search
Back to results

Effects of Carotid Stent Design on Cerebral Embolization

Primary Purpose

Stroke, Carotid Stenosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
closed-cell stent (Xact stent)
Open-cell stent (Acculink carotid)
Sponsored by
Dallas VA Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Stroke focused on measuring Stroke, Carotid stenosis, stents

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is at high risk for carotid endarterectomy due to either anatomic or co-morbid conditions; AND
  • Symptomatic patients (TIA or non-disabling stroke within 6 months of the procedure), with carotid stenosis ≥ 50% as diagnosed by angiography, using NASCET methodology (50); OR
  • Asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis ≥ 80% as diagnosed by angiography, using NASCET methodology

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Conditions that interfere with the evaluation of endpoints
  • Subject has anticipated or potential sources of cardiac emboli
  • Subject plans to have a major surgical procedure within 30 days after the index procedure.
  • Subject has intracranial pathology that makes the subject inappropriate for study participation.
  • Subject has a total occlusion of the ipsilateral carotid artery (i.e., CCA).
  • Severe circumferential lesion calcification that may restrict the full deployment of the carotid stent.
  • Carotid stenosis located distal to the target stenosis that is more severe than the target stenosis.

Sites / Locations

  • Dallas VA Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Closed-cell stent (Xact stent)

Open-cell stent (Acculink carotid)

Arm Description

For patients randomized to the closed-cell stent group, the Xact closed-cell stents were used. The Xact stent is a FDA approved device.

For patients randomized to the open-cell stent group, the Acculink carotid stent was used. The Acculink stent is a FDA approved device.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Transcranial Doppler Counts of Micro-embolic Signals in the Ipsilateral Middle Cerebral Artery.
Bilateral transcranial Doppler scan monitoring of the anterior and middle cerebral arteries was performed using a PMD150-ST3 digital transcranial Doppler pulsed-wave ultrasound scan system (Spencer Technologies, Seattle, Wash) with 2-MHz probes located over the temporal bones above the zygomatic arch. Isolated microembolic signals (MES) were identified from Doppler spectras according to the criteria given by the Consensus Committee of the Ninth International Cerebral Hemodynamic Symposium. If the number of MES was too high to be counted separately, heartbeats with microemboli were counted as microembolic showers. To avoid confusion, MES detected during contrast injection were excluded from the analysis. For analysis purposes, the procedure was divided into the following phases: lesion crossing, filter deployment, IVUS examination, predilation, stent deployment, postdilatation (when applicable), and filter removal.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Composite of Any Stroke, Myocardial Infarction or Death
Subclinical Cerebral Embolization Assessed by Brain Diffusion-weighted MRI

Full Information

First Posted
January 26, 2009
Last Updated
January 27, 2020
Sponsor
Dallas VA Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00830232
Brief Title
Effects of Carotid Stent Design on Cerebral Embolization
Official Title
Effects of Carotid Stent Design on Cerebral Embolization
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Dallas VA Medical Center

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of the proposed study is to contrast the relative efficacy of closed-cell stents versus open-cell stents in preventing periprocedural cerebral embolization in high-risk patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS).
Detailed Description
Stroke is responsible for more than 10% of all deaths and much severe disability in developed countries. In the United States, approximately 600,000 new strokes are reported annually, of which 150,000 are fatal, and more than 4,000,000 surviving stroke victims are affected by significant disability. Seventy-five percent of strokes occur in the distribution of the carotid arteries and are considered of a thromboembolic etiology, most of which originate in carotid lesions. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) with cerebral embolic protection is currently the preferred treatment of carotid stenosis in high risk surgical patients, i.e., those with significant comorbidities or a hostile neck from previous surgical procedures or radiation. Although several predictors of adverse outcomes after CAS have been identified, the effects of device characteristics, including stent design, on neurologic adverse events have not been established. The proposed study will be a randomized prospective controlled trial designed to test the hypothesis that the implantation of closed-cell stents for carotid lesions in high-risk patients will be associated with a reduced perioperative cerebral microembolization, as detected by transcranial Doppler and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, and reduced 30-day stroke, myocardial infarction, and death rates when compared with the implantation of open-cell stents.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke, Carotid Stenosis
Keywords
Stroke, Carotid stenosis, stents

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Closed-cell stent (Xact stent)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
For patients randomized to the closed-cell stent group, the Xact closed-cell stents were used. The Xact stent is a FDA approved device.
Arm Title
Open-cell stent (Acculink carotid)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
For patients randomized to the open-cell stent group, the Acculink carotid stent was used. The Acculink stent is a FDA approved device.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
closed-cell stent (Xact stent)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Carotid artery angioplasty
Intervention Description
Patients enrolled in this study arm underwent for carotid stenting using closed stent cell. The graft used in this groups was the Xact closed-cell stent. This type of device is rigid device with dense conposition of the nitinol rigns. Carotid stenting was used on standard fashion using filters as embolic protection device.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Open-cell stent (Acculink carotid)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Carotid artery angioplasty
Intervention Description
Patients enrolled in this study arm underwent for carotid stenting using open stent cell stents. This type of stent is a tube shaped graft composed of flexible nitinol rings. The device used in this group was the Acculinx open-cell stent. Stenting procedure eas performed on standard fashion.Filters were used as embolic protection device.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Transcranial Doppler Counts of Micro-embolic Signals in the Ipsilateral Middle Cerebral Artery.
Description
Bilateral transcranial Doppler scan monitoring of the anterior and middle cerebral arteries was performed using a PMD150-ST3 digital transcranial Doppler pulsed-wave ultrasound scan system (Spencer Technologies, Seattle, Wash) with 2-MHz probes located over the temporal bones above the zygomatic arch. Isolated microembolic signals (MES) were identified from Doppler spectras according to the criteria given by the Consensus Committee of the Ninth International Cerebral Hemodynamic Symposium. If the number of MES was too high to be counted separately, heartbeats with microemboli were counted as microembolic showers. To avoid confusion, MES detected during contrast injection were excluded from the analysis. For analysis purposes, the procedure was divided into the following phases: lesion crossing, filter deployment, IVUS examination, predilation, stent deployment, postdilatation (when applicable), and filter removal.
Time Frame
First 24 hours after implantation of carotid stent
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Composite of Any Stroke, Myocardial Infarction or Death
Time Frame
within 30 days after the carotid stenting procedure
Title
Subclinical Cerebral Embolization Assessed by Brain Diffusion-weighted MRI
Time Frame
within 24 hours after carotid artery stenting

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subject is at high risk for carotid endarterectomy due to either anatomic or co-morbid conditions; AND Symptomatic patients (TIA or non-disabling stroke within 6 months of the procedure), with carotid stenosis ≥ 50% as diagnosed by angiography, using NASCET methodology (50); OR Asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis ≥ 80% as diagnosed by angiography, using NASCET methodology Exclusion Criteria: Conditions that interfere with the evaluation of endpoints Subject has anticipated or potential sources of cardiac emboli Subject plans to have a major surgical procedure within 30 days after the index procedure. Subject has intracranial pathology that makes the subject inappropriate for study participation. Subject has a total occlusion of the ipsilateral carotid artery (i.e., CCA). Severe circumferential lesion calcification that may restrict the full deployment of the carotid stent. Carotid stenosis located distal to the target stenosis that is more severe than the target stenosis.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carlos H Timaran, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Dallas VA Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Dallas VA Medical Center
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75216
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21723064
Citation
Timaran CH, Rosero EB, Higuera A, Ilarraza A, Modrall JG, Clagett GP. Randomized clinical trial of open-cell vs closed-cell stents for carotid stenting and effects of stent design on cerebral embolization. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1310-1316.e1; discussion 1316. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.013. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Effects of Carotid Stent Design on Cerebral Embolization

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs