Fluticasone Versus Esomeprazole to Treat Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Primary Purpose
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Swallowed fluticasone
Esomeprazole
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Eosinophilic Esophagitis focused on measuring Eosinophilic esophagitis, acid reflux
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with an established diagnosis of EE defined as > 20 eosinophils/HPF in the setting of dysphagia or food impaction.
- Males and females age > 18 years of age.
- Ability to undergo ambulatory pH monitoring.
- DEERS (Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System) eligible.
- Willingness to take a one month holiday from a PPI or steroids if they have been prescribed this prior to enrollment.
- Willingness to participate and have additional biopsies taken during endoscopy and answer a questionnaire.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients < 18 years of age.
- Inability to give consent.
- Inability to undergo endoscopy or contraindications to endoscopy. Any medical condition or disorder (including drug allergies), which would preclude the use of conscious sedation or the ability to tolerate upper endoscopy.
- Contraindications to proton pump inhibitors or steroids.
- Inability to accurately fill out a short questionnaire.
- Pregnant females. A urine beta human chorionic gonadotropin (BHCG) prior to endoscopy will be offered to all female patients of child bearing potential (exceptions include post-menopausal, hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation). Positive BHCG results will prevent enrollment.
- Known coagulation abnormalities, thrombocytopenia and patients on coumadin.
Sites / Locations
- Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Swallowed fluticasone
Esomeprazole
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of Participants Who Responded
Histologic resolution of esophageal eosinophilia. Response is defined as achieving < 7 eosinophils/high power field in both the proximal and distal esophagus.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Symptom Score
Using a validated questionnaire, symptoms will be assessed at baseline and following therapy.
Endoscopic Change
Following therapy, resolution of EE findings will be assessed.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00895817
First Posted
May 6, 2009
Last Updated
March 11, 2013
Sponsor
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00895817
Brief Title
Fluticasone Versus Esomeprazole to Treat Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Official Title
Comparison of Aerosolized Swallowed Fluticasone to Esomeprazole for the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2010 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in comparison to aerosolized swallowed steroids for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EE). EE is an increasingly recognized disorder that has been associated with dysphagia and food impaction. The presence of anatomical abnormalities in the esophagus such as longitudinal furrows, corrugated rings and a narrow caliber esophagus with friable mucosa are classic endoscopic findings. Diagnosis is established with the histologic finding of large numbers (> 15) of eosinophils per high power field. The underlying pathologic mechanism remains poorly understood but food allergies and aeroallergens have been implicated. It is well known that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may cause esophageal eosinophilia, but it is unclear whether a complex relationship exists between GERD and EE, as recent data suggests. Furthermore, a large number of patients with clinical presentations and endoscopic findings highly suggestive of EE which is confirmed on histology are responding favorably to proton pump inhibitors.
The aims of the study are to (1) compare the clinical efficacy of aerosolized swallowed Fluticasone to Esomeprazole for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis, (2) determine whether proton pump inhibitors are effective in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis, (3) determine the number of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis that have coexisting gastroesophageal reflux disease, and (4) correlate change in eosinophil count to improvement in symptoms before and after therapy.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Keywords
Eosinophilic esophagitis, acid reflux
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
42 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Swallowed fluticasone
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Esomeprazole
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Swallowed fluticasone
Intervention Description
440 µg twice daily for 8 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Esomeprazole
Intervention Description
40 mg once daily for 8 weeks
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants Who Responded
Description
Histologic resolution of esophageal eosinophilia. Response is defined as achieving < 7 eosinophils/high power field in both the proximal and distal esophagus.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Symptom Score
Description
Using a validated questionnaire, symptoms will be assessed at baseline and following therapy.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Endoscopic Change
Description
Following therapy, resolution of EE findings will be assessed.
Time Frame
8 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with an established diagnosis of EE defined as > 20 eosinophils/HPF in the setting of dysphagia or food impaction.
Males and females age > 18 years of age.
Ability to undergo ambulatory pH monitoring.
DEERS (Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System) eligible.
Willingness to take a one month holiday from a PPI or steroids if they have been prescribed this prior to enrollment.
Willingness to participate and have additional biopsies taken during endoscopy and answer a questionnaire.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients < 18 years of age.
Inability to give consent.
Inability to undergo endoscopy or contraindications to endoscopy. Any medical condition or disorder (including drug allergies), which would preclude the use of conscious sedation or the ability to tolerate upper endoscopy.
Contraindications to proton pump inhibitors or steroids.
Inability to accurately fill out a short questionnaire.
Pregnant females. A urine beta human chorionic gonadotropin (BHCG) prior to endoscopy will be offered to all female patients of child bearing potential (exceptions include post-menopausal, hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation). Positive BHCG results will prevent enrollment.
Known coagulation abnormalities, thrombocytopenia and patients on coumadin.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Fouad J Moawad, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20307
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Fluticasone Versus Esomeprazole to Treat Eosinophilic Esophagitis
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs