search
Back to results

Modifications to Radical Prostatectomy: Feasibility Study

Primary Purpose

Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
radical prostatectomy with urethral irrigation but no fascial suturing, QOL forms
radical prostatectomy with fascial suturing but no urethral irrigation, QOL forms
radical prostatectomy with both urethral irrigation and fascial suturing, QOL forms
radical prostatectomy with neither urethral irrigation nor fascial suturing, QOL forms
Sponsored by
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Prostate Cancer focused on measuring Prostate, Radical Prostatectomy, urethral irrigation, fascial suturing, 09-051

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy for the treatment of prostate cancer with one of the consenting surgeons at MSKCC.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior treatment for prostate cancer: radiation, hormonal therapy, chemotherapy or focal therapy.

Sites / Locations

  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

urethral irrigation but no fascial suturing, QOL forms

fascial suturing but no urethral irrigation, QOL forms

both urethral irrigation and fascial suturing, QOL forms

neither urethral irrigation nor fascial suturing, QOL forms

Arm Description

The anterior two-thirds of the urethra is divided exposing a Foley catheter that was placed at the beginning of the procedure. Irrigation of the urethra may prevent spread of prostate cancer cells to tissue that is not removed during surgery. The urethra is irrigated with 60 cc of sterile water as it is withdrawn from the patient to 'wash' the urethra.

For patients undergoing fascial suturing only, after the initial placement of the suture through the urethra a second bite is taken deeply into the fascia of the lateral pelvic fascia.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

To pilot a randomized trial of modifications to radical prostatectomy to determine:Proportion of patients accrued and Accrual rate

Secondary Outcome Measures

Determine surgeon compliance with allocation

Full Information

First Posted
June 25, 2009
Last Updated
November 19, 2019
Sponsor
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00928850
Brief Title
Modifications to Radical Prostatectomy: Feasibility Study
Official Title
A Randomized Trial of Modifications to Radical Prostatectomy: Feasibility Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 4, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 4, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study aims to determine whether surgeons at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center are able to randomize patients to test modifications of surgery to remove the prostate. Surgery to remove the prostate is known as a "radical prostatectomy". Surgeons know many things about the best way to do a radical prostatectomy. However, there is disagreement about some aspects of surgery. Two modifications of surgery to remove the prostate (radical prostatectomy) identified for this study include Irrigation, and Fascial Suturing. Two aspects of the operation may vary, fascial suturing and urethral irrigation. For each aspect, surgeons will use their clinical judgment as to the best interests of the patient. In other words, if there are clear reasons to use or avoid a fascial suturing approach, the surgeon will act accordingly; similarly, if there is a clear reason to irrigate or avoid irrigating the urethra, the surgeon can make the appropriate clinical decision. If the surgeon is unsure as to which approach to take, then the randomization scheme will be followed. All of the surgeons who are taking part in this study have used these techniques at different times. However, they are unsure as to the best approach. Sometimes, they use different treatments with different patients. Irrigation. Cancer cells can spill during surgery and this can cause cancer to return ("recur"). Some surgeons believe that "irrigating" could help stop spilling of cancer cells. "Irrigating" means washing the surgical area with sterile water and sucking the water back up through a tube. As a result, surgeons vary as to how they irrigate. In this study, we will examine irrigation of the urethra. This is the part of the body that carries urine from the bladder to the penis. Fascial suturing. Surgeons believe that what happens to the urethra can affect the risk of incontinence. This is when a patient cannot control urine, and drips or leaks urine. One idea is that additional stitches ("sutures") to the connective tissue ("fascia") could be helpful, but this is not known for sure.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer
Keywords
Prostate, Radical Prostatectomy, urethral irrigation, fascial suturing, 09-051

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
154 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
urethral irrigation but no fascial suturing, QOL forms
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The anterior two-thirds of the urethra is divided exposing a Foley catheter that was placed at the beginning of the procedure. Irrigation of the urethra may prevent spread of prostate cancer cells to tissue that is not removed during surgery. The urethra is irrigated with 60 cc of sterile water as it is withdrawn from the patient to 'wash' the urethra.
Arm Title
fascial suturing but no urethral irrigation, QOL forms
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
For patients undergoing fascial suturing only, after the initial placement of the suture through the urethra a second bite is taken deeply into the fascia of the lateral pelvic fascia.
Arm Title
both urethral irrigation and fascial suturing, QOL forms
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
neither urethral irrigation nor fascial suturing, QOL forms
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
radical prostatectomy with urethral irrigation but no fascial suturing, QOL forms
Intervention Description
Cancer cells can spill during surgery and this can cause cancer to return ("recur"). Some surgeons believe that "irrigating" could help stop spilling of cancer cells. "Irrigating" means washing the surgical area with sterile water and sucking the water back up through a tube. As a result, surgeons vary as to how they irrigate. In this study, we will examine irrigation of the urethra. This is the part of the body that carries urine from the bladder to the penis. Quality of life are assessed for clinical evaluation approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months after surgery
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
radical prostatectomy with fascial suturing but no urethral irrigation, QOL forms
Intervention Description
Surgeons believe that what happens to the urethra can affect the risk of incontinence. This is when a patient cannot control urine, and drips or leaks urine. One idea is that additional stitches ("sutures") to the connective tissue ("fascia") could be helpful, but this is not known for sure. Quality of life are assessed for clinical evaluation approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months after surgery
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
radical prostatectomy with both urethral irrigation and fascial suturing, QOL forms
Intervention Description
Quality of life are assessed for clinical evaluation approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months after surgery
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
radical prostatectomy with neither urethral irrigation nor fascial suturing, QOL forms
Intervention Description
Quality of life are assessed for clinical evaluation approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months after surgery
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To pilot a randomized trial of modifications to radical prostatectomy to determine:Proportion of patients accrued and Accrual rate
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Determine surgeon compliance with allocation
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy for the treatment of prostate cancer with one of the consenting surgeons at MSKCC. Exclusion Criteria: Prior treatment for prostate cancer: radiation, hormonal therapy, chemotherapy or focal therapy.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Andrew Vickers, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22364367
Citation
Vickers AJ, Bennette C, Touijer K, Coleman J, Laudone V, Carver B, Eastham JA, Scardino PT. Feasibility study of a clinically-integrated randomized trial of modifications to radical prostatectomy. Trials. 2012 Feb 24;13:23. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-23.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.mskcc.org
Description
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Learn more about this trial

Modifications to Radical Prostatectomy: Feasibility Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs