Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Based Robotic Rehabilitation for Stroke
Primary Purpose
Stroke
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Singapore
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Rehabilitation technique
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Demographics: 21 to 65 years, within 12 months of first, single clinical stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic).
- Moderate to severe upper extremity (UE) weakness post stroke.
- Fugly-Meyer motor score of the upper limb < 40.
- Upper limb motor power MRC grade 3 or less /5 in at least 1 arm region.
- Able to give own consent and understand simple instructions and learn through practice.
- Resting brain states determined by FMRI criteria
Exclusion Criteria:
- Recurrent stroke.
- Previous brain surgery.
- Spasticity of Modified Ashworth scale > 2.
- Fixed contracture of any upper limb joint
- Ataxia, dystonia or tremor of the involved upper limb or previous cervical myelopathy
- Upper limb pain or painful joints in upper limb.
- Severe cognitive impairment (Abbreviated Mental Test <7/10), or severe aphasia which may affect ability to participate in training.
- . History of seizures in the past 12 months.
- Severe left neglect
Sites / Locations
- National Neuroscience InstituteRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Manus
BCI_Manus
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Motricity score for hemiplegic upper limb (shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, finger-thumb opposition
Fugly Meyer motor score for upper limb (0-66)
Motor Assessment Scale
Secondary Outcome Measures
Functional assessments
Neuroradiological parameters
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00955838
First Posted
August 6, 2009
Last Updated
August 7, 2009
Sponsor
National Neuroscience Institute
Collaborators
Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Institue for Infocomm Research, A*Star
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00955838
Brief Title
Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Based Robotic Rehabilitation for Stroke
Official Title
Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Based Robotic Rehabilitation for Stroke
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2009
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2009 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 2009 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
National Neuroscience Institute
Collaborators
Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Institue for Infocomm Research, A*Star
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The trial aims to test a novel rehabilitation device for subacute stroke hemiplegic upper limbs based on state-of-the-art non invasive Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) robotic rehabilitation in a clinical setting. The investigators aim to prove the clinical efficacy and safety of BCI therapy over traditional rehabilitation methods.
Detailed Description
The proposed rehabilitation device is the first neuro-rehabilitation system which combines non-invasive BCI and robotic rehabilitation for the paralysed stroke upper extremity within 6 months of stroke.Spontaneous recovery after stroke takes place over the first 6-12 months after stroke. The first 3-6 months are the most crucial periods as this is the period of maximal neurological recovery and neuroplasticity. Differential rates of recovery occur for various types of impairments post-stroke. In general, motor functions (mobility, walking, upper limb function, activities of daily living (ADL)) recover faster than cognitive or language impairments which may recover over 12 months. A number of approaches to stroke injury rehabilitation have been introduced to facilitate intrinsic recovery or aid adaptive compensation for stroke-related impairments. Generally for rehabilitative training to be effective, it must be commenced as early as possible after stroke. Current research proves that rehabilitation using traditional neuro-facilitation approaches is effective in improving neurological and functional recovery and is superior to no treatment or nursing care alone. Rehabilitated patients have shorter total hospitalization stays, lower complication rates, earlier and higher rates of discharge home than patients who do not receive rehabilitation. In addition, rehabilitation involving a multidisciplinary team approach led by rehabilitation physician or specialist result in better functional outcomes compared to acute general ward-based therapies. In order for rehabilitation to be effective in modifying cortical neuroplasticity, it must be targeted at the specific stroke impairment, task specific, exercise must be repetitive and intensive, goal directed and command the attention of the stroke patient. Some of the components of rehabilitation include physical therapy, gait and balance training, aerobic conditioning, functional Activities of Daily Living (ADL) training, physical modalities to treat pain, Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) or Neuro-Muscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES). Other methods include specific treatments to address complications of rehabilitation such as spasticity, ataxia, contractures and bladder or bowel incontinence. Often, one-to-one and highly labour-intensive and expensive therapies with close hand-over-hand treatments are required. Limitations of current physiotherapy and occupational therapy techniques include the following:(1) Difficulties in rehabilitation for the severely paralysed arm and hand which are often treated with passive modalities such as NMES, passive ROMs and other modalities. (2) Difficulties in achieving intensive rehabilitation and high repetitions in those with moderate to severe upper extremity paralysis either due to non participation or pain which is commoner in those with severe paralysis. (3)Problems in motivating and sustaining patient interest in repetitive exercises.(4)Therapy is often perceived to be boring and due to lack of immediate biofeedback. (I) Robot Aided Rehabilitation: MIT (USA) has developed a robot, named the MIT-MANUS, to aid therapy of stroke victims. Small clinical trials have reported that the robot significantly improved patients' recovery of arm motor movement and function with sustained gains several months after cessation of treatment. This system is being clinically used as a rehabilitation training tool in over 20 centres world-wide. Advantages of robot aided rehabilitation include the ability to document and store motion and force parameters, the ability to achieve thousands of repetitions per treatment session (100 times more than conventional treatment or FES) without causing tissue injury or pain, high intensity with low friction, attention training and increased biofeedback through the incorporation of interactive video games, which can simulate trajectories, mazes, ADL tasks such as preparing a meal and spatial task simulation such as going shopping. In addition, after the initial training period, supervision of the patient by the therapist can be reduced due to the sustainability of participation of the patient from the robot or BCI based Robotic Rehabilitation. Hence, productivity of the human therapist is increased by the robot. The robot thus acts as a high technology aid to the clinician and therapist. The system is also portable, giving rise to the possibility of tele-rehabilitation options with the performance and progress of the patient being monitored by the institution remotely. (II)BCI-based BCI based Robotic Rehabilitation:This non invasive device aims to use a novel approach in robotic training, which has not been employed in the therapeutic realm before.In the MIT-MANUS and related commercially available systems, there is no direct communication between the patient's mind or thinking processes or motor volitional thinking and the robotic system. Although some sensors are used to detect the patient's weak movement, it never knows when and how the patient wants to move. The robot arm to which the patient is tethered or constrained plans the trajectory of movement for the patient and reduces its active role as the patient recovers voluntary motion. In most times, the patient can only passively follow the predefined program, which may not fully explore the patient's motor initiatives and potential or attention processes.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Manus
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
BCI_Manus
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Rehabilitation technique
Other Intervention Name(s)
Stroke Rehabilitation technique
Intervention Description
12 therapy session
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Motricity score for hemiplegic upper limb (shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, finger-thumb opposition
Time Frame
Baseline (0 months), 4, 12 and 24 weeks
Title
Fugly Meyer motor score for upper limb (0-66)
Time Frame
Baseline (0 months), 4, 12 and 24 weeks
Title
Motor Assessment Scale
Time Frame
Baseline (0 months), 4, 12 and 24 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Functional assessments
Time Frame
Baseline (0 months), 4, 12 and 24 weeks
Title
Neuroradiological parameters
Time Frame
Baseline (0 months), 4, 12 and 24 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Demographics: 21 to 65 years, within 12 months of first, single clinical stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic).
Moderate to severe upper extremity (UE) weakness post stroke.
Fugly-Meyer motor score of the upper limb < 40.
Upper limb motor power MRC grade 3 or less /5 in at least 1 arm region.
Able to give own consent and understand simple instructions and learn through practice.
Resting brain states determined by FMRI criteria
Exclusion Criteria:
Recurrent stroke.
Previous brain surgery.
Spasticity of Modified Ashworth scale > 2.
Fixed contracture of any upper limb joint
Ataxia, dystonia or tremor of the involved upper limb or previous cervical myelopathy
Upper limb pain or painful joints in upper limb.
Severe cognitive impairment (Abbreviated Mental Test <7/10), or severe aphasia which may affect ability to participate in training.
. History of seizures in the past 12 months.
Severe left neglect
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Sui Geok, Karen Chua, MD
Phone
+(65)64506164
Email
Karen_Chua@ttsh.com.sg
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Beng Ti, Christopher Ang, MD
Organizational Affiliation
National Neuroscience Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
National Neuroscience Institute
City
Singapore
ZIP/Postal Code
308433
Country
Singapore
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Beng Ti, Christopher Ang, MD
Phone
+65 63577191
Email
beng_ti_ang@nni.com.sg
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Beng Ti, Christopher Ang, MD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Based Robotic Rehabilitation for Stroke
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs