Quetiapine XR Versus Sertraline in Acute Bipolar Depression as add-on Therapy
Primary Purpose
Bipolar Disorder, Bipolar Depression
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Extended release quetiapine (quetiapine XR)
Sertraline
adequate mood stabilizer
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Bipolar Disorder focused on measuring Bipolar disorder, Bipolar depression, quetiapine, sertraline
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult ambulatory patients diagnosed of bipolar disorder I or II, current depressive episode (DSM-IV-TR 4ª Ed: 296.5x or 296.89 codes)
- Have been treated with only one mood stabilizer (lithium or valproate) in optimal and stable doses during at least the previous 4 weeks to randomization
- Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) total score ≥ 20 and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score ≤ 14 at the screening and randomization visits - Informed consent signed
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with any axis I or II Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR) diagnoses different from bipolar disorder I or II - Length of current depressive episode less than 2 weeks or more than 12 months
- Having been treated with more than one mood stabilizer or any mood stabilizer other than Lithium or valproate, any antidepressant, any antipsychotic or any CP450-3A inductor/inhibitor within the 7 days period prior to randomization
Sites / Locations
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Quetiapine Extended Release
Sertraline
Arm Description
Lithium or valproate at stable doses within seric therapeutic levels
Lithium or valproate at stable doses within seric therapeutic levels
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms)
Secondary Outcome Measures
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms)
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms)
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms)
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score
CGI-BP-M assesses severity of clinical status. It ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 7 ( higher scores indicating a greater clinical severity)
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score
CGI-BP-M assesses severity of clinical status. It ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 7 ( higher scores indicating a greater clinical severity)
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score
CGI-BP-M assesses severity of clinical status. It ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 7 ( higher scores indicating a greater clinical severity)
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score
CGI-BP-M assesses severity of clinical status. It ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 7 (higher scores indicating a greater clinical severity)
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) Total Score
HARS assesses severity of anxiety symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 56 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of anxiety symptoms)
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) Total Score
HARS assesses severity of anxiety symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 56 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of anxiety symptoms)
Number of Patients Response at Week 1
Number of patients responded to the treatment at week 1, where response is defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to week 1.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Number of Patients With Response at Week 2
Number of patients responded to the treatment at week 2, where response is defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to week 2.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Number of Patients With Response at Week 4.
Number of patients responded to the treatment at week 4, where response is defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to week 4.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Number of Patients With Response at Week 8.
Number of patients responded to the treatment at week 8, where response is defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to week 8.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Number of Patients With Remission at Week 1.
Number of patients who achieved remission at week 1, where remission is defined as Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≤ 10.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Number of Patients With Remission at Week 2.
Number of patients who achieved remission at week 2, where remission is defined as Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≤ 10.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Number of Patients With Remission at Week 4.
Number of patients who achieved remission at week 4, where remission is defined as Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≤ 10.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Number of Patients With Remission at Week 8.
Number of patients who achieved remission at week 8, where remission is defined as Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≤ 10.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00857584
Brief Title
Quetiapine XR Versus Sertraline in Acute Bipolar Depression as add-on Therapy
Official Title
Effectiveness of Quetiapine XR Versus Sertraline in Acute Depression as add-on Therapy to Previous Mood Stabilizer Treatment: a Pilot Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2011 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
AstraZeneca
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Prospective, open-label, controlled (active comparator), randomized study of 8 weeks follow-up for the evaluation of the efficacy of extended release quetiapine (quetiapine XR) versus Sertraline in addition to previous mood stabilizer treatment (lithium or valproate at stable and clinically therapeutic blood levels) in the treatment of the adult bipolar depression. This multicentric study will be featured in two sites in Spain.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Bipolar Disorder, Bipolar Depression
Keywords
Bipolar disorder, Bipolar depression, quetiapine, sertraline
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
27 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Quetiapine Extended Release
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Lithium or valproate at stable doses within seric therapeutic levels
Arm Title
Sertraline
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Lithium or valproate at stable doses within seric therapeutic levels
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Extended release quetiapine (quetiapine XR)
Other Intervention Name(s)
SEROQUEL XR®
Intervention Description
Flexible dose from 300 to 600 mg/d (combination of tablets of 50mg, 200mg and 300mg) oral, daily, 8 weeks length.
Quetiapine XR was initiated at 50 mg/day and titrated to 100 mg on day 2, 200 mg on day 3, 300 mg on day 4, and flexible doses of 300 to 600 mg/d from day 5 to the end of the study.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Sertraline
Other Intervention Name(s)
Zoloft
Intervention Description
Flexible dose from 50 to 200 mg/d (combination of tablets of 50mg and 100mg) oral, daily, 8 weeks length.
Sertraline titration: 50 mg on day 1-3, 100 mg on day 4, and flexible doses of 50 to 200 mg/d from day 5 to the end of the study.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
adequate mood stabilizer
Intervention Description
An adequate mood stabilizer treatment with lithium or valproate(defined as a serum concentration of 0.5-1.2 mEq/L or 50-100 microg/ml, respectively).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
Description
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms)
Time Frame
baseline, week 2
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
Description
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms)
Time Frame
baseline, week 1
Title
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
Description
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms)
Time Frame
baseline, week 4
Title
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
Description
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms)
Time Frame
baseline. week 8
Title
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score
Description
CGI-BP-M assesses severity of clinical status. It ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 7 ( higher scores indicating a greater clinical severity)
Time Frame
baseline, week 1
Title
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score
Description
CGI-BP-M assesses severity of clinical status. It ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 7 ( higher scores indicating a greater clinical severity)
Time Frame
baseline, week 2
Title
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score
Description
CGI-BP-M assesses severity of clinical status. It ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 7 ( higher scores indicating a greater clinical severity)
Time Frame
baseline, week 4
Title
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score
Description
CGI-BP-M assesses severity of clinical status. It ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 7 (higher scores indicating a greater clinical severity)
Time Frame
baseline, week 8
Title
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) Total Score
Description
HARS assesses severity of anxiety symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 56 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of anxiety symptoms)
Time Frame
baseline, week 4
Title
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) Total Score
Description
HARS assesses severity of anxiety symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 56 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of anxiety symptoms)
Time Frame
baseline, week 8
Title
Number of Patients Response at Week 1
Description
Number of patients responded to the treatment at week 1, where response is defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to week 1.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Time Frame
week 1
Title
Number of Patients With Response at Week 2
Description
Number of patients responded to the treatment at week 2, where response is defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to week 2.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Time Frame
week 2
Title
Number of Patients With Response at Week 4.
Description
Number of patients responded to the treatment at week 4, where response is defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to week 4.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Time Frame
week 4
Title
Number of Patients With Response at Week 8.
Description
Number of patients responded to the treatment at week 8, where response is defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to week 8.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Time Frame
week 8
Title
Number of Patients With Remission at Week 1.
Description
Number of patients who achieved remission at week 1, where remission is defined as Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≤ 10.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Time Frame
week 1
Title
Number of Patients With Remission at Week 2.
Description
Number of patients who achieved remission at week 2, where remission is defined as Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≤ 10.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Time Frame
week 2
Title
Number of Patients With Remission at Week 4.
Description
Number of patients who achieved remission at week 4, where remission is defined as Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≤ 10.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Time Frame
week 4
Title
Number of Patients With Remission at Week 8.
Description
Number of patients who achieved remission at week 8, where remission is defined as Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≤ 10.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Time Frame
week 8
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adult ambulatory patients diagnosed of bipolar disorder I or II, current depressive episode (DSM-IV-TR 4ª Ed: 296.5x or 296.89 codes)
Have been treated with only one mood stabilizer (lithium or valproate) in optimal and stable doses during at least the previous 4 weeks to randomization
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) total score ≥ 20 and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score ≤ 14 at the screening and randomization visits - Informed consent signed
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with any axis I or II Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR) diagnoses different from bipolar disorder I or II - Length of current depressive episode less than 2 weeks or more than 12 months
Having been treated with more than one mood stabilizer or any mood stabilizer other than Lithium or valproate, any antidepressant, any antipsychotic or any CP450-3A inductor/inhibitor within the 7 days period prior to randomization
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Santander
State/Province
Cantabria
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Zamora
State/Province
Castilla-León
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Vigo
State/Province
Galicia
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Vitoria
State/Province
Pais Vasco
Country
Spain
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Quetiapine XR Versus Sertraline in Acute Bipolar Depression as add-on Therapy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs