search
Back to results

RCT of Air Insufflation Versus Water Infusion Colonoscopy by Supervised Trainees

Primary Purpose

Colorectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening
Water Infusion Colonoscopy
Air insufflation colonoscopy
Sponsored by
East Bay Institute for Research and Education
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Colorectal Cancer focused on measuring Colorectal cancer screening, Optical colonoscopy, Water method, Sedation

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria:

  • Adult (> 50 years old) male and female patients who are scheduled and consented for screening or surveillance colonoscopy,
  • Accept randomization to the study or the conventional method, and agree to complete study questionnaires
  • The adults will be normal healthy patients or patients with mild systemic disease, ASA 1 or ASA 2

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients who have contraindications for sedation, decline to participate, unable to give informed consent or complete the questionnaires due to language or other difficulties will be excluded
  • Excluded patients will be managed by usual procedures

Sites / Locations

  • Sacramento VA Medical Center,

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

1

2

Arm Description

Water Infusion in lieu of Air Insufflation Colonoscopy

Air Insufflation Colonoscopy

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Increments of medications used for sedation

Secondary Outcome Measures

pain score during colonoscopy
success of cecal intubation
willingness to repeat colonoscopy

Full Information

First Posted
February 9, 2009
Last Updated
February 10, 2009
Sponsor
East Bay Institute for Research and Education
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00841282
Brief Title
RCT of Air Insufflation Versus Water Infusion Colonoscopy by Supervised Trainees
Official Title
Comparison of Study Versus Conventional Method for Performing Colonoscopy by Supervised Trainees for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2009
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2009 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
East Bay Institute for Research and Education

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Our aim is to perform a randomized-controlled trial comparing air insufflation sedated colonoscopy (conventional method) vs. water infusion sedated colonoscopy (study method) by supervised trainees. Randomized trials demonstrating reduced need for sedation medications without compromising patients' comfort, cecal intubation rates or polyps detection may cause a paradigm shift and positively alter the way traditional colonoscopy is performed and future endoscopists are trained.
Detailed Description
Background: A novel water method permitted 52% of patients accepting on-demand sedation to complete colonoscopy without medications and significantly increased successful cecal intubation from 76% to 97% in patients accepting scheduled unsedated colonoscopy. Aim: To perform a randomized controlled trial comparing air insufflation (conventional method) vs. water infusion in lieu of air (study method) colonoscopy in minimally sedated patients by supervised trainees. Hypothesis: Compared with the conventional method, patients examined by the study method have lower pain scores and require less medication but have similar cecal intubation rate and willingness to repeat future colonoscopy. Setting: Outpatient colonoscopy in a single VA hospital Methods: After informed consent and standard bowel preparation, patients received pre-medications administered as 0.5 increment of Fentanyl (25 μg) and 0.5 increment of Versed (1 mg) plus 50 mg Diphenhydramine. The conventional and the study method for colonoscopy were implemented as previously described. Additional pain medications were administered at the patients' request. Outcome measures: Increments of medications, pain scores, cecal intubation and willingness to repeat colonoscopy. Limitations: Single VA site, older male population

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colorectal Cancer
Keywords
Colorectal cancer screening, Optical colonoscopy, Water method, Sedation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
62 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Water Infusion in lieu of Air Insufflation Colonoscopy
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Air Insufflation Colonoscopy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Water Infusion Colonoscopy
Intervention Description
water infusion in lieu of air insufflation for screening colonoscopy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Air insufflation colonoscopy
Intervention Description
Conventional colonoscopy with air insufflation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Increments of medications used for sedation
Time Frame
duration of procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
pain score during colonoscopy
Time Frame
duration of procedure
Title
success of cecal intubation
Time Frame
duration of study
Title
willingness to repeat colonoscopy
Time Frame
duration of study

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: Adult (> 50 years old) male and female patients who are scheduled and consented for screening or surveillance colonoscopy, Accept randomization to the study or the conventional method, and agree to complete study questionnaires The adults will be normal healthy patients or patients with mild systemic disease, ASA 1 or ASA 2 Exclusion criteria: Patients who have contraindications for sedation, decline to participate, unable to give informed consent or complete the questionnaires due to language or other difficulties will be excluded Excluded patients will be managed by usual procedures
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Sacramento VA Medical Center,
City
Mather
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95655
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

RCT of Air Insufflation Versus Water Infusion Colonoscopy by Supervised Trainees

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs