search
Back to results

Percutaneous Dynamic Stabilization (PDS) System Versus Fusion for Treating Degenerative Disc Disease

Primary Purpose

Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PDS System
Fusion
Sponsored by
Interventional Spine, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease focused on measuring back pain, Spine, Spinal, Lower back pain, Lumbar, Lumbar Pain, DDD, Degenerative Disc Disease

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Confirmation of DDD (back pain with degeneration of the disc by patient history, physical exam, and radiographic studies and with one or more of the following factors:

    • Osteophyte formation of facet joints or vertebral endplates
    • Facet joint degeneration (no more than mild to moderate)
    • Subjects with ≤50% collapse of disc as compared to the adjacent level
    • Subjects with or without a contained herniated nucleus pulposus <5 mm and no free fragment
  2. Skeletally mature subjects aged between 18 and 70 years of age inclusive.
  3. Subjects with primarily back pain associated with degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine at one level or two adjacent levels from L3 through S1. Subjects may have a lesser degree of leg pain at the same level(s).
  4. Subjects who require surgical or minimally invasive intervention, who have failed to adequately improve following 6 months of non-operative therapy.
  5. Subject is a surgical candidate for a posterior approach to the lumbar spine and is suitable for fusion using pedicle screw systems
  6. Subjects with a minimum baseline Oswestry Score of 40% (20/50).
  7. Subjects with a minimum baseline VAS Score of 40/100 mm.
  8. MRI diagnostic for DDD within 3 months of the screening visit.
  9. Subjects who are mentally, physically and psychosocially able to cooperate with the study procedures and return for all required follow-up visits.
  10. Subjects who are able to understand this study and have given voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects who have leg pain greater than back pain.
  2. Subjects with severe facet degeneration, radiographic findings of severe facet joint disease, degeneration or misshapen facet(s) or structural anomalies at the target level(s) that would preclude placement of the PDS device or pedicle screw systems.
  3. Subjects who require a pedicle screw smaller than 4.5 mm.
  4. Subjects with Modic 3 bone changes at the target level(s).
  5. Spondylolisthesis > Grade 1 and/or spondylolysis at the target level(s).
  6. Subjects with myelopathy or cauda equina syndrome, defined as neural compression causing neurogenic bowel (rectal incontinence) or bladder dysfunction (retention or incontinence).
  7. Subjects with fixed motor deficit and/or peripheral neuropathy.
  8. Subjects with prior discectomy at the target level(s).
  9. Subjects with prior spine surgery, trauma, metastatic disease, or spinal deformity due to scoliosis (Cobb angle > 15 degrees) or kyphosis (> 11 degrees) at any lumbar level.
  10. Subjects who have used any investigational drug or device within the past 30 days or have had an experimental spinal implant at any time.
  11. Subjects with active local or systemic infection.
  12. Subjects with osteoporosis. A screening questionnaire for osteoporosis, SCORE (Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation), will be used to screen subjects. If DEXA is required, exclusion will be defined as a DEXA bone density measured T scored < -1.0.
  13. Subjects with metabolic bone disease (e.g. osteomalacia, Paget's disease).
  14. Subjects with rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune spondyloarthropathies.
  15. Subjects with a systemic disease that compromises life expectancy (e.g. HIV, AIDS, hepatitis) or are on immuno-suppressive agents.
  16. Subjects who are taking any drug known to potentially interfere with bony/soft tissue healing, (e.g., steroids at any dose daily within the last 12 months).
  17. Subjects with active malignancy: A subject with a history of any invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer), unless s/he has been treated with curative intent and there have been no clinical signs or symptoms of malignancy for at least 5 years.
  18. Subjects with a known allergy to titanium and/or polycarbonate urethane (PCU).
  19. Subjects who have existing conditions or pending litigation claims that could compromise their participation, follow-up care, or treatment outcomes (e.g., drug or alcohol abuse).
  20. Subjects with a BMI of ≥ 40 kg/m2 or weight > 275 pounds (125 kg).
  21. Subjects who are pregnant or are planning a pregnancy during the study period.
  22. Subjects who are prisoners.

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

PDS System

Fusion

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
April 7, 2009
Last Updated
February 19, 2013
Sponsor
Interventional Spine, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00878579
Brief Title
Percutaneous Dynamic Stabilization (PDS) System Versus Fusion for Treating Degenerative Disc Disease
Official Title
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the PDS System to Treat Back Pain Associated With Degenerative Disc Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Sponsor Termination
Study Start Date
March 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Interventional Spine, Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the PDS System compared to the surgical control of posterolateral fusion with autograft and pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of one or two levels from L3-S1 to relieve back pain associated with degenerative disc disease.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
Keywords
back pain, Spine, Spinal, Lower back pain, Lumbar, Lumbar Pain, DDD, Degenerative Disc Disease

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
PDS System
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Fusion
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
PDS System
Intervention Description
Percutaneous Dynamic Stabilization System
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Fusion
Intervention Description
Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (TLIF) with Autograft and Pedicle Screws
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame
2 Years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Confirmation of DDD (back pain with degeneration of the disc by patient history, physical exam, and radiographic studies and with one or more of the following factors: Osteophyte formation of facet joints or vertebral endplates Facet joint degeneration (no more than mild to moderate) Subjects with ≤50% collapse of disc as compared to the adjacent level Subjects with or without a contained herniated nucleus pulposus <5 mm and no free fragment Skeletally mature subjects aged between 18 and 70 years of age inclusive. Subjects with primarily back pain associated with degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine at one level or two adjacent levels from L3 through S1. Subjects may have a lesser degree of leg pain at the same level(s). Subjects who require surgical or minimally invasive intervention, who have failed to adequately improve following 6 months of non-operative therapy. Subject is a surgical candidate for a posterior approach to the lumbar spine and is suitable for fusion using pedicle screw systems Subjects with a minimum baseline Oswestry Score of 40% (20/50). Subjects with a minimum baseline VAS Score of 40/100 mm. MRI diagnostic for DDD within 3 months of the screening visit. Subjects who are mentally, physically and psychosocially able to cooperate with the study procedures and return for all required follow-up visits. Subjects who are able to understand this study and have given voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this study. Exclusion Criteria: Subjects who have leg pain greater than back pain. Subjects with severe facet degeneration, radiographic findings of severe facet joint disease, degeneration or misshapen facet(s) or structural anomalies at the target level(s) that would preclude placement of the PDS device or pedicle screw systems. Subjects who require a pedicle screw smaller than 4.5 mm. Subjects with Modic 3 bone changes at the target level(s). Spondylolisthesis > Grade 1 and/or spondylolysis at the target level(s). Subjects with myelopathy or cauda equina syndrome, defined as neural compression causing neurogenic bowel (rectal incontinence) or bladder dysfunction (retention or incontinence). Subjects with fixed motor deficit and/or peripheral neuropathy. Subjects with prior discectomy at the target level(s). Subjects with prior spine surgery, trauma, metastatic disease, or spinal deformity due to scoliosis (Cobb angle > 15 degrees) or kyphosis (> 11 degrees) at any lumbar level. Subjects who have used any investigational drug or device within the past 30 days or have had an experimental spinal implant at any time. Subjects with active local or systemic infection. Subjects with osteoporosis. A screening questionnaire for osteoporosis, SCORE (Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation), will be used to screen subjects. If DEXA is required, exclusion will be defined as a DEXA bone density measured T scored < -1.0. Subjects with metabolic bone disease (e.g. osteomalacia, Paget's disease). Subjects with rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune spondyloarthropathies. Subjects with a systemic disease that compromises life expectancy (e.g. HIV, AIDS, hepatitis) or are on immuno-suppressive agents. Subjects who are taking any drug known to potentially interfere with bony/soft tissue healing, (e.g., steroids at any dose daily within the last 12 months). Subjects with active malignancy: A subject with a history of any invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer), unless s/he has been treated with curative intent and there have been no clinical signs or symptoms of malignancy for at least 5 years. Subjects with a known allergy to titanium and/or polycarbonate urethane (PCU). Subjects who have existing conditions or pending litigation claims that could compromise their participation, follow-up care, or treatment outcomes (e.g., drug or alcohol abuse). Subjects with a BMI of ≥ 40 kg/m2 or weight > 275 pounds (125 kg). Subjects who are pregnant or are planning a pregnancy during the study period. Subjects who are prisoners.
Facility Information:
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Willow Grove
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Percutaneous Dynamic Stabilization (PDS) System Versus Fusion for Treating Degenerative Disc Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs