Ofatumumab Added to Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide vs Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide Combination in Relapsed Subjects With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Primary Purpose
Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
OFC Infusion
FC infusion
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic focused on measuring Relapsed, Oncology, Safety, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Ofatumumab, Efficacy
Eligibility Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- confirmed and active CLL requiring treatment
- at least one previous treatment for CLL and having achieved a complete or partial remission/response but after a period of 6 or more months, shows evidence of disease progression
- fully active at a minimum or fully capable of selfcare and up and about more than 50% of waking hours
- age 18yrs or older
- signed written informed consent
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- diagnosis of refractory CLL (failure to achieve a complete or partial remission/response or disease progression within 6 months of last anti-CLL treatment
- abnormal/inadequate blood values, liver and kidney function
- certain heart problems, serious significant diseases, AIHA, other current cancers or within the last 5 years
- active or chronic infections
- use of drugs to suppress allergic or inflammatory responses (glucocorticoids)
- CLL transformation
- CLL central nervous system involvement
- current participation in other clinical study
- inability to comply with the protocol activities
- lactating or pregnant women or female patients of child-bearing potential (or male patients with such partners) not willing to use adequate contraception
Sites / Locations
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigational Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigation Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigational Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigational Site
- Novartis Investigational Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigational Site
- Novartis Investigational Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigational Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigational Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigational Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Ofatumumab, Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide
Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide
Arm Description
Ofatumumab Cycle 1-Day 1 300mg, Cycle 1-Day 8 1000mg, then Cycles 2-6 Day 1 1000mg every 28 days, Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles
Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Progression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
PFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression (progressive disease,PD) and the date of death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Each participant was followed at the time when the last IRC-assessed PFS events occurred. Participants who had not died were censored at the date of last contact.
Time to Response, as Assessed by the IRC
Time to response is defined as the time from randomization to the first response. Complete Response/remission(CR) all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment: no lymphadenopathy(Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/spleenomegaly/constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter(µL), platelets(PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin(Hb) >11 grams/deciliter(g/dL), lymphocytes(LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow(BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. Incomplete bone marrow recovery(CRi): CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. Partial Remission/response(PR): >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline(BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. Nodular PR(nPR): persistent nodules BM.
Duration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRC
DOR is defined as the time from the initial response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR) to the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
Time to Progression, as Assessed by the IRC
Time to progression is defined as the time from the date of randomization to PD. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
Time to Next Therapy
Time to next therapy is defined as the time from randomization until the start of the next-line of treatment. Data are presented for participants who took anti-cancer therapies and participants in the ITT population.
Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
The ECOG performance status scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, how the disease affects the daily living, and determines appropriate treatment and prognosis. ECOG performance status are measured at Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1 and Cycle 6 Day1. During follow period, 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months). Improvement is defined as a decrease from baseline by at least one step on the ECOG performance status scale (yes/no).
Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time
Participants with no B-symptoms (B-Sy) (no night sweat, no weight loss, no fever and no extreme fatigue) and at least one indicated B-sy(night sweats, weight loss, fever or extreme fatigue) were presented at Screening, Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and during follow up period at 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months).
Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC
OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response [CR], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery [CRi], partial response [PR], and nodular PR [nPR]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM.
Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator
OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response [CR], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery [CRi], partial response [PR], and nodular PR [nPR]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM.
Responder = CR + CRi + NPR + PR
Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC
MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.
Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator
MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury.
Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points
Serum samples for analysis of HAHA were collected at Baseline (Screening), after 3 cycles were compelted, after 1 M and 6 M post last dose. All samples were first tested in a screening step; positive samples from the screening were further evaluated in a confirmation test. The confirmed positive samples were reported as HAHA-positive.
Number of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA)
AIHA is a condition where the body's immune system fails to recognize red blood cells as "self" and begins destroying these red blood cells. The number of participants experienced AIHA are presented.
Number of Participants With Drug Related Infections Reported as AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or Higher
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Maximum severity grades were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).
Number of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression Adverse Events
Participants with at least one Grade 3 or Grade 4 myelosuppression (anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) are presented. Myelosuppression is defined as the decrease in the ability of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. AEs were graded according to NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade, version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).
Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the Study
Participants who received no transfusion and at least one transfusion during the study are presented. Participants who took any blood products or blood supportive care product are included.
Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM
Immunoglobulins, or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Low levels indicate immuno-suppression. Blood samples were collected from each participant and IgA, IgG, and IgM were measured at Baseline, and 1M and 6M after last dose during follow up period.
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+
CD5+ and CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (Baseline) on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during the treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month follow up up to 45 M. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. day 1 if available, otherwise, screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+
CD5- CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (baseline) at Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during follow up period. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. Day 1 if available otherwise screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of the following prognostic markers at BL: immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region(IgVH) homology; Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70(ZAP70), VH3-21 usage; Cytogenetics (by fluorescent in situ hybridization [FISH]); beta 2 microglobulin. Cox-regression model was used to explore the relationship between progression-free survival and the following explanatory variables: treatment group, cytogenetics (analyzed by FISH included 6q-,11q-, +12q, 17p-, 13q-) , ZAP-70 (positive, negative or intermediate), VH3-21 usage (Yes and No), IgVH homology (>98%, 97%-98% and <97%), beta 2 microglobulin (>3500 microgram per liter [µg/L] and <=3500 µg/L). For each covariate, a hazard ratio <1 indicates a lower risk on the first effect tested compared with the other effects tested. Cytogenetics Group (based on >=20%)=cytogenetics (CY G).
Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)
The EORTC QLQ-CLL16 is comprised of 16 questions that address 5 domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) important in CLL. There are 4 multi-item scales - fatigue (2 items), treatment side effects ([TSE], 4 items), disease symptoms (disease effects scale [DES], 4 items), and infection scale [IS] (4 items) - and single item scales (social activities [Social Problems (SP) Scale] and future health worries[Future Health (FH) Scale].). These are measured on a four point scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. These scores are transformed to give a rating from 0 - 100, where 0 =no symptoms or problems and 100 = a severe symptoms or problems. EORTC QLQ-CLL16 was assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value was obtained at randomization.
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit
EQ-5D is comprised of a 5-item health status measure and a visual analogue scale (VAS) and is used to generate two scores: the utility score and the thermometer score. The utility score measures mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Responses to each of the 5 health states are measured on a 3-point scale (level 1 = no problem; level 2 = some or moderate problem(s) and level 3 = unable, or extreme problems). Responses are typically converted into health utilities or valuations on a scale ranging from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). The thermometer score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A Negative health status describes health state worse than death.Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study drug dose date.
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score
EORTC QLQ-C30, a self-reported, cancer-specific instrument assessing 15 domains: physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning, pain,fatigue, nausea and vomiting, insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation, diarrhea, and dyspnea, financial difficulties and a global health status/quality of life (QOF). Functional and symptoms scales were measured on four point Likert scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. Pat. assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date. Clinically meaningful changes or minimally important differences (MIDs)have been previously established for the EORTC QLQ C30, and categorized as 'small' if the mean change in scores is 5-10 points, 'moderate' if 10-20 points, and 'large' if >20points.
Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)
The HCQ consists of a single question in which the participant is asked if he/she has experienced any change in his/her health overall since beginning the study. For HCQ, values from 1 to 9 were assigned to the 9 responses in the HCQ questionnaire, ranging from 1 for 'my health is a great deal better' to 9 for 'my health is a great deal worse' since the beginning of the study. Lower scores represent better conditions.
Mean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumab
Area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) over the dosing interval (AUC[0-tau]) was evaluated. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141).
Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of Ofatumumab
Blood samples were collected to assess the plasma concentration of ofatumumab.Cmax and Ctrough were determined. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141).
Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of Ofatumumab
Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00824265
First Posted
January 15, 2009
Last Updated
June 5, 2020
Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00824265
Brief Title
Ofatumumab Added to Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide vs Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide Combination in Relapsed Subjects With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Official Title
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Trial of Ofatumumab Added to Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide vs. Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide Combination in Subjects With Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 12, 2009 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 17, 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 25, 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ofatumumab added to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).
Detailed Description
Fludarabine is currently approved for treatment of relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Studies have shown that drugs in combination with fludarabine have shown more effectiveness than fludarabine alone. The addition of ofatumumab to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide combination offers potentially a more effective therapy, without additional toxicity.
The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ofatumumab added to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia who have responded previously to therapy but later develop progressive disease and require additional therapy.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic
Keywords
Relapsed, Oncology, Safety, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Ofatumumab, Efficacy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
365 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Ofatumumab, Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Ofatumumab Cycle 1-Day 1 300mg, Cycle 1-Day 8 1000mg, then Cycles 2-6 Day 1 1000mg every 28 days, Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles
Arm Title
Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
OFC Infusion
Intervention Description
Ofatumumab Cycle 1-Day 1 300mg, Cycle 1-Day 8 1000mg, then Cycles 2-6 Day 1 1000mg every 28 days, Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
FC infusion
Intervention Description
Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Description
PFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression (progressive disease,PD) and the date of death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL).
Time Frame
From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Survival (OS)
Description
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Each participant was followed at the time when the last IRC-assessed PFS events occurred. Participants who had not died were censored at the date of last contact.
Time Frame
From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Title
Time to Response, as Assessed by the IRC
Description
Time to response is defined as the time from randomization to the first response. Complete Response/remission(CR) all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment: no lymphadenopathy(Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/spleenomegaly/constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter(µL), platelets(PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin(Hb) >11 grams/deciliter(g/dL), lymphocytes(LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow(BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. Incomplete bone marrow recovery(CRi): CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. Partial Remission/response(PR): >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline(BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. Nodular PR(nPR): persistent nodules BM.
Time Frame
From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Title
Duration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRC
Description
DOR is defined as the time from the initial response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR) to the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
Time Frame
From time of initial response to disease progression or death, whichever came first (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug)
Title
Time to Progression, as Assessed by the IRC
Description
Time to progression is defined as the time from the date of randomization to PD. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
Time Frame
From randomization up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug
Title
Time to Next Therapy
Description
Time to next therapy is defined as the time from randomization until the start of the next-line of treatment. Data are presented for participants who took anti-cancer therapies and participants in the ITT population.
Time Frame
From the start of study drug until the start of the next anti-CLL therapy (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug)
Title
Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Description
The ECOG performance status scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, how the disease affects the daily living, and determines appropriate treatment and prognosis. ECOG performance status are measured at Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1 and Cycle 6 Day1. During follow period, 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months). Improvement is defined as a decrease from baseline by at least one step on the ECOG performance status scale (yes/no).
Time Frame
Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day1, follow up (FU) at 1Month (M) after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months)
Title
Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time
Description
Participants with no B-symptoms (B-Sy) (no night sweat, no weight loss, no fever and no extreme fatigue) and at least one indicated B-sy(night sweats, weight loss, fever or extreme fatigue) were presented at Screening, Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and during follow up period at 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months).
Time Frame
Screening, Cycle1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and During at 1M after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months)
Title
Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC
Description
OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response [CR], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery [CRi], partial response [PR], and nodular PR [nPR]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM.
Time Frame
From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Title
Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator
Description
OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response [CR], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery [CRi], partial response [PR], and nodular PR [nPR]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM.
Responder = CR + CRi + NPR + PR
Time Frame
From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Title
Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC
Description
MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.
Time Frame
From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Title
Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator
Description
MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.
Time Frame
From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Title
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
Description
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury.
Time Frame
From first dose of study medication to 60 Days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)
Title
Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points
Description
Serum samples for analysis of HAHA were collected at Baseline (Screening), after 3 cycles were compelted, after 1 M and 6 M post last dose. All samples were first tested in a screening step; positive samples from the screening were further evaluated in a confirmation test. The confirmed positive samples were reported as HAHA-positive.
Time Frame
From start of study drug until 60 days after the last dose of study medication
Title
Number of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA)
Description
AIHA is a condition where the body's immune system fails to recognize red blood cells as "self" and begins destroying these red blood cells. The number of participants experienced AIHA are presented.
Time Frame
From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)
Title
Number of Participants With Drug Related Infections Reported as AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or Higher
Description
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Maximum severity grades were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).
Time Frame
From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)
Title
Number of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression Adverse Events
Description
Participants with at least one Grade 3 or Grade 4 myelosuppression (anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) are presented. Myelosuppression is defined as the decrease in the ability of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. AEs were graded according to NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade, version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).
Time Frame
From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)
Title
Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the Study
Description
Participants who received no transfusion and at least one transfusion during the study are presented. Participants who took any blood products or blood supportive care product are included.
Time Frame
From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Title
Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM
Description
Immunoglobulins, or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Low levels indicate immuno-suppression. Blood samples were collected from each participant and IgA, IgG, and IgM were measured at Baseline, and 1M and 6M after last dose during follow up period.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1M and 6M follow up
Title
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+
Description
CD5+ and CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (Baseline) on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during the treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month follow up up to 45 M. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. day 1 if available, otherwise, screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three months up to 45 M during Follow-up Period
Title
Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+
Description
CD5- CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (baseline) at Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during follow up period. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. Day 1 if available otherwise screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during Follow-up Period
Title
Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of the following prognostic markers at BL: immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region(IgVH) homology; Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70(ZAP70), VH3-21 usage; Cytogenetics (by fluorescent in situ hybridization [FISH]); beta 2 microglobulin. Cox-regression model was used to explore the relationship between progression-free survival and the following explanatory variables: treatment group, cytogenetics (analyzed by FISH included 6q-,11q-, +12q, 17p-, 13q-) , ZAP-70 (positive, negative or intermediate), VH3-21 usage (Yes and No), IgVH homology (>98%, 97%-98% and <97%), beta 2 microglobulin (>3500 microgram per liter [µg/L] and <=3500 µg/L). For each covariate, a hazard ratio <1 indicates a lower risk on the first effect tested compared with the other effects tested. Cytogenetics Group (based on >=20%)=cytogenetics (CY G).
Time Frame
From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Title
Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)
Description
The EORTC QLQ-CLL16 is comprised of 16 questions that address 5 domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) important in CLL. There are 4 multi-item scales - fatigue (2 items), treatment side effects ([TSE], 4 items), disease symptoms (disease effects scale [DES], 4 items), and infection scale [IS] (4 items) - and single item scales (social activities [Social Problems (SP) Scale] and future health worries[Future Health (FH) Scale].). These are measured on a four point scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. These scores are transformed to give a rating from 0 - 100, where 0 =no symptoms or problems and 100 = a severe symptoms or problems. EORTC QLQ-CLL16 was assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value was obtained at randomization.
Time Frame
Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit
Description
EQ-5D is comprised of a 5-item health status measure and a visual analogue scale (VAS) and is used to generate two scores: the utility score and the thermometer score. The utility score measures mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Responses to each of the 5 health states are measured on a 3-point scale (level 1 = no problem; level 2 = some or moderate problem(s) and level 3 = unable, or extreme problems). Responses are typically converted into health utilities or valuations on a scale ranging from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). The thermometer score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A Negative health status describes health state worse than death.Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study drug dose date.
Time Frame
Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.
Title
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score
Description
EORTC QLQ-C30, a self-reported, cancer-specific instrument assessing 15 domains: physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning, pain,fatigue, nausea and vomiting, insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation, diarrhea, and dyspnea, financial difficulties and a global health status/quality of life (QOF). Functional and symptoms scales were measured on four point Likert scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. Pat. assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date. Clinically meaningful changes or minimally important differences (MIDs)have been previously established for the EORTC QLQ C30, and categorized as 'small' if the mean change in scores is 5-10 points, 'moderate' if 10-20 points, and 'large' if >20points.
Time Frame
Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.
Title
Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)
Description
The HCQ consists of a single question in which the participant is asked if he/she has experienced any change in his/her health overall since beginning the study. For HCQ, values from 1 to 9 were assigned to the 9 responses in the HCQ questionnaire, ranging from 1 for 'my health is a great deal better' to 9 for 'my health is a great deal worse' since the beginning of the study. Lower scores represent better conditions.
Time Frame
Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.
Title
Mean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumab
Description
Area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) over the dosing interval (AUC[0-tau]) was evaluated. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141).
Time Frame
Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5,6
Title
Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of Ofatumumab
Description
Blood samples were collected to assess the plasma concentration of ofatumumab.Cmax and Ctrough were determined. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141).
Time Frame
Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5
Title
Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of Ofatumumab
Description
Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4.
Time Frame
Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycle 4
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria:
confirmed and active CLL requiring treatment
at least one previous treatment for CLL and having achieved a complete or partial remission/response but after a period of 6 or more months, shows evidence of disease progression
fully active at a minimum or fully capable of selfcare and up and about more than 50% of waking hours
age 18yrs or older
signed written informed consent
Key Exclusion Criteria:
diagnosis of refractory CLL (failure to achieve a complete or partial remission/response or disease progression within 6 months of last anti-CLL treatment
abnormal/inadequate blood values, liver and kidney function
certain heart problems, serious significant diseases, AIHA, other current cancers or within the last 5 years
active or chronic infections
use of drugs to suppress allergic or inflammatory responses (glucocorticoids)
CLL transformation
CLL central nervous system involvement
current participation in other clinical study
inability to comply with the protocol activities
lactating or pregnant women or female patients of child-bearing potential (or male patients with such partners) not willing to use adequate contraception
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Organizational Affiliation
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Boca Raton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33486
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612-3833
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Clinton
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20735
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64128
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Memphis
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38120
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Brasilia
State/Province
Goiás
ZIP/Postal Code
70390-150
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Porto Alegre
State/Province
Rio Grande Do Sul
ZIP/Postal Code
90610000
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sao Paulo
State/Province
São Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
05403-000
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Novartis Investigational Site
City
Porto Alegre
ZIP/Postal Code
91350
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rio de Janeiro
ZIP/Postal Code
20211-030
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Novartis Investigation Site
City
Rio de Janeiro
ZIP/Postal Code
20230-130
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rio de Janeiro
ZIP/Postal Code
21941-913
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Novartis Investigational Site
City
Sao Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
03102-002
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Pleven
ZIP/Postal Code
5800
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1233
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigational Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1407
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigational Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1606
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sofia
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Varna
ZIP/Postal Code
9010
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
New Westminster
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V3L 3W4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kitchener
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N2G 1G3
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Newmarket
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L3Y 2P9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1H 8L6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Greenfield Park
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J4V 2H1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H1T 2M4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sherbrooke
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J1H 5N4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Saskatoon
State/Province
Saskatchewan
ZIP/Postal Code
S7N 4H4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Karlsruhe
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
76137
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Stuttgart
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
70190
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Stuttgart
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
70376
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Villingen-Schwenningen
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
78052
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Muenchen
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
81241
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Frankfurt
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
65929
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kassel
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
34119
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Hannover
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
30625
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lehrte
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
31275
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Essen
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
45122
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Moenchengladbach-Rheydt
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
41239
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Muenster
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
48149
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Saarbruecken
State/Province
Saarland
ZIP/Postal Code
66113
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Dresden
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
01307
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigational Site
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
22767
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigational Site
City
Lubeck
ZIP/Postal Code
23562
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Athens,
ZIP/Postal Code
11 527
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
11527
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Thessaloniki
ZIP/Postal Code
564 29
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Thessaloniki
ZIP/Postal Code
57010
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bangalore
ZIP/Postal Code
560029
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Mumbai
ZIP/Postal Code
400012
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Mumbai
ZIP/Postal Code
400014
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
New Delhi
ZIP/Postal Code
110029
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Pune
ZIP/Postal Code
411001
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Vadodara
ZIP/Postal Code
390007
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Potenza
State/Province
Basilicata
ZIP/Postal Code
85100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Roma
State/Province
Lazio
ZIP/Postal Code
00041
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Roma
State/Province
Lazio
ZIP/Postal Code
00161
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Genova
State/Province
Liguria
ZIP/Postal Code
16132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Pavia
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
27100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ascoli Piceno
State/Province
Marche
ZIP/Postal Code
63100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Alessandria
State/Province
Piemonte
ZIP/Postal Code
15100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Novara
State/Province
Piemonte
ZIP/Postal Code
28100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Catania
State/Province
Sicilia
ZIP/Postal Code
95124
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Palermo
State/Province
Sicilia
ZIP/Postal Code
90146
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Guadalajara
State/Province
Jalisco
ZIP/Postal Code
44280
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Monterrey
State/Province
Nuevo León
ZIP/Postal Code
64460
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Monterrey
State/Province
Nuevo León
ZIP/Postal Code
64710
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Mexico City
ZIP/Postal Code
CP 14080
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Amersfoort
ZIP/Postal Code
3818 ES
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Den Haag
ZIP/Postal Code
2545 CH
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Nijmegen
ZIP/Postal Code
6525 GA
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rotterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
3015 CE
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rotterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
3075 EA
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-276
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Chorzow
ZIP/Postal Code
41-500
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Krakow
ZIP/Postal Code
31-501
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lodz
ZIP/Postal Code
93-510
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Opole
ZIP/Postal Code
45-372
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Slupsk
ZIP/Postal Code
76-200
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Szczecin
ZIP/Postal Code
71-242
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-507
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-776
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-781
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Wroclaw
ZIP/Postal Code
50-367
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bucharest
ZIP/Postal Code
022328
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bucharest
ZIP/Postal Code
050098
Country
Romania
City
Iasi
ZIP/Postal Code
300328
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Iasi
ZIP/Postal Code
700483
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kazan
ZIP/Postal Code
420029
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
115478
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
125101
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
125167
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Novosibirsk
ZIP/Postal Code
630087
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
St'Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
191024
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
St. Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
197 089
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08003
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08025
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08916
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28040
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28046
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Salamanca
ZIP/Postal Code
37007
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41014
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Taichung
ZIP/Postal Code
404
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Taipei city
ZIP/Postal Code
100
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
112
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigational Site
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
404
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bangkok
ZIP/Postal Code
10330
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bangkok
ZIP/Postal Code
10400
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bangkok
ZIP/Postal Code
10700
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Cherkasy
ZIP/Postal Code
18009
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Dnipropetrovsk
ZIP/Postal Code
49102
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kharkiv
ZIP/Postal Code
61070
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Khmelnytskyi
ZIP/Postal Code
29000
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kyiv
ZIP/Postal Code
03022
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kyiv
ZIP/Postal Code
04112
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lviv
ZIP/Postal Code
79044
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Makiivka
ZIP/Postal Code
86132
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Novartis Investigational Site
City
Simferopil
ZIP/Postal Code
95023
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Vinnitsa
ZIP/Postal Code
21018
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Novartis Investigational Site
City
Zhytomyr
ZIP/Postal Code
10002
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Birmingham
ZIP/Postal Code
B9 5SS
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bradford
ZIP/Postal Code
BD96RJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Burton on Trent
ZIP/Postal Code
DE13 0RB
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Cottingham
ZIP/Postal Code
HU16 5JQ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Dudley
ZIP/Postal Code
DY1 2HQ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Glasgow
ZIP/Postal Code
G12 OYN
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Leicester
ZIP/Postal Code
LE1 5WW
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SE5 9RS
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M13 9WL
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sutton
ZIP/Postal Code
SM5 1AA
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Swindon
ZIP/Postal Code
SN3 6BB
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Truro
ZIP/Postal Code
TR1 3LJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Uxbridge
ZIP/Postal Code
UB8 3NN
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.
This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27830957
Citation
Robak T, Warzocha K, Govind Babu K, Kulyaba Y, Kuliczkowski K, Abdulkadyrov K, Loscertales J, Kryachok I, Kloczko J, Rekhtman G, Homenda W, Blonski JZ, McKeown A, Chang CN, Bal V, Lisby S, Gupta IV, Grosicki S. Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes of ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide versus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in the COMPLEMENT 2 trial of patients with relapsed CLL. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Jul;58(7):1598-1606. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1253837. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27731748
Citation
Robak T, Warzocha K, Govind Babu K, Kulyaba Y, Kuliczkowski K, Abdulkadyrov K, Loscertales J, Kryachok I, Kloczko J, Rekhtman G, Homenda W, Blonski JZ, McKeown A, Gorczyca MM, Carey JL, Chang CN, Lisby S, Gupta IV, Grosicki S. Ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from the COMPLEMENT 2 trial. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 May;58(5):1084-1093. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1233536. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25103870
Citation
Jewell RC, Laubscher K, Lewis E, Fang L, Gafoor Z, Carey J, McKeown A, West S, Wright O, Sedoti D, Dixon I, Hottenstein CS, Chan G. Assessment of the effect of ofatumumab on cardiac repolarization. J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jan;55(1):114-21. doi: 10.1002/jcph.376. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Ofatumumab Added to Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide vs Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide Combination in Relapsed Subjects With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs