search
Back to results

Vitrification Versus Slow Cooling of Human Cleavage Stage Embryos

Primary Purpose

Infertility

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
embryo vitrification
Sponsored by
UMC Utrecht
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Infertility focused on measuring IVF, embryo cryopreservation, vitrification, slow cooling, slow freezing, surplus embryos, Human Reproduction

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 35 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • female patient age 35 years or less
  • embryos are obtained by in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intra cytoplasmatic spermatozoon injection (ICSI)
  • single embryo transfer
  • 1rst IVF/ICSI treatment with an embryo transfer
  • availability of cryopreservable embryos

Exclusion Criteria:

  • female patient age is 36 years or older
  • participants of oocyte donation program
  • participants of percutaneous spermatozoon aspiration (PESA) program
  • couples with a finite source of spermatozoa
  • absence of cryopreservable embryos

Sites / Locations

  • Academic Hospital of Brussels
  • University Medical Center of Utrecht

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Vitrification

Slow cooling

Arm Description

The embryos of patients allocated to this arm will be cryopreserved by vitrification.

The embryos of patients allocated to this arm will be cryopreserved by the slow cooling method, which is the standard method (=no intervention)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The percent change of the ongoing pregnancy rate per patient/couple who use their thawed embryos (following a fesh embryo transfer which did not result in an ongoing pregnancy) from baseline (slow cooling) to end point (vitrification).

Secondary Outcome Measures

post-thaw embryo survival rate
ongoing pregnancy rate per patient using their thawed embryos (independent of whether they became pregnant following a fresh embryo transfer or not
implantation rate per thawed embryo
implantation rate per transferred thawed embryo
cumulative implantation rate per cryopreservation
ongoing pregnancy rate per frozen-thaw cycle
average number of frozen-thawed cycles per patient
post thaw development (categorial) per thawed embryo
average number of cryo-thaw cycles to ongoing pregnancy
average number of thawed embryos to ongoing implantation
Life birth rate

Full Information

First Posted
April 22, 2009
Last Updated
November 26, 2014
Sponsor
UMC Utrecht
Collaborators
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00886431
Brief Title
Vitrification Versus Slow Cooling of Human Cleavage Stage Embryos
Official Title
A Double Blinded, Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Vitrification to Slow Cooling in Cryopreserving Human Preimplantation Embryos
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Study Start Date
May 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
UMC Utrecht
Collaborators
Vrije Universiteit Brussel

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Human embryos can be preserved for later transfers by freezing. Traditionally the slow cooling method has been used. About 70% of the embryos remain fully intact after thawing. However, the remaining 30% of the embryos become (partially) damaged, and this freezing damage reduces their chance to implant. Recently an ultra rapid freezing method, called vitrification has been developed. During vitrification no damaging ice crystals are formed and the embryo freezes in a glass like state. It appears that the freezing damage is reduced when embryos are vitrified. Observational studies in humans indicate that embryos are successfully preserved by vitrification, as indicated by promising pregnancy rates following thawing. However, the effectiveness of vitrification in relation to slow cooling with respect to pregnancy rates has so far not been evaluated by a randomised, controlled trial. The aim of this study is to investigate whether vitrification significantly improves embryo survival and ongoing pregnancy rates when compared to embryos frozen by slow cooling.
Detailed Description
time of allocation: following embryo selection type of embryos: cleavage stage -, morula stage or early blastocyst stage embryo (day3 - day4 after oocyte collection) cryoprotectants: sucrose, dimethylsulfoxide, ethyleneglycol vitrification storage device: high security vitrification straws

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Infertility
Keywords
IVF, embryo cryopreservation, vitrification, slow cooling, slow freezing, surplus embryos, Human Reproduction

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare Provider
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
146 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Vitrification
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The embryos of patients allocated to this arm will be cryopreserved by vitrification.
Arm Title
Slow cooling
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
The embryos of patients allocated to this arm will be cryopreserved by the slow cooling method, which is the standard method (=no intervention)
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
embryo vitrification
Other Intervention Name(s)
vitrification, high security vitrification straws
Intervention Description
Ultra rapid cooling of embryos by immersion in liquid nitrogen. The formation of potentially damaging ice crystals is prevented by briefly incubating the embryos in high concentrations of a mix of cryoprotectants.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The percent change of the ongoing pregnancy rate per patient/couple who use their thawed embryos (following a fesh embryo transfer which did not result in an ongoing pregnancy) from baseline (slow cooling) to end point (vitrification).
Time Frame
ongoing pregnancy is established 10 weeks following the transfer of a frozen embryo
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
post-thaw embryo survival rate
Time Frame
1 hour after thawing
Title
ongoing pregnancy rate per patient using their thawed embryos (independent of whether they became pregnant following a fresh embryo transfer or not
Time Frame
10 weeks following transfer of frozen thawed embryo
Title
implantation rate per thawed embryo
Time Frame
10 weeks after transfer of thawed embryo
Title
implantation rate per transferred thawed embryo
Time Frame
10 weeks after transfer of thawed embryo
Title
cumulative implantation rate per cryopreservation
Time Frame
10 weeks after thawed embryo transfer
Title
ongoing pregnancy rate per frozen-thaw cycle
Time Frame
10 weeks following thawed embryo transfer
Title
average number of frozen-thawed cycles per patient
Time Frame
is variable
Title
post thaw development (categorial) per thawed embryo
Time Frame
24 hours following thawing
Title
average number of cryo-thaw cycles to ongoing pregnancy
Time Frame
variable, up to 3 years
Title
average number of thawed embryos to ongoing implantation
Time Frame
variable, up to 3 years
Title
Life birth rate
Time Frame
9 month after pregnancy test

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
35 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: female patient age 35 years or less embryos are obtained by in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intra cytoplasmatic spermatozoon injection (ICSI) single embryo transfer 1rst IVF/ICSI treatment with an embryo transfer availability of cryopreservable embryos Exclusion Criteria: female patient age is 36 years or older participants of oocyte donation program participants of percutaneous spermatozoon aspiration (PESA) program couples with a finite source of spermatozoa absence of cryopreservable embryos
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bart C Fauser, Prof.,MD,PhD
Organizational Affiliation
UMC Utrecht
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Academic Hospital of Brussels
City
Brussels
ZIP/Postal Code
1090
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
University Medical Center of Utrecht
City
Utrecht
ZIP/Postal Code
3584 CX
Country
Netherlands

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16541460
Citation
Boonkusol D, Gal AB, Bodo S, Gorhony B, Kitiyanant Y, Dinnyes A. Gene expression profiles and in vitro development following vitrification of pronuclear and 8-cell stage mouse embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 2006 Jun;73(6):700-8. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20450.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10519629
Citation
Burns WN, Gaudet TW, Martin MB, Leal YR, Schoen H, Eddy CA, Schenken RS. Survival of cryopreservation and thawing with all blastomeres intact identifies multicell embryos with superior frozen embryo transfer outcome. Fertil Steril. 1999 Sep;72(3):527-32. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00280-0.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17298725
Citation
Desai N, Blackmon H, Szeptycki J, Goldfarb J. Cryoloop vitrification of human day 3 cleavage-stage embryos: post-vitrification development, pregnancy outcomes and live births. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007 Feb;14(2):208-13. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60789-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10611209
Citation
Edgar DH, Bourne H, Speirs AL, McBain JC. A quantitative analysis of the impact of cryopreservation on the implantation potential of human early cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod. 2000 Jan;15(1):175-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.1.175.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15333245
Citation
Kasai M, Mukaida T. Cryopreservation of animal and human embryos by vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Aug;9(2):164-70. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62125-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11532492
Citation
Mukaida T, Nakamura S, Tomiyama T, Wada S, Kasai M, Takahashi K. Successful birth after transfer of vitrified human blastocysts with use of a cryoloop containerless technique. Fertil Steril. 2001 Sep;76(3):618-20. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01968-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16274602
Citation
Rama Raju GA, Haranath GB, Krishna KM, Prakash GJ, Madan K. Vitrification of human 8-cell embryos, a modified protocol for better pregnancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Oct;11(4):434-7. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61135-2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16684837
Citation
Salumets A, Suikkari AM, Makinen S, Karro H, Roos A, Tuuri T. Frozen embryo transfers: implications of clinical and embryological factors on the pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod. 2006 Sep;21(9):2368-74. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del151. Epub 2006 May 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16950825
Citation
Sheehan CB, Lane M, Gardner DK. The CryoLoop facilitates re-vitrification of embryos at four successive stages of development without impairing embryo growth. Hum Reprod. 2006 Nov;21(11):2978-84. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del253. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16102287
Citation
Stehlik E, Stehlik J, Katayama KP, Kuwayama M, Jambor V, Brohammer R, Kato O. Vitrification demonstrates significant improvement versus slow freezing of human blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Jul;11(1):53-7. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61298-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16009162
Citation
Takahashi K, Mukaida T, Goto T, Oka C. Perinatal outcome of blastocyst transfer with vitrification using cryoloop: a 4-year follow-up study. Fertil Steril. 2005 Jul;84(1):88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.12.051.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17359578
Citation
Al-Hasani S, Ozmen B, Koutlaki N, Schoepper B, Diedrich K, Schultze-Mosgau A. Three years of routine vitrification of human zygotes: is it still fair to advocate slow-rate freezing? Reprod Biomed Online. 2007 Mar;14(3):288-93. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60869-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16762345
Citation
Liebermann J, Tucker MJ. Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application. Fertil Steril. 2006 Jul;86(1):20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.01.029. Epub 2006 Jun 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11334922
Citation
Yokota Y, Sato S, Yokota M, Yokota H, Araki Y. Birth of a healthy baby following vitrification of human blastocysts. Fertil Steril. 2001 May;75(5):1027-9. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01685-5.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Vitrification Versus Slow Cooling of Human Cleavage Stage Embryos

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs