search
Back to results

Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Clinical Trial to Heal Articular Cartilage Defects

Primary Purpose

Defect of Articular Cartilage

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
Norway
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
stem cells
Chondrocytes
Rehabilitation program
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Akershus
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Defect of Articular Cartilage focused on measuring Cartilage defect, chondrocytes, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), femoral condyle, knee

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 50 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Norwegian citizens
  • A full-thickness cartilage lesion (diameter > 15 mm, but less than 6 cm2 and Lysholm score < 75 points) located on the femoral condyle

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with malignment of the knee
  • Other knee pathology such as ACL injury or a nontreated meniscus injury will not be included in the study to avoid the impact of these knee pathologies on the final results

Sites / Locations

  • Oslo UniversityHospital-Ullevaal

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Stem cells

Rehabilitation

Arm Description

Cartilage defect are treated surgical either with chondrocytes or stem cells

Active rehabilitation program

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Lysholm score

Secondary Outcome Measures

Radiographics

Full Information

First Posted
April 17, 2009
Last Updated
October 14, 2015
Sponsor
University Hospital, Akershus
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00885729
Brief Title
Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Clinical Trial to Heal Articular Cartilage Defects
Official Title
Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Clinical Trial to Heal Articular Cartilage Defects
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2018 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Akershus

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to: Compare the treatment efficacy of autologous mesenchymal stem cells (Mesenchymal Stem Cells) versus chondrocytes implanted in a commercial available scaffold in a human clinical trial. Determine the effects of specific three months strength training program preoperatively to improve knee function and possible postpone the need of cartilage repair surgery. Determine if degenerative changes occur in the knee joints following cartilage repair. This question will be investigated in the proposed clinical trial. Determine the characteristics of patients treated either by surgery or by rehabilitation in a long-term follow-up (1, 5 years).
Detailed Description
Musculoskeletal diseases are growing in the Norwegian population and are currently the largest group of the chronic diseases (31%). Musculoskeletal diseases are the largest cause of disability on the working part of our population (49%). The most frequent problems are rheumatism, osteoarthritis and unspecific back pain. The most common known etiology is traumatic events towards the joint. Often, the degenerative development starts with a small injury to the cartilage on weightbearing surface of the joint. This leads to changes in the surrounding cartilage, indicative of degenerative joint disease or arthrosis. When the injured area becomes larger than 2 cm2, the patients seem to experience pain. Our group has shown that 11% of patients, who underwent an arthroscopy for knee pain, had a cartilage injury on weightbearing surface with depth down to bone (grade IV) (Aroen et al.).Unfortunately, articular cartilage shows a very limited capacity of healing. Several surgical techniques have been developed to fill the cartilage defects, but so far none of them have been able to produce normal cartilage Chondrocyte implantation techniques are at date the most popular treatment, but have not demonstrated their superiority to other cartilage repair techniques. Some clinical randomised studies exist though a more thorough review of the cartilage repair methods in a study by Jakobsen and coauthors verified that no conclusion could be made considering treatment options for articular cartilage injury (Jakobsen, Engebretsen, and Slauterbeck). Although the natural history of these lesions is not finally outlined it is clear that for some patients the disruption of the cartilage surface imposes disability especially for the young athlete. The clinical studies report a significant improvement from the preoperative status although full knee function is not obtained with either of the techniques available today (Bentley et al.;Brittberg et al.;Horas et al.;Knutsen et al.). The expected Lysholm score of 80 and the standard deviation tends to be large or is not reported which illustrating the considerable variation and that full knee function is not obtained (Peterson et al.).The impact of disrupting the cartilage surface to obtain chondrocytes for culturing has not gained much attention in the clinical studies using this repair method. However it is reported that adverse effects exist as a result of this harvesting of chondrocytes for culturing (Whittaker et al.). Whittaker and coauthors observed that the harvesting of chondrocytes for cell culturing and subsequent implantation in talus resulted in a mean 15 points reduction in Lysholm score in 7 out of 10 patients. Furthermore, additional even in the best hands a mean Lysholm score of 79 are obtained for a single lesion at the femoral condyle (Peterson et al.). Even though the new scaffolds seem to reduce the rate of reoperation as a result of graft hypertrophy from 21 % to 9 %, the harvesting procedure of cartilage may still contribute to the suboptimal by this approach (Bartlett et al.;Gooding et al.). Consequently, there is a need for a better causing less morbidity when harvesting. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) represent an alternative cell source with the potential of generating hyaline cartilage without the same adverse effects. In addition with MSC more cells will be available for culturing with the potential of treatment of larger lesions possible. Furthermore, the repair potential of mesenchymal stem cells is not expected to decrease with age indicating that also the aging athlete may benefit from a procedure based on cartilage repair with this cell source (Dressler, Butler, and Boivin). The use of mesenchymal stem cell aspirate from the iliaca crest under a periosteum flap support the view that this might be an option to treat knee cartilage defects with success, although this study also has periosteum hypertrophy as a side effect in one of the patients (Slynarski, Deszczynski, and Karpinski). The beneficial effects of this therapy has also been reported in other studies both clinical and experimental ones (Takagi et al.;Wakitani et al.;Wakitani et al.;Wakitani et al.). Thus, the current project will investigate if the similar results can be obtained with mesenchymal stem cells as with chondrocytes both delivered in a commercial available scaffold in clinical trial with patients eligible for the current treatment options.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Defect of Articular Cartilage
Keywords
Cartilage defect, chondrocytes, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), femoral condyle, knee

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Stem cells
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Cartilage defect are treated surgical either with chondrocytes or stem cells
Arm Title
Rehabilitation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Active rehabilitation program
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
stem cells
Intervention Description
Stem cells or chondrocytes under a commercial available membrane
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Chondrocytes
Intervention Description
Implantation of chondrocytes
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Rehabilitation program
Intervention Description
Strength exercises, neuromuscular exercises
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Lysholm score
Time Frame
2018
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Radiographics
Time Frame
Two and five years
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Return to work
Description
Return to work one year after surgery
Time Frame
1 Year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Norwegian citizens A full-thickness cartilage lesion (diameter > 15 mm, but less than 6 cm2 and Lysholm score < 75 points) located on the femoral condyle Exclusion Criteria: Patients with malignment of the knee Other knee pathology such as ACL injury or a nontreated meniscus injury will not be included in the study to avoid the impact of these knee pathologies on the final results
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lars Engebretsen, MD,PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Professor
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Oslo UniversityHospital-Ullevaal
City
Oslo
ZIP/Postal Code
0481
Country
Norway

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26868015
Citation
Aroen A, Brogger H, Rotterud JH, Sivertsen EA, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA. Evaluation of focal cartilage lesions of the knee using MRI T2 mapping and delayed Gadolinium Enhanced MRI of Cartilage (dGEMRIC). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Feb 11;17:73. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0941-y.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
24661577
Citation
Rotterud JH, Reinholt FP, Beckstrom KJ, Risberg MA, Aroen A. Relationship between CTX-II and patient characteristics, patient-reported outcome, muscle strength, and rehabilitation in patients with a focal cartilage lesion of the knee: a prospective exploratory cohort study of 48 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Mar 24;15:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-99.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
23485794
Citation
Wondrasch B, Aroen A, Rotterud JH, Hoysveen T, Bolstad K, Risberg MA. The feasibility of a 3-month active rehabilitation program for patients with knee full-thickness articular cartilage lesions: the Oslo Cartilage Active Rehabilitation and Education Study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 May;43(5):310-24. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4354. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Clinical Trial to Heal Articular Cartilage Defects

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs