search
Back to results

NKTR-102 Versus Irinotecan in Patients With Second-Line, Irinotecan-Naïve, KRAS Mutant, Colorectal Cancer

Primary Purpose

Colorectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
NKTR-102
irinotecan
Sponsored by
Nektar Therapeutics
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Colorectal Cancer focused on measuring colorectal cancer, Colorectal cancer, second line

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • metastatic colorectal cancer
  • tumor with k-ras mutation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • More than 1 prior regimen for treatment of metastatic disease

Sites / Locations

  • Investigator Site - Peoria
  • Investigator Site - Burbank
  • Investigator Site - Los Angeles
  • Investigator Site - Vallejo
  • Investigator Site - Centralia
  • Investigator Site - Louisville
  • Investigator Site - Detroit
  • Investigator Site - Buffalo
  • Investigator Site - Knoxville
  • Investigator Site - Antwerp
  • Investigator Site - Celle
  • Investigator Site - Karlsruhe
  • Investigator Site - Hyderabad
  • Investigator Site - Ahmedabad
  • Investigator Site - Bangalore
  • Investigator Site - Bangalore
  • Investigator Site - Kochi
  • Investigator Site - Mumbai
  • Investigator Site - Kolkata
  • Investigator Site - Kolkata
  • Investigator Site - Elche
  • Investigator Site - Madrid
  • Investigator Site - Aberdeen
  • Investigator Site - Manchester

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

NKTR-102

irinotecan

Arm Description

NKTR-102 IV every 3 weeks

irinotecan IV every 3 weeks

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of PFS by Central Radiological Review: ITT Population
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of disease progression (assessed by central radiological review according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] 1.1) or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. PFS was determined using the intention-to-treat (ITT) population which included all randomized patients who underwent baseline evaluation, with treatment assigned according to randomized arm. For patients whose disease did not progress or who did not die, the PFS time was censored at the time of the last tumor assessment that demonstrated lack of disease progression. For patients who received new anti-cancer therapy, the PFS time was censored at the time of last tumor assessment prior to the new anti-cancer therapy starts.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of OS: ITT Population
Duration of OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Patients were followed until their date of death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or final database closure. Patients who were lost-to-follow-up or were not known to have died were censored at last date they were shown to be alive. Patients who did not have any follow-up since the date of randomization were censored at the date of randomization.
ORR by Central Radiological Review: ITT Population
ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.1 based upon the best response as assessed by central radiological review; confirmation of response was not required. The analyses were performed for patients in the ITT population who had measurable disease as determined by the central imaging facility at baseline.
DoR by Central Radiological Review: ITT Population
Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study); in addition to a relative increase of 20%, the sum must have also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters
Percentage of Participants (≥2%) With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events NCI-CTCAE Grade 3 or Higher
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient administered a pharmaceutical product which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE could have been any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Pre-existing events, which increased in frequency or severity or changed in nature during or as a consequence of use of the study medication were also considered as AEs. All AEs were assessed for severity using the National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 3.0. If a particular AE was not listed in the NCI CTCAE Version 3.0, the following criteria were used: Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life threatening or disabling; Grade 5 = death.
PK Parameters of NKTR-102 or Irinotecan and Respective Metabolites
Blood samples for PK analysis were collected from 4 patients only, 3 from the irinotecan treatment arm and 1 from the NKTR-102 treatment arm. NKTR-102, irinotecan, SN38, SN38-G, 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecin, and 7-ethyl-10-(4-amino-1-piperidino) carbonyloxycamptothecin concentration levels were determined. However, due to the limited number of patients with PK samples, no further PK analysis was conducted.

Full Information

First Posted
March 3, 2009
Last Updated
July 9, 2021
Sponsor
Nektar Therapeutics
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00856375
Brief Title
NKTR-102 Versus Irinotecan in Patients With Second-Line, Irinotecan-Naïve, KRAS Mutant, Colorectal Cancer
Official Title
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of NKTR-102 Versus Irinotecan in Patients With Second-Line, Irinotecan-Naive, KRAS-Mutant, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Nektar Therapeutics

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will evaluate whether NKTR-102, an investigational drug has an anti-tumor effect in patients with colorectal cancer. This study will also evaluate how the safety and anti-tumor activity of NKTR-102 compares with irinotecan, a cancer drug that is approved for use in the US for treatment of patients with certain types of colorectal cancer.
Detailed Description
NKTR-102 (Topoisomerase I Inhibitor Polymer Conjugate) is a polyethylene glycol (PEG) conjugate of irinotecan. Irinotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor approved worldwide. In the US, irinotecan is indicated as a component of first-line therapy in combination with 5 fluorouracil (5 FU) and leucovorin for patients with metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum. Irinotecan is also indicated for patients with metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum whose disease has recurred or progressed following initial fluorouracil-based therapy. Second-line therapy for colorectal cancer typically involves cetuximab and irinotecan. However, growing evidence indicates that cetuximab (or other EGFR inhibitors) is not appropriate therapy for patients with mutant KRAS. For these patients, irinotecan may be appropriate as a single agent, and a new therapy that could improve upon efficacy and safety would provide an important option for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colorectal Cancer
Keywords
colorectal cancer, Colorectal cancer, second line

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
83 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
NKTR-102
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
NKTR-102 IV every 3 weeks
Arm Title
irinotecan
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
irinotecan IV every 3 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
NKTR-102
Other Intervention Name(s)
etirinotecan pegol
Intervention Description
IV every 3 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
irinotecan
Intervention Description
IV every 3 weeks
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of PFS by Central Radiological Review: ITT Population
Description
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of disease progression (assessed by central radiological review according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] 1.1) or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. PFS was determined using the intention-to-treat (ITT) population which included all randomized patients who underwent baseline evaluation, with treatment assigned according to randomized arm. For patients whose disease did not progress or who did not die, the PFS time was censored at the time of the last tumor assessment that demonstrated lack of disease progression. For patients who received new anti-cancer therapy, the PFS time was censored at the time of last tumor assessment prior to the new anti-cancer therapy starts.
Time Frame
Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study, approximately 42 months.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of OS: ITT Population
Description
Duration of OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Patients were followed until their date of death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or final database closure. Patients who were lost-to-follow-up or were not known to have died were censored at last date they were shown to be alive. Patients who did not have any follow-up since the date of randomization were censored at the date of randomization.
Time Frame
From randomization to death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or end of study, approximately 42 months.
Title
ORR by Central Radiological Review: ITT Population
Description
ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.1 based upon the best response as assessed by central radiological review; confirmation of response was not required. The analyses were performed for patients in the ITT population who had measurable disease as determined by the central imaging facility at baseline.
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study approximately 42 months
Title
DoR by Central Radiological Review: ITT Population
Description
Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study); in addition to a relative increase of 20%, the sum must have also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters
Time Frame
From the time measurement criteria for CR/PR (whichever was first recorded) were first met until the first date that recurrent disease or PD or death was objectively documented, assessed until the end of study approximately 42 months
Title
Percentage of Participants (≥2%) With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events NCI-CTCAE Grade 3 or Higher
Description
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient administered a pharmaceutical product which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE could have been any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Pre-existing events, which increased in frequency or severity or changed in nature during or as a consequence of use of the study medication were also considered as AEs. All AEs were assessed for severity using the National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 3.0. If a particular AE was not listed in the NCI CTCAE Version 3.0, the following criteria were used: Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life threatening or disabling; Grade 5 = death.
Time Frame
From the first dose of study medication through the End-of-Treatment visit (30 ± 3 days from last dose of study drug), assessed until the end of study approximately 42 months
Title
PK Parameters of NKTR-102 or Irinotecan and Respective Metabolites
Description
Blood samples for PK analysis were collected from 4 patients only, 3 from the irinotecan treatment arm and 1 from the NKTR-102 treatment arm. NKTR-102, irinotecan, SN38, SN38-G, 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecin, and 7-ethyl-10-(4-amino-1-piperidino) carbonyloxycamptothecin concentration levels were determined. However, due to the limited number of patients with PK samples, no further PK analysis was conducted.
Time Frame
Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 3 and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 4 and all subsequent cycles, until End of Study, approximately 42 months.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: metastatic colorectal cancer tumor with k-ras mutation Exclusion Criteria: More than 1 prior regimen for treatment of metastatic disease
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Study Director
Organizational Affiliation
Nektar Therapeutics
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Peoria
City
Peoria
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85381
Country
United States
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Burbank
City
Burbank
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91505
Country
United States
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Los Angeles
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90033
Country
United States
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Vallejo
City
Vallejo
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94589
Country
United States
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Centralia
City
Centralia
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
62801
Country
United States
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Louisville
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Detroit
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Buffalo
City
Buffalo
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Knoxville
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37909
Country
United States
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Antwerp
City
Antwerp
ZIP/Postal Code
2020
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Celle
City
Celle
ZIP/Postal Code
29223
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Karlsruhe
City
Karlsruhe
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Hyderabad
City
Hyderabad
State/Province
Andra Pradesh
ZIP/Postal Code
500004
Country
India
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Ahmedabad
City
Ahmedabad
State/Province
Gujarat
ZIP/Postal Code
380009
Country
India
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Bangalore
City
Bangalore
State/Province
Karnatak
ZIP/Postal Code
560054
Country
India
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Bangalore
City
Bangalore
State/Province
Karnatak
ZIP/Postal Code
560078
Country
India
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Kochi
City
Kochi
State/Province
Kerata
ZIP/Postal Code
682041
Country
India
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Mumbai
City
Mumbai
State/Province
Maharashtra
ZIP/Postal Code
91-98-50986003
Country
India
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Kolkata
City
Kolkata
State/Province
West Benagal
ZIP/Postal Code
700026
Country
India
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Kolkata
City
Kolkata
State/Province
West Bengal
ZIP/Postal Code
700053
Country
India
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Elche
City
Elche
ZIP/Postal Code
34-966-616250
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Madrid
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28034
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Aberdeen
City
Aberdeen
State/Province
Scotland
ZIP/Postal Code
AB25 2ZN
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Investigator Site - Manchester
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
MD20 4BX
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

NKTR-102 Versus Irinotecan in Patients With Second-Line, Irinotecan-Naïve, KRAS Mutant, Colorectal Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs