search
Back to results

Impact of Accu-Chek 360 in Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes

Primary Purpose

Type 2 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Targeted Self-Monitoring Of Blood Glucose (SMBG)
Provider Training
Patient Education
Sponsored by
Biomedical Research Institute of New Mexico
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Type 2 Diabetes focused on measuring Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, HbA1c

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must have a primary care provider
  • Diabetes diagnosed after age 35
  • Eat 3 meals daily and ≤ 1 snack
  • If on OHA, have willingness to start insulin

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Type 1 diabetes or DKA
  • On insulin pump or CGM
  • Preference for language other than English
  • Can't or won't monitor
  • Unfavorable occupation or living arrangements
  • Terminal illness
  • Active alcoholism or substance abuse
  • Severe depression
  • Chronic liver disease
  • Pituitary or adrenal dysfunction
  • Immunosuppression
  • Hct < 35
  • Creatinine ≥ 2.5

Sites / Locations

  • Carl T. Hayden VAMC
  • Southern Arizona VA Healthcare System
  • New Mexico VA Health Care System

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Intervention

Control Arms

Arm Description

The intervention will consist of targeted SMBG, provider training and patient education-all of which are focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time. SMBG will alternate between 2 strategies: glucose profiling and target monitoring. Intervention PCP's will use 380 View to identify a patient's most significant glucose elevations(s) and devise a treatment plan that includes drug type, dose increases, monitoring times, goal for the target, and stop criteria.

Subjects will repeat the dose titration cycle under the guidance of a case manager until the target is reached, maximal recommended doses of medications are used, or a stop criterion is met. They will then resume glucose profiling to identify the next target. This process is repeated until all targets reach their optimal value. Control patients will monitor and be treated in the customary manner.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Principal endpoints will be measured 48 weeks after group assignment and include the number of medication changes and HbA1c. Interim analysis will include HbA1c measurement at 3 mont intervals.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary endpoints include changes in patient attitudes toward SMBG, daily carbohydrate consumption, physical activity level, BMI, and medication compliance (for subjects on OHA).

Full Information

First Posted
January 16, 2009
Last Updated
June 21, 2011
Sponsor
Biomedical Research Institute of New Mexico
Collaborators
New Mexico VA Healthcare System, Carl T. Hayden VA Medical Center, Southern Arizona VA Health Care System
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00824694
Brief Title
Impact of Accu-Chek 360 in Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes
Official Title
Impact of Accu-Chek 360 View on Practice Patterns and HBA1C in Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2011
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Biomedical Research Institute of New Mexico
Collaborators
New Mexico VA Healthcare System, Carl T. Hayden VA Medical Center, Southern Arizona VA Health Care System

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To show that a structured treatment plan based upon Accu-Chek 360 View has a favorable effect on physician decision-making and HbA1c for patients on oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) or insulin for type 2 diabetes (T2D). Hypothesis 1: Compared to controls, intervention subjects will undergo a greater number of medication changes and have a lower HbA1 at the conclusion of the study. Hypothesis 2: Higher rates of monitoring at entry will be associated with lower CHO consumption, lower percent body fat, higher medication compliance, and higher physical activity levels. Hypothesis 3: Patients with lower rates of monitoring at entry will have higher rates of depression, more likely to have an external locus of control, and express greater fear about self-testing.
Detailed Description
Primary care providers (PCP's) will be randomized to intervention and control arms. Their T2D patients will be identified by searching computerized pharmacy records for OHA or insulin, followed until they are on a stable medical regimen, and eligible to participate if their baseline HbA1c is 7.0 - 9.5% if on OHA or 7.5 - 10.0% if on insulin. Two sample frames will be created for intervention patients: one of patients on OHA alone and one of patients on insulin alone or in combination with OHA. The same procedure will be used to develop corresponding sample frames for control patients. OHA patients will be randomly sampled from the intervention and control groups at a ratio of 1:1 until 174 subjects have been enrolled. Insulin patients will be recruited in the same manner until another 174 subjects are recruited. At entry, patients will have measurements of fat mass, insulin-resistance, stimulated C-peptide, carbohydrate intake, and physical activity level. The intervention will consist of targeted SMBG, provider training, and patient education, all of which will be focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time. SMBG will alternate between 2 strategies: glucose profiling and target monitoring. Intervention PCP's will use 360 View to identify a patient's most significant glucose elevation(s) and devise a treatment plan that includes the medication to be used, starting dose, dose increment per cycle, interval between dose increases, monitoring times and frequency, goal for the target, and stop criteria. Separate treatment protocols will be recommended for OHA patients with basal hyperglycemia, OHA patients with PP hyperglycemia, insulin patients with basal hyperglycemia, and insulin patients with PP hyperglycemia. Treatment will conform to current standards of practice as defined by package inserts and Micromedex, the VA's official on-line drug reference. Subjects will repeat the dose titration cycle under the guidance of a case manager until the target is reached, maximal recommended doses of medications are used, or a stop criterion is met. They will then resume glucose profiling to identify the next target. This process is repeated until all targets reach their optimal value. Intervention subjects will undergo no less than 4 cycles in 48 weeks. Control patients will monitor and be treated in the customary manner.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Type 2 Diabetes
Keywords
Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, HbA1c

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
348 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The intervention will consist of targeted SMBG, provider training and patient education-all of which are focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time. SMBG will alternate between 2 strategies: glucose profiling and target monitoring. Intervention PCP's will use 380 View to identify a patient's most significant glucose elevations(s) and devise a treatment plan that includes drug type, dose increases, monitoring times, goal for the target, and stop criteria.
Arm Title
Control Arms
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects will repeat the dose titration cycle under the guidance of a case manager until the target is reached, maximal recommended doses of medications are used, or a stop criterion is met. They will then resume glucose profiling to identify the next target. This process is repeated until all targets reach their optimal value. Control patients will monitor and be treated in the customary manner.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Targeted Self-Monitoring Of Blood Glucose (SMBG)
Intervention Description
SMBG will alternate between 2 strategies: glucose profiling and target monitoring.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Provider Training
Intervention Description
Focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Patient Education
Intervention Description
Focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Principal endpoints will be measured 48 weeks after group assignment and include the number of medication changes and HbA1c. Interim analysis will include HbA1c measurement at 3 mont intervals.
Time Frame
48 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Secondary endpoints include changes in patient attitudes toward SMBG, daily carbohydrate consumption, physical activity level, BMI, and medication compliance (for subjects on OHA).
Time Frame
48 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Must have a primary care provider Diabetes diagnosed after age 35 Eat 3 meals daily and ≤ 1 snack If on OHA, have willingness to start insulin Exclusion Criteria: Type 1 diabetes or DKA On insulin pump or CGM Preference for language other than English Can't or won't monitor Unfavorable occupation or living arrangements Terminal illness Active alcoholism or substance abuse Severe depression Chronic liver disease Pituitary or adrenal dysfunction Immunosuppression Hct < 35 Creatinine ≥ 2.5
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Glen H Murata, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
New Mexico VA Healthcare System
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Carl T. Hayden VAMC
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85012
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southern Arizona VA Healthcare System
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85723
Country
United States
Facility Name
New Mexico VA Health Care System
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
87108
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Impact of Accu-Chek 360 in Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs