search
Back to results

My Scrivener® - Measuring Effectiveness and Dose Response in Children

Primary Purpose

Asperger's Syndrome, Dyslexia, Cerebral Palsy

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
My Scrivener(R)
Sponsored by
Obslap Research LLC
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Asperger's Syndrome focused on measuring haptic, rehabilitation, fine-motor skill, handwriting

Eligibility Criteria

5 Years - 19 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meet the following base prerequisites for writing: orientation to written language; eye-hand coordination, single handed utensil or tool manipulation (BAMF score >= 6), recognize all letters of the alphabet (unless the child has dyslexia).
  • Children have illegible printing for their grade, or legible printing but a speed less than the norms for their grade and sex.
  • Be able to grasp a pen.
  • Be able to speak and understand English.
  • Be able to follow instructions.
  • Be able to devote at least 20 minutes to the assigned tasks (short breaks will be allowed).
  • Be enrolled in school at grade K or above.
  • A score lower than 80% on the Print Tool™ or the Cursive Tool.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to pass the informed assent screener.
  • Unwilling to sign or mark the informed assent documents.
  • Uncontrolled spasticity.
  • A BAMF score lower than 6 (includes severe paralysis of the upper extremity).
  • Cerebral palsy other than hemiplegia cerebral palsy
  • Severe autism or intellectual disabilities that prevent productive interactions with the investigator

Sites / Locations

  • Susan Palsbo

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

Handwriting without Tears

Haptic guidance

Arm Description

Standard practice

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Beery Motor Coordination Subtest
Print Tool and Cursive Tool
Deviations from desired 3-D writing path

Secondary Outcome Measures

Brief Assessment of Fine Motor Skills

Full Information

First Posted
June 10, 2009
Last Updated
October 27, 2010
Sponsor
Obslap Research LLC
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00919906
Brief Title
My Scrivener® - Measuring Effectiveness and Dose Response in Children
Official Title
My Scrivener® - Measuring Effectiveness and Dose Response in Children
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2010
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Obslap Research LLC

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will assess whether a computer haptic peripheral device programmed to provide repetitive motion training is as effective as the same repetitive motion training provided by a human being.
Detailed Description
This study builds on a large body of neurological research that uses robot-guided repetitive motion training to induce neuroplasticity and improvements in upper extremity motor skills in adults and children. This research study is looking at handwriting, a fine-motor task that is used daily. In our study, we want to see if 3-dimensional robotic-assisted repetitive motion training can be a safe and effective intervention for school-age children with fine motor deficits arising from several different impairment origins. Our research construct is: Legible handwriting = function of (tactile feedback, visual feedback, duration, and fine-motor control). Independent variables: Tactile feedback is a continuous variable of force-feedback measured in pounds of force. Duration is a continuous variable measured in seconds and number of repetitions. Visual feedback is the letter scribed on the paper. Dependent variable: Legible handwriting will be measured by scoring on the Test of Handwriting Skills and the Print Tool™ evaluation. Fine motor deficit/control will be measured directly and objectively by quantifying the error between the desired scribing task and the actual scribing task. The robotic device is an affordable (<$200) computer haptic (the Falcon(R)) that currently is approved by the FCC for home and office. It is *not* approved for medical use. This is an investigational, nonsignificant risk device.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Asperger's Syndrome, Dyslexia, Cerebral Palsy, Attention Deficit Disorder, ADHD, Traumatic Brain Injury, Stroke
Keywords
haptic, rehabilitation, fine-motor skill, handwriting

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
176 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Handwriting without Tears
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Standard practice
Arm Title
Haptic guidance
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
My Scrivener(R)
Other Intervention Name(s)
My Scrivener, Falcon, by Novint Technologies, Handwriting Without Tears
Intervention Description
Twenty 20-minute sessions of the Handwriting Without Tears(R) instructional handwriting program, with substitution of hand-over-hand or self-generated repetitive motion writing by computer guided repetitive motion.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Beery Motor Coordination Subtest
Time Frame
after 20 interventions
Title
Print Tool and Cursive Tool
Time Frame
after 20 interventions
Title
Deviations from desired 3-D writing path
Time Frame
after 5, 10, 15, 20 interventions
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Brief Assessment of Fine Motor Skills
Time Frame
after 20 interventions

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
5 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
19 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Meet the following base prerequisites for writing: orientation to written language; eye-hand coordination, single handed utensil or tool manipulation (BAMF score >= 6), recognize all letters of the alphabet (unless the child has dyslexia). Children have illegible printing for their grade, or legible printing but a speed less than the norms for their grade and sex. Be able to grasp a pen. Be able to speak and understand English. Be able to follow instructions. Be able to devote at least 20 minutes to the assigned tasks (short breaks will be allowed). Be enrolled in school at grade K or above. A score lower than 80% on the Print Tool™ or the Cursive Tool. Exclusion Criteria: Unable to pass the informed assent screener. Unwilling to sign or mark the informed assent documents. Uncontrolled spasticity. A BAMF score lower than 6 (includes severe paralysis of the upper extremity). Cerebral palsy other than hemiplegia cerebral palsy Severe autism or intellectual disabilities that prevent productive interactions with the investigator
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Susan E Palsbo, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Obslap Research LLC
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Susan Palsbo
City
Eugene
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97405
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
18335049
Citation
Bluteau J, Coquillart S, Payan Y, Gentaz E. Haptic guidance improves the visuo-manual tracking of trajectories. PLoS One. 2008 Mar 12;3(3):e1775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001775.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17140881
Citation
O'Malley MK, Ro T, Levin HS. Assessing and inducing neuroplasticity with transcranial magnetic stimulation and robotics for motor function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Dec;87(12 Suppl 2):S59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.08.332.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16915876
Citation
Volman MJ, van Schendel BM, Jongmans MJ. Handwriting difficulties in primary school children: a search for underlying mechanisms. Am J Occup Ther. 2006 Jul-Aug;60(4):451-60. doi: 10.5014/ajot.60.4.451.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16541981
Citation
Denton PL, Cope S, Moser C. The effects of sensorimotor-based intervention versus therapeutic practice on improving handwriting performance in 6- to 11-year-old children. Am J Occup Ther. 2006 Jan-Feb;60(1):16-27. doi: 10.5014/ajot.60.1.16.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Palluel-Germain R, Bara F, Hillairet de Boisferon A, Hennion B, Gouagout P, Gentaz E. 2007. A visuo-haptic device - Telemaque - increases kindergarten children's handwriting acquisition. In proceedings of IEEE World Haptics 2007, pp72-77.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16541980
Citation
Marr D, Dimeo SB. Outcomes associated with a summer handwriting course for elementary students. Am J Occup Ther. 2006 Jan-Feb;60(1):10-5. doi: 10.5014/ajot.60.1.10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23106988
Citation
Palsbo SE, Hood-Szivek P. Effect of robotic-assisted three-dimensional repetitive motion to improve hand motor function and control in children with handwriting deficits: a nonrandomized phase 2 device trial. Am J Occup Ther. 2012 Nov-Dec;66(6):682-90. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2012.004556.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niM5gI26U4o
Description
3-minute video of the My Scrivener device

Learn more about this trial

My Scrivener® - Measuring Effectiveness and Dose Response in Children

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs