search
Back to results

Effects of Palliative Care on Quality of Life and Symptom Control in Patients With Stage I, Stage II, or Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Can Be Removed by Surgery

Primary Purpose

Lung Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
educational intervention
medical chart review
questionnaire administration
end-of-life treatment/management
psychosocial assessment and care
quality-of-life assessment
Sponsored by
City of Hope Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Lung Cancer focused on measuring stage I non-small cell lung cancer, stage II non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of stage I-IIIA resectable NSCLC - Undergoing either lobectomy, pneumonectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection
  • Living within a 50 mile radius of the City of Hope
  • No previous cancer within the past 5 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of stage II-III NSCLC that are not resectable based on clinical and individual characteristics (co-morbidities, extent of disease, bulky mediastinal lymph nodes [N2], etc.)
  • NSCLC patients receiving radiofrequency ablation

Sites / Locations

  • City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Phase 1 Usual care

Phase 2 Intervention

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Overall quality of life and psychological distress
Symptom control
Geriatric assessment outcomes as measured by OARS Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, MOS Activities of Daily Living, MOS Social Activities Limitation Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores, and Karnofsky performance scale
Resource use as measured by chart audits
Identification of subgroups of patients who benefit most from the palliative care intervention in relation to sociodemographic characteristics, treatment factors, and geriatric assessment predictors at week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
January 14, 2009
Last Updated
September 18, 2014
Sponsor
City of Hope Medical Center
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00823667
Brief Title
Effects of Palliative Care on Quality of Life and Symptom Control in Patients With Stage I, Stage II, or Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Can Be Removed by Surgery
Official Title
Palliative Care for Quality of Life and Symptom Concerns in Early Stage Lung Cancer
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
City of Hope Medical Center
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Palliative care may be more effective than standard care in improving quality of life and symptoms in patients with lung cancer. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying the effects of palliative care on quality of life and symptom control in patients with stage I, stage II, or stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer that can be removed by surgery.
Detailed Description
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of palliative care intervention (PCI) vs standard care on overall quality of life and psychological distress in patients with resectable stage I-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer. To compare symptom control in these patients. To compare geriatric assessment outcomes, as measured by OARS (Older Americans Resources and Services) Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, MOS Activities of Daily Living, MOS (Medical Outcomes Study)Social Activities Limitation Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores, and Karnofsky performance scale, in these patients. To compare the effects of the PCI vs standard care on resource use. To identify subgroups of patients who benefit most from the PCI in relation to sociodemographic characteristics, treatment factors, and geriatric assessment predictors at week 12. OUTLINE: Patients assigned to 1 of 2 groups. Group I (standard care): Patients receive standard care. Patients complete questionnaires at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 52 weeks to evaluate quality of life (QOL), symptoms, psychological distress, and geriatric assessments. A medical chart review is performed at 52 weeks to assess the progression of treatment, episodes of care, and re-admissions. Group II (palliative care intervention): Patients receive an individualized interdisciplinary palliative care intervention combining patient-centered teaching principles and concepts that are learner-centered (builds on the strengths, interests, and needs of the learner), knowledge-centered (teacher is proficient in the content being taught), assessment-centered (learners are given an opportunity to test their understanding and receive feedback), and community-centered (opportunities are available for continued learning and support). Patients undergo 4 teaching sessions (based on the patient-centered teaching principles and concepts) that focus on physical, psychological, social, and spiritual well-being, respectively, once a week in weeks 3-6. Patients then receive 4 follow-up phone calls in weeks 9-21 to clarify questions or review concerns from the teaching sessions and to coordinate follow-up resources as needed. Patients also complete questionnaires as in group I.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lung Cancer
Keywords
stage I non-small cell lung cancer, stage II non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
198 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Phase 1 Usual care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Phase 2 Intervention
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
educational intervention
Intervention Description
Palliative care intervention at weeks 3,4,5 and 6 post study enrollment
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
medical chart review
Intervention Description
Occurs at 1 year post study enrollment
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
questionnaire administration
Intervention Description
Occurs at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks and 52 weeks post study enrollment
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
end-of-life treatment/management
Intervention Description
Occurs at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks and 52 weeks post study enrollment
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
psychosocial assessment and care
Intervention Description
Occurs at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks and 52 weeks post study enrollment
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
quality-of-life assessment
Intervention Description
Occurs at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks and 52 weeks post study enrollment
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall quality of life and psychological distress
Time Frame
1 year after study enrollment
Title
Symptom control
Time Frame
1 year after study enrollment
Title
Geriatric assessment outcomes as measured by OARS Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, MOS Activities of Daily Living, MOS Social Activities Limitation Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores, and Karnofsky performance scale
Time Frame
1 year after study enrollment
Title
Resource use as measured by chart audits
Time Frame
1 year after study enrollment
Title
Identification of subgroups of patients who benefit most from the palliative care intervention in relation to sociodemographic characteristics, treatment factors, and geriatric assessment predictors at week 12
Time Frame
Week 12 after study enrollment

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of stage I-IIIA resectable NSCLC - Undergoing either lobectomy, pneumonectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection Living within a 50 mile radius of the City of Hope No previous cancer within the past 5 years Exclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of stage II-III NSCLC that are not resectable based on clinical and individual characteristics (co-morbidities, extent of disease, bulky mediastinal lymph nodes [N2], etc.) NSCLC patients receiving radiofrequency ablation
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Betty Ferrell, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
City
Duarte
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91010-3000
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27794406
Citation
Kim JY, Sun V, Raz DJ, Williams AC, Fujinami R, Reckamp K, Koczywas M, Cristea M, Hurria A, Ferrell B. The impact of lung cancer surgery on quality of life trajectories in patients and family caregivers. Lung Cancer. 2016 Nov;101:35-39. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Effects of Palliative Care on Quality of Life and Symptom Control in Patients With Stage I, Stage II, or Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Can Be Removed by Surgery

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs