short acting opioid.

This crossover study includes a screening period, two titration periods, two double-blind treatment periods during which subjects will be randomized to receive fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) plus placebo during the first treatment period and then immediate release oxycodone plus placebo during the second treatment period or vice versa, then followed by a 12-week open-label treatment period with FBT or an alternative short acting opioid.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 15 Minutes Post-treatment (PID15)
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID15 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 15 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 5 Minutes Post-treatment
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID5 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 5 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry.
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 10 Minutes Post-treatment
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID10 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 10 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry.
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 30 Minutes Post-treatment
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID30 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 30 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry.
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 45 Minutes Post-treatment
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID45 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 45 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry.
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 60 Minutes Post-treatment
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID60 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 60 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry.
Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 5 Minutes Post-treatment
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID5 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 5 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score.
Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 10 Minutes Post-treatment
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain. The PID10 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 10 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score. This was assessed during the double-blind treatment period.
Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 15 Minutes Post-treatment
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed during the double-blind treatment period on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain. The PID15 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 15 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score.
Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 30 Minutes Post-treatment
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID30 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 30 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score.
Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 45 Minutes Post-treatment
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID45 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 45 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score.
Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 60 Minutes Post-treatment
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID60 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 60 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score.
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference at 30 Minutes Post-treatment (SPID30)
PI scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. SPID30 were derived from PID values. The SPID30 scores during the double-blind treatment phase were calculated as the time- weighted sum of the PID scores from 5 through 30 minutes,after the administration of study drug. SPID30 = (⅓ x PID5) + (⅓ x PID10) + (⅓ x PID15) + PID30. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry.
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference at 60 Minutes Post-treatment (SPID60)
PI scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine during the double-blind treatment period. The SPID60 was derived from PID values. The SPID60 scores during the double-blind treatment phase were calculated as the time- weighted sum of the PID scores from 5 through 60 minutes,after the administration of the study drug. SPID60 = SPID30 + PID45 + PID60. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry.
Pain Relief (PR) Score at 5 Minutes Post-treatment
The PR score 5 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete).
Pain Relief Score at 10 Minutes Post-treatment
The PR score 10 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete).
Pain Relief Score at 15 Minutes Post-treatment
The PR score 15 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete).
Pain Relief Score at 30 Minutes Post-treatment
The PR score 30 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete).
Pain Relief Score at 45 Minutes Post-treatment
The PR score 45 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete).
Pain Relief Score at 60 Minutes Post-treatment
The PR score 60 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete).
Total Pain Relief at 60 Minutes (TOTPAR60)
The mean TOTPAR at 60 minutes will be calculated for each episode as the weighted sum of Pain Relief (PR) scores (5-point Likert scale, 0 = none to 4 = complete) at each assessment of PR (during the double-blind treatment period) until 60 minutes after study drug administration, as follows: TOTPAR60 =(⅓ x PR5)+ (⅓ x PR10) +(⅓ x PR15)+ PR30 + PR45 + PR60. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry.
Percent Total Pain Relief at 60 Minutes Posttreatment (%TOTPAR)
The PR score at set intervals after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete). The maximum TOTPAR score that could be achieved at 60 minutes is equal to 16; thus, %TOTPAR at 60 minutes is (TOTPAR60 /16) x 100.The % TOTPAR achieved 60 minutes after the administration of study drug was calculated during the double-blind treatment phase.
Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment - <= 5 Minutes
Time to APR (subjective perception of any reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to APR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes where APR was achieved in 5 minutes or less was compared.
Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=10 Minutes
Time to APR (subjective perception of any reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to APR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes where APR was achieved in 10 minutes or less was compared.
Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=15 Minutes
Time to APR (subjective perception of any reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to APR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes where APR was achieved in 15 minutes or less was compared.
Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=30 Minutes
Time to APR (subjective perception of any reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to APR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes where APR was achieved in 30 minutes or less was compared.
Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=45 Minutes
Time to APR (subjective perception of any reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to APR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes where APR was achieved in 45 minutes or less was compared.
Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=60 Minutes
Time to APR (subjective perception of any reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to APR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes where APR was achieved in 60 minutes or less was compared.
Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment - <= 5 Minutes
Time to MPR (subjective perception of meaningful reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to MPR fell in that category was compared.
Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=10 Minutes
Time to MPR(subjective perception of meaningful reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to MPR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in 10 minutes or less was compared.
Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=15 Minutes
Time to MPR(subjective perception of meaningful reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to MPR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in 15 minutes or less was compared.
Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=30 Minutes
Time to MPR(subjective perception of meaningful reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to MPR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in 30 minutes or less was compared.
Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=45 Minutes
Time to MPR(subjective perception of meaningful reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to MPR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in 45 minutes or less was compared.
Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=60 Minutes
Time to MPR(subjective perception of meaningful reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to MPR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in 60 minutes or less was compared.
Use of Standard Rescue Medication
Any use of standard rescue medication after the administration of study drug for relief of Breakthrough Pain (BTP) during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The number of breakthrough pain episodes for which study drug treatment was administered and which required rescue medication use was recorded.
Medication Performance Assessment 30 Minutes Post-treatment
The medication performance assessment assessed study drug performance on a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=poor, 1=fair,2=good, 3=very good, 4=excellent) 30 minutes after administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment periods and for the first 5 BTP episodes after each visit during the open-label extension period were recorded in the patient's paper diary. Patients were asked "How well did your study medication perform in controlling this breakthrough pain episode?" The number of episodes rated for each category were recorded.
Medication Performance Assessment 60 Minutes Post-treatment
The medication performance assessment assessed study drug performance on a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=poor, 1=fair,2=good, 3=very good, 4=excellent) 60 minutes after administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment periods and for the first 5 BTP episodes after each visit during the open-label extension period were recorded in the patient's paper diary. Patients were asked "How well did your study medication perform in controlling this breakthrough pain episode?" The number of episodes rated for each category were recorded.
Breakthrough Pain Preference Questionnaire
The BTP preference questionnaire is a questionnaire used to measure patients' preference for FBT or immediate-release oxycodone for management of BTP. The question is used to determine a patient's preference between the study drugs given in the 2 double-blind treatment periods. The patient was asked to select 1 of the following: 1, a preference for study drug used in the 1st double-blind treatment period; 2, a preference for study drug used in the 2nd double-blind treatment period; or 3, no preference.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Visit 7- 1 Month After Open Label Treatment
The PGIC is a standardized self-report tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period. The 7-point scale includes very much worse= -3, much worse= -2, minimally worse= -1, no change=0, minimally improved= +1, much improved= +2, and very much improved= +3. This was assessed 1 month after start of the open-label extension period.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Visit 8- 2 Months After Open Label Treatment
The PGIC is a standardized self-report tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period. The 7-point scale includes very much worse= -3, much worse= -2, minimally worse= -1, no change=0, minimally improved= +1, much improved= +2, and very much improved= +3. Here it was assessed 2 months after the start of the open-label extension period.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Visit 9- 3 Months After Open Label Treatment
The PGIC is a standardized self-report tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period. The 7-point scale includes very much worse= -3, much worse= -2, minimally worse= -1, no change=0, minimally improved= +1, much improved= +2, and very much improved= +3. Here it was assessed 3 months after the start of the open-label extension period.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Endpoint
The PGIC is a standardized self-report tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period. The 7-point scale includes very much worse= -3, much worse= -2, minimally worse= -1, no change=0, minimally improved= +1, much improved= +2, and very much improved= +3. Here it was assessed at the conclusion of the open-label extension period.
Clinician Global Impression of Change at Visit 7- 1 Month After Open Label Treatment
The CGIC is a standardized tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period, in the opinion of the clinician. The 7-point scale includes very much worse=-3, much worse=-2, minimally worse=-1,no change=0, minimally improved=+1, much improved=+2, and very much improved=+3. The CGIC was completed by the clinicians at visits 7, 8, and 9 (or early termination) which correspond to 1, 2, or 3 months after the start of the open-label extension period.
Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Visit 8- 2 Months After Open Label Treatment
The CGIC is a standardized tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period, in the opinion of the clinician. The 7-point scale includes very much worse=-3, much worse=-2, minimally worse=-1,no change=0, minimally improved=+1, much improved=+2, and very much improved=+3. Here it was assessed 2 months after the start of the open-label extension period. The CGIC was completed by the clinicians at visits 7, 8, and 9 (or early termination).
Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Visit 9- 3 Months After Open Label Treatment
The CGIC is a standardized tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period, in the opinion of the clinician. The 7-point scale includes very much worse=-3, much worse=-2, minimally worse=-1,no change=0, minimally improved=+1, much improved=+2, and very much improved=+3. The CGIC was completed by the clinicians at visits 7, 8, and 9 (or early termination), which correspond to 1, 2, or 3 months after the start of the open-label extension period.
Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Endpoint
The CGIC is a standardized tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period, in the opinion of the clinician. The 7-point scale includes very much worse=-3, much worse=-2, minimally worse=-1,no change=0, minimally improved=+1, much improved=+2, and very much improved=+3. The CGIC was completed by the clinicians at visits 7, 8, and 9 (or early termination).

Full Information

First Posted
December 19, 2008
Last Updated
May 22, 2012
Sponsor
Cephalon
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00813488
Brief Title
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets Versus Immediate Release Oxycodone for Breakthrough Pain in Patients With Chronic Pain
Official Title
A Double Blind, Active Controlled Crossover Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl Buccal Tablets Versus Immediate Release Oxycodone for the Management of Breakthrough Pain in Opioid Tolerant Patients With Chronic Pain
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Cephalon

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Evaluate the efficacy of treatment with the fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) compared with immediate release oxycodone treatment in alleviating breakthrough pain (BTP) in opioid tolerant patients with chronic pain.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Pain
Keywords
Breakthrough Pain, Opioid-tolerant, Chronic Pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
213 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Fentanyl buccal tablet first then immediate release oxycodone
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This crossover study includes a screening period, two titration periods, two double-blind treatment periods during which subjects will be randomized to receive fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) plus placebo during the first treatment period and then immediate release oxycodone plus placebo during the second treatment period or vice versa, then followed by a 12-week open-label treatment period with FBT or an alternative short acting opioid.
Arm Title
Immediate Release Oxycodone first then FBT
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This crossover study includes a screening period, two titration periods, two double-blind treatment periods during which subjects will be randomized to receive fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) plus placebo during the first treatment period and then immediate release oxycodone plus placebo during the second treatment period or vice versa, then followed by a 12-week open-label treatment period with FBT or an alternative short acting opioid.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet
Other Intervention Name(s)
CEP-25608
Intervention Description
FBT dose strengths = 200, 400, 600, or 800 mcg (1, 2, 3, or 4 tablets) taken prn (as needed) in the event of breakthrough pain. The maximum dose of FBT permitted during the titration and double-blind periods in this study is 800 mcg (4 tablets). For the subsequent 12-week open-label treatment period, patients will either continue with FBT treatment or begin treatment with an alternative short-acting opioid deemed appropriate for each patient by the clinician.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Immediate release oxycodone
Intervention Description
Immediate release oxycodone dosage strength: 15, 30, 45, and 60 mg doses (1, 2, 3 or 4 capsules) to be taken prn (as needed) for breakthrough pain. The maximum single dose would be 60 mg (4 capsules).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 15 Minutes Post-treatment (PID15)
Description
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID15 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 15 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry.
Time Frame
Immediately pre-dose and 15 minutes after dosing
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 5 Minutes Post-treatment
Description
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID5 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 5 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry.
Time Frame
Immediately pre-dose and 5 minutes after dosing
Title
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 10 Minutes Post-treatment
Description
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID10 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 10 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry.
Time Frame
Immediately pre-dose and 10 minutes after dosing
Title
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 30 Minutes Post-treatment
Description
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID30 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 30 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry.
Time Frame
Immediately pre-dose and 30 minutes after dosing
Title
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 45 Minutes Post-treatment
Description
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID45 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 45 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry.
Time Frame
Immediately pre-dose and 45 minutes after dosing
Title
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 60 Minutes Post-treatment
Description
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID60 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 60 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry.
Time Frame
Immediately pre-dose and 60 minutes after dosing
Title
Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 5 Minutes Post-treatment
Description
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID5 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 5 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score.
Time Frame
Immediately pre-dose and 5 minutes after dosing
Title
Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 10 Minutes Post-treatment
Description
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain. The PID10 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 10 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score. This was assessed during the double-blind treatment period.
Time Frame
Immediately before treatment and 10 minutes after treatment.
Title
Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 15 Minutes Post-treatment
Description
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed during the double-blind treatment period on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain. The PID15 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 15 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score.
Time Frame
Baseline (immediately pre-dose) and 15 minutes after dosing
Title
Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 30 Minutes Post-treatment
Description
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID30 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 30 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score.
Time Frame
Pre-dose and 30 minutes after dosing
Title
Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 45 Minutes Post-treatment
Description
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID45 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 45 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score.
Time Frame
Immediately pre-dose and 45 minutes after dosing
Title
Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 60 Minutes Post-treatment
Description
Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID60 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 60 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score.
Time Frame
Immediately pre-dose and 60 minutes after dosing
Title
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference at 30 Minutes Post-treatment (SPID30)
Description
PI scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. SPID30 were derived from PID values. The SPID30 scores during the double-blind treatment phase were calculated as the time- weighted sum of the PID scores from 5 through 30 minutes,after the administration of study drug. SPID30 = (⅓ x PID5) + (⅓ x PID10) + (⅓ x PID15) + PID30. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry.
Time Frame
From 5 minutes after dosing through 30 minutes after dosing
Title
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference at 60 Minutes Post-treatment (SPID60)
Description
PI scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine during the double-blind treatment period. The SPID60 was derived from PID values. The SPID60 scores during the double-blind treatment phase were calculated as the time- weighted sum of the PID scores from 5 through 60 minutes,after the administration of the study drug. SPID60 = SPID30 + PID45 + PID60. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry.
Time Frame
From 5 minutes after dosing through 60 minutes after dosing
Title
Pain Relief (PR) Score at 5 Minutes Post-treatment
Description
The PR score 5 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete).
Time Frame
5 minutes after treatment
Title
Pain Relief Score at 10 Minutes Post-treatment
Description
The PR score 10 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete).
Time Frame
10 minutes after treatment with study drug
Title
Pain Relief Score at 15 Minutes Post-treatment
Description
The PR score 15 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete).
Time Frame
15 minutes after treatment with study drug
Title
Pain Relief Score at 30 Minutes Post-treatment
Description
The PR score 30 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete).
Time Frame
30 minutes after treatment with study drug
Title
Pain Relief Score at 45 Minutes Post-treatment
Description
The PR score 45 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete).
Time Frame
45 minutes after treatment with study drug
Title
Pain Relief Score at 60 Minutes Post-treatment
Description
The PR score 60 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete).
Time Frame
60 minutes after treatment with study drug
Title
Total Pain Relief at 60 Minutes (TOTPAR60)
Description
The mean TOTPAR at 60 minutes will be calculated for each episode as the weighted sum of Pain Relief (PR) scores (5-point Likert scale, 0 = none to 4 = complete) at each assessment of PR (during the double-blind treatment period) until 60 minutes after study drug administration, as follows: TOTPAR60 =(⅓ x PR5)+ (⅓ x PR10) +(⅓ x PR15)+ PR30 + PR45 + PR60. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry.
Time Frame
From 5 minutes to 60 minutes after dosing
Title
Percent Total Pain Relief at 60 Minutes Posttreatment (%TOTPAR)
Description
The PR score at set intervals after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete). The maximum TOTPAR score that could be achieved at 60 minutes is equal to 16; thus, %TOTPAR at 60 minutes is (TOTPAR60 /16) x 100.The % TOTPAR achieved 60 minutes after the administration of study drug was calculated during the double-blind treatment phase.
Time Frame
From 5 minutes through 60 minutes after study drug treatment
Title
Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment - <= 5 Minutes
Description
Time to APR (subjective perception of any reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to APR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes where APR was achieved in 5 minutes or less was compared.
Time Frame
From time study drug was taken until 5 minutes after treatment
Title
Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=10 Minutes
Description
Time to APR (subjective perception of any reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to APR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes where APR was achieved in 10 minutes or less was compared.
Time Frame
From study drug treatment until 10 minutes after treatment
Title
Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=15 Minutes
Description
Time to APR (subjective perception of any reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to APR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes where APR was achieved in 15 minutes or less was compared.
Time Frame
From study drug administration to 15 minutes after treatment
Title
Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=30 Minutes
Description
Time to APR (subjective perception of any reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to APR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes where APR was achieved in 30 minutes or less was compared.
Time Frame
Time of study drug administration till 30 minutes after treatment
Title
Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=45 Minutes
Description
Time to APR (subjective perception of any reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to APR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes where APR was achieved in 45 minutes or less was compared.
Time Frame
Time of study drug treatment until 45 minutes after treatment
Title
Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=60 Minutes
Description
Time to APR (subjective perception of any reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to APR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes where APR was achieved in 60 minutes or less was compared.
Time Frame
Time of study drug treatment until 60 minutes after treatment
Title
Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment - <= 5 Minutes
Description
Time to MPR (subjective perception of meaningful reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to MPR fell in that category was compared.
Time Frame
From time study drug was taken until 5 minutes after treatment
Title
Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=10 Minutes
Description
Time to MPR(subjective perception of meaningful reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to MPR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in 10 minutes or less was compared.
Time Frame
Time of study drug treatment until 10 minutes after treatment
Title
Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=15 Minutes
Description
Time to MPR(subjective perception of meaningful reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to MPR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in 15 minutes or less was compared.
Time Frame
Time of study drug administration until 15 minutes after treatment
Title
Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=30 Minutes
Description
Time to MPR(subjective perception of meaningful reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to MPR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in 30 minutes or less was compared.
Time Frame
Time of study drug administration until 30 minutes after treatment
Title
Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=45 Minutes
Description
Time to MPR(subjective perception of meaningful reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to MPR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in 45 minutes or less was compared.
Time Frame
From study drug administration until 45 minutes after treatment
Title
Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=60 Minutes
Description
Time to MPR(subjective perception of meaningful reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to MPR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in 60 minutes or less was compared.
Time Frame
Time of study drug administration until 60 minutes after treatment
Title
Use of Standard Rescue Medication
Description
Any use of standard rescue medication after the administration of study drug for relief of Breakthrough Pain (BTP) during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The number of breakthrough pain episodes for which study drug treatment was administered and which required rescue medication use was recorded.
Time Frame
Throughout the double-blind treatment period
Title
Medication Performance Assessment 30 Minutes Post-treatment
Description
The medication performance assessment assessed study drug performance on a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=poor, 1=fair,2=good, 3=very good, 4=excellent) 30 minutes after administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment periods and for the first 5 BTP episodes after each visit during the open-label extension period were recorded in the patient's paper diary. Patients were asked "How well did your study medication perform in controlling this breakthrough pain episode?" The number of episodes rated for each category were recorded.
Time Frame
30 minutes post-treatment
Title
Medication Performance Assessment 60 Minutes Post-treatment
Description
The medication performance assessment assessed study drug performance on a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=poor, 1=fair,2=good, 3=very good, 4=excellent) 60 minutes after administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment periods and for the first 5 BTP episodes after each visit during the open-label extension period were recorded in the patient's paper diary. Patients were asked "How well did your study medication perform in controlling this breakthrough pain episode?" The number of episodes rated for each category were recorded.
Time Frame
60 minutes post-treatment
Title
Breakthrough Pain Preference Questionnaire
Description
The BTP preference questionnaire is a questionnaire used to measure patients' preference for FBT or immediate-release oxycodone for management of BTP. The question is used to determine a patient's preference between the study drugs given in the 2 double-blind treatment periods. The patient was asked to select 1 of the following: 1, a preference for study drug used in the 1st double-blind treatment period; 2, a preference for study drug used in the 2nd double-blind treatment period; or 3, no preference.
Time Frame
At Visit 6 ( up to 42 days depending upon how long it takes the patient to manage their BTP) after completion of both double-blind treatment periods.
Title
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Visit 7- 1 Month After Open Label Treatment
Description
The PGIC is a standardized self-report tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period. The 7-point scale includes very much worse= -3, much worse= -2, minimally worse= -1, no change=0, minimally improved= +1, much improved= +2, and very much improved= +3. This was assessed 1 month after start of the open-label extension period.
Time Frame
One month after start of open-label treatment
Title
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Visit 8- 2 Months After Open Label Treatment
Description
The PGIC is a standardized self-report tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period. The 7-point scale includes very much worse= -3, much worse= -2, minimally worse= -1, no change=0, minimally improved= +1, much improved= +2, and very much improved= +3. Here it was assessed 2 months after the start of the open-label extension period.
Time Frame
2 months after start of open-label extension period
Title
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Visit 9- 3 Months After Open Label Treatment
Description
The PGIC is a standardized self-report tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period. The 7-point scale includes very much worse= -3, much worse= -2, minimally worse= -1, no change=0, minimally improved= +1, much improved= +2, and very much improved= +3. Here it was assessed 3 months after the start of the open-label extension period.
Time Frame
3 months after start of open-label extension period
Title
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Endpoint
Description
The PGIC is a standardized self-report tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period. The 7-point scale includes very much worse= -3, much worse= -2, minimally worse= -1, no change=0, minimally improved= +1, much improved= +2, and very much improved= +3. Here it was assessed at the conclusion of the open-label extension period.
Time Frame
At conclusion of open-label extension period
Title
Clinician Global Impression of Change at Visit 7- 1 Month After Open Label Treatment
Description
The CGIC is a standardized tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period, in the opinion of the clinician. The 7-point scale includes very much worse=-3, much worse=-2, minimally worse=-1,no change=0, minimally improved=+1, much improved=+2, and very much improved=+3. The CGIC was completed by the clinicians at visits 7, 8, and 9 (or early termination) which correspond to 1, 2, or 3 months after the start of the open-label extension period.
Time Frame
One month after start of open-label extension
Title
Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Visit 8- 2 Months After Open Label Treatment
Description
The CGIC is a standardized tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period, in the opinion of the clinician. The 7-point scale includes very much worse=-3, much worse=-2, minimally worse=-1,no change=0, minimally improved=+1, much improved=+2, and very much improved=+3. Here it was assessed 2 months after the start of the open-label extension period. The CGIC was completed by the clinicians at visits 7, 8, and 9 (or early termination).
Time Frame
Two months after start of open-label extension period
Title
Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Visit 9- 3 Months After Open Label Treatment
Description
The CGIC is a standardized tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period, in the opinion of the clinician. The 7-point scale includes very much worse=-3, much worse=-2, minimally worse=-1,no change=0, minimally improved=+1, much improved=+2, and very much improved=+3. The CGIC was completed by the clinicians at visits 7, 8, and 9 (or early termination), which correspond to 1, 2, or 3 months after the start of the open-label extension period.
Time Frame
3 months after start of open-label extension period
Title
Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Endpoint
Description
The CGIC is a standardized tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period, in the opinion of the clinician. The 7-point scale includes very much worse=-3, much worse=-2, minimally worse=-1,no change=0, minimally improved=+1, much improved=+2, and very much improved=+3. The CGIC was completed by the clinicians at visits 7, 8, and 9 (or early termination).
Time Frame
End of open-label extension period

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria: The patient has chronic pain of at least 3 months duration associated with any of the following conditions: diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, traumatic injury, complex regional pain syndrome, back pain, neck pain, fibromyalgia, chronic pancreatitis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or cancer. Other chronic painful conditions may be evaluated for possible inclusion. The patient is currently using at least one of the following: at least 60 mg of oral morphine/day, or at least 25 mcg of transdermal fentanyl/hour, or at least 30 mg of oxycodone/day, or at least 8 mg of hydromorphone/day, or an equianalgesic dose of another opioid/day as ATC therapy for at least 7 days before administration of the first dose of study drug. The patient is willing to provide written informed consent, including a written opioid agreement form, to participate in this study. Women must be surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal, or, if of childbearing potential, using a medically accepted method of birth control and agree to continued use of this method for the duration of the study. Any patient with cancer should have a life expectancy of at least 3 months. The patient reports an average PI score, over the 24 hours prior to screening, of 6 or less (0=no pain through 10=pain as bad as you can imagine) for their chronic pain. The patient experiences, on average, at least 1 and less than 5 BTP episodes per day while taking ATC opioid therapy, and on average, the duration of each BTP episode is less than 4 hours during the screening period. The patient currently uses opioid therapy for alleviation of BTP episodes, occurring at the location of the chronic pain, and achieves at least partial relief. The patient must be willing and able to successfully self administer the study drug, comply with study restrictions, complete the electronic diary, and return to the clinic for scheduled study visits as specified in this protocol. Key Exclusion Criteria: The patient has uncontrolled or rapidly escalating pain as determined by the investigator or has pain uncontrolled by therapy that could adversely impact the safety of the patient or that could be compromised by treatment with study drug. The patient has a recent history (within 5 years) or current evidence of alcohol or other substance abuse. The patient has known or suspected hypersensitivities, allergies, or other contraindications to any ingredient in either study drug. The patient has a diagnosis of chronic headache or migraine as the primary painful condition with associated BTP. The patient has cardiopulmonary disease that would, in the opinion of the investigator, significantly increase the risk of treatment with potent synthetic opioids. The patient has medical or psychiatric disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the patient's safety or collected data. The patient has suicidal ideation at screening or has a history of suicidal ideation within 1 year or history of suicide attempt within 2 years before screening, or a diagnosis of bipolar disorder or history of schizophrenia The patient is expected to have surgery during the study that will impact the patient's chronic pain and/or BTP. The patient has had therapy before study drug treatment that, in the opinion of the investigator, could alter pain or response to pain medication. The patient is pregnant or lactating. The patient has participated in a previous study with FBT. The patient has participated in a study involving an investigational drug in the prior 30 days. The patient is currently using FBT or oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for BTP. The patient is currently using immediate-release oxycodone for BTP and is unwilling to undergo re-titration. The patient has received a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) within 14 days before the first treatment with study drug. The patient has any other medical condition or is receiving concomitant medication/therapy (e.g., regional nerve block) that could, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the patient's safety or compliance with the study protocol, or compromise collected data. The patient is involved in active litigation in regard to the chronic pain currently being treated. The patient has a positive UDS for an illicit drug or a medication not prescribed for him/her or which is not medically explainable (i.e., active metabolites). The investigator feels that the patient is not suitable for the study for any reason (e.g., the patient's social history indicates an increased risk of drug diversion) Additional exclusion criteria will apply for patients who decide to participate in the pharmacokinetics assessment to be performed at designated study sites.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sponsor's Medical Expert, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Cephalon
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Parkway Medical Center
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Horizon Research Group, Inc
City
Mobile
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36608
Country
United States
Facility Name
Robert Karns, MD a Medical Corporation
City
Beverly Hills
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90211
Country
United States
Facility Name
Catalina Research Institute, LLC
City
Chino
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pacific Coast Pain Management
City
Laguna Hills
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92637
Country
United States
Facility Name
Loma Linda University Health
City
Loma Linda
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92354
Country
United States
Facility Name
VA Northern California Health
City
Mather
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95655
Country
United States
Facility Name
New England Research Associates
City
Trumbull
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Delray Research Associates
City
Delray Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33484
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emerald Coast Research Group Inc
City
Marianna
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32446
Country
United States
Facility Name
Compass Research, LLC
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Gold Coast Research
City
Plantation
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33324
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sarasota Pain Medicine Research
City
Sarasota
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34238
Country
United States
Facility Name
Suncoast Neuroscience Associates
City
St. Petersburg
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research of West Florida
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33603
Country
United States
Facility Name
Taylor Research
City
Marietta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30060
Country
United States
Facility Name
Drug Studies America
City
Marietta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30066
Country
United States
Facility Name
Georgia Pain Care
City
Newman
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30265
Country
United States
Facility Name
South Coast Medical Group
City
Savannah
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31406
Country
United States
Facility Name
Millennium Pain Center
City
Bloomington
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Suburban Clinical Research
City
Bolingbrook
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60490
Country
United States
Facility Name
Knight Center for Integrated Health
City
Peoria
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61614
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indiana Medical Research
City
Elkhart
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46514
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rehabilitation Associates of Indiana
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46250
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indiana Pain & Spine Clinic
City
South Bend
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46617
Country
United States
Facility Name
ICRI Inc.
City
Overland Park
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66211
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Pain Treatment Center of the Bluegrass
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40503
Country
United States
Facility Name
Gulf Coast Research Associates, Inc
City
Baton Rouge
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70708
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbia Medical Practice
City
Columbia
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21045
Country
United States
Facility Name
MidAtlantic Pain Medicine Center
City
Pikesville
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21208
Country
United States
Facility Name
Michigan Neurology Associates PC
City
Clinton Township
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48035
Country
United States
Facility Name
CRC of Jackson
City
Jackson
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
39202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Healthcare Research
City
Florissant
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63031
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Center of Nevada
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Five Towns Neuroscience Research
City
Cedarhurst
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11516
Country
United States
Facility Name
Upstate Clinical Research Associates
City
Williamsville
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14221
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Cincinnati Medical Center
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45267
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Source Inc
City
Perrysburg
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43551
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pain Research of Oregon
City
Eugene
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Allegheny Pain Management
City
Altoona
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
16602
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Clinical Trial Center, LLC
City
Jenkintown
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19046
Country
United States
Facility Name
CRI Worldwide
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19139
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19146
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Center
City
West Reading
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Greenville Pharmaceutical Research
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29615
Country
United States
Facility Name
Trident Institute of Medical Research, LLC
City
North Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29406
Country
United States
Facility Name
South Carolina Pharmaceutical Research
City
Spartanburg
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29303
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lovelace Scientific
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78759
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sun Research Institute
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Aspen Clinical Research
City
Orem
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84058
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23855816
Citation
Webster LR, Slevin KA, Narayana A, Earl CQ, Yang R. Fentanyl buccal tablet compared with immediate-release oxycodone for the management of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant patients with chronic cancer and noncancer pain: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study followed by a 12-week open-label phase to evaluate patient outcomes. Pain Med. 2013 Sep;14(9):1332-45. doi: 10.1111/pme.12184. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Fentanyl Buccal Tablets Versus Immediate Release Oxycodone for Breakthrough Pain in Patients With Chronic Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs