search
Back to results

rhBMP-2 Versus Autograft in Critical Size Tibial Defects

Primary Purpose

Tibial Fractures

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 2
Autogenous iliac crest bone graft
Sponsored by
St. Louis University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Tibial Fractures focused on measuring Open tibia fractures, rhBMP-2, critical size defects, bone grafting

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients 18-65 years old with an open tibia fracture involving diaphysis (if patient has a bilateral tibia fracture and both require a bone graft, then each will be randomized separately).
  • Tibia fractures with a circumferential bone defect of at least one centimeter in length compromising at least 50% of the circumference of the bone.
  • The definitive treatment of the tibia fracture must be with an intramedullary nail (may have temporary external fixation prior to IM nail placement).
  • Patients whose treatment plan includes placement of a bone graft between 6 to 16 weeks after their initial injury.
  • Patients who have no evidence of infection by clinical examination (defined as active infection at the operative site, purulent drainage from the fracture or evidence of active osteomyelitis at the time of bone graft).
  • Patients who are independent in living and ambulation prior to injury.
  • Patients who are English speaking.
  • Patients who are willing to provide consent and available for follow-up for at least 12 months following definitive surgical procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are pregnant or lactating.
  • Patients with known hypersensitivity to rhBMP-2 or bovine type I collagen.
  • Patients with a history of tumor, a resected or extant tumor, an active malignancy, or patients undergoing treatment for malignancy.
  • Patients who are skeletally immature (<18 years of age or no radiographic evidence of epiphyseal closure).
  • Patients with inadequate neurovascular status, e.g. high risk of amputation.
  • Patients with compartment syndrome of the affected limb.
  • Patients with immune deficiency or history of auto-immune disease,
  • Patients who have undergone treatment of any other investigational therapy within the month preceding implantation or planned within the 12 months following implantation.
  • Patients unable to return for required follow-up visits.
  • Patients who have medical co-morbidities that preclude treatment with a general anesthetic.
  • Patient who is pending incarceration or who is incarcerated.
  • Patients with an active infection at the operative site, purulent drainage from the fracture or evidence of active osteomyelitis at the time of bone grafting.
  • Patient has intraoperative positive gram stain or an elevated CRP after laboratory screening for infection.
  • Patient has segmental defects longer than 5cm in length.
  • Patients who have segmental defects that require more than 60 cc of bone graft.
  • Patients who require more than one large kit of rhBMP-2 at time of surgery.
  • Patient's anticipated treatment plan also includes the use of other procedures to promote fracture healing, e.g. ultrasound, magnetic field or electrical stimulation.
  • Patient's tibia fracture has been treated with additional fixation beyond the intramedullary nail, e.g. plates, wires or screws.
  • Patients who have pathological fractures; a known history of Paget's disease or known history of heterotropic calcification.
  • Patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale less than 15 (less than fully awake) at the time of informed consent.
  • Patients with previous hardware in place that prevents placement of an intramedullary nail for treatment of the tibial shaft fracture.
  • Patients with prior use of INFUSE.

If the patient is a female of child bearing potential:

  • Does she have a negative pregnancy test (administered within 72 hours prior to surgery)?
  • Has she agreed to use adequate contraception for a period of at least 1 year following implementation of rhBMP-2?

Sites / Locations

  • UCSF Medical Center
  • Denver Health and Hospital Authority
  • Florida Orthopaedic Institute / Tampa General & St. Joseph's Hospitals
  • University of Iowa Hospitals
  • Boston Medical Center
  • Hennepin County Medical Center
  • St. Louis Medical Center
  • Carolinas Medical Center
  • MetroHealth Medical Center
  • University of Oklahoma / OU Medical Center
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • Brooke Army Medical Center
  • University of Washington / Harborview Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 2

Autogenous iliac crest bone graft

Arm Description

The patient will receive rhBMP-2 plus allograft chips in the bone defect site. Intervention type: surgical

Bone will be harvested from the iliac crest and placed in the bone defect.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Fracture Healing (Union) at 12 Months
Union will be defined by: 1. Radiographic union as defined by the Radiographic union scale in tibia fractures (RUST) score, Radiographic evaluation will be assessed by blinded orthopaedic surgeons.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Infection
Infection will be assessed based on the CDC criteria for deep and superficial infection.
Medical Cost
An economic evaluation will also be performed including the costs of iliac crest bone graft harvest and complications from the bone graft surgery and the cost of the Rh-BMP 2 and the biologic implant used in the treatment group.

Full Information

First Posted
February 24, 2009
Last Updated
October 23, 2018
Sponsor
St. Louis University
Collaborators
Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00853489
Brief Title
rhBMP-2 Versus Autograft in Critical Size Tibial Defects
Official Title
RhBMP-2 vs. Autograft for Critical Size Tibial Defects: A Multicenter Randomized Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Enrollment too slow
Study Start Date
August 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 17, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 17, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
St. Louis University
Collaborators
Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of our study is to evaluate the use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (RhBMP-2) as compared to standard ICBG in the treatment of severe open tibia fractures with a critical size bone defect (at least one centimeter in length compromising at least 50% of the circumference of the bone).
Detailed Description
Open tibia fractures have a 15% or higher rate of not healing. Those fractures which do not heal are typically treated with bone from the hip (iliac crest autograft; or ICBG). The use of ICBG bone with the treatment of delayed unions/non-unions with critical defect, although successful, has its drawbacks. The bone graft sources are limited and the procedure is associated with additional operating room time plus a second incision with increased risk of infection, post operative pain and increased hospital stay. The purpose of this study is to determine if Rh-BMP2, a new bone graft substitute, is at least as effective as using bone from the hip (autograft) to help promote healing of open, tibia (shin bone) fractures. Research Questions: Primary: What is the relative effect of rhBMP-2 versus autogenous ICBG on rates of union in patients with critical size defects following tibial shaft fractures? Null hypothesis #1: rhBMP-2 has the same union rate when used in critical-sized defects as does ICBG. Secondary: What is the relative effect of rhBMP-2 versus autogenous ICBG on infection rates in patients with nonunion or critical size defects following tibial shaft fractures? Null hypothesis #2: The infection rate in open tibias with critical-sized defects treated with rhBMP-2 and autogenous ICBG are the same. What is the economic impact of the use of Rh-BMP 2 for tibial fractures with critical sized defects? Null hypothesis #3: There will be no difference in the economic cost of the treatment of critical sized defects using the RhBMP-2 versus iliac crest bone graft.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tibial Fractures
Keywords
Open tibia fractures, rhBMP-2, critical size defects, bone grafting

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
33 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The patient will receive rhBMP-2 plus allograft chips in the bone defect site. Intervention type: surgical
Arm Title
Autogenous iliac crest bone graft
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Bone will be harvested from the iliac crest and placed in the bone defect.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 2
Other Intervention Name(s)
(rhBMP-2) (INFUSE)
Intervention Description
Patients will receive 1.50 mg/ml -12 mg of rhBMP-2 soaked on a absorbable collagen sponge (rhBMP-2/ACS) as an adjuvant to a freeze-dried cancellous allograft
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Autogenous iliac crest bone graft
Intervention Description
Patients will undergo autogenous iliac crest bone graft surgery per the surgeon's usual practice.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Fracture Healing (Union) at 12 Months
Description
Union will be defined by: 1. Radiographic union as defined by the Radiographic union scale in tibia fractures (RUST) score, Radiographic evaluation will be assessed by blinded orthopaedic surgeons.
Time Frame
12 months post op
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Infection
Description
Infection will be assessed based on the CDC criteria for deep and superficial infection.
Time Frame
12 months post op.
Title
Medical Cost
Description
An economic evaluation will also be performed including the costs of iliac crest bone graft harvest and complications from the bone graft surgery and the cost of the Rh-BMP 2 and the biologic implant used in the treatment group.
Time Frame
12 mos post op

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients 18-65 years old with an open tibia fracture involving diaphysis (if patient has a bilateral tibia fracture and both require a bone graft, then each will be randomized separately). Tibia fractures with a circumferential bone defect of at least one centimeter in length compromising at least 50% of the circumference of the bone. The definitive treatment of the tibia fracture must be with an intramedullary nail (may have temporary external fixation prior to IM nail placement). Patients whose treatment plan includes placement of a bone graft between 6 to 16 weeks after their initial injury. Patients who have no evidence of infection by clinical examination (defined as active infection at the operative site, purulent drainage from the fracture or evidence of active osteomyelitis at the time of bone graft). Patients who are independent in living and ambulation prior to injury. Patients who are English speaking. Patients who are willing to provide consent and available for follow-up for at least 12 months following definitive surgical procedure. Exclusion Criteria: Patients who are pregnant or lactating. Patients with known hypersensitivity to rhBMP-2 or bovine type I collagen. Patients with a history of tumor, a resected or extant tumor, an active malignancy, or patients undergoing treatment for malignancy. Patients who are skeletally immature (<18 years of age or no radiographic evidence of epiphyseal closure). Patients with inadequate neurovascular status, e.g. high risk of amputation. Patients with compartment syndrome of the affected limb. Patients with immune deficiency or history of auto-immune disease, Patients who have undergone treatment of any other investigational therapy within the month preceding implantation or planned within the 12 months following implantation. Patients unable to return for required follow-up visits. Patients who have medical co-morbidities that preclude treatment with a general anesthetic. Patient who is pending incarceration or who is incarcerated. Patients with an active infection at the operative site, purulent drainage from the fracture or evidence of active osteomyelitis at the time of bone grafting. Patient has intraoperative positive gram stain or an elevated CRP after laboratory screening for infection. Patient has segmental defects longer than 5cm in length. Patients who have segmental defects that require more than 60 cc of bone graft. Patients who require more than one large kit of rhBMP-2 at time of surgery. Patient's anticipated treatment plan also includes the use of other procedures to promote fracture healing, e.g. ultrasound, magnetic field or electrical stimulation. Patient's tibia fracture has been treated with additional fixation beyond the intramedullary nail, e.g. plates, wires or screws. Patients who have pathological fractures; a known history of Paget's disease or known history of heterotropic calcification. Patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale less than 15 (less than fully awake) at the time of informed consent. Patients with previous hardware in place that prevents placement of an intramedullary nail for treatment of the tibial shaft fracture. Patients with prior use of INFUSE. If the patient is a female of child bearing potential: Does she have a negative pregnancy test (administered within 72 hours prior to surgery)? Has she agreed to use adequate contraception for a period of at least 1 year following implementation of rhBMP-2?
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas Revak, DO
Organizational Affiliation
St. Louis Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paul Tornetta, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Boston Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
UCSF Medical Center
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Denver Health and Hospital Authority
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80204
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Orthopaedic Institute / Tampa General & St. Joseph's Hospitals
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33606
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Iowa Hospitals
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52242
Country
United States
Facility Name
Boston Medical Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02118
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hennepin County Medical Center
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55715
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Louis Medical Center
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Carolinas Medical Center
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28232
Country
United States
Facility Name
MetroHealth Medical Center
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44109
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Oklahoma / OU Medical Center
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232
Country
United States
Facility Name
Brooke Army Medical Center
City
Fort Sam Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78234-6315
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Washington / Harborview Medical Center
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98104-2499
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

rhBMP-2 Versus Autograft in Critical Size Tibial Defects

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs